Gastroenterology Research and Practice / 2015 / Article / Tab 2 / Research Article
Optimized Sedation Improves Colonoscopy Quality Long-Term Table 2 Individual endoscopist performance in cohort B.
Endoscopist per Era: 1, 2, and 3 SAR, % (CI) CCR, % (CI) CR, % (CI) Era 1 Era 2 Era 3 Era 1 Era 2 Era 3 Era 1 Era 2 Era 3 (1) 30.0 (19.3–40.7) 84.3 (75.8–92.8) 4.3 (0–9.1) (2) 41.0 (36–46) 88.4 (85–92) 4.2 (2–6) (3) 38.5 (32–45) 60.3a (53–67) (70.6–84.2)88.0 (83.6–92.4) 93.6 (90.2–97) 97.9c (95.6–100) 2.9 (0.6–5.2) 2.0 (0.1–3.9) 0.0c (0) (4) 49.4 (43.4–55.4) 66.8a (61.1–72.5) (84.5–93.1)90.2 (86.6–93.3) 95.8a (93.6–98.2) 97.6c (95.5–99.7) 3.0 (0.9–5) 1.2 (0–2.5) 0.0c (0) (5) 40.8 (34.3–47.3) 63.4a (57–69.8) 86.7 (82.2–91.2) 91.7 (88–95.4) 2.8 (0.6–5) 1.9 (0.1–3.7) (6) 75.5 (70.2–80.8) 92.5b (89.3–95.7) 89.5 (85.8–93.2) 94.5b (91.7–97.3) 1.6 (0.1–3.1) 0.8 (0–1.9) (7) 55.6 (48.2–63) 79.5 (73.4–85.6) 4.1 (1–7)
: number of colonoscopies; SAR: sedation administration rate; CI: 95% confidence interval; CCR: colonoscopy completion rate; ADR: adenoma detection rate; CR: early complications rate; a significance over Era 1; b significance over Era 2; c significance of Era 3 over Era 1.