- About this Journal ·
- Abstracting and Indexing ·
- Aims and Scope ·
- Annual Issues ·
- Article Processing Charges ·
- Articles in Press ·
- Author Guidelines ·
- Bibliographic Information ·
- Citations to this Journal ·
- Contact Information ·
- Editorial Board ·
- Editorial Workflow ·
- Free eTOC Alerts ·
- Publication Ethics ·
- Reviewers Acknowledgment ·
- Submit a Manuscript ·
- Subscription Information ·
- Table of Contents
Gastroenterology Research and Practice
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 620707, 4 pages
Calprotectin Is a Useful Tool in Distinguishing Coexisting Irritable Bowel-Like Symptoms from That of Occult Inflammation among Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients in Remission
1Department of Gastroenterology, Østfold Hospital Trust, 1603 Fredrikstad, Norway
2Department of Health Sciences, Østfold University College, K.G. Meldahlsvei 9, 1671 Kråkerøy, Norway
3Department of Research, Telemark Hospital Trust, 3710 Skien, Norway
4Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo-Oslo University Hospital, 0450 Oslo, Norway
Received 19 November 2012; Accepted 17 January 2013
Academic Editor: Peter James Whorwell
Copyright © 2013 Lars-Petter Jelsness-Jørgensen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Background and Aim. In the inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), many symptoms are similar to the functional disorder irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). A challenge is thus to distinguish symptoms of IBD from IBS. The aim of this study was to investigate the levels of calprotectin in IBS-positive IBD patients in remission. Methods. Remission was defined as a simple clinical colitis activity index (SCCAI) or simple crohn’s disease activity index (SCDAI) score of less than three and less than four, respectively. The Rome II criteria were used to identify cases, and the calprotectin ELISA test was used to quantify calprotectin in stools. Results. The Rome II criteria were fulfilled in 24.6% of ulcerative colitis (UC) patients, while the comparable number for Crohn's disease (CD) was 21.4%. There was a tendency for elevated fecal calprotectin levels in IBS-positive patients, regardless of diagnosis. However, these differences were only significant in CD. Conclusions. Calprotectin levels are elevated in subgroups of IBD patients that are in remission and have coexisting IBS-like symptoms. This study underscores the clinical usefulness of a noninvasive marker to distinguish patients in need of intensified followup from those that do not need further workup.
Both ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease are chronic gastrointestinal disorders, which are often referred to as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). IBD is characterised by a pattern of symptoms that most commonly alternate between periods of remission and exacerbation . Since IBD shares many common features with the functional gastrointestinal disorder irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), a usual clinical challenge is to distinguish symptoms of IBD from that of IBS [2, 3]. Among IBD patients deemed by conventional tests to be in remission, this is particularly challenging. Simrén et al.  found that 57% of patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) and 33% of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) have IBS-like symptoms, despite the long-standing remission. Recently, Keohane et al.  confirmed the findings of Simrén et al.  and reported the prevalence of IBS-like symptoms among CD and UC to be 59.7% and 38.6%, respectively.
Since IBS and IBD, in many cases, cannot be separated from each other on the basis of symptoms, an objective marker would be preferable. Even though the serological panel for IBD has been expanding in recent years, the value of such parameters in distinguishing IBD from IBS has not been successful . On the other hand, Roseth et al. , Schoepfer et al. , and Keohane et al.  demonstrated promising results when measuring the zinc-binding protein calprotectin in feces. Interestingly, IBS-positive patients were found to have significantly higher levels of calprotectin [2, 3].
The aim of this study was to investigate the levels of calprotectin in IBS-positive IBD patients in clinical remission.
2. Materials and Methods
Patients who were over the age of 18 years, had IBD that was previously verified clinically, endoscopically, and histologically, and were either in remission or with mild to moderate disease activity, defined as SCCAI (simple clinical colitis activity index)  or SCDAI (simple Crohn’s disease activity index)  score less than 10, were eligible for inclusion in this study. Patients were excluded if they had cognitive impairment, and they were judged to be unlikely to comply with the study procedures, or if they had already participated in other studies. Clinical remission was defined as an SCCAI or SCDAI score of less than three and less than four in UC and CD, respectively. Patients were consecutively recruited from three outpatient clinics in the southeast of Norway during routine followup. At each of the centres, a senior gastroenterologist was in charge of the study performance.
2.2. Clinical and Sociodemographic Data
Sociodemographic variables were gathered by way of interview. Data regarding clinical status and symptoms were obtained from medical records, laboratory tests, and disease activity indices (SCCAI/SCDAI) [6, 7]. The Rome II criteria for IBS were used to define IBS cases  (Table 1).
2.3. Fecal Calprotectin
The calprotectin ELISA test (ALP) (Calpro AS, Oslo, Norway) was used to quantify the level of calprotectin in a stool sample obtained from each patient. The test is previously validated and has also been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a measurement tool to distinguish IBD from IBS. All procedures were followed according to the recommendations made by the manufacturer .
2.4. Statistical Analysis
To assess the characteristics of the sample, we used descriptive analysis, frequencies, and the test. -tests were used to evaluate the differences in parametric data.
All tests were 2 sided and with a 5% significance level. All statistics were performed by the use of the Predictive Analytics Software, PASW, version 18.0 (IBM Corporation, Route 100, Somers, NY, USA).
One hundred and forty-four patients diagnosed with either UC or CD gave written informed consent for participation in the study. When a cutoff of <4 on the SCDAI and <3 on the SCCAI was used to define clinical remission, and patients on current steroid treatment had been excluded, a total of 89 patients, 63.6% of the initial sample, were identified. Out of these 89 patients, 61 were diagnosed with UC and 28 with CD.
3.1. Fecal Calprotectin in Patients with and without IBS-Like Symptoms
The Rome II criteria were fulfilled in 24.6% of UC patients, while the comparable number for CD was 21.4%. Primary characteristics of patients are presented in Table 1. As shown in this table, there was a tendency for elevated fecal calprotectin levels in IBS-positive patients, regardless of diagnosis. However, these differences were only significant in CD.
When using a score of <100 μg/g calprotectin as a cutoff value for an endoscopically inactive disease, as suggested by af Björkesten et al. , 9 IBS-positive patients had calprotectin values >100 μg/g, with a mean value of 808.2 and 872.7 µg/g in UC and CD, respectively. The comparable number in IBS-positive patients with calprotectin values less than 100 µg/g was 40.5 and 5.3 (Table 2).
In this study, we investigated the prevalence of irritable-bowel-syndrome-(IBS-) like symptoms among inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients deemed to be in clinical remission. We found the prevalence of patients fulfilling the Rome II criteria for IBS-like symptoms to be somewhat lower than previously reported [3, 4, 11]. The reason for this is unclear, but potential explanations might be found in factors not taken into account, such as the duration of remission. Minderhoud et al.  reported, using the Rome II criteria, that the prevalence of IBS-like symptoms among IBD patients in remission was 31.5% and 41.7% for UC and CD, respectively. However, some differences were noted when the same cohort of patients was reevaluated using the Manning criteria, where the number of cases in CD was nearly halved . Consequently the prevalence and detection of such symptoms are dependent on which criteria and cutoff value are used.
Since IBS is symptomatically similar to IBD, it is particularly difficult to distinguish the two from each other, without having to investigate patients endoscopically. In addition, there is nothing more frustrating from the patients’ point of view than to be told that they have IBS symptoms when the patients are convinced that it is the active the IBD that is the cause of their problems. From a clinical perspective, it is therefore preferable to “ruleout” the IBS-like symptoms by the use of a noninvasive marker, for example, calprotectin, in order to ensure whether further IBD workup or intensified treatment is justified. Another key aspect is the inability of clinical activity indices, such as the SCCAI and SCDAI, to indicate clinical remission alone. Even though the CDAI indicates remission, endoscopic findings have proven otherwise . Therefore, bowel symptoms in these patients do not need to necessarily be IBS. Even though we defined cutoff values for clinical remission at <3 and <4 on the SCCAI and SCDAI, respectively, some patients had calprotectin values indicating ongoing inflammatory activity. Keohane et al.  found a significantly elevated level of calprotectin in both IBS-positive UC and CD patients, and Schoepfer et al.  argued that the fecal test was highly accurate in discriminating IBD from IBS. However, we agree with Keohane et al.  that—unless otherwise proven—symptoms of IBD should be regarded as IBD and not as IBS-like symptoms. The latter is clearly underscored by the level of calprotectin among IBS-positive patients . Even though we were not able to replicate the findings of Keohane et al.  in UC, merely in CD, there was a clear tendency for elevated calprotectin levels in IBS-positive patients, regardless of diagnosis.
As shown in the present study and the study from Ireland , it is important to combine clinical activity indices with a noninvasive marker, such as calprotectin. The use of laboratory markers is, in this sense, not an unnecessary but rather a useful tool . On the other hand, several different cut-off levels of calprotectin have been proposed both in order to distinguish IBD from IBS and to indicate remission. Tibble et al.  reported that 30 μg/g had 100% sensitivity in discriminating IBS from IBD. Others like D’Incà et al.  and Sipponen et al.  have found 130 and 200 μg/g, respectively, to be potential useful cutoff values for remission and activity. In a recently published paper by Sipponen’s group , the best cutoff value for endoscopic remission was found to be 94 μg/g. Interestingly, when setting a cutoff level of calprotectin at <100 μg/g—in accordance with the findings of Björkesten and collegues —we found significantly different mean levels for IBD patients with IBS-like symptoms above and under the cutoff limit. The important message is that even though patients are judged to be in clinical remission, they may not be so. Calprotectin cutoff levels may therefore be helpful in distinguishing those patients that most likely have coexisting IBS-like symptoms and those patients that need more workup or intensified treatment.
Therefore, in conclusion, calprotectin levels are elevated in subgroups of IBD patients that are in clinical remission and have coexisting IBS-like symptoms, indicating subclinical activity. This study underscores the clinical usefulness of a noninvasive marker, such as calprotectin, to distinguish IBD patients in need of intensified followup from those that potentially do not need further workup.
Statement of Originality
The authors of this paper declare that it has been submitted solely to Gastroenterology Research and Practice.
The study was performed in accordance with the principles of the Helsinki Declaration, and approval was obtained from the Regional Ethics Committee.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests in this paper.
Dr. L.-P. Jelsness-Jørgensen has contributed in gathering data and analyses, in writing the paper, and in controlling the submitted version for its scientific content. Dr. T. Bernklev and Professor B. Moum have contributed in gathering data and analyses and in controlling the submitted version for its scientific content.
- E. V. Loftus, “Clinical epidemiology of inflammatory bowel disease: incidence, prevalence, and environmental influences,” Gastroenterology, vol. 126, no. 6, pp. 1504–1517, 2004.
- A. M. Schoepfer, M. Trummler, P. Seeholzer, B. Seibold-Schmid, and F. Seibold, “Discriminating IBD from IBS: comparison of the test performance of fecal markers, blood leukocytes, CRP, and IBD antibodies,” Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 32–39, 2008.
- J. Keohane, C. O'Mahony, L. O'Mahony, S. O'Mahony, E. M. Quigley, and F. Shanahan, “Irritable bowel syndrome-type symptoms in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a real association or reflection of occult inflammation,” American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 105, no. 8, pp. 1789–1794, 2010.
- M. Simrén, J. Axelsson, R. Gillberg, H. Abrahamsson, J. Svedlund, and E. S. Björnsson, “Quality of life in inflammatory bowel disease in remission: the impact of IBS-like symptoms and associated psychological factors,” American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 97, no. 2, pp. 389–396, 2002.
- A. G. Roseth, M. K. Fagerhol, E. Aadland, and H. Schjonsby, “Assessment of the neutrophil dominating protein calprotectin in feces. A methodologic study,” Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 793–798, 1992.
- R. S. Walmsley, R. C. S. Ayres, R. E. Pounder, and R. N. Allan, “A simple clinical colitis activity index,” Gut, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 29–32, 1998.
- R. F. Harvey and J. M. Bradshaw, “A simple index of Crohn's-disease activity,” The Lancet, vol. 315, no. 8167, pp. 514–515, 1980.
- W. G. Thompson, F. H. Creed, D. A. Drossman, K. W. Heaton, and G. Mazzacca, “Functional bowel disease and functional abdominal pain,” Gastroenterology International, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 75–91, 1992.
- M. K. Fagerhol, “Calprotectin, a faecal marker of organic gastrointestinal abnormality,” The Lancet, vol. 356, no. 9244, pp. 1783–1784, 2000.
- C. G. af Björkesten, U. Nieminen, U. Turunen, P. Arkkila, T. Sipponen, and M. Färkillä, “Surrogate markers and clinical indices, alone or combined, as indicators for endoscopic remission in anti-TNF-treated luminal Crohn’s disease,” Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 47, pp. 528–537, 2012.
- I. M. Minderhoud, B. Oldenburg, J. A. Wismeijer, G. P. Van Berge Henegouwen, and A. J. P. M. Smout, “IBS-like symptoms in patients with inflammatory bowel disease in remission; relationships with quality of life and coping behavior,” Digestive Diseases and Sciences, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 469–474, 2004.
- S. Vermeire, G. Van Assche, and P. Rutgeerts, “Laboratory markers in IBD: useful, magic, or unnecessary toys?” Gut, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 426–431, 2006.
- J. Tibble, K. Teahon, B. Thjodleifsson et al., “A simple method for assessing intestinal inflammation in Crohn's disease,” Gut, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 506–513, 2000.
- R. D'Incà, E. Dal Pont, V. Di Leo et al., “Can calprotectin predict relapse risk in inflammatory bowel disease?” American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 103, no. 8, pp. 2007–2014, 2008.
- T. Sipponen, E. Savilahti, K. L. Kolho, H. Nuutinen, U. Turunen, and M. Färkkilä, “Crohn's disease activity assessed by fecal calprotectin and lactoferrin: correlation with Crohn's disease activity index and endoscopic findings,” Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 40–46, 2008.