About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 872169, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/872169
Research Article

Identification of Candida Species Associated with Vulvovaginal Candidiasis by Multiplex PCR

1Skin Research Center, Shaheed Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mahdieh Educational Hospital, Shaheed Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada V5A 1S6

Received 8 March 2012; Revised 28 April 2012; Accepted 17 May 2012

Academic Editor: Francesco De Seta

Copyright © 2012 Mahnaz Mahmoudi Rad et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background. Vulvovaginal candidiasis is a common infection. The aim of this study was to identify the species of vaginal Candida isolates by using multiplex PCR technique. Methods. 191 isolates from patients admitted to Mahdieh hospital were identified. The vaginal swab specimens were cultured on Sabouraud Dextrose Agar. The ITS1 region between the 18S and 5.8S rRNA genes and a specific DNA fragment within the ITS2 region were amplified. The multiplex PCR products were separated by electrophoresis in 2% agarose gel, visualized by staining with ethidium bromide, and photographed. Descriptive statistics, Chi-square test, and Spearman correlation were used to summarize the findings. Results. C. albicans and C. glabrata were the most common species isolated from the specimens. A mix of C. glabrata and C. albicans was the most common mixed infection isolated from the samples. The analysis revealed a significant positive association between older age and infection with C. glabrata isolates (Spearman’s rho = 0.89, ). Conclusion. Multiplex PCR is a fast, yet reliable method to identify Candida species. C. albicans and then C. glabrata are the two most common causes of vulvovaginal candidiasis. The number of mixed fungal infections is higher among Iranian population compared to international reports.

1. Introduction

Candida species are the second most common cause of vulvovaginitis worldwide [1]. The prevalence of vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) is increasing due to the extensive utilization of broad-spectrum antibiotics as well as increased cases of immunocompromised patients [2, 3]. Nearly 75% of women over 25 years of age, reported to have at least one episode of physician approved VVC during their lifetime and 5% experienced recurrent type; which is defined by getting infected for at least 4 times in a one-year period [4]. However, 20–50% of women have Candida species in their vaginal flora without showing any clinical symptoms [4, 5]. C. albicans is the most common and clinically relevant species that accounts for 85–90% of VVC [4]. However, there has been a significant trend towards the emergence of other species such as C. glabrata, C. krusei, and C. parapsilosis which ironically show more resistance to the first line antifungal treatments [6]. Hence, the differentiation of diverse species of Candida in the laboratories seems necessary. Traditionally, the identification and classification of Candida species were done by time consuming and unreliable methods such as serotyping [7], colony morphotyping [8], conventional culture techniques, and morphological and biochemical analysis [9]. Nonetheless, the improvements in molecular assay technology for identifying Candida species, such as randomly amplified polymorphic DNA analysis (RAPD), has overcome these limitations during the last couple of years. However, methods such as single and direct PCR or multiplex PCR have not been used extensively despite being highly sensitive and specific with a shorter turn-around time [1013]. Multiplex PCR is a rapid diagnostic assay which combines many specific species primers in one PCR tube. Hence, it could be used to identify more than one species in a specimen simultaneously [14]. Very little is known regarding the epidemiology of VVC in Iran. The aim of this study was to identify different species of Candida in an Iranian patient population by using different methods. Multiplex PCR method was also evaluated as a rapid and reliable method to identify Candida species by comparing the results with the traditional methods such as germ tube formation in serum, chlamydospore production on Corn Meal Agar (CMA), and carbohydrate absorption.

2. Materials and Methods

Participants of this study were women with signs and symptoms of VVC, who were admitted to the gynecology clinic in Mahdieh Educational Hospital in Tehran, Iran during a 2-year period from March 2006 to 2008. Participants who experienced the signs of VVC less than four times (including their latest admission to the clinic) in the previous year were categorized in nonrecurrent VVC (NRVVC), and those who experienced the vaginal itch and secretions equal or more than four times in the previous year were considered recurrent VVC (RVVC) after being confirmed by finding three positive cultures of VVC within a year in their medical records. Specimens were collected from the first 100 consecutive patients with NRVVC and likewise for the first 100 consecutive patients with RVVC. Each patient was tested only once at her first visit to the clinic during the two-year period of the study. Out of a total 200 collected specimens, 25 were excluded from the study due to contamination or having no signs of fungal growth. Hence, the final number of specimens was 175. To further evaluate the risk factors for VVC, we also asked our participants to complete a questionnaire regarding their demographic and behavioral characteristics. This study was approved by Iran’s National Research Ethics Committee. All of the patients signed a written consent form before participating in the study and patients’ confidentiality was strictly protected. Furthermore, no complication was seen after taking the vaginal samples.

Vaginal sampling of the participants performed by using a sterile swab by the principle researcher and was cultured simultaneously onto sabouraud dextrose agar medium. Candida species colonies were also identified by germ tube formation in serum, chlamydospore production on CMA, and carbohydrate absorption using the API 20 C-AUX kit (bioM'erieux, Paris, France), results of which have already been published elsewhere [15]. Colonies were placed in transport medium at room temperature before being processed for PCR analysis.

DNA extraction and purification were performed using a Genomic DNA Extraction kit (AccuPrep Bioneer Corporation) based on the guidelines. Multiplex PCR was performed using the PCR premix kit (AccuPower Bioneer Corporation) with a total reaction volume of a 50  L consists of 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3), 40 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.8 mM deoxyribonucleoside triphosphates (0.2 mM each), 4  M primers (0.16  M each), and Taq DNA polymerase (1 U). The primers used in this reaction were synthesized at TAGC (Berlin, Germany) including universal primers (ITS1 [5′TCCGTAGGTGAACCTGCGG-3′] and ITS2 [5′GCTGCGTTCTTCATCGATGC-3′]) [12] and C. albicans-specific primers (CA3 [5′-GGTTTGCTTGAAAGACGGTAG-3′] and CA4 [5′-AGTTTGAAGATATACGTGGTAG-3′]). A conserved portion of the 18S rDNA region, the adjacent ITS1, and a portion of the 28S rDNA region were amplified, using the ITS1 and ITS2 primers. A portion of the ITS2 region of C. albicans was amplified by including CA3 and CA4 in the PCR mixture. PCR amplification process was carried out with an Eppendorf thermal cycler under the following conditions: initial denaturation (94°C, 3 min); 35 cycles of denaturation (94°C, 1 min), annealing (60°C, 1 min), and extension (72°C, 1 min); final extension (72°C, 5 min). PCR products were analyzed by electrophoresis through a 2% agarose gel (Roche) containing ethidium bromide (Sigma), and UV visualization were performed according to the protocols provided (UVdoc, GAS9000, England). The length of the bands was measured by UVIsoft software. Positive controls were included in each PCR experiment and consisted of one strain of each C. albicans ATCC14053 (218 or 219, and 110 bp), C. glabrata CBS2175 (482 or 483 bp), C. parapsilosis CBS2195 (229 bp), C. tropicalis CBS94 (218 bp), and C. krusei CBS573 (182 bp). Pyrogen-free water was used as negative control. Two DNA bands were identified for C. albicans while one DNA band was corresponded to other Candida species. An assessment of the different species of RVVC and NRVVC was also made. Descriptive statistics, chi square test, and Spearman’s correlation were used to analyze the data.

3. Results

The mean age (±SD) of the 175 participants was 32.4 (±8.2) years. There was no significant difference between the mean age of women with RVVC and those with NRVVC ( ). There was a significant association between the age of participants and detection rates of C. albicans ( ). The results of the analysis indicate that older participants were less likely to be infected with C. albicans. However, as depicted in Figure 1, they were most prone to get infected with C. glabrata (Spearman’s rho = 0.89, ).

872169.fig.001
Figure 1: Correlation of participants’ age range and isolated C. glabrata.

Figure 2 shows the results of the multiplex PCR method.

872169.fig.002
Figure 2: Multiplex PCR using primers ITS1, ITS2, CA3, and CA4. Lane 1: 50-bp DNA ladder. Lane 2: negative control. Lanes 3 to 8, 11 to 13 and 15 to 16: eleven clinical isolates. Lane 9: mixed reference strains C. krusei CBS573, C. albicans ATCC14053, and C. glabrata CBS2175, Lane 10: reference strain C. tropicalis CBS94, and Lane 14: reference strain C. parapsilosis CBS2195.

Among vaginal samples, 89.7% contained only one species of Candida and 10.3% contained more than one species of Candida. The prevalence of different species of Candida was as follow: C. albicans  (65.1%), C. glabrata  (13.1%), C. tropicalis  (6.2%), C. krusei  (4%), C. guilliermondii  (0.6%), C. parapsilosis  (0.6%), mixed infection of C. glabrata and C. albicans  (5.7%), C. parapsilosis and C. albicans  (1.1%), C. krusei and C. albicans  (0.6%), C. albicansand C. tropicalis  (0.6%), C. glabrata and C. tropicalis  (0.6%), C. krusei and C. tropicalis  (0.6%), C. krusei and C. glabrata  (0.6%), and a combination of C. glabrata, C. krusei, and C. albicans  (0.6%). Only one species of Candida was identified in 90.2% of participants with NRVVC while 9.8% of them were infected with more than one species. Also, 89.7% of those with RVVC were infected with one species compared to 10.8% who were infected with more. There was no statistically significant difference between these groups ( ). Chi-square test showed no significant difference between the prevalence of Candida species among recurrent and nonrecurrent groups ( ). A more detailed comparison of demographical and behavioral characteristics of the participants has already been published elsewhere [15]. The results of the multiplex PCR method perfectly matched the results of the germ tube test and chlamydospore production on CMA and API 20C-AUX kit.

4. Discussion

C. albicans is still the most common yeast infection worldwide. Hence, the reliable and rapid identification method of this species is a fundamental goal of microbiology laboratories. The multiplex PCR method is a highly sensitive and specific technique based on the results of the previous studies [16]. Despite their demonstrated reliability, molecular methods have not been routinely used to identify Candida species. Liguori et al. compared different chromogenic and biological methods to PCR for C. albicans identification. They pointed out high incubation time, lack of experienced personnel, lower sensitivity and specificity, and lower discrimination power as disadvantages of other methods and suggested using them for screening and preliminary assays, while introduced the multiplex PCR as a precise and simple to implement method with no requirement of toxic and expensive chemical reagents [17]. This cross-sectional study used a multiplex PCR method previously used by Chang et al. [12] to identify the Candida species in a sample of Iranian population. It has been previously shown that 30.7% of isolated C. glabrata are resistant to common antifungal therapies compared to 0.6% of C. albicans [6, 18]. Hence, including methods which can identify the nonalbicans species is important and useful in choosing the appropriate treatment. The results of this study showed that C. glabrata is more common in women at older age while other species are more common among the young population. This finding is in agreement with previous studies [1922] and could be due to the development of antifungal resistance, the immune response, or hormonal changes among women of older age [19]. However, the result could be due to an unanticipated bias, and further studies seem essential to solely address this observation. The results of this study showed that 10.3% of participants were infected with more than one species of Candida which is a higher rate compared to the other studies conducted in China [23], United States [24], and Jordan [25]. The first and second most common isolated species in this study were C. albicans and C. glabratawhich was in agreement with similar studies conducted worldwide [23, 2531]. The prevalence of other species had the same pattern in our study as seen in earlier findings [25, 3237]. Finally, of interest is using the Genomic DNA Extraction kit (AccuPrep Bioneer Corporation) as an effective and rapid method for extracting the DNA in 35 minutes. This eliminated the use of phenol-chloroform which is a cumbersome and tedious step of other PCR methods, resulting in significant improvements in the processing speed (the whole process could be completed in less than 6 hours). Another advantage of Multiplex PCR method is its ability to identify more than one species in a single specimen. Despite its strengths, our study was subject to some limitations such as low number of participants due to the lack of budget and personnel and collecting samples from patients admitted to one hospital which can affect the results of this study. Therefore, the results of our study should be used with caution and further research is recommended.

5. Conclusion

The results of this study showed that C. albicans is the most common Candida species in VVC among women followed by C. glabrata which has a higher prevalence among older women. A multiplex PCR method was used to identify the Candida species which seemed to be a reliable, rapid, and cost effective technique since it only requires PCR components and a commercial DNA extraction kit.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Ms. Niki Mahmoudi Rad for her ongoing assistance and her willingness and patience during the development of this study. They would also like to thank Dr. Noushin Farnoud for her expert help in editing this paper.

References

  1. J. D. Sobel, “Vaginitis,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 337, no. 26, pp. 1896–1903, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. M. Yücesoy and S. Marol, “Performance of CHROMAGAR candida and BIGGY agar for identification of yeast species,” Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials, vol. 2, article 8, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. B. Sendid, N. François, A. Standaert et al., “Prospective evaluation of the new chromogenic medium CandiSelect 4 for differentiation and presumptive identification of the major pathogenic Candida species,” Journal of Medical Microbiology, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 495–499, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. D. Sobel, “Candidal vulvovaginitis,” Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 36, pp. 153–212, 1997.
  5. D. Abi-Said, E. Anaissie, O. Uzun, I. Raad, H. Pinzcowski, and S. Vartivarian, “The epidemiology of hematogenous candidiasis caused by different Candida species,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 1122–1128, 1997. View at Scopus
  6. A. M. Tortorano, J. Peman, H. Bernhardt et al., “Epidemiology of candidaemia in Europe: results of 28-month European Confederation of Medical Mycology (ECMM) hospital-based surveillance study,” European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 317–322, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. D. L. Brawner, “Comparison between methods for serotyping of Candida albicans produces discrepancies in results,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 1020–1025, 1991. View at Scopus
  8. D. R. Soll, “High-frequency switching in Candida albicans,” Clinical Microbiology Reviews, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 183–203, 1992. View at Scopus
  9. M. I. Williamson, L. P. Samaranayake, and T. W. MacFarlane, “Biotypes of oral Candida albicans and Candida tropicalis isolates,” Journal of Medical and Veterinary Mycology, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 81–84, 1986. View at Scopus
  10. J. A. Jordan, “PCR identification of four medically important Candida species by using a single primer pair,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 32, no. 12, pp. 2962–2967, 1994. View at Scopus
  11. H. J. Tietz, A. Kussner, M. Thanos, M. P. De Andrade, W. Presber, and G. Schonian, “Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of unusual vaginal isolates of Candida albicans from Africa,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 33, no. 9, pp. 2462–2465, 1995. View at Scopus
  12. H. C. Chang, S. N. Leaw, A. H. Huang, T. L. Wu, and T. C. Chang, “Rapid identification of yeasts in positive blood cultures by a multiplex PCR method,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 39, no. 10, pp. 3466–3471, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. S. I. Fujita, Y. Senda, S. Nakaguchi, and T. Hashimoto, “Multiplex PCR using internal transcribed spacer 1 and 2 regions for rapid detection and identification of yeast strains,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 39, no. 10, pp. 3617–3622, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. G. Luo and T. G. Mitchell, “Rapid identification of pathogenic fungi directly from cultures by using multiplex PCR,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 40, no. 8, pp. 2860–2865, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. Mahmoudi Rad, S. Zafarghandi, B. Abbasabadi, and M. Tavallaee, “The epidemiology of Candida species associated with vulvovaginal candidiasis in an Iranian patient population,” European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 155, no. 2, pp. 199–203, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. N. M. Tarini, W. Mardiastuti, F. Ibrahim, A. Yasmon, and S. Djauzi, “Development of multiplex-PCR assay for rapid detection of Candida spp.,” Medical Journal of Indonesia, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 83–88, 2010.
  17. G. Liguori, V. D. I. Onofrio, F. Gallé et al., “Candida albicans identification: comparison among nine phenotypic systems and a multiplex PCR,” Journal of Preventive Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 121–124, 2010. View at Scopus
  18. K. C. Hazen, E. J. Baron, A. L. Colombo et al., “Comparison of the susceptibilities of Candida spp. to fluconazole and voriconazole in a 4-year global evaluation using disk diffusion,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 41, no. 12, pp. 5623–5632, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. J. P. Trama, M. E. Adelson, I. Raphaelli, S. M. Stemmer, and E. Mordechai, “Detection of Candida species in vaginal samples in a clinical laboratory setting,” Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 63–67, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. A. M. Geiger, B. Foxman, and B. W. Gillespie, “The epidemiology of vulvovaginal candidiasis among university students,” American Journal of Public Health, vol. 85, no. 8, pp. 1146–1148, 1995. View at Scopus
  21. A. M. Geiger and B. Foxman, “Risk factors for vulvovaginal candidiasis: a case-control study among university students,” Epidemiology, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 182–187, 1996. View at Scopus
  22. J. D. Sobel, “Pathogenesis and epidemiology of vulvovaginal candidiasis,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 544, pp. 547–557, 1988. View at Scopus
  23. S. R. Fan, X. P. Liu, and J. W. Li, “Clinical characteristics of vulvovaginal candidiasis and antifungal susceptibilities of Candida species isolates among patients in southern China from 2003 to 2006,” Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 561–566, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. S. S. Richter, R. P. Galask, S. A. Messer, R. J. Hollis, D. J. Diekema, and M. A. Pfaller, “Antifungal susceptibilities of Candida species causing vulvovaginitis and epidemiology of recurrent cases,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 2155–2162, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. K. H. Abu-Elteen, “Increased incidence of vulvovaginal candidiasis caused by Candida glabrata in Jordan,” Japanese Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 103–107, 2001. View at Scopus
  26. N. Novikova, A. Rodrigues, and P. A. Mårdh, “Can the diagnosis of recurrent vulvovaginal candidosis be improved by use of vaginal lavage samples and cultures on chromogenic agar?” Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 89–92, 2002. View at Scopus
  27. A. Ahmad and A. U. Khan, “Prevalence of Candida species and potential risk factors for vulvovaginal candidiasis in Aligarh, India,” European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 144, no. 1, pp. 68–71, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. A. Paulitsch, W. Weger, G. Ginter-Hanselmayer, E. Marth, and W. Buzina, “A 5-year (2000–2004) epidemiological survey of Candida and non-Candida yeast species causing vulvovaginal candidiasis in Graz, Austria,” Mycoses, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 471–475, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. O. Grigoriou, S. Baka, E. Makrakis, D. Hassiakos, G. Kapparos, and E. Kouskouni, “Prevalence of clinical vaginal candidiasis in a university hospital and possible risk factors,” European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 126, no. 1, pp. 121–125, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. M. E. Lopes Consolaro, T. Aline Albertoni, C. Shizue Yoshida, J. Mazucheli, R. Marina Peralta, and T. I. Estivalet Svidzinski, “Correlation of Candida species and symptoms among patients with vulvovaginal candidiasis in Maringá, Paraná, Brazil,” Revista Iberoamericana de Micologia, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 202–205, 2004. View at Scopus
  31. F. I. Okungbowa, O. S. Isikhuemhen, and A. P. O. Dede, “The distribution frequency of Candida species in the genitourinary tract among symptomatic individuals in Nigerian cities,” Revista Iberoamericana de Micologia, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 60–63, 2003. View at Scopus
  32. F. J. Fleury, “Adult vaginitis,” Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 24, p. 407, 1981.
  33. F. C. Odds and R. Bernaerts, “CHROMagar Candida, a new differential isolation medium for presumptive identification of clinically important Candida species,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 1923–1929, 1994. View at Scopus
  34. E. T. S. Houang, K. C. Chu, A. P. Koehler, and A. F. B. Cheng, “Use of CHROMagar Candida for genital specimens in the diagnostic laboratory,” Journal of Clinical Pathology, vol. 50, no. 7, pp. 563–565, 1997. View at Scopus
  35. V. Kunzelmann, H. J. Tictz, D. Ro et al., “Prerequisites for an effective treatment of chronic recurrent vaginal candidosis,” Mycoses, Supplement, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 65–72, 1996. View at Scopus
  36. M. J. Goldacre, B. Watt, and N. Loudon, “Vaginal microbial flora in normal young women,” British Medical Journal, vol. 1, no. 6176, pp. 1450–1453, 1979. View at Scopus
  37. R. A. Falleiros De Pádua, E. Guilhermetti, and T. I. Estivalet Svidzinski, “In vitro activity of antifungal agents on yeasts isolated from vaginal secretion,” Acta Scientiarum, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 51–54, 2003. View at Scopus