Review Article

The Comparison between Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection and Surgery in Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Table 2

The survival outcome of different studies.

Ryu [19]Shin [20]Chiu [11]Cho [12]Fukunaga [22]Kim [15]Najmeh [17]Park [18]

3 YSR (%) (ESD/surgery)N/AN/A94.6%/89.7%N/AN/AEC: N/A
GC: N/A
N/A80.0%/96.3%
OS (%) (ESD/surgery)N/AN/AN/A89.8%/90.0%N/AEC: 100.5 ± 1.3/84.9 ± 2.6
GC: 93.4 ± 3.2/85.8 ± 5.5 (month)
100%/90.3% (4 years)N/A
5-year OS (%) (ESD/surgery)100%/100%N/AN/AN/A97.1%/85.8%EC: N/A
GC: N/A
N/A97.4%/96.1%
DFS (%) (ESD/surgery)N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AEC:93.6 ± 2.5/87.6 ± 2.0
GC: 89.7 ± 3.6/90.4 ± 3.5 (month)
84.6%/82.6%N/A
5-year DFS (%) (ESD/surgery)85%/97%N/AN/AN/AN/AEC: N/A
GC: N/A
N/AN/A
5 YSR (%) (ESD/surgery)N/A92%/93.3%N/AN/AN/AEC: N/A
GC: N/A
N/AN/A
value5-year DFS: 0.0010.4960.440.5650.01EC:—OS: 0.397, DFS: 0.597
GC: N/A
N/A3-year SR: <0.001, 5-year OSR: 0.280

ESD: endoscopic submucosal dissection; YSR: year survival rate; SR: survival rate; OS: overall survival; OSR: overall survival rate; DFS: disease-free survival; EC: expanded criteria; GC: guideline criteria. N/A: not available.