Review Article
Molecular Biologic Approach to the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Carcinoma Using Specimens Obtained by EUS-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration
Table 4
Studies of molecular biologic diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma using specimens obtained by EUS-FNA.
|
Biological analyses
| Author | Year | EUS-FNA samples | Sensitivity | Specificity | Positive predictive value | Negative positive value | Accuracy | Diagnosis |
| |
Reicher et al. [11] | 2011 | 46 | 87.9% | 93.8% | 96.7% | 78.9% | 89.8% | Combination with cytology and FISH | KRAS | Bournet et al. [10] | 2009 | 178 | 88.0% | 100% | 100% | 63.0% | 90.0% | Combination with cytopathology | | Maluf-Filho et al. [8] | 2007 | 74 | 90.9% | 47.6% | 89.5% | 98.1% | 89.2% | Combination with cytopathology |
| P53 | Jahng et al. [17] | 2010 | 61 | 51.0% | 100% | | | | Combination with cytology | Itoi et al. [16] | 2005 | 62 | 90.0% | 91.0% | | | 92% | Combination with cytopathology |
| P16 | Salek et al. [20] | 2007 | 101 | 85.0% | 100.0% | | | | Monitoring the loss of heterozygosity | SMAD4 | Salek et al. [20] | 2007 | 101 | 78.0% | 57.0% | | | | Monitoring the loss of heterozygosity |
| MUCs | Wang et al. [26] | 2007 | 40 | 100% | | | | 91.1% | MUC5AC+cytology | | Giorgadze et al. [25] | 2006 | 30 | 70% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 75% | Combination of MUC1+/ MUC2−/ MUC5AC+ |
| S100P | Kosarac et al. [34] | 2011 | 14 | 78.2% | 87.5% | | | | | Daniel et al. [35] | 2011 | 62 | 90.0% | 67.0% | | | | |
|
|
*FISH: fluorescense in situ hybridization.
|