Clinical Study

Comparisons of Esophageal Function Tests between Chinese and British Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Table 3

Results of stepwise linear regression analysis of different demographic data on items of HRiM and MII/pH in British and Chinese GERD patients.

HRiM and MII/pH items Unstandardized coefficients ()
ConstantAgeGenderEthnicity square

LESP
LESL2.4280.2660.071
LESRP
IRP16.775−4.3740.166
UESP124.142−0.654−27.5660.231
DEA
DCI
Peristalsis
TBTT
CRTR
Demeester−10.6670.28610.3660.090
Acid exposure upright−4.6520.1262.9890.086
Acid exposure recumbent0.0370.0583.2440.037
Acid exposure total−3.0990.0842.7620.077
Bolus exposure upright2.1971.5930.042
Bolus exposure recumbent
Bolus exposure total1.3231.1920.041
Proximal acid9.415−0.22815.8000.278
Proximal nonacid23.882−5.4560.039
Proximal total11.390 −9.52824.5360.349
Acid reflux16.076−8.05017.1710.244
Nonacid reflux11.00611.7140.050
Total reflux32.592−11.69128.9120.206

LESP: lower esophageal sphincter pressure; LESL: length of lower esophageal sphincter; LESRP: lower esophageal sphincter residual pressure; IRP: integrated relaxation pressure; UESP: upper esophageal sphincter pressure; DEA: distal esophageal amplitude; DCI distal contractile integral; TBTT: total bolus transit time; CBTR: complete bolus transit rate. Only data with were expressed as values of beta-coefficients. “—”: .