In the paper titled “Apple pollination biology for stable and novel fruit production: search system for apple cultivar combination showing incompatibility, semicompatibility, and full-compatibility based on the S-RNase allele database,” there are mistakes in Figures 4(e) and 4(f) and these are corrected.


Figure 4 
(a) Results of self-pollination of diploid “Dolgo” (1), diploid “Fuji” × diploid “Cox’s Pomona” (2), “Fuji” × “Dolgo” (3), “Dolgo” × “Cox’s Pomona” (4), and “Dolgo” × diploid “Pink Perfection” (5). (b) Results of self-pollination of tetraploid “Tensei” (1), diploid “Fuji” × “Tensei” (2), diploid “Jonathan” × “Tensei” (3), and diploid “Golden Delicious” × “Tensei” (4). (c) Results of self-pollination of tetraploid “Tensei” (1), triploid “Fukunishiki” × “Tensei” (2), triploid “Jonagold” × “Tensei” (3), and triploid “Mutsu” × “Tensei” (4). (d) Results of self-pollination of tetraploid “Tensei” (1), “Tensei” × tetraploid “Welday Jonathan” (2), “Welday Jonathan” × “Tensei” (3), “Tensei” × tetraploid “Doud Golden Delicious” (4), and “Doud Golden Delicious” × “Tensei” (5). (e) Results of triploid “Fukunishiki” × diploid “Fuji” (1), “Fukunishiki” × diploid “Shinano Sweet” (2), “Fukunishiki” × diploid “Tsugaru” (3), “Fukunishiki” × diploid “Cox’s Pomona” (4), “Fukunishiki” × diploid “Snowdrift” (5), and “Fukunishiki” × diploid “Dolgo” (6). (f) Results of tetraploid “Tensei” × diploid “Fuji” (1), “Tensei” × diploid “Shinano Sweet” (2), “Tensei” × diploid “Tsugaru” (3), “Tensei” × diploid “Cox’s Pomona” (4), “Tensei” × diploid “Snowdrift” (5), and “Tensei” × diploid “Dolgo” (6).