Research Article

Physician Perceptions on Colonoscopy Quality: Results of a National Survey of Gastroenterologists

Table 6

Physician perceptions about colonoscopy surveillance recommendations*.

Patient preferenceAdequacy of the preparationDifficulty of the procedureFinancial incentivesMalpractice concerns

Sex 0.6580.0070.8210.2620.128
0.0010.0570.0000.0090.015

Years in practice 0.4010.7410.0910.6250.001
0.0050.0010.0220.0020.073

GI board certification 0.9810.5490.2240.0360.691
0.0000.0030.0110.0320.001

Practice setting 0.0040.3280.4890.1100.002
0.0620.0070.0040.0180.067

Productivity bonus 0.3430.6900.8520.3720.148
0.0070.0010.0000.0060.014

Colonoscopy volume 0.9910.8590.7510.2600.038
0.0020.0100.0150.0370.069

Receive quality feedback 0.4150.7280.4900.1000.185
0.0050.0010.0040.0190.012

The root of each question was as follows. “Rate how often you shorten a surveillance recommendation based on…never, rarely, sometimes, usually or always?”
Eta squared ( ) represents the proportion of the variance in the dependent variable that can be explained by the variance in the independent variable.