| Table 5: Rice (Orza sativa L.) visible injury at 6 and 12 days after application (DAA) in response to postemergence application (4- to 6-leaf stage, V4-V6) of saflufenacil following preemergence application of clomazone. Saflufenacil results were averaged across clomazone rates, and clomazone results were averaged across saflufenacil rates. |
| | Saflufenacil rates (g ha−1) | Visual injurya | | 2010 | | 6 DAA | 12 DAA |
| | % | | 0 | 3 db | 0 b | | 12.5 | 6 c | 0 b | | 18.75 | 9 bc | 1 b | | 25 | 13 b | 2 b | | 50 | 26 a | 9 a |
| | Clomazone rates (g ha−1) | | |
| | 0c | 9 b | 2d | | 392 | 9 b | 2 | | 505 | 17 a | 3 |
|
|
aInjury was estimated visually using a scale of 0 to 100% where 0 = no rice injury and 100 = rice death. bMeans followed by a different letter are significantly different according to the Tukey’s test (P ≤ 0.05). cPlots that did not receive clomazone were treated with propanil plus quinclorac. dMeans were not different according to F-test at P ≤ 0.05.
|