Physician Perceptions on Colonoscopy Quality: Results of a National Survey of Gastroenterologists
Table 6
Physician perceptions about colonoscopy surveillance recommendations*.
Patient preference
Adequacy of the preparation
Difficulty of the procedure
Financial incentives
Malpractice concerns
Sex
0.658
0.007
0.821
0.262
0.128
0.001
0.057
0.000
0.009
0.015
Years in practice
0.401
0.741
0.091
0.625
0.001
0.005
0.001
0.022
0.002
0.073
GI board certification
0.981
0.549
0.224
0.036
0.691
0.000
0.003
0.011
0.032
0.001
Practice setting
0.004
0.328
0.489
0.110
0.002
0.062
0.007
0.004
0.018
0.067
Productivity bonus
0.343
0.690
0.852
0.372
0.148
0.007
0.001
0.000
0.006
0.014
Colonoscopy volume
0.991
0.859
0.751
0.260
0.038
0.002
0.010
0.015
0.037
0.069
Receive quality feedback
0.415
0.728
0.490
0.100
0.185
0.005
0.001
0.004
0.019
0.012
The root of each question was as follows. “Rate how often you shorten a surveillance recommendation based on…never, rarely, sometimes, usually or always?” Eta squared () represents the proportion of the variance in the dependent variable that can be explained by the variance in the independent variable.