|
| Author | Publication year | Type of comparison | Study design | Total procedures/procedures for recurrent CD | Study populations—other details | Stoma | Conversion |
|
| Wu et al. | 1997 | Open (70) versus laparoscopic (46) | Retrospective | 116/10 | All ileocolic resections; within the laparoscopic group, subgroup analysis for complex, recurrent, and primary uncomplicated CD | NR | 11% |
| Hasegawa et al. | 2003 | Laparoscopic primary (45) versus recurrent (16) | Retrospective | 61/16 | All ileocolonic resections; within the laparoscopic group, subgroup analysis for primary operation open or laparoscopic | NR | 8.2% (6.7% versus 12.5%) |
| Uchikoshi et al. | 2004 | Open (20) versus laparoscopic (23) | Retrospective | 43/43 | Ileocolic resections and stricturoplasty; subgroup analysis for Lap-assisted and HALS | NR | 69.6%** |
| Moorthy et al. | 2004 | Laparoscopic primary (31) versus recurrent (26) | Retrospective | 57/26 | Ileocolic resections, subtotal colectomies; within the laparoscopic group subgroup analysis for converted or not-converted procedures | NR | 28% (13% versus 42%) |
| Lawes and Motson | 2006 | First versus second versus third laparoscopic approach to CD recurrence | Retrospective | 29/29 | Ileocolic resections, stricturoplasties, subtotal colectomies, and abdominoperineal resection | NR | 0% |
| Goyer et al. | 2009 | Patients with complex CD (54) versus patients without complex CD (70) | Prospective | 124/54 | Ileocolic resections and associated procedures: left colectomy, sigmoid suture, duodenal suture, duodenal suture, unplanned splenectomy, and rectovaginal treatment (open group); cholecystectomy, intestinal resection, right and transverse colectomy and oophorectomy, (lap-group) | 39% versus 9%* | 37% versus 14%* |
| Broquet et al. | 2010 | Open (33) versus laparoscopic (29) | Retrospective | 62 | Ileocolic resections, stricturoplasties | 18% versus 24% | 31% |
| Chaudhray et al. | 2010 | Laparoscopic primary (29) versus recurrent (30) | Retrospective | 59/30 | All ileocolic resections | NR | 8.5% (10.3% versus 6.7%) |
| Holubar et al. | 2010 | Laparoscopic completed (30) versus laparoscopic converted (10) | Retrospective | 40 | All ileocolic resections | 3% | 25% |
| Pinto et al. | 2011 | Laparoscopic primary (80) versus recurrent (50) | Retrospective | 130/50 | All ileocolic resections | 17% versus 10% | 23.8% (18.7% versus 32%) |
| Bandyopadhyay et al. | 2011 | No comparison | Retrospective | 27 | All ileocolic resections | NR | 7.4% |
|
