About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 125087, 11 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/125087
Review Article

Silencing Sexually Transmitted Infections: Topical siRNA-Based Interventions for the Prevention of HIV and HSV

M.D./Ph.D. Program, Harvard Medical School, Program for Cellular & Molecular Medicine, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA 02111, USA

Received 24 July 2013; Accepted 25 November 2013; Published 12 January 2014

Academic Editor: Kevin Ault

Copyright © 2014 Lee Adam Wheeler. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

The global impact of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) is significant. The sexual transmission of viruses such as herpes simplex virus type-2 (HSV-2) and the human immunodeficiency virus type-1 (HIV-1), has been especially difficult to control. To date, no effective vaccines have been developed to prevent the transmission of these STIs. Although antiretroviral drugs have been remarkably successful in treating the symptoms associated with these viral infections, the feasibility of their widespread use for prevention purposes may be more limited. Microbicides might provide an attractive alternative option to reduce their spread. In particular, topically applied small inhibitory RNAs (siRNAs) have been shown to not only block transmission of viral STIs to mucosal tissues both in vitro and in vivo, but also confer durable knockdown of target gene expression, thereby circumventing the need to apply a microbicide around the time of sexual encounter, when compliance is mostly difficult. Despite numerous clinical trials currently testing the efficacy of siRNA-based therapeutics, they have yet to be approved for use in the treatment of viral STIs. While several obstacles to their successful implementation in the clinic still exist, promising preclinical studies suggest that siRNAs are a viable modality for the future prevention and treatment of HSV and HIV.

1. Clinical Context

Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) continue to be a major source of global morbidity and mortality [1]. Viral infections, notably herpes simplex virus type-2 (HSV-2) and the human immunodeficiency virus type-1 (HIV-1), have proven particularly problematic to control from both scientific and public health perspectives.

HSV-2, the most common cause of genital ulcers, is the most widespread viral sexually transmitted infection (STI) worldwide [2]. Prevalence is high; currently estimated to be ~15–25% of sexually active adults in the US and as high as 60–80% in some developing nations [25]. Rates of infection are even higher among women, owing to the greater efficiency of male-to-female (MTF) transmission [6, 7]. While multiple variables factor into the high prevalence rate at the population level, the fact that most sexual transmissions occur in the absence of clinically identifiable genital lesions likely plays a major role [8, 9]. While antiviral drugs have proven effective to reduce viral transmission [6, 8, 10], they are not curative. Furthermore, due to the high costs associated with population-wide screening and maintenance therapy, their utility as public health initiatives to reduce transmission is debatable [11]. This is especially true when more economical interventions, such as condoms, are known to be similarly effective for prevention purposes [12, 13]. Nonetheless, the numbers of infected individuals continues to rise underscoring the need for developing new modalities to reduce transmission and clear what are currently life-long infections.

Epidemiological analysis has established a link between the prevalence of HSV-2 and HIV-1 [3]. In fact, individuals infected with HSV are at greater risk of acquiring HIV after exposure, underscoring the fact that herpes infection is an important cofactor for HIV transmission [4, 1416]. While the prevalence of HIV-1 is much lower than that of HSV-2, the global burden of HIV is significant. An estimated 60 million people have been infected by the virus, and some 30 million people are currently living with HIV [17]. Research on HIV vaccine development began almost immediately after HIV was identified as the causative agent for AIDS [1821]. However, to date, no effective vaccines against HIV have been developed [2224]. Since 1996, there has been a dramatic decline in the clinical burden associated with HIV infection with the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), an approach predicated on the simultaneous pharmacological inhibition of multiple components of the viral life cycle [25, 26]. HAART has significantly reduced both the mortality and morbidity associated with HIV and it is now the standard of care for the treatment of HIV in both children and adults [2730]. Continued challenges to HIV control include drug resistance, poor compliance, and limited access, especially in the developing world [3143]. Importantly, due to the persistence of viral reservoirs in infected individuals, HAART cannot eliminate virus from the seroconverted host [4448].

Therefore, a combination of therapeutic and preventative approaches is needed to effectively manage the growing epidemic [49]. While preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has proven an effective approach to preventing transmission [50, 51], high cost, potential side effects, and possible development of drug resistance suggest that PrEP may be best suited to targeted use in only the highest-risk populations [52, 53]. That being said, given that 2.7 million people were newly infected with HIV in 2010 alone [54], the continued spread of the infection underscores the urgent need for the development of novel ways to prevent viral transmission.

An extensive body of knowledge and research that has accumulated over the past decades on viral transmission and pathogenesis, however HSV-2 and HIV-1 continue to present formidable scientific and public health challenges. Vaccines are often considered the gold standard for prevention of viral infection; but historically, vaccine strategies against viral STIs have proven ineffective [5561]. While more recent vaccine candidates against HIV-1 and HSV-2 have shown a modest protective effect, none have yet been FDA approved for use. In fact, the vaccine against the human papilloma virus (HPV) is the only vaccine currently available and approved for the prevention of a viral STI [6265]. While its cost is still prohibitive in most developing countries, it has proven highly effective against the primary strains of HPV known to cause both genital warts and cervical cancer. In the absence of an effective vaccine against HSV-2 and HIV-1, the global burden of disease, cost of treatment, and lack of cure all serve to highlight the need for research into alternative interventions to prevent the transmission of viral STIs.

2. STI Microbicides

One particularly attractive option is a topical microbicide, which could reduce sexual transmission of the virus at the mucosal site of entry [66, 67]. Several microbicidal compounds targeting HIV-1, HSV-2, and HPV are being assessed in clinical trials, and more are currently under investigation [68].

The earliest microbicide candidates were surfactants, such as nonoxynol-9 (N9), that showed antiretroviral activity against both HIV and HSV in vitro by disrupting the membrane coat of the virus [6971]. When applied intravaginally, however, N9 led to higher rates of HIV infection [7275]. Because this was most likely secondary to the inflammation it induces in the genital tract, further studies against both HIV and HSV were subsequently abandoned.

Over the past two decades of research in the field, multiple alternative vaginal microbicide strategies—ranging from acid buffering gels [76] to polyanionic inhibitors of virus entry [77]—have been tested both in vitro [78] and clinically [79] with little success. Most rectal formulations have been based on those models successful in preclinical trials for vaginal application and have met with a similar fate. To date, only one has demonstrated clinical efficacy, both against HIV and HSV-2 [80]: a vaginally applied 1% tenofovir gel, which was the first microbicide tested clinically that afforded study participants protection from viral transmission. While protection was only partial, CAPRISA004 served as the catalyst for further study on topical tenofovir gels, including those intended for rectal administration [81, 82]. While follow-up studies have failed to reproduce the partial protection observed in CAPRISA004 [83], post hoc data analysis suggests that this was due in large part to inadequate compliance of study subjects to the treatment regimen. The future of tenofovir gel as a preventative microbicide remains unclear, but this first success story in the decade-long history of research in microbicide development has galvanized interest in working toward designing a viable topical microbicide to prevent the sexual transmission of HSV and HIV.

3. The RNAi Revolution

RNA interference (RNAi) is a cost-effective means of suppressing the expression of virtually any gene in a sequence specific manner [84, 85]. The field began early in the 1990s, with the discovery that small RNA molecules had the ability to regulate developmental timing in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans and trans gene expression in plants [8688]. Nonetheless, it was the seminal discovery by Fire and colleagues in 1998 that conclusively demonstrated how these RNAs could be used to modulate gene expression [85]. The term RNA interference, or RNAi, came to refer to the process of introducing small dsRNA, termed small inhibitory RNAs (siRNAs), to silence gene expression in a sequence specific manner. When it was later demonstrated to function similarly in mammalian cells, we came to understand it as well-conserved endogenous gene regulatory mechanism that could be harnessed as an experimental tool for the analysis of gene function. In so doing, it also opened the door for the development of novel therapeutic approaches for multiple diseases, including viral pathogens (e.g., HIV-1 [8993], respiratory syncytial virus [RSV] [94], and herpes simplex virus-2 [95, 96]), inflammatory disorders [97100], and a variety of cancers [101, 102].

Therapeutically relevant siRNAs can be introduced to the endogenous RNAi pathway at various stages (Figure 1). For example, siRNAs can be derived from short hairpin sequences (shRNAs) introduced to the host genome by viral vectors [103], which follow much the same processing pathways as endogenous microRNAs (miRNAs). After transcription, shRNAs are cleaved in the nucleus by the RNAse III Drosha, after which time they are exported into the cytoplasm via exportin-5, and processed by Dicer into siRNAs [104]. Synthetic siRNAs, introduced exogenously to the cytoplasm, bypass much of the host RNAi machinery, converging at the point of Dicer-mediated processing [84].

125087.fig.001
Figure 1: Cellular machinery for RNAi-mediated gene silencing. (a) miRNA-mediated gene silencing. miRNAs (endogenous) and shRNAs (exogenous—lentiviral vectors) are expressed from Pol II-derived primary transcripts (pri-miRNA/pri-shRNA). The pri-miRNA/shRNA is cleaved by Drosha, an RNase III-type enzyme, producing the precursor miRNA/shRNA (pre-miRNA/shRNA), which is exported into the cytoplasm by exportin-5. Once in the cytoplasm, the loop of the pre-miRNA is cleaved off by Dicer, producing the transiently double-stranded miRNA, which is taken up by the miRNA-containing RISC (miRISC). The passenger strand rapidly dissociates, leaving the single-stranded mature miRNA to guide the sequence-specific inhibition of translation or cleavage of the target mRNA. shRNA is processed in a similar way but has been introduced to the host genome exogenously, often by lentiviral vector. (b) siRNAs, 19–21 nucleotide duplexes, are processed by Dicer to generate 2-3 nucleotide overhangs at their 3′ ends and phosphate groups on their 5′ termini., thereby activating the siRNAs. Active siRNAs are then incorporated into the RISC. The passenger strand of the duplexed siRNA is cleaved and released from the complex, leaving the single-stranded guide strand to direct RISC to the complimentary site on the target mRNA. Ago2 catalyzes the cleavage of target mRNA in trans, and the cleaved mRNA is released and the active strand containing RISC can direct the cleavage of additional target mRNAs. Ago: argonaute; RISC: RNA-induced silencing complex. Figure is adapted from [105].

Both siRNAs and miRNAs that are produced by Dicer act as effector molecules that, through their association with the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC), guide the sequence-specific inhibition of gene expression. The critical component of RISC is an argonaute (Ago) protein that not only provides the siRNA/miRNA binding site, but also contains the endonucleolytic domain that cleaves complementary mRNA targets.

While, structurally, the siRNA/miRNA strands are symmetric, functionally, they are not equivalent [106]. The strand exhibiting the lower thermodynamic stability upon biding to RISC predominates as the active (antisense) strand used to guide the silencing of target mRNA expression, while the inactive (sense) strand is either cleaved or released from the complex [107]. Strand bias is a critical feature in siRNA design, since it determines target specificity. Most perfectly complimentary sequences (like most siRNAs) allow for site-specific cleavage of the target mRNAs by argonaute 2, an RNAse III enzyme, at predictable and verifiable locations, namely, distal to the 10th nucleotide from the 5′-end of the guide strand [104, 108]. Cleaved target mRNA is subsequently released from the complex and degraded, allowing for the activated RISC to effect subsequent rounds of cleavage. Originally, imperfectly complimentary sequences (like some miRNAs) were thought to only block downstream translation of mRNA strands [109]. Recent evidence suggests that some target cleavage does indeed occur [110, 111], however more robust target gene silencing is observed with perfectly homologous sequences and, thus, will be the focus of this review.

4. Antiviral Activity of RNAi

Soon after RNAi was shown to operate in mammalian cells, several groups demonstrated that small inhibitory RNAs (siRNAs) could be used to interfere with both of the transmission and replication of HIV-1, HSV-2, and HPV in vitro and in vivo [112, 113]. For HIV infection, siRNAs can inhibit viral replication in vitro by either directly targeting sequences of viral gene products [105, 114117] or silencing essential host factors (EHFs) [118], such as the HIV receptor CD4 [89] or the CCR5 coreceptor [92] required for productive infection (Figure 2). For antiviral siRNAs, targeting a single conserved HIV-1 sequence is able to inhibit primary isolates from all viral clades [90]. Accordingly, a judicious selection of siRNAs directed against highly conserved viral gene products might allow for the simultaneous inhibition of diverse strains of HIV present throughout the world. Similar approaches have been validated for HSV-2 infection, where siRNAs directed against the nectin-1 cell surface receptor required for viral entry, and viral gene products UL27/UL29 essential to the viral life cycle, effectively inhibit replication. Importantly, the inhibitory effect is more pronounced when targeting both host and pathogen gene products, suggesting that synergistic effects could play an important role.

125087.fig.002
Figure 2: siRNAs directed against either conserved HIV-1 sequences or essential host factors (EHFs) could impair HIV-1 replication at various points in the viral life cycle.Although the incoming viral RNA is protected from siRNA-mediated degradation by its association with the preintegration complex (PIC) [119], it is possible to interfere with EHFs required for viral entry or integration by targeting its receptor CD4, its coreceptor, or factors required for entry into the nucleus such as transportin-3. Targeting conserved HIV-1 sequences can also inhibit progeny virus formation by cleaving HIV-1 transcripts such as gag and pol, expressed by the integrated proviral DNA. Figure is adapted from [105].

Early approaches focused primarily on systemic delivery. While this delivery method has potential utility for postinfection therapeutics, systemic administration is unlikely to prevent infection at the site of entry. The proof of principle that topically-applied siRNAs are taken up and effect gene silencing at the mucosa was first shown using a model of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection [94, 120, 121], confirming that siRNA-mediated protection from viral infection is in fact possible in mucosal tissues.

Establishing stable viral resistance in the genital tract to prevent sexual transmission of viruses may be possible based on recent studies of other sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Using a mouse model of herpes infection, intravaginal (IVAG) application of siRNAs targeting HSV-2-encoded genes and/or its cellular receptor, nectin-1, inhibited sexual transmission of HSV-2 for more than one week [95, 96]. Similarly, siRNAs against the CCR5 coreceptor and viral gene products gag and vif have demonstrated protection from vaginal infection in a newly developed small animal model for HIV infection [122, 123].

To address the considerable problem of patient compliance faced by most microbicidal intervention strategies, ensuring durable gene silencing is critical, since lasting knockdown would likely circumvent the need to apply the microbicide prior to each sexual encounter [124]. Two approaches to date have proven effective in this regard. Conjugation of siRNAs to cholesterol moieties prolonged half-life in the vaginal mucosa of mice challenged with HSV-2, maintaining protection even when viral challenge is delayed [96]. For HIV, similar approaches were not possible since the immune cells HIV infects are refractory to transfection with cholesterol conjugated siRNAs. While siRNAs directed against CCR5 were known to effectively silence target gene expression in vitro and prevent viral replication in primary macrophages when challenge is delayed for up to 3 weeks [89], only recently was testing possible in an in vivo model. Using CD4 aptamers as targeting vehicles, siRNAs against CCR5 were shown to protect from vaginal transmission of the virus when applied 4-5 days prior to viral challenge, and inhibition of viral replication was observed when applied up to one week prior to challenge [122]. While additional testing will be required to confirm these preliminary studies, these data suggest that repeated siRNA applications may have an additive effect. In other words, they may confer durable protection from STIs such as HIV when applied every few days, thereby obviating the need for application just prior to sexual encounters, when compliance is most difficult.

5. RNAi Therapeutics: The Challenge of Delivery

Despite the potential promise of antiviral siRNAs for therapy or prevention, the primary obstacle to their widespread clinical application has been delivery; more specifically, finding an efficient means of shuttling exogenous siRNAs across the plasma membrane [112]. Over the years, several techniques have been employed to successfully deliver siRNAs to cells for gene knockdown, including cationic lipids, lentiviral vectors, and conjugation to other molecules such as PEG or cholesterol [125132]. While these approaches successfully overcome the first barrier to effective siRNA delivery, that is, the plasma membrane, they typically fail to target siRNAs to the cells of interest; that is, they lack cell specificity.

Targeted siRNA delivery may not be essential for all potential clinical applications. Nonetheless, targeting siRNA therapeutics to a specific subset of cells or tissue types may have some significant advantages relative to non-specific administration. In particular, it would minimize non-specific effects and toxicity in bystander cells; and, perhaps more importantly, it would reduce the dose required for therapeutic silencing in the cells and tissues of relevance. For viral STIs, targeted delivery has not been necessary for inhibiting HSV-2. When applied topically to the genital mucosa, the epithelial cells HSV-2 infects readily endocytose both naked and cholesterol conjugated siRNAs, which effect target gene silencing after uptake. HIV has been proven more difficult to prevent in a similar way, primarily because the CD4+ immune cells HIV infects are particularly refractory to most traditional methods of transfection [89, 92]. As a result, siRNA-based interventions have had to overcome the obstacle of in vivo transduction of CD4+ cells.

Targeted delivery has become possible in recent years using bifunctional fusion proteins, which couple a targeting antibody fragment (Ab) to an RNA binding motif, such as protamine. Using Fabs recognizing cell surface receptors, such as the lymphocyte function-associated antigen (LFA-1) [98] or the HIV glycoprotein gp120 [93], functional siRNAs have been effectively delivered to relevant cell types, even in vivo [91]. Despite these promising results, critics of the antibody-based approach cite difficulties with synthesis, high manufacturing and storage costs, chemical instability, and potential immunogenicity as important limitations for widespread use. Given that HIV-1 and HSV-2 are most prevalent in the developing world and given the economic and storage requirements, they may not be ideally suited for use as preventative microbicides, especially in resource poor settings.

More recently, small structured oligonucleotides, called aptamers, provide a promising alternative option for siRNA delivery. Aptamers can be efficiently and economically synthesized in large scale, and they are amenable to multiple chemical modifications. Moreover, because they are rarely immunogenic, aptamers are ideally suited for therapeutic applications like topical microbicides, which may require repeated administration. Synthesized from randomized oligonucleotide libraries, aptamers are in vitro selected for their ability to bind a desired ligand with high affinity. They have been used in several disease models [133], including HIV, primarily for their receptor-blocking properties [134, 135].

Aptamers were recently demonstrated as potential delivery vehicles for siRNA. Using a ligand-targeting aptamer fused at its 3′-end to an siRNA duplex, these aptamer-siRNA chimeras (AsiCs) were first used to transfect and silence gene expression in prostate cancer cells both in vitro [136] and in vivo [137] using a prostate-membrane specific antigen (PSMA) aptamer. AsiCs, constructed using a gp120-targeting aptamer, were tested in vitro and, more recently, in vivo [138140] and reduced viral replication in infected hosts. A second strategy using CD4-targeting aptamers has also demonstrated effectiveness by both inhibiting HIV replication and blocking transmission of the virus in vivo [122, 123]. Merging both approaches would likely be even more effective, by coupling a method to prevent de novo infection in CD4+ cells susceptible to HIV infection with another that effectively inhibits viral replication in the small number of cells that may become infected with HIV, the virus after exposure. Combinatorial approaches, known to be highly effective against viruses such as HIV given past experience with HAART, capitalize on the aptamer’s ability to block HIV entry at CD4, as well as specifically to deliver siRNAs that inhibit factors required for both viral transmission and replication.

6. Future Prospects

From its first discovery, less than 20 years ago, the field of RNA interference has evolved at a rapid pace. The potential to silence the expression of virtually any gene product has found applications outside of the lab and has now been successfully applied to the treatment and prevention of several diseases, including viral STIs. Despite these successes, a number of challenges remain for the effective application of RNAi-based approaches in the fight against HIV and HSV. The brisk development of technological innovations in the field has in many ways outpaced our understanding of basic biology of RNAi. As we better understand the underlying biochemical pathways, we can improve the design, the effectiveness, and the side effect profile of these reagents to maximize their therapeutic index. Furthermore, for both therapeutic and preventative purposes, multiple applications over long periods of time may be required. While largely dependent on patient-specific factors such as burden of disease and risk of exposure, this underscores the need for further studies investigating the effects of repetitive administration and long-term use.

The most well-developed therapeutic approaches using siRNA have used localized delivery to easily accessible organs and tissues, including treatment of the eye for age-related macular degeneration or the treatment of lungs for RSV infection [105]. While HSV-2 appears to be effectively controlled with similar tissue-based applications, HIV-1 poses a more difficult challenge. Because it infects multiple cell types that are spread throughout the body, utilizing new modalities (antibodies, aptamers, etc.) to deliver functionally active siRNAs to specific CD4+ target cells will likely be required for future siRNA-based approaches to be effective. Irrespective of the specific delivery mechanism used, the combination of multiple siRNAs targeting either multiple conserved sites on the HIV-1 genome or viral and host factors will undoubtedly minimize the potential for viral escape mutations and, thus, be the most effective strategy. While targeting new host factors implicated in disease pathogenesis could prove useful to identifying new ways to prevent viral transmission, care must be taken in selecting such targets to minimize off-target effects.

While the mouse model has been indispensible for studying topical siRNA-based interventions for both HSV-2 [95, 96] and HIV-1 [122, 123, 141, 142], translating these results into safe and cost-effective therapies for clinical use in humans remains a significant challenge. Nonhuman primate (NHP) models have traditionally been used to bridge the gap between small animal models and clinical trials, especially in STI research; however, meaningful differences between NHP and patient populations do exist. In particular, off-target effects can manifest themselves in vastly different ways from one species to the next and can, during preliminary clinical trials, derail what had been a very promising drug candidate in preclinical studies. Safety concerns are not limited to animal models, however, as the recent termination of the phase III trial targeting macular degeneration using VEGF-specific siRNAs has highlighted [143]. Along with other studies, this has underscored potential bias introduced by nonspecific effects and reinforced the need to rigorously demonstrate siRNA-mediated mechanisms of action at every stage of development. In the case of RNAi-based therapeutics, this becomes especially important when specific chemical modifications have been made or new moieties have been conjugated to siRNA strands for targeting, stability, or other purposes [131, 144, 145].

Given that RNAi-based therapeutics are predicated on the introduction of exogenous RNA to the cytoplasm, it is perhaps not surprising that some reports have found that siRNAs can trigger a type I interferon (IFN) response. Triggering toll-like receptors that recognize intracellular nucleic acids activates a nonspecific immune response that generally blunts knockdown of target genes and produces unwanted side effects [146148]. While, in certain circumstances, a nonspecific IFN response can enhance the observed therapeutic effect [149, 150], generally, strategies focus on minimizing these off-target effects. To date, substitutions such as 2′-OMe linkages [151], modified DNA/RNA bases [152, 153], and design enhancements to improve the chemical stability of the siRNA moiety [154] have been employed with some success. Nonetheless, reports exist in which modifications of this type did not blunt the innate immune response [155], suggesting that alternative approaches to “mask” siRNAs from TLR recognition would be required [131, 156].

Overexpression of small RNAs can also be problematic. Typically associated with lentiviral shRNA constructs, overexpression can result in saturation of the endogenous RNAi machinery, perturbations of normal miRNA function [157], and even fatal brain toxicity in small animal models [158]. While using siRNAs instead of shRNAs can circumvent these adverse outcomes [159], high concentrations of siRNAs have similar detrimental effects [157]. This underscores the need to improve the potency of siRNA-based constructs while minimizing potential off-target effects. While biochemical and structural modifications have been used to improve potency with some success [151, 152, 160, 161], combinatorial approaches to target gene silencing have also proven useful to reduce the effective concentration of siRNA required for therapeutic effect. Combinatorial approaches do increase competition for RISC loading [94, 162] and thus may result in impaired silencing of one or more target genes depending on factors such as relative chemical stability and affinity for the RISC.

Given the increasing incidence of worldwide infections with both HIV-1 and HSV-2, developing new ways to prevent transmission is essential. Topically applied siRNAs have been shown to not only block transmission of the virus to tissue both in vitro and in vivo but also confer durable knockdown of target gene expression [95, 96, 122, 123, 163]. Patient compliance will determine the success of any therapeutic intervention, including a topical microbicide, as recent clinical trials testing the efficacy of tenofovir-based gels have demonstrated [80, 83]. These findings underscore the importance of developing interventions and dosing schedules that are not too burdensome to the user, in order to facilitate adherence. Agents that confer durable protection might circumvent the need to apply a microbicide around the time of sexual encounter, when compliance is most difficult [79, 124]. In some cases then, RNAi—which has already been shown to knock down multiple target genes in various disease models for several weeks at a time both in vitro and in vivo [92, 95, 96, 99, 105]—may be an ideal choice. Despite numerous clinical trials currently underway to evaluate the efficacy of RNAi-based therapeutics [164], they have yet to be approved for use in the treatment of viral STIs. While several obstacles to their successful implementation in the clinic still exist, reassuring data highlights the future promise of RNAi as a viable modality for the prevention and treatment of HIV and HSV.

Conflict of Interests

The author declares no conflict of interests.

Acknowledgments

My research was supported by the Harvard Medical School M.D.-Ph.D. Program, the Lieberman Lab, the Immune Disease Institute, and Boston Children’s Hospital, as well as funding from the Adelstein, Ryan, Cancer Research Institute, and Point Foundation Fellowships. I would like to thank Judy Lieberman and Derek Dykxhoorn for their guidance and leadership and my colleagues for reading the paper and assisting in its preparation.

References

  1. R. J. Whitley, Field’s Virology, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 2001.
  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , “Seroprevalence of herpes simplex virus type 2 among persons aged 14–49 years—United States, 2005–2008,” Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, vol. 59, pp. 456–459, 2010.
  3. H. Weiss, “Epidemiology of herpes simplex virus type 2 infection in the developing world,” Herpes, vol. 11, supplement 1, pp. 24A–35A, 2004. View at Scopus
  4. L. Corey, A. Wald, C. L. Celum, and T. C. Quinn, “The effects of herpes simplex virus-2 on HIV-1 acquisition and transmission: a review of two overlapping epidemics,” Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 435–445, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. D. M. Koelle and A. Wald, “Herpes simplex virus: the importance of asymptomatic shedding,” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, vol. 45, supplement 3, pp. 1–8, 2000. View at Scopus
  6. L. Corey, A. Wald, R. Patel et al., “Once-daily valacyclovir to reduce the risk of transmission of genital herpes,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 350, no. 1, pp. 11–20, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. L. R. Stanberry, S. L. Spruance, A. L. Cunningham et al., “Glycoprotein-D-adjuvant vaccine to prevent genital herpes,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 347, no. 21, pp. 1652–1661, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. R. Gupta, A. Wald, E. Krantz et al., “Valacyclovir and acyclovir for suppression of shedding of herpes simplex virus in the genital tract,” Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 190, no. 8, pp. 1374–1381, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. G. J. Mertz, O. Schmidt, and J. L. Jourden, “Frequency of acquisition of first-episode genital infection with herpes simplex virus from symptomatic and asymptomatic source contacts,” Sexually Transmitted Diseases, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 33–39, 1985. View at Scopus
  10. A. Wald, D. Carrell, M. Remington, E. Kexel, J. Zeh, and L. Corey, “Two-day regimen of acyclovir for treatment of recurrent genital herpes simplex virus type 2 infection,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 944–948, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. P. E. Bonnar, “Suppressive valacyclovir therapy to reduce genital herpes transmission: good public health policy?” McGill Journal of Medicine, vol. 12, pp. 39–46, 2009.
  12. C. Casper and A. Wald, “Condom use and the prevention of genital herpes acquisition,” Herpes, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 10–14, 2002. View at Scopus
  13. A. Wald, A. G. M. Langenberg, K. Link et al., “Effect of condoms on reducing the transmission of herpes simplex virus type 2 from men to women,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 285, no. 24, pp. 3100–3106, 2001. View at Scopus
  14. D. Serwadda, R. H. Gray, N. K. Sewankambo et al., “Human immunodeficiency virus acquisition associated with genital ulcer disease and herpes simplex virus type 2 infection: a nested case-control study in Rakai, Uganda,” Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 188, no. 10, pp. 1492–1497, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. A. Wald and K. Link, “Risk of human immunodeficiency virus infection in herpes simplex virus type 2-seropositive persons: a meta-analysis,” Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 185, no. 1, pp. 45–52, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. E. E. Freeman, H. A. Weiss, J. R. Glynn, P. L. Cross, J. A. Whitworth, and R. J. Hayes, “Herpes simplex virus 2 infection increases HIV acquisition in men and women: systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies,” AIDS, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 73–83, 2006. View at Scopus
  17. UNAIDS, Report on the Global HIV/AIDS Epidemic 2008: Executive Summary, UNAIDS, Geneva, Switzerland, 2008.
  18. M. S. Hirsch and J. C. Kaplan, “Prospects of therapy for infections with human T-lymphotropic virus type III,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 103, no. 5, pp. 750–755, 1985. View at Scopus
  19. T. Beardsley, “AIDS progress. Synthetic vaccine only a distant prospect,” Nature, vol. 314, no. 6013, p. 659, 1985. View at Scopus
  20. P. S. Sarma, K. J. Cremer, and J. Gruber, “Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome: progress and prospects for vaccine development,” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 80, no. 15, pp. 1193–1197, 1988. View at Scopus
  21. W. C. Koff and D. F. Hoth, “Development and testing of AIDS vaccines,” Science, vol. 241, no. 4864, pp. 426–432, 1988. View at Scopus
  22. H. W. Virgin and B. D. Walker, “Immunology and the elusive AIDS vaccine,” Nature, vol. 464, no. 7286, pp. 224–231, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. B. D. Walker and D. R. Burton, “Toward an AIDS vaccine,” Science, vol. 320, no. 5877, pp. 760–764, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. S. W. Lagakos and A. R. Gable, “Challenges to HIV prevention—seeking effective measures in the absence of a vaccine,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 358, no. 15, pp. 1543–1545, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. E. L. Murphy, A. C. Collier, L. A. Kalish et al., “Highly active antiretroviral therapy decreases mortality and morbidity in patients with advanced HIV disease,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 135, no. 1, pp. 17–26, 2001. View at Scopus
  26. V. Simon and D. D. Ho, “HIV-1 dynamics in vivo: implications for therapy,” Nature reviews. Microbiology, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 181–190, 2003. View at Scopus
  27. R. S. Hogg, K. V. Heath, B. Yip et al., “Improved survival among HIV-infected individuals following initiation of antiretroviral therapy,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 279, no. 6, pp. 450–454, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. F. J. Palella Jr., K. M. Delaney, A. C. Moorman et al., “Declining morbidity and mortality among patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus infection,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 338, no. 13, pp. 853–860, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. D. C. Watson and J. J. Farley, “Efficacy of and adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy in children infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1,” Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 682–689, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. M. de Martino, P.-A. Tovo, M. Balducci et al., “Reduction in mortality with availability of antiretroviral therapy for children with perinatal HIV-1 infection,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 284, no. 2, pp. 190–197, 2000. View at Scopus
  31. T.-W. Chun, L. Carruth, D. Finzi et al., “Quantification of latent tissue reservoirs and total body viral load in HIV-1 infection,” Nature, vol. 387, no. 6629, pp. 183–188, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. V. Giacomet, F. Albano, F. Starace et al., “Adherence to antiretroviral therapy and its determinants in children with human immunodeficiency virus infection: a multicentre, national study,” Acta Paediatrica, vol. 92, no. 12, pp. 1398–1402, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. M. P. Carrieri, F. Raffi, C. Lewden et al., “Impact of early versus late adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy on immuno-virological response: a 3-year follow-up study,” Antiviral Therapy, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 585–594, 2003. View at Scopus
  34. D. L. Paterson, S. Swindells, J. Mohr et al., “Adherence to protease inhibitor therapy and outcomes in patients with HIV infection,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 133, no. 1, pp. 21–30, 2000. View at Scopus
  35. J. A. Epping-Jordan, R. Bengoa, R. Kawar, and E. Sabaté, “The challenge of chronic conditions: WHO responds,” British Medical Journal, vol. 323, no. 7319, pp. 947–948, 2001. View at Scopus
  36. E. Wood, R. S. Hogg, B. Yip, P. R. Harrigan, M. V. O'Shaughnessy, and J. S. G. Montaner, “Effect of medication adherence on survival of HIV-infected adults who start highly active antiretroviral therapy when the CD4+ cell count is 0.200 to 0.350 x 10(9) cells/L,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 139, no. 10, pp. 810–816, 2003. View at Scopus
  37. I. Lanièce, M. Ciss, A. Desclaux et al., “Adherence to HAART and its principal determinants in a cohort of Senegalese adults,” AIDS, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. S103–S108, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. L. Weiss, T. French, R. Finkelstein, M. Waters, R. Mukherjee, and B. Agins, “HIV-related knowledge and adherence to HAART,” AIDS Care, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 673–679, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. D. A. Murphy, M. Sarr, S. J. Durako, A.-B. Moscicki, C. M. Wilson, and L. R. Muenz, “Barriers to HAART adherence among human immunodeficiency virus—infected adolescents,” Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, vol. 157, no. 3, pp. 249–255, 2003. View at Scopus
  40. B. S. Peters and K. Conway, “Therapy for HIV: past, present, and future,” Advances in Dental Research, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 23–27, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. A. Krüsi, E. Wood, J. Montaner, and T. Kerr, “Social and structural determinants of HAART access and adherence among injection drug users,” International Journal of Drug Policy, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 4–9, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. F. Orsi and C. D'Almeida, “Soaring antiretroviral prices, TRIPS and TRIPS flexibilities: a burning issue for antiretroviral treatment scale-up in developing countries,” Current Opinion in HIV and AIDS, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 237–241, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. V. Simon, J. Vanderhoeven, A. Hurley et al., “Evolving patterns of HIV-1 resistance to antiretroviral agents in newly infected individuals,” AIDS, vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 1511–1519, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. D. Finzi, M. Hermankova, T. Pierson et al., “Identification of a reservoir for HIV-1 in patients on highly active antiretroviral therapy,” Science, vol. 278, no. 5341, pp. 1295–1300, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. L. Zhang, B. Ramratnam, K. Tenner-Racz et al., “Quantifying residual HIV-1 replication in patients receiving combination antiretroviral therapy,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 340, no. 21, pp. 1605–1613, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. O. Turriziani, M. Andreoni, and G. Antonelli, “Resistant viral variants in cellular reservoirs of human immunodeficiency virus infection,” Clinical Microbiology and Infection, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 1518–1524, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. D. D. Ho and L. Zhang, “HIV-1 rebound after anti-retroviral therapy,” Nature Medicine, vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 736–737, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. B. Ramratnam, J. E. Mittler, L. Zhang et al., “The decay of the latent reservoir of replication-competent HIV-1 is inversely correlated with the extent of residual viral replication during prolonged anti-retroviral therapy,” Nature Medicine, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 82–85, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. F. Hladik and G. F. Doncel, “Preventing mucosal HIV transmission with topical microbicides: challenges and opportunities,” Antiviral Research, vol. 88, supplement 1, pp. S3–S9, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. N. S. Padian, A. Buvé, J. Balkus, D. Serwadda, and W. Cates Jr., “Biomedical interventions to prevent HIV infection: evidence, challenges, and way forward,” The Lancet, vol. 372, no. 9638, pp. 585–599, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. L. A. Paxton, T. Hope, and H. W. Jaffe, “Pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV infection: what if it works?” The Lancet, vol. 370, no. 9581, pp. 89–93, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. K. Underhill, D. Operario, M. J. Mimiaga, M. R. Skeer, and K. H. Mayer, “Implementation science of pre-exposure prophylaxis: preparing for public Use,” Current HIV/AIDS Reports, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 210–219, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. A. K. Sethi, D. D. Celentano, S. J. Gange, R. D. Moore, and J. E. Gallant, “Association between adherence to antiretroviral therapy and human immunodeficiency virus drug resistance,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 1112–1118, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. UNAIDS, “World AIDS day report 2011,” in World AIDS Day Report, UNAIDS, Geneva, Switzerland, 2011.
  55. M. J. McElrath, S. C. de Rosa, Z. Moodie et al., “HIV-1 vaccine-induced immunity in the test-of-concept step study: a case-cohort analysis,” The Lancet, vol. 372, no. 9653, pp. 1894–1905, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. S. P. Buchbinder, D. V. Mehrotra, A. Duerr et al., “Efficacy assessment of a cell-mediated immunity HIV-1 vaccine (the step study): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, test-of-concept trial,” The Lancet, vol. 372, no. 9653, pp. 1881–1893, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. J. Cohen, “Beyond thailand: making sense of a qualified AIDS vaccine ‘success’,” Science, vol. 326, no. 5953, pp. 652–653, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. N. Karasavvas, E. Billings, M. Rao et al., “The Thai Phase III HIV Type 1 Vaccine trial (RV144) regimen induces antibodies that target conserved regions within the V2 loop of gp120,” AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses, vol. 28, pp. 1444–1457, 2012.
  59. A. Sabchareon, D. Wallace, C. Sirivichayakul et al., “Protective efficacy of the recombinant, live-attenuated, CYD tetravalent dengue vaccine in Thai schoolchildren: a randomised, controlled phase 2b trial,” The Lancet, vol. 380, pp. 1559–1567, 2012.
  60. T. Dudek and D. M. Knipe, “Replication-defective viruses as vaccines and vaccine vectors,” Virology, vol. 344, no. 1, pp. 230–239, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. Y. Hoshino, S. K. Dalai, K. Wang et al., “Comparative efficacy and immunogenicity of replication-defective, recombinant glycoprotein, and DNA vaccines for herpes simplex virus 2 infections in mice and guinea pigs,” Journal of Virology, vol. 79, pp. 410–418, 2005.
  62. J. T. Bryan, “Developing an HPV vaccine to prevent cervical cancer and genital warts,” Vaccine, vol. 25, no. 16, pp. 3001–3006, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. R. K. Zimmerman, “HPV vaccine and its recommendations, 2007,” Journal of Family Practice, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. S1–S5, 2007. View at Scopus
  64. E. A. Joura, S. Leodolter, M. Hernandez-Avila et al., “Efficacy of a quadrivalent prophylactic human papillomavirus (types 6, 11, 16, and 18) L1 virus-like-particle vaccine against high-grade vulval and vaginal lesions: a combined analysis of three randomised clinical trials,” The Lancet, vol. 369, no. 9574, pp. 1693–1702, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. S. M. Garland, M. Hernandez-Avila, C. M. Wheeler et al., “Quadrivalent vaccine against human papillomavirus to prevent anogenital diseases,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 356, no. 19, pp. 1928–1943, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. L. R. Minces and I. McGowan, “Advances in the development of microbicides for the prevention of HIV infection,” Current Infectious Disease Reports, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 56–62, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. J. M. Lange, M. Karam, and P. Piot, “Boost for vaginal microbicides against HIV,” The Lancet, vol. 342, no. 8883, p. 1356, 1993. View at Scopus
  68. D. S. Nikolic, E. Garcia, and V. Piguet, “Microbicides and other topical agents in the prevention of HIV and sexually transmitted infections,” Expert Review of Anti-Infective Therapy, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 77–88, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. A. S. Bourinbaiar and E. C. Fruhstorfer, “The efficacy of nonoxynol-9 from an in vitro point of view,” AIDS, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 558–559, 1996. View at Scopus
  70. M. Malkovsky, A. Newell, and A. G. Dalgleish, “Inactivation of HIV by nonoxynol-9,” The Lancet, vol. 1, no. 8586, p. 645, 1988. View at Scopus
  71. B. C. Herold, R. Kirkpatrick, D. Marcellino et al., “Bile salts: natural detergents for the prevention of sexually transmitted diseases,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 745–751, 1999. View at Scopus
  72. M. K. Stafford, H. Ward, A. Flanagan et al., “Safety study of nonoxynol-9 as a vaginal microbicide: evidence of adverse effects,” Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes and Human Retrovirology, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 327–331, 1998. View at Scopus
  73. R. E. Roddy, L. Zekeng, K. A. Ryan, U. Tamoufé, S. S. Weir, and E. L. Wong, “A controlled trial of nonoxynol 9 film to reduce male-to-female transmission of sexually transmitted diseases,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 339, no. 8, pp. 504–510, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. L. van Damme, G. Ramjee, M. Alary et al., “Effectiveness of COL-1492, a nonoxynol-9 vaginal gel, on HIV-1 transmission in female sex workers: a randomised controlled trial,” The Lancet, vol. 360, no. 9338, pp. 971–977, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. S. L. Hillier, T. Moench, R. Shattock, R. Black, P. Reichelderfer, and F. Veronese, “In vitro and in vivo: the story of nonoxynol 9,” Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. K. H. Mayer, J. Peipert, T. Fleming et al., “Safety and tolerability of BufferGel, a novel vaginal microbicide, in women in the United States,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 476–482, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. L. van Damme, R. Govinden, F. M. Mirembe et al., “Lack of effectiveness of cellulose sulfate gel for the prevention of vaginal HIV transmission,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 359, no. 5, pp. 463–472, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  78. M. J. Keller, A. Tuyama, M. J. Carlucci, and B. C. Herold, “Topical microbicides for the prevention of genital herpes infection,” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 420–423, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  79. I. McGowan, “Microbicides for HIV prevention: reality or hope?” Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 26–31, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  80. Q. A. Karim, S. S. A. Karim, J. A. Frohlich et al., “Effectiveness and safety of tenofovir gel, an antiretroviral microbicide, for the prevention of HIV infection in women,” Science, vol. 329, no. 5996, pp. 1168–1174, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  81. I. McGowan, “Rectal microbicide development,” Current Opinion in HIV and AIDS, vol. 7, pp. 526–533, 2012.
  82. P. A. Anton, R. D. Cranston, A. Kashuba et al., “RMP-02/MTN-006: a phase 1 rectal safety, acceptability, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic study of tenofovir 1% gel compared with oral tenofovir disoproxil fumarate,” AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses, vol. 28, pp. 1412–1421, 2012.
  83. C. Celum and J. M. Baeten, “Tenofovir-based pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention: evolving evidence,” Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 51–57, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  84. S. M. Elbashir, J. Harborth, W. Lendeckel, A. Yalcin, K. Weber, and T. Tuschl, “Duplexes of 21-nucleotide RNAs mediate RNA interference in cultured mammalian cells,” Nature, vol. 411, no. 6836, pp. 494–498, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  85. A. Fire, S. Xu, M. K. Montgomery, S. A. Kostas, S. E. Driver, and C. C. Mello, “Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in caenorhabditis elegans,” Nature, vol. 391, no. 6669, pp. 806–811, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  86. R. Jorgensen, “Altered gene expression in plants due to trans interactions between homologous genes,” Trends in Biotechnology, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 340–344, 1990. View at Scopus
  87. B. Wightman, I. Ha, and G. Ruvkun, “Posttranscriptional regulation of the heterochronic gene lin-14 by lin-4 mediates temporal pattern formation in C. elegans,” Cell, vol. 75, no. 5, pp. 855–862, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  88. R. C. Lee, R. L. Feinbaum, and V. Ambros, “The C. elegans heterochronic gene lin-4 encodes small RNAs with antisense complementarity to lin-14,” Cell, vol. 75, no. 5, pp. 843–854, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  89. C. D. Novina, M. F. Murray, D. M. Dykxhoorn et al., “siRNA-directed inhibition of HIV-1 infection,” Nature Medicine, vol. 8, pp. 681–686, 2002.
  90. S.-K. Lee, D. M. Dykxhoorn, P. Kumar et al., “Lentiviral delivery of short hairpin RNAs protects CD4 T cells from multiple clades and primary isolates of HIV,” Blood, vol. 106, no. 3, pp. 818–826, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  91. P. Kumar, H.-S. Ban, S.-S. Kim et al., “T cell-specific siRNA delivery suppresses HIV-1 infection in humanized mice,” Cell, vol. 134, no. 4, pp. 577–586, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  92. E. Song, S.-K. Lee, D. M. Dykxhoorn et al., “Sustained small interfering RNA-mediated human immunodeficiency virus type 1 inhibition in primary macrophages,” Journal of Virology, vol. 77, no. 13, pp. 7174–7181, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  93. E. Song, P. Zhu, S.-K. Lee et al., “Antibody mediated in vivo delivery of small interfering RNAs via cell-surface receptors,” Nature Biotechnology, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 709–717, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  94. V. Bitko, A. Musiyenko, O. Shulyayeva, and S. Barik, “Inhibition of respiratory viruses by nasally administered siRNA,” Nature Medicine, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 50–55, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  95. D. Palliser, D. Chowdhury, Q.-Y. Wang et al., “An siRNA-based microbicide protects mice from lethal herpes simplex virus 2 infection,” Nature, vol. 439, no. 7072, pp. 89–94, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  96. Y. Wu, F. Navarro, A. Lal et al., “Durable protection from herpes simplex virus-2 transmission following intravaginal application of siRNAs targeting both a viral and host gene,” Cell Host and Microbe, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 84–94, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  97. D. Peer, J. P. Eun, Y. Morishita, C. V. Carman, and M. Shimaoka, “Systemic leukocyte-directed siRNA delivery revealing cyclin D1 as an anti-inflammatory target,” Science, vol. 319, no. 5863, pp. 627–630, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  98. D. Peer, P. Zhu, C. V. Carman, J. Lieberman, and M. Shimaoka, “Selective gene silencing in activated leukocytes by targeting siRNAs to the integrin lymphocyte function-associated antigen-1,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 104, no. 10, pp. 4095–4100, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  99. E. Song, S.-K. Lee, J. Wang et al., “RNA interference targeting Fas protects mice from fulminant hepatitis,” Nature Medicine, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 347–351, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  100. P. Hamar, E. Song, G. Kökeny, A. Chen, N. Ouyang, and J. Lieberman, “Small interfering RNA targeting Fas protects mice against renal ischemia-reperfusion injury,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 101, no. 41, pp. 14883–14888, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  101. D. M. Dykxhoorn, D. Chowdhury, and J. Lieberman, “RNA interference and cancer: endogenous pathways and therapeutic approaches,” Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol. 615, pp. 299–329, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  102. S. I. Pai, Y.-Y. Lin, B. Macaes, A. Meneshian, C.-F. Hung, and T.-C. Wu, “Prospects of RNA interference therapy for cancer,” Gene Therapy, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 464–477, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  103. T. R. Brummelkamp, R. Bernards, and R. Agami, “Stable suppression of tumorigenicity by virus-mediated RNA interference,” Cancer Cell, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 243–247, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  104. D. H. Kim and J. J. Rossi, “RNAi mechanisms and applications,” BioTechniques, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 613–616, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  105. L. A. Wheeler and D. M. Dykxhoorn, “RNAi as a potential new therapy for HIV infection,” Future HIV Therapy, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 567–577, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  106. D. S. Schwarz, G. Hutvágner, T. Du, Z. Xu, N. Aronin, and P. D. Zamore, “Asymmetry in the assembly of the RNAi enzyme complex,” Cell, vol. 115, no. 2, pp. 199–208, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  107. C. Matranga, Y. Tomari, C. Shin, D. P. Bartel, and P. D. Zamore, “Passenger-strand cleavage facilitates assembly of siRNA into Ago2-containing RNAi enzyme complexes,” Cell, vol. 123, no. 4, pp. 607–620, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  108. D. M. Dykxhoorn and J. Lieberman, “Running interference: prospects and obstacles to using small interfering RNAs as small molecule drugs,” Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 8, pp. 377–402, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  109. D. P. Bartel, “MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function,” Cell, vol. 116, no. 2, pp. 281–297, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  110. G. Stefani and F. J. Slack, “Small non-coding RNAs in animal development,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 219–230, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  111. L. Wu and J. G. Belasco, “Let Me count the ways: mechanisms of gene regulation by miRNAs and siRNAs,” Molecular Cell, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  112. A. de Fougerolles, H.-P. Vornlocher, J. Maraganore, and J. Lieberman, “Interfering with disease: a progress report on siRNA-based therapeutics,” Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 443–453, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  113. B. Berkhout and O. Ter Brake, “Towards a durable RNAi gene therapy for HIV-AIDS,” Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 161–170, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  114. J. Capodici, K. Karikó, and D. Weissman, “Inhibition of HIV-1 infection by small interfering RNA-mediated RNA interference,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 169, no. 9, pp. 5196–5201, 2002. View at Scopus
  115. G. A. Coburn and B. R. Cullen, “Potent and specific inhibition of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 replication by RNA interference,” Journal of Virology, vol. 76, no. 18, pp. 9225–9231, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  116. J.-M. Jacque, K. Triques, and M. Stevenson, “Modulation of HIV-1 replication by RNA interference,” Nature, vol. 418, no. 6896, pp. 435–438, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  117. N. S. Lee, T. Dohjima, G. Bauer et al., “Expression of small interfering RNAs targeted against HIV-1 rev transcripts in human cells,” Nature Biotechnology, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 500–505, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  118. A. L. Brass, D. M. Dykxhoorn, Y. Benita et al., “Identification of host proteins required for HIV infection through a functional genomic screen,” Science, vol. 319, no. 5865, pp. 921–926, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  119. Y. Gao, M. A. Lobritz, J. Roth et al., “Targets of small interfering RNA restriction during human immunodeficiency virus type 1 replication,” Journal of Virology, vol. 82, no. 6, pp. 2938–2951, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  120. R. Alvarez, S. Elbashir, T. Borland et al., “RNA interference-mediated silencing of the respiratory syncytial virus nucleocapsid defines a potent antiviral strategy,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 3952–3962, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  121. W. Zhang, H. Yang, X. Kong et al., “Inhibition of respiratory syncytial virus infection with intranasal siRNA nanoparticles targeting the viral NS1 gene,” Nature Medicine, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 56–62, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  122. L. A. Wheeler, V. Vrbanac, R. Trifonova et al., “Durable knockdown and protection from HIV transmission in humanized mice treated with gel-formulated CD4 aptamer-siRNA chimeras,” Molecular Therapy, vol. 21, pp. 1378–1389, 2013.
  123. L. A. Wheeler, R. Trifonova, V. Vrbanac et al., “Inhibition of HIV transmission in human cervicovaginal explants and humanized mice using CD4 aptamer-siRNA chimeras,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 121, no. 6, pp. 2401–2412, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  124. R. M. Grant, D. Hamer, T. Hope et al., “Whither or wither microbicides?” Science, vol. 321, no. 5888, pp. 532–534, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  125. J. Yano, K. Hirabayashi, S.-I. Nakagawa et al., “Antitumor activity of small interfering RNA/cationic liposome complex in mouse models of cancer,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 10, no. 22, pp. 7721–7726, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  126. J. Anderson, A. Banerjea, V. Planelles, and R. Akkina, “Potent suppression of HIV type 1 infection by a short hairpin anti-CXCR4 siRNA,” AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 699–706, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  127. E. Devroe and P. A. Silver, “Therapeutic potential of retroviral RNAi vectors,” Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 319–327, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  128. D. L. Lewis and J. A. Wolff, “Delivery of siRNA and siRNA expression constructs to adult mammals by hydrodynamic intravascular injection,” Methods in Enzymology, vol. 392, pp. 336–350, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  129. C. Lorenz, P. Hadwiger, M. John, H.-P. Vornlocher, and C. Unverzagt, “Steroid and lipid conjugates of siRNAs to enhance cellular uptake and gene silencing in liver cells,” Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters, vol. 14, no. 19, pp. 4975–4977, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  130. Y. Minakuchi, F. Takeshita, N. Kosaka et al., “Atelocollagen-mediated synthetic small interfering RNA delivery for effective gene silencing in vitro and in vivo,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 32, no. 13, p. e109, 2004. View at Scopus
  131. J. Soutschek, A. Akinc, B. Bramlage et al., “Therapeutic silencing of an endogenous gene by systemic administration of modified siRNAs,” Nature, vol. 432, no. 7014, pp. 173–178, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  132. B. Urban-Klein, S. Werth, S. Abuharbeid, F. Czubayko, and A. Aigner, “RNAi-mediated gene-targeting through systemic application of polyethylenimine (PEI)-complexed siRNA in vivo,” Gene Therapy, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 461–466, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  133. R. A. Stull and F. C. Szoka Jr., “Antigene, ribozyme and aptamer nucleic acid drugs: progress and prospects,” Pharmaceutical Research, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 465–483, 1995. View at Scopus
  134. L. Scherer, J. J. Rossi, and M. S. Weinberg, “Progress and prospects: RNA-based therapies for treatment of HIV infection,” Gene Therapy, vol. 14, no. 14, pp. 1057–1064, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  135. D. M. Held, J. D. Kissel, J. T. Patterson, D. G. Nickens, and D. H. Burke, “HIV-1 inactivation by nucleic acid aptamers,” Frontiers in Bioscience, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 89–112, 2006. View at Scopus
  136. J. O. McNamara II, E. R. Andrechek, Y. Wang et al., “Cell type-specific delivery of siRNAs with aptamer-siRNA chimeras,” Nature Biotechnology, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 1005–1015, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  137. J. P. Dassie, X.-Y. Liu, G. S. Thomas et al., “Systemic administration of optimized aptamer-siRNA chimeras promotes regression of PSMA-expressing tumors,” Nature Biotechnology, vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 839–846, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  138. J. Zhou, H. Li, S. Li, J. Zaia, and J. J. Rossi, “Novel dual inhibitory function aptamer-siRNA delivery system for HIV-1 therapy,” Molecular Therapy, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 1481–1489, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  139. J. Zhou, P. Swiderski, H. Li et al., “Selection, characterization and application of new RNA HIV gp 120 aptamers for facile delivery of Dicer substrate siRNAs into HIV infected cells,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 3094–3109, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  140. C. P. Neff, J. Zhou, L. Remling et al., “An aptamer-siRNA chimera suppresses HIV-1 viral loads and protects from helper CD4+ T cell decline in humanized mice,” Science Translational Medicine, vol. 3, no. 66, Article ID 66ra6, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  141. D. M. Brainard, E. Seung, N. Frahm et al., “Induction of robust cellular and humoral virus-specific adaptive immune responses in human immunodeficiency virus-infected humanized BLT mice,” Journal of Virology, vol. 83, no. 14, pp. 7305–7321, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  142. J. Zhou, H. Li, J. Zhang, S. Piotr, and J. Rossi, “Development of cell-type specific anti-HIV gp120 aptamers for siRNA delivery,” Journal of Visualized Experiments, no. 52, Article ID e2954, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  143. OPKO Health, “OPKO Health announces update on Phase III clinical trial of bevasiranib,” Press release.
  144. M. Robbins, A. Judge, and I. MacLachlan, “SiRNA and innate immunity,” Oligonucleotides, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 89–102, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  145. J. A. Katakowski and D. Palliser, “SiRNA-based topical microbicides targeting sexually transmitted infections,” Current Opinion in Molecular Therapeutics, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 192–202, 2010. View at Scopus
  146. V. Hornung, M. Guenthner-Biller, C. Bourquin et al., “Sequence-specific potent induction of IFN-α by short interfering RNA in plasmacytoid dendritic cells through TLR7,” Nature Medicine, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 263–270, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  147. A. D. Judge, V. Sood, J. R. Shaw, D. Fang, K. McClintock, and I. MacLachlan, “Sequence-dependent stimulation of the mammalian innate immune response by synthetic siRNA,” Nature Biotechnology, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 457–462, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  148. M. Robbins, A. Judge, E. Ambegia et al., “Misinterpreting the therapeutic effects of small interfering RNA caused by immune stimulation,” Human Gene Therapy, vol. 19, no. 10, pp. 991–999, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  149. M. Schlee, V. Hornung, and G. Hartmann, “siRNA and isRNA: two edges of one sword,” Molecular Therapy, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 463–470, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  150. H. Poeck, R. Besch, C. Maihoefer et al., “5′-triphosphate-siRNA: turning gene silencing and Rig-I activation against melanoma,” Nature Medicine, vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 1256–1263, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  151. A. L. Jackson, J. Burchard, D. Leake et al., “Position-specific chemical modification of siRNAs reduces “off-target” transcript silencing,” RNA, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 1197–1205, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  152. K. Ui-Tei, Y. Naito, S. Zenno et al., “Functional dissection of siRNA sequence by systematic DNA substitution: modified siRNA with a DNA seed arm is a powerful tool for mammalian gene silencing with significantly reduced off-target effect,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 2136–2151, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  153. M. B. Laursen, M. M. Pakula, S. Gao et al., “Utilization of unlocked nucleic acid (UNA) to enhance siRNA performance in vitro and in vivo,” Molecular BioSystems, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 862–870, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  154. Y.-L. Chiu and T. M. Rana, “RNAi in human cells: basic structural and functional features of small interfering RNA,” Molecular Cell, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 549–561, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  155. M. E. Kleinman, K. Yamada, A. Takeda et al., “Sequence- and target-independent angiogenesis suppression by siRNA via TLR3,” Nature, vol. 452, no. 7187, pp. 591–597, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  156. T. S. Zimmermann, A. C. H. Lee, A. Akinc et al., “RNAi-mediated gene silencing in non-human primates,” Nature, vol. 441, no. 1, pp. 111–114, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  157. A. A. Khan, D. Betel, M. L. Miller, C. Sander, C. S. Leslie, and D. S. Marks, “Transfection of small RNAs globally perturbs gene regulation by endogenous microRNAs,” Nature Biotechnology, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 549–555, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  158. D. Grimm, K. L. Streetz, C. L. Jopling et al., “Fatality in mice due to oversaturation of cellular microRNA/short hairpin RNA pathways,” Nature, vol. 441, no. 7092, pp. 537–541, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  159. M. John, R. Constien, A. Akinc et al., “Effective RNAi-mediated gene silencing without interruption of the endogenous microRNA pathway,” Nature, vol. 449, no. 7163, pp. 745–747, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  160. J. L. McBride, R. L. Boudreau, S. Q. Harper et al., “Artificial miRNAs mitigate shRNA-mediated toxicity in the brain: implications for the therapeutic development of RNAi,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 105, no. 15, pp. 5868–5873, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  161. A. D. Judge, G. Bola, A. C. H. Lee, and I. MacLachlan, “Design of noninflammatory synthetic siRNA mediating potent gene silencing in vivo,” Molecular Therapy, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 494–505, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  162. D. Castanotto, K. Sakurai, R. Lingeman et al., “Combinatorial delivery of small interfering RNAs reduces RNAi efficacy by selective incorporation into RISC,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 35, no. 15, pp. 5154–5164, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  163. A. R. de Fougerolles, “Delivery vehicles for small interfering RNA in vivo,” Human Gene Therapy, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 125–132, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  164. B. L. Davidson and P. B. McCray Jr., “Current prospects for RNA interference-based therapies,” Nature Reviews Genetics, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 329–340, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus