Outcomes of Endoscopic-Ultrasound-Guided Cholangiopancreatography: A Literature Review

Table 4

Published EUS-CP series on pancreatic duct drainage (involving ≥5 patients).

Year	Author	𝑁	Indication	Initial ERCP	Techniques	Technical success	Clinical success	Complications
2007	Will et al. [16]	12*	B	Sb	5 T; 4 R	8/12 (67%)	4/8 (50%)	6/14 (42.9%)
2007	Tessier et al. [22]	36	B	Sb	T	33/36 (91.7%)	25/36 (69%)	5/36 (13.8%)
2007	Kahaleh et al. [40]	13	B	Sb	5 R; 5 T	10/13 (77%)	10/10 (100%)	2/13 (15.4%)
2009	Brauer et al. [13]	8	B	Sb	4 T; 3 R	7/8 (88%)	4/8 (50%)	No
2010	Barkay et al. [8]	21	B	Sb	6 D (mb injection); 4 R	10/21 (48%)	8/8^# (100%)	2/21 (10%)
2012	Shah et al. [9]	25	B	Sm	10 A or T; 9 R; 3 D	22/25% (88%)	n/a	4/25 (16%)
	Total	115			46 T; 25 R; 10 A; 9 D	90/115 (78%)	51/68 (75%)	19/115 (16.5%)

EUS-CP: endoscopic-ultrasound-guided cholangiopancreatography, 𝑁: number of patients, B: benign, Sb: subsequent day, Sm: same day/session, D: ductography, T: transluminal, R: rendezvous, A: antegrade, mb: methylene blue, n/a: not applicable/mentioned. *14 attempts in 12 patients. ^#Long-term data was available in 8 patients only.