Clinical Study

Risk Factors for Additional Surgery after Iatrogenic Perforations due to Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

Table 2

Clinical characteristics, endoscopic findings, histology, surgical methods, and treatment results of patients with surgery.

Patient numberSexAge (years)Tumor site (location/circumference)Sizea of the resected specimen (cm)HistologyTime of surgery after ER (day)Cause of surgerySurgical methodHospital stay (day)Results of surgery

1M72Middle third/anterior4.0EGCa1PeritonitisLWR28Survival
2M62Lower third/anterior15.0Adenoma1PeritonitisTLDG c Billroth I anastomosis9Survival
3M60Middle third/anterior7.5Adenoma1PeritonitisLWR6Survival
4F76Middle third/anterior5.0Adenoma1PeritonitisLWR17Survival
5M54Upper third/anterior1.3GIST1PeritonitisLWR8Survival
6M62Upper third/GC5.5EGCa1PeritonitisDSG with Billroth II anastomosis10Survival
7M69Upper third/anterior1.0GIST5PeritonitisLWR4Survival
8F63Middle third/GC0.7Schwannoma5PeritonitisLWR19Survival
9F50Middle third/anterior3.0Schwannoma2PeritonitisLWR8Survival

aTumor size was determined by the measurement of the ER specimen.
DSG: distal subtotal gastrectomy; EGCa: early gastric cancer; ER: endoscopic resection; GC: greater curvature; GIST: gastrointestinal stromal tumor; LWR: laparoscopic wedge resection; TLDG: totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy.