About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Hepatitis Research and Treatment
Volume 2010 (2010), Article ID 182067, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/182067
Review Article

Rituximab Administration and Reactivation of HBV

1Department of Hematology, Hakodate Municipal Hospital, Hakodate 041-8680, Japan
2Department of Internal Medicine, Hakodate Municipal Hospital, 1-10-1 Minato-Cho, Hakodate 041-8680, Japan
3Department of Gastroenterology, Hakodate Municipal Hospital, Hakodate 041-8680, Japan
4Department of Hematology and Oncology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo 060-8638, Japan
5Department of Gastroentelology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo 060-8638, Japan

Received 2 June 2010; Revised 3 September 2010; Accepted 29 September 2010

Academic Editor: Yoichi Hiasa

Copyright © 2010 Yutaka Tsutsumi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Rituximab is a drug used for the treatment of B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and its range of use has expanded to the treatment of collagen diseases such as idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura and rheumatoid arthritis. One serious complication of rituximab use is the reactivation of dormant hepatitis B virus, and prevention of this phenomenon has become an urgent issue. This paper provides a general outline of the problem through an analysis of patient cases that we and other groups have experienced to date.

1. Introduction

Rituximab is a human-mouse chimeric monoclonal antibody that targets the B-cell CD20 cell surface protein and has become indispensible for the treatment of B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma [13]. however, Complications in the form of severe viral infections have been observed, and methods to counter these infections are presently being evaluated [47]. Reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) is one such complication. Prior to the introduction of rituximab, reactivation of HBV was a major complication of chemotherapy-induced immunosuppression [820]. The events leading to HBV reactivation during rituximab/chemotherapy combination treatment have been reported by various groups, as have the effects of preventive administration of the nucleoside analogue lamivudine on the suppression of HBV reactivation [2133]. However, a number of issues remain to be determined, such as the level of HBV resistance to lamivudine, the optimal lamivudine administration period, and even whether or not lamivudine is the best preventive drug to use. HBV reactivation may result in a number of serious outcomes, including death from hepatitis [2337]. Additionally, even in the event that hepatitis is prevented, possible problems in subsequent lymphoma treatment or in anticipated outcomes may arise, such as lymphoma recurrence or shortened survival prognosis. In this paper based on studies from various groups, we explored issues in preventive nucleoside analog administration, including optimal administration period and the utility of concurrent use of these drugs. The discussion includes a compilation of our results on preventive administration of nucleoside analogs in HBs antigen- (HBsAg-) positive cases, which were accrued from the debut of rituximab in Japan in 2002 to December 2008.

2. HBV Reactivation during Rituximab Administration

 Acute hepatitis caused by HBV is initially suppressed by cytokines secreted from NK and other types of cells. CD8-positive cells subsequently induce a CTL reaction which then eventually leads to hepatitis. Since hepatitis is triggered by CTLs, a time lag exists from initial infection to hepatitis onset [38, 39]. However, hepatitis that arises from HBV reactivation, unlike that which occurs during conventional HBV infection, is under a state of immunosuppression of the normal immunological responses to HBV, leading to increased viral replication and widespread infection of hepatocytes. When immunosuppression is removed by discontinuation of chemotherapy, immune competence is restored and infected hepatocytes are rapidly destroyed, leading to hepatitis. It is therefore likely that reactivated HBV results in a shorter time period to hepatitis progression than seen in conventional HBV infection. We believe that this mechanism of hepatitis aggravation can explain those case patients who die despite administration of lamivudine in response to HBV reactivation during chemotherapy or use of immunosuppressive drugs. In contrast, HCV tends to become chronic through suppression of the induction and amplification of immune responses (such as interferons) from the outset, and this may be why hepatitis caused by HCV reactivation during the use of anticancer or immunosuppressive drugs is less likely to become severe [4042].

 We have reported on reactivation of HBV and hepatitis during rituximab treatment alone or in combination with chemotherapy. Other groups have reported a rate of HBV reactivation of 20%~55% [15, 1820]. One report claims an HBV reactivation rate of 3%, even in HBsAg-negative cases [43]. Umemura et al. reported a 4% rate of HBV reactivation in HBsAg-positive patients based on a questionnaire conducted in Japan, which is lower than previous studies, and 20% of these patients developed fatal hepatitis [44]. Frequent HBV reactivation is also thought to occur as a complication of chemotherapy during treatment of lymphomas and may be influenced by steroids [18, 45, 46]. Since the initial use of rituximab in the clinic, debate has centered on whether rituximab alone can induce HBV reactivation or whether it does so only when used in combination with chemotherapy. Initially, we believed that rituximab alone was unlikely to induce HBV reactivation [21]. However, subsequent reports by us and by Yang et al. have shown that HBV reactivation can occur with rituximab alone, and it is therefore likely that rituximab itself can induce HBV reactivation [22, 37]. Although reactivation of HBV is deemed more likely when rituximab is combined with chemotherapy or steroid therapy, clearly the use of rituximab alone cannot be deemed completely safe [22]. Future prospective analyses are needed to definitively answer whether or not reactivation of HBV is more prevalent in patients given rituximab alone or given chemotherapy without rituximab. Nonetheless, in a questionnaire survey at a Hokkaido facility examining and treating blood diseases, HBV reactivation cases were observed only in patients given rituximab alone. These results support the study by Yeo et al., showing that reactivation of HBV is more prevalent in patients given rituximab alone compared with chemotherapy alone [22, 47].

3. Risk Factors for HBV Reactivation

 To date, various investigators have identified a number of risk factors for HBV reactivation which include being male, HBs antigen positivity, HBV-DNA level, presence of lymphoma, use of anthracyclines or steroids, second- and third-line anticancer drug treatment, and youth. A review of these factors by Yeo et al. showed that youth, being male, and liver function prior to chemotherapy were potential risk factors. Furthermore, Yeo et al. conducted an analysis on HBV reactivation in patients using rituximab, as there is a potential for risk factors to change in such cases. Including risk factors which had previously been reported, they list being male, lacking HBs antibodies, and using rituximab as additional risk factors. Further analyses on such risk factors are needed in order to enable the stratification of HBV-infected patients receiving rituximab in order to identify those that require preventive administration with nucleoside analogs [20, 47, 48].

4. HBsAg-Positive, Anti-HBc-Positive, and HBV-DNA-Positive Cases

 In HBsAg-positive patients, there have been reports of HBV reactivation during chemotherapy [820]. Increased liver function and a tendency for increased jaundice and lowered albumin have also been reported in hepatitis cases caused by HBV reactivation, compared to primary HBV infection [44]. Similarly, HBV reactivation has been reported in patients receiving chemotherapy in addition to rituximab [2137]. For these patients, attempts to prevent HBV reactivation are needed regardless of whether or not rituximab is given. Preventive administration of nucleoside analogs is currently recommended for such patients, and chemotherapy under preventive administration is desirable [4963]. Although there are few complete reports of cases in which rituximab was used in combination with preventive treatments, He et al. among others have suggested the effectiveness of preventive lamivudine [49, 64, 65]. Loomba et al. reported that preventive lamivudine therapy reduced HBV-reactivation-related hepatitis by 79% or more, based on an analysis of previous studies [49]. However, it has been reported that with lamivudine administration, drug resistance increases yearly by 15%–20% [66, 67]. Thus, with preventative administration of lamivudine, the emergence of resistant HBV strains is highly problematic.

A report by Pelizzari et al. suggested that lamivudine administration may result in a lower likelihood of emergent drug resistance compared to treatments for conventional hepatitis B [56]. However, Picardi et al. reported numerous instances of HBV genome mutations in patients receiving chemotherapy with fludarabine [68]. In addition, they have shown that there is a high risk of HBV resistance to lamivudine in patients undergoing treatments that have powerful immunosuppressive effects. A similar report exists for chemotherapy combined with rituximab, and it is possible that similar occurrences may be observed when steroids or fludarabine are used together with rituximab [69]. From these observations, as well as considering issues of emergent drug resistance, administration of entecavir is preferred over lamivudine for the prevention of HBV reactivation. Additionally, even among HBsAg-positive cases, preventive treatment may change in relation to the level of HBV-DNA present. Various guidelines recommend that when more than 1 year of long-term nucleoside analog administration against HBV-DNA is necessary, the analog should be changed to entecavir. In patients who have a high level of HBV-DNA, it is desirable to use drugs such as entecavir, based on its effectiveness against the YMDD mutation [70, 71]. Moreover, for HBsAg chronic hepatitis, the guidelines recommend the use of entecavir when HBV-DNA is more than 2000 IU/ml, while lamivudine is adequate at less than 2000 IU/ml. In addition, in HBV-DNA-positive cases, it may be necessary to screen for YMDD mutations in advance as there is a possibility in these cases that other treatments will be necessary, such as the use of tenofovir or the combined use of 2 nucleoside analogs [7073].

5. Anti-HBc-Positive, Anti-HBs-Negative, and HBsAg-Negative Cases

Anti-HBc-positive cases indicate a prior history of HBV infection. These include window period cases as well as cases which are HBV-DNA positive and Anti-HBs negative or HBsAg negative (occult HBV infection) [43, 7476]. Caution is required in these cases when using rituximab, chemotherapy with anticancer drugs, or immunosuppressive drug preparations [70, 71]. Although rare, HBV reactivation during chemotherapy has been reported in Anti-HBs-positive, Anti-HBc-positive cases or in cases positive only for Anti-HBc [15, 26, 43, 45]. Moreover, in a study by Hui et al., HBV reactivation-induced hepatitis was reported in anti-HBc-positive, anti-HBs-negative cases, and even in those that were HBV-DNA negative [43]. This shows that hepatitis caused by HBV reactivation can occur in Anti-HBc-positive cases regardless of HBV-DNA status. For these cases, the guidelines recommend careful monitoring of HBV-DNA, since hepatitis caused by HBV reactivation is uncommon and treatment is expensive [7073, 77]. Although reports to date show that HBV reactivation in patients undergoing chemotherapy is rare, when it does occur, the chemotherapy treatment period is extended. In addition, the treatment intensity of the chemotherapy against lymphoma declines, and fatalities are not uncommon in HBV reactivation-induced hepatitis. This is because the mortality of hepatitis caused by HBV reactivation is about 30%–100%, and once the disease is present, some patients are not able to be saved [4345]. Based on these facts, administration of nucleoside analogs may be desired in these cases. It has been reported, however, that HBV reactivation-related hepatitis can be preventable by monitoring HBV-DNA level on a monthly basis [43]. Further studies are needed, including calculations of the cost involved in these treatments.

6. Anti-HBs-Positive, Anti-HBc-Positive, and HBsAg-Negative Cases

HBV reactivation-induced hepatitis has been reported in Anti-HBs-positive, Anti-HBc-positive, HBsAg-negative cases [15, 26, 43, 45]. In addition, while rare, there have been sporadic reports of cases in which HBV reactivation was observed after administration of rituximab in patients that were positive for Anti-HBs alone [29, 43, 78] although it is generally thought that such occurrences are primarily due to vaccine administration. Such cases may arise when, for instance, the production of antibodies has declined with age and only Anti-HBs remains; however, details from these types of cases are unavailable. Caution is required, as even in cases that are positive for Anti-HBs alone, the chance exists that symptoms are due to HBV reactivation. In our experience studying the changes in Anti-HBs after rituximab administration, we have found that in the large majority of cases, Anti-HBs antibody titers decreased with increased number of rituximab administrations [21, 32, 33, 79]. Furthermore, we have experienced cases which presented with HBV reactivation following an increase in HBV-DNA that accompanied a decline in Anti-HBs and Anti-HBc antibody titers [32, 33]. These results suggest an association between Anti-HBs/Anti-HBc antibodies and HBV reactivation, and that monitoring these antibodies may provide an index for HBV reactivation. In addition, regarding HBV reactivation during bone marrow transplantation, Onozawa et al. reported that a decrease in Anti-HBs titer results in HBV reactivation-induced hepatitis [80]. As Anti-HBs is a part of the humoral immune component which monitors HBV, we surmise that transitions in Anti-HBs have the potential to become indices for predicting hepatitis caused by HBV reactivation. However, HBV reactivation has also been observed by Westhoff et al., in a patient with Anti-HBs titers of 868 mIU/mL, indicating that HBV reactivation may occur even in cases with high Anti-HBs titers [26]. This may indicate that predicting reactivation only by monitoring Anti-HBs titers would be insufficient.

7. Prevention of HBV Reactivation

From each group, treatment guidelines for prevention of HBV reactivation are shown in Table 1 [7073, 77]. From the information detailed above, HBe-Ag- and HBsAg-positive cases qualify as targets for preventive administration of nucleoside analogs. In HBsAg-negative cases, it is likely that the frequency of HBV reactivation in Anti-HBc only positive cases is not necessarily high. However, since HBV reactivation may lead to patient death, we believe that these cases would qualify as targets for preventive administration of nucleoside analogs. In contrast, in HBsAg-negative, Anti-HBs-positive cases, it is desirable while observing changes in antibody titers to additionally monitor HBV-DNA in those cases with titers less than 500 [79]. Additionally, it is possible that periodic monitoring of HBV-DNA may predict HBV reactivation, and it is therefore advantageous, keeping cost in mind, to combine these indices [81, 82]. Monitoring of HBV-DNA is also likely to be essential in cases having HBV-DNA mutations and in whom antibody expression is weak [81]. It is crucial, however, to stratify groups into those in whom preventive administration can be recommended, since with HBV-DNA monitoring alone, the frequency of HBV reactivation has been reported to be higher in those given preventive administration of lamivudine compared to controls [51]. When monitoring for HBV reactivation, it is important to identify HBV reactivation at an early stage using, in addition to HBV-DNA monitoring, a variety of additional information including changes in anti-HB titers. Kusumoto et al. summarized the risks of HBV reactivation during chemotherapy in reference to HBsAg, Anti-HB, and level of treatment. These data may be useful for preventive treatment, however, more clinical studies are needed [83]. Preventive administration against HBV is recommended for a period of 6 months following completion of treatment [67, 70]. This may not be sufficient, however, as a number of cases in which HBV reactivation occurred more than 4–6 months after treatment have been reported [8488]. The 6-month timeframe is possibly associated with changes in B-cell number [13, 82, 88]. The guidelines proposed by Lok and McMahon in 2007 have been more specific compared to past guidelines and have incorporated recommendations such as extending the period of preventive administration depending on the HBV-DNA level [70]. We observed a case in which HBV reactivation occurred 4 years after termination of preventive lamivudine administration following completion of treatment [79]. From this case, we surmise that for HBeAg- or HBsAg-positive cases in which Anti-HBs cannot be produced, it is necessary to combine the use of nucleoside analogs from the initial time of treatment and to continue their use. In addition, for cases which are Anti-HBs positive from the outset, we believe that preventive administration of nucleoside analogs is necessary at least until Anti-HBs titers return to pretreatment levels, and that the period of nucleoside analog administration needs to be determined using immune recovery, for example, of anti-HBs, as an index. However, with long-term administration of drugs such as lamivudine or entecavir, issues such as cost arise; therefore, it is hoped that cases requiring long-term preventive administration will become clarified in the future with followup studies. As this report shows, preventive nucleoside analog administration involves issues of lamivudine resistance, therefore we believe it is desirable to administer entecavir at an early stage. Although we commonly set lamivudine dosing at 100 mg and entecavir at 0.5 mg, it is recommended that entecavir be increased to 1 mg when dealing with lamivudine-resistant cases [7073]. Compared to lamivudine, resistance to entecavir is less likely to develop [89], and administration of entecavir is recommended in cases where preventive administration against HBV will exceed 12 months [70, 71, 73]. In lamivudine-resistant cases, some clinicians recommend the combined use of entecavir, adefovir, or tenofovir with lamivudine [73] while others recommend switching over completely [72]. We believe that combined use with lamivudine is desirable, as it has been reported that adefovir-resistant strains immediately develop when patients with lamivudine-resistant strains are switched over to adefovir alone [90]. In seronegative HBV cases that are treated with immunosuppressive or anticancer drugs, the use of HBV vaccine has been recommended [73]. However, as mentioned previously, when using rituximab, anti-HBs level decreases and then disappears, and it is therefore possible that no antibodies will be produced after prior administration of vaccine; therefore, it may be desirable to administer vaccine after completion of treatment. In some cases, however, hepatitis caused by HBV reactivation cannot be controlled with a vaccine, and it is therefore possible that HBV reactivation will not be prevented with vaccination alone [78]. Future studies on vaccine efficacy in patients receiving rituximab or chemotherapy are needed; however, it will take considerable time before practical applications of these studies can be realized.

tab1
Table 1: Treatment guideline methods during chemotherapy or immunosuppressive drug therapy.

8. Conclusions

 HBV reactivation during chemotherapy treatment is thought to occur from HBV amplification in hepatocytes as a result of immunosuppression caused by anticancer drugs, and subsequently from HBV-infected hepatocytes that are targeted by an immune response that becomes activated after removal of this immunosuppression [45]. It is likely that one of the causes of HBV amplification during the combined use of chemotherapy and rituximab is the reduction in antibody titers that accompanies a decrease in B cells [79, 91]. In addition, rituximab is able to alter the T lymphocyte population, and it is possible that aggressiveness toward HBV intensifies as a result, further promoting HBV amplification and subsequent recovery of the distribution of immunocompetent cells such as lymphocytes [92]. Uemura et al. found that chemotherapy-induced reactivation of HBV is more lethal compared to acute HBV hepatitis, and the likelihood of survival also decreases; therefore, it is crucial to prevent this method of disease onset [36, 44]. It is hoped that future studies will further clarify the changes that occur in immune functions of the organism during rituximab use along with the mechanisms of HBV reactivation, which will lead to safer and more effective treatments for malignant lymphomas.

References

  1. P. McLaughlin, A. J. Grillo-López, and A. J. Grillo-López, “Rituximab chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody therapy for relapsed indolent lymphoma: half of patients respond to a four-dose treatment program,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 2825–2833, 1998. View at Scopus
  2. K. Tobinai, Y. Kobayashi, and Y. Kobayashi, “Feasibility and pharmacokinetic study of a chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (IDEC-C2B8, rituximab) in relapsed B-cell lymphoma,” Annals of Oncology, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 527–534, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. T. Igarashi, “Re-treatment of relapsed indolent B-cell lymphoma with rituximab,” International Journal of Hematology, vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 213–221, 2001.
  4. A. Bermudez, F. Marco, E. Conde, E. Mazo, M. Recio, and A. Zubizarreta, “Fatal visceral varicella-zoster infection following rituximab and chemotherapy treatment in a patient with follicular lymphoma,” Haematologica, vol. 85, no. 8, pp. 894–895, 2000. View at Scopus
  5. V. R. Sharma, D. R. Fleming, and S. P. Slone, “Pure red cell aplasia due to parvovirus B19 in a patient treated with rituximab,” Blood, vol. 96, no. 3, pp. 1184–1186, 2000. View at Scopus
  6. F. Suzan, M. Ammor, and V. Ribrag, “Fatal reactivation of cytomegalovirus infection after use of rituximab for a post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 345, no. 13, article 1000, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  7. S. L. Goldberg, A. L. Pecora, and A. L. Pecora, “Unusual viral infections (progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy and cytomegalovirus disease) after high-dose chemotherapy with autologous blood stem cell rescue and peritransplantation rituximab,” Blood, vol. 99, no. 4, pp. 1486–1488, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. R. M. Galbraith, A. L. Eddleston, R. Williams, A. J. Zuckerman, and K. D. Bagshawe, “Fulminating hepatic failure in leukemia and choriocarcinoma related to withdrawal of cytotoxic drug therapy,” The Lancet, vol. 2, pp. 538–530, 1975.
  9. J. H. Hoofnagle, G. M. Dusheiko, D. F. Schafer, et al., “Reactivation of chronic hepatitis B virus infection by cancer chemotherapy,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 96, no. 4, pp. 447–449, 1982.
  10. S. N. Thung, M. A. Gerber, F. Klion, and H. Gilbert, “Massive hepatic necrosis after chemotherapy withdrawal in a hepatitis B virus carrier,” Archives of Internal Medicine, vol. 145, no. 7, pp. 1313–1314, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J. Y. N. Lau, C. L. Lai, and C. L. Lai, “Fatal reactivation of chronic hepatitis B virus infection following withdrawal of chemotherapy in lymphoma patients,” Quarterly Journal of Medicine, vol. 73, no. 270, pp. 911–917, 1989. View at Scopus
  12. G. L. A. Bird, H. Smith, B. Portmann, G. J. M. Alexander, and R. Williams, “Acute liver decompensation on withdrawal of cytotoxic chemotherapy and immunosuppressive therapy in hepatitis B carriers,” Quarterly Journal of Medicine, vol. 73, no. 270, pp. 895–902, 1989. View at Scopus
  13. R. H. S. Liang, A. S. F. Lok, C. L. Lai, T. K. Chan, D. Todd, and E. K. W. Chiu, “Hepatitis B infection in patients with lymphomas,” Hematological Oncology, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 261–270, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. A. S. F. Lok, C.-L. Lai, and P.-C. Wu, “Hepatitis B virus infection in Chinese families in Hong Kong,” American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 126, no. 3, pp. 492–499, 1987. View at Scopus
  15. A. S. F. Lok, R. H. S. Liang, E. K. W. Chiu, K. L. Wong, T. K. Chan, and D. Todd, “Reactivation of hepatitis B virus replication in patients receiving cytotoxic therapy: report of a prospective study,” Gastroenterology, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 182–188, 1991. View at Scopus
  16. P. C. Pinto, E. Hu, M. Bernstein-Singer, L. Pinter-Brown, and S. Govindarajan, “Acute hepatic injury after the withdrawal of immunosuppressive chemotherapy in patients with hepatitis B,” Cancer, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 878–884, 1990. View at Scopus
  17. L. T. Soh, P. T. Ang, I. Sng, E. J. Chua, and Y. W. Ong, “Fulminant hepatic failure in non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients treated with chemotherapy,” European Journal of Cancer A, vol. 28, no. 8-9, pp. 1338–1339, 1992. View at Scopus
  18. Y. Nakamura, T. Motokura, A. Fujita, T. Yamashita, and E. Ogata, “Severe hepatitis related to chemotherapy in hepatitis B virus carriers with hematologic malignancies: survey in Japan, 1987–1991,” Cancer, vol. 78, no. 10, pp. 2210–2215, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. K. Kumagai, T. Takagi, and T. Takagi, “Hepatitis B virus carriers in the treatment of malignant lymphoma: an epidemiological study in Japan,” Annals of Oncology, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. S107–S109, 1997. View at Scopus
  20. W. Yeo, P. K. S. Chan, and P. K. S. Chan, “Frequency of hepatitis B virus reactivation in cancer patients undergoing cytotoxic chemotherapy: a prospective study of 626 patients with identification of risk factors,” Journal of Medical Virology, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 299–307, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. Y. Tsutsumi, H. Kanamori, A. Mori, J. Tanaka, M. Asaka, M. Imamura, and N. Masauzi, “Reactivation of hepatitis B virus with rituximab,” Expert Opinion on Drug Safety, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 599–608, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  22. Y. Tsutsumi, A. Shigematsu, and A. Shigematsu, “Analysis of reactivation of hepatitis B virus in the treatment of B cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in Hokkaido,” Annals of Hematology, vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 375–377, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  23. M. S. Czuczman, A. J. Grillo-López, and A. J. Grillo-López, “Treatment of patients with low-grade B-cell lymphoma with the combination of chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody and CHOP chemotherapy,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 268–276, 1999.
  24. J. A. Hernandez, R. Diloy, D. Salat, N. del Rio, X. Martinez, and J. M. Castellvi, “Fluminant hepatitis subsequent to reactivation of precore mutant hepatitis B virus in a patient with lymphoma treated with chemotheraoy and rituximab,” Haematologica, vol. 88, article ECR22, 2003.
  25. C. Skrabs, C. Müller, H. Agis, C. Manhalter, and U. Jäger, “Treatment of HBV-carrying lymphoma patients with Rituximab and CHOP: a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge,” Leukemia, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 1884–1886, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  26. T. H. Westhoff, F. Jochimsen, and F. Jochimsen, “Fatal hepatitis B virus reactivation by an escape mutant following rituximab therapy,” Blood, vol. 102, no. 5, article 1930, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  27. H. J. Ng and L. C. Lim, “Fulminant hepatitis B virus reactivation with concomitant listeriosis after fludarabine and rituximab therapy: case report,” Annals of Hematology, vol. 80, no. 9, pp. 549–552, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. G. Jäeger, P. Neumeister, R. Brezinschek, G. Höfler, F. Quehenberger, W. Linkesch, and H. Sill, “Rituximab (anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody) as consolidation of first-line CHOP chemotherapy in patients with follicular lymphoma: a phase II study,” European Journal of Haematology, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 21–26, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. I. Dervite, D. Hober, and P. Morel, “Acute hepatitis B in a patient with antibodies to hepatitis B surface antigen who was receiving rituximab,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 344, no. 1, pp. 68–69, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. F. Rossini, S. Capalbo, M. Fumagalli, et al., “Standard dose: rituximab in refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia,” Hematology Journal, vol. 3, supplement 1, article 0827, 2002.
  31. E. Domingo-Domenech, E. González-Borco, C. Estany, A. Sureda, J. Besalduch, and A. F. de Sevilla, “Combined treatment with anti CD20 (rituximab) and CHOP in relapsed advanced-stage follicular lymphomas,” Haematologica, vol. 87, no. 11, pp. 1229–1230, 2002. View at Scopus
  32. Y. Tsutsumi, T. Kawamura, and T. Kawamura, “Hepatitis B virus reactivation in a case of Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma treated with chemotherapy and rituximab: necessity of prophylaxis for hepatitis B virus reactivation in rituximab therapy,” Leukemia and Lymphoma, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 627–629, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. Y. Tsutsumi, J. Tanaka, and J. Tanaka, “Possible efficacy of lamivudine treatment to prevent hepatitis B virus reactivation due to rituximab therapy in a patient with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma,” Annals of Hematology, vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 58–60, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  34. J. C. Wasmuth, H. P. Fischer, T. Sauerbruch, and F. L. Dumoulin, “Fatal acute liver failure due to reactivation of hepatitis B following treatment with fludarabine/cyclophosphamide/rituximab for low grade non-hodgkin's lymphoma,” European Journal of Medical Research, vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 483–486, 2008. View at Scopus
  35. T. Sera, Y. Hiasa, and Y. Hiasa, “Anti-HBs-positive liver failure due to hepatitis B virus reactivation induced by Rituximab,” Internal Medicine, vol. 45, no. 11, pp. 721–724, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. T. Umemura and K. Kiyosawa, “Fatal HBV reactivation in a subject with anti-HBs and anti-HBc,” Internal Medicine, vol. 45, no. 12, pp. 747–748, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. S. H. Yang and S. H. Kuo, “Reactivation of hepatitis B virus during rituximab treatment of a patient with follicular lymphoma,” Annals of Hematology, vol. 87, no. 4, pp. 325–327, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  38. L. G. Guidotti, R. Rochford, J. Chung, M. Shapiro, R. Purcell, and F. V. Chisari, “Viral clearance without destruction of infected cells during acute HBV infection,” Science, vol. 284, no. 5415, pp. 825–829, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. G. J. M. Webster, S. Reignat, and S. Reignat, “Incubation phase of acute hepatitis B in man: dynamic of cellular immune mechanisms,” Hepatology, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 1117–1124, 2000. View at Scopus
  40. E. Foy, K. Li, C. Wang, R. Sumpter, M. Ikeda, S. M. Lemon, and M. Gale, “Regulation of interferon regulatory factor-3 by the hepatitis C virus serine protease,” Science, vol. 300, no. 5622, pp. 1145–1148, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  41. D. R. Taylor, S. T. Shi, P. R. Romano, G. N. Barber, and M. M. C. Lai, “Inhibition of the interferon-inducible protein kinase PKR by HCV E2 protein,” Science, vol. 285, no. 5424, pp. 107–110, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. M. Gale, C. M. Blakely, and C. M. Blakely, “Control of PKR protein kinase by hepatitis C virus nonstructural 5A protein: molecular mechanisms of kinase regulation,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 5208–5218, 1998. View at Scopus
  43. C. K. Hui, W. W. W. Cheung, and W. W. W. Cheung, “Kinetics and risk of de novo hepatitis B infection in HBsAg-negative patients undergoing cytotoxic chemotherapy,” Gastroenterology, vol. 131, no. 1, pp. 59–68, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  44. T. Umemura, E. Tanaka, and E. Tanaka, “Mortality secondary to fulminant hepatic failure in patients with prior resolution of hepatitis B virus infection in Japan,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. e52–e56, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  45. S. Vento, F. Cainelli, and M. S. Longhi, “Reactivation of replication of hepatitis B and C viruses after immunosuppressive therapy: an unresolved issue,” Lancet Oncology, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 333–340, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. A. L. Cheng, “Steroid-free chemotherapy decreases the risk of hepatitis flare-up in hepatitis B virus carriers with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma,” Blood, vol. 87, no. 3, article 1202, 1996.
  47. W. Yeo, T. C. Chan, and T. C. Chan, “Hepatitis B virus reactivation in lymphoma patients with prior resolved hepatitis B undergoing anticancer therapy with or without rituximab,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 605–611, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  48. W. Yeo, B. Zee, and B. Zee, “Comprehensive analysis of risk factors associating with Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in cancer patients undergoing cytotoxic chemotherapy,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 90, no. 7, pp. 1306–1311, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  49. R. Loomba, A. Rowley, R. Wesley, T. J. Liang, J. H. Hoofnagle, F. Pucino, and G. Csako, “Systematic review: the effect of preventive lamivudine on hepatitis B reactivation during chemotherapy,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 148, no. 7, pp. 519–528, 2008. View at Scopus
  50. B. Coiffier, “Hepatitis B virus reactivation in patients receiving chemotherapy for cancer treatment: role of lamivudine prophylaxis,” Cancer Investigation, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 548–552, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  51. G. K. K. Lau, H. H. Y. Yiu, and H. H. Y. Yiu, “Early is superior to deferred preemptive Lamivudine therapy for hepatitis B patients undergoing chemotherapy,” Gastroenterology, vol. 125, no. 6, pp. 1742–1749, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. O. H. Al-Taie, H. Mörk, A. M. Gassel, M. Wilhelm, B. Weissbrich, and M. Scheurlen, “Prevention of hepatitis B flare-up during chemotherapy using lamivudine: case report and review of the literature,” Annals of Hematology, vol. 78, no. 5, pp. 247–249, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. F. Silvestri, A. Ermacora, and A. Ermacora, “Lamivudine allows completion of chemotherapy in lymphoma patients with hepatitis B reactivation,” British Journal of Haematology, vol. 108, no. 2, pp. 394–396, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. O. Shibolet, Y. Ilan, S. Gillis, A. Hubert, D. Shouval, and R. Safadi, “Lamivudine therapy for prevention of immunosuppressive-induced hepatitis B virus reactivation in hepatitis B surface antigen carriers,” Blood, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 391–396, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. M. Esteve, C. Saro, F. González-Huix, F. Suarez, M. Forné, and J. M. Viver, “Chronic hepatitis B reactivation following infliximab therapy in Crohn's disease patients: need for primary prophylaxis,” Gut, vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 1363–1365, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  56. A. M. Pelizzari, M. Motta, E. Cariani, P. Turconi, E. Borlenghi, and G. Rossi, “Frequency of hepatitis B virus mutant in asymptomatic hepatitis B virus carriers receiving prophylactic lamivudine during chemotherapy for hematologic malignancies,” Hematology Journal, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 325–328, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  57. T. Cil, A. Altintas, S. Pasa, K. Bayan, T. Ozekinci, and A. Isikdogan, “Lamivudine for the prevention of hepatitis B virus reactivation in hepatitis-B surface antigen (HBSAG) seropositive cancer patients undergoing cytotoxic chemotherapy,” Leukemia and Lymphoma, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 939–947, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  58. N. D. Simpson, P. W. Simpson, A. M. Ahmed, M. H. Nguyen, G. Garcia, E. B. Keeffe, and A. Ahmed, “Prophylaxis against chemotherapy-induced reactivation of hepatitis B virus infection with lamivudine,” Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 68–71, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. M. S. Dai, P. F. Wu, R. Y. Shyu, J. J. Lu, and T. Y. Chao, “Hepatitis B virus reactivation in breast cancer patients undergoing cytotoxic chemotherapy and the role of preemptive lamivudine administration,” Liver International, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 540–546, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  60. R. Idilman, “Lamivudine prophylaxis in HBV carriers with haemato-oncological malignancies who receive chemotherapy,” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 828–831, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  61. J. W. Jang, J. Y. Choi, and J. Y. Choi, “A randomized controlled study of preemptive lamivudine in patients receiving transarterial chemo-lipiodolization,” Hepatology, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 233–240, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  62. Y. H. Li, Y. F. He, and Y. F. He, “Lamivudine prophylaxis reduces the incidence and severity of hepatitis in hepatitis B virus carriers who receive chemotherapy for lymphoma,” Cancer, vol. 106, no. 6, pp. 1320–1325, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  63. W. Yeo, W. M. Ho, P. Hui, P. K. S. Chan, K. C. Lam, J. J. Lee, and P. J. Johnson, “Use of lamivudine to prevent hepatitis B virus reactivation during chemotherapy in breast cancer patients,” Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 209–215, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  64. K. Mimidis, C. Tsatalas, and C. Tsatalas, “Efficacy of lamivudine in patients with hematologic malignancies receiving chemotherapy and precore mutant chronic active hepatitis B,” Acta Haematologica, vol. 107, no. 1, pp. 49–51, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. T. Hamaki, M. Kami, E. Kusumi, J. I. Ueyama, S. Miyakoshi, S. I. Morinaga, and Y. Mutou, “Prophylaxis of hepatitis B reactivation using lamivudine in a patient receiving rituximab,” American Journal of Hematology, vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 292–294, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  66. A. S. F. Lok and B. J. McMahon, “Chronic hepatitis B: update of recommendations,” Hepatology, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 857–861, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  67. A. S. F. Lok and B. J. McMahon, “Chronic hepatitis B,” Hepatology, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 1225–1241, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  68. M. Picardi, F. Pane, and F. Pane, “Hepatitis B virus reactivation after fludarabine-based regimens for indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphomas: high prevalence of acquired viral genomic mutations,” Haematologica, vol. 88, no. 11, pp. 1296–1303, 2003.
  69. M. Miyagawa, M. Minami, and M. Minami , “Molecular characterization of a variant virus that caused de novo hepatitis B without elevation of hepatitis B surface antigen after chemotherapy with rituximab,” Journal of Medical Virology, vol. 80, no. 12, pp. 2069–2078, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  70. A. S. F. Lok and B. J. McMahon, “Chronic hepatitis B,” Hepatology, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 507–539, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  71. A. S. F. Lok and B. J. McMahon, “Chronic hepatitis B: update 2009,” Hepatology, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 661–662, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  72. Y. F. Liaw, N. Leung, and N. Leung, “Asian-Pacific consensus statement on the management of chronic hepatitis B: a 2005 update,” Liver International, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 472–489, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  73. European Association for the Study of the Liver, “EASL clinical practice guidelines: management of chronic hepatitis B,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 227–242, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  74. K. Q. Hu, “Occult hepatitis B virus infection and its clinical implications,” Journal of Viral Hepatitis, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 243–257, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  75. W. Yeo, K. C. Lam, and K. C. Lam, “Hepatitis B reactivation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing systemic chemotherapy,” Annals of Oncology, vol. 15, no. 11, pp. 1661–1666, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  76. N. Fukushima, T. Mizuta, and T. Mizuta, “Retrospective and prospective studies of hepatitis B virus reactivation in malignant lymphoma with occult HBV carrier,” Annals of Oncology, vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 2013–2017, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  77. H. Tsubouchi, H. Kumada, and H. Kumada, “Prevention of immunosuppressive therapy or chemotherapy-induced reactivation of hepatitis B virus infection—joint report of the Intractable Liver Diseases Study Group of Japan and the Japanese Study Group of the Standard Antiviral Therapy for Viral Hepatitis,” Acta Hepatologica Japonica, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 38–42, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  78. S. Awerkiew, M. Däumer, and M. Däumer, “Reactivation of an occult hepatitis B virus escape mutant in an anti-HBs positive, anti-HBc negative lymphoma patient,” Journal of Clinical Virology, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 83–86, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  79. Y. Tsutsumi, Y. Yamamoto, J. Tanaka, M. Asaka, M. Imamura, and N. Masauzi, “Prevention of hepatitis B virus reactivation under rituximab therapy,” Immunotherapy, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 1053–1061, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  80. M. Onozawa, S. Hashino, and S. Hashino, “Progressive disappearance of anti-hepatitis B surface antigen antibody and reverse seroconversion after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with previous hepatitis B virus infection,” Transplantation, vol. 79, no. 5, pp. 616–619, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  81. J. P. Allain, “Occult hepatitis B virus infection,” Transfusion Clinique et Biologique, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 18–25, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  82. R. Liang, “How I treat and monitor viral hepatitis B infection in patients receiving intensive immunosuppressive therapies or undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation,” Blood, vol. 113, no. 14, pp. 3147–3153, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  83. S. Kusumoto, Y. Tanaka, M. Mizokami, and R. Ueda, “Reactivation of hepatitis B virus following systemic chemotherapy for malignant lymphoma,” International Journal of Hematology, vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 13–23, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  84. M. S. Dai, T. Y. Chao, W. Y. Kao, R. Y. Shyu, and T. M. Liu, “Delayed hepatitis B virus reactivation after cessation of preemptive lamivudine in lymphoma patients treated with rituximab plus CHOP,” Annals of Hematology, vol. 83, no. 12, pp. 769–774, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  85. M. J. Garcia-Rodriguez, M. A. Canales, D. Hernandez-Maraver, and F. Hernandez-Navarro, “Late reactivation of resolved hepatitis B virus infection: an increasing complication post rituximab-based regimens treatment?” American Journal of Hematology, vol. 83, no. 8, pp. 673–675, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  86. G. Perceau, N. Diris, O. Estines, C. Derancourt, S. Lévy, and P. Bernard, “Late lethal hepatitis B virus reactivation after rituximab treatment of low-grade cutaneous B-cell lymphoma,” British Journal of Dermatology, vol. 155, no. 5, pp. 1053–1056, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  87. J. Gossmann, E.-H. Scheuermann, H.-G. Kachel, H. Geiger, and I. A. Hauser, “Reactivation of hepatitis B two years after rituximab therapy in a renal transplant patient with recurrent focal segmental glomerulosclerosis: a note of caution,” Clinical Transplantation, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 431–434, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  88. W. Yeo and P. J. Johnson, “Diagnosis, prevention and management of hepatitis B virus reactivation during anticancer therapy,” Hepatology, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 209–220, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  89. G. V. Papatheodoridis, S. Manolakopoulos, G. Dusheiko, and A. J. Archimandritis, “Therapeutic strategies in the management of patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection,” Lancet Infectious Diseases, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 167–178, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  90. S. K. Fung, P. Andreone, and P. Andreone, “Adefovir-resistant hepatitis B can be associated with viral rebound and hepatic decompensation,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 937–943, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  91. M. E. Reff, K. Carner, and K. Carner, “Depletion of B cells in vivo by a chimeric mouse human monoclonal antibody to CD20,” Blood, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 435–445, 1994.
  92. M. Vigna-Perez, B. Hernández-Castro, O. Paredes-Saharopulos, D. Portales-Pérez, L. Baranda, C. Abud-Mendoza, and R. González-Amaro, “Clinical and immunological effects of Rituximab in patients with lupus nephritis refractory to conventional therapy: a pilot study,” Arthritis Research and Therapy, vol. 8, no. 3, article R83, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed