|
| IMPACT Clinic | Action points |
|
Step 1 Collect outside data for IMPACT MD to review before office visit | Initial review of outside medical records: symptoms, laboratory, imaging review with staff radiologist | Consider repeat pancreas protocol CT and MRI/MRCP to better visualize pancreatic parenchyma and ductal anatomy |
| | Proceed to Step 2: arrange office visit and imaging based on symptoms and imaging |
|
Step 2 Initial triage based on symptoms or ominous features on imaging: | Symptomatic or high risk lesion | Surgical referral (age, ASA grade, resectability) may request EUS based on findings |
recurrent pancreatitis, dilated main duct, mural nodule, solid component, obstructive jaundice, abrupt caliber change of duct | Asymptomatic | Triage based on size |
| | Proceed to Step
3
|
|
Step 3 Secondary triage based on cyst size (i) IAP Guidelines, 2012 (ii) Am College of Radiology Guidelines, 2010 (iii) Markov model, 2010 (iv) Cost-effective analysis, 2009 |
Cyst <1 cm Cyst 1–3 cm Cyst > 3 cm | Medical pancreatology Therapeutic endoscopy for EUS Surgical referral (age, ASA grade, resectability) may request EUS based on findings |
| | Proceed to Step 4 or 5 based on results of evaluation |
|
Step 4 Clinical challenges | Indeterminate results: equivocal imaging and/or cyst fluid analysis | Present case in weekly Multidisciplinary Pancreas Study Group for consensus recommendations |
| | Proceed to Step
5
|
|
Step 5 IMPACT recommendations | Schedule follow-up appointment: surgical resection, EUS –FNA, or observation | Letter to referring MD and patient |
| | Proceed to Step
6
|
|
Step 6 Followup | Surveillance recommendations based on imaging, fluid analysis, and/or surgical pathology findings | IMPACT Clinical Database entry Letter to referring MD and patient Automated follow-up letter: 3 mo, 6 mo etc… |
|