About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
International Journal of Analytical Chemistry
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 260425, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/260425
Review Article

Application of Monoclonal Antibodies against Bioactive Natural Products: Eastern Blotting and Preparation of Knockout Extract

1Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Science, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-0855, Japan
2Faculty of Pharmaceutical Science, Nagasaki International University, 2827-7 Huis Ten Bosch, Sasebo 859-3298, Japan
3Faculty of Health Management, Nagasaki International University, 2827-7 Huis Ten Bosch, Sasebo 859-3298, Japan
4Phytochemistry Department, Centre for Scientific Research into Plant Medicine, University of Ghana, P.O. Box 73, Mampong-Akuapem, Ghana
5State Key Laboratory of Natural and Biomimetic Drugs, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Peking University, No.38 Xue-yuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100191, China
6Faculty of Pharmaceutical Science, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand

Received 30 August 2011; Accepted 18 October 2011

Academic Editor: Norberto Peporine Lopes

Copyright © 2012 Hiroyuki Tanaka et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) tof mass spectrometry was used for the confirmation of hapten number in synthesized antigen. As application of MAb, the MAbs against ginsenosides and glycyrrhizin have been prepared resulting in the development of two new techniques that we named the eastern blotting method and the knockout extract preparation. In eastern blotting technique, glycosides like ginsenosides and glycyrrhizin separated by silica gel TLC were blotted to PVDF membrane that was treated with a NaIO4 solution followed by BSA resulted in glycoside-BSA conjugate on a PVDF membrane. The blotted spots were stained by MAb. Double staining of eastern blotting for ginsenosides using antiginsenoside Rb1 and Rg1 MAbs promoted complete identification of ginsenosides in Panax species. The immunoaffinity concentration of glycyrrhizin was determined by immunoaffinity column conjugated with antiglycyrrhizin MAb resulting in the glycyrrhizin-knockout extract, which was determined by the synergic effect with glycyrrhizin on NO production using the cell line.

1. Introduction

Immunoassay systems using monoclonal antibody (MAb) against drugs and small molecular weight bioactive compounds have become an important tool for studies on receptor binding analysis, enzyme assay, and quantitative and/or qualitative analytical techniques in animals or plants. The immunoblotting method is based on the western blotting technique that utilizes the antigen-antibody binding properties and provides a specific and sensitive detection of higher molecule analytes like peptides and proteins. In our ongoing study on MAb, previously we prepared various kinds of MAb against natural products like forskolin [1], solamargine [2], crocin [3], marihuana compounds [4], opium alkaloids [5], ginsenosides [6, 7], berberine [8], sennosides [9], paeoniflorin [10], glycyrrhizin [11, 12], ginkgolic acid [13], aconitine alkaloid [14], baicalin [15], and so on and developed individual competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) as a highly sensitive, specific, and simple methodology.

The confirmation of hapten number in synthesized antigens is most important in the first stage of MAb preparation. Therefore, its determination method will be discussed first of all. As an application of MAb, the MAb against ginsenosides and glycyrrhizin has been prepared resulting in the development of two new techniques that we have named the eastern blotting method [12] and the knockout extract preparation [16]. They will be introduced in this paper.

2. Preparation of MAb against Natural Products

Various methods have been employed for the determination of natural products. They include spectral methods such as infrared (IR), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), and circular dichroism (CD) and other chromatographic methods such as ion chromatography (IC), capillary electrophoresis (CE), and high-speed counter current chromatography (HSCCC), and so on. Compared to TLC, GLC and HPLC methods, the ELISA method was more sensitive and selective. Moreover, it is possible to study a large number of natural products. Since natural product extracts consist of various chemical constituents (e.g., licorice contains 470 components or more), in general, some pretreatment is necessary for HPLC and other chromatographic analysis methods. ELISA, however, can determine the concentration of components directly without any pretreatment. Therefore, ELISA was used to measure the concentration of ginsenoside Rb1 in ginseng and traditional Chinese medicines (TCMs).

2.1. Analytical Method for Determination of Hapten Number in Antigen, Hapten-Carrier Protein Conjugate

For production of MAb, synthesis of hapten, which is derived from an immune antigen and linker bridge, and the carrier protein conjugate is necessary. There had been no direct and appropriate methods for the determination of haptens conjugated with carrier proteins without differential UV analysis, radiochemical, or chemical methods. Therefore, immunization by the injection of hapten-carrier protein conjugate was unreliable. Wengatz et al. [17] determined the hapten density of immunoconjugates by matrix-assisted UV laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry. We also reported the direct analytical method of hapten and carrier protein conjugates by a matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry (MALDI) tof mass spectrometry using an internal standard [1820].

Figure 1 shows the MALDI tof mass spectrum of the most pharmacologically active marihuana compound, tetrahydrocannabinolic acid (THCA)-bovine serum albumin (BSA) conjugate, and BSA used as an internal standard [20]. This shows only the singly, doubly, and triply ionized molecule ions of the intact conjugate. The sharp peak at m/z 66,465 is the [M + H]+ peak of BSA. A small [M + H]+ peak of the THCA-BSA conjugate is at m/z 70,792, indicating that the calculated molecular mass of the THCA-BSA conjugate is 70,581 using a calculated molecular mass of 66,267 for BSA. The calculated molecule mass of the THCA moiety is 4,314. From this result, 12.7 molecules of THCA are combined with BSA [20]. Since this method is suitable for small molecule natural products, we had been analyzing the hapten number of all natural products for MAbs including glycosides like ginsenosides and glycyrrhizin.

260425.fig.001
Figure 1: Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization tof mass spectrometry of tetrahydrocannabinolic-acid-BSA conjugate. [M + H] indicates the molecular weight of the conjugate, from which the hapten number can be calculated.
2.2. Preparation of MAb against Ginsenosides and ELISA as an Assay System

Ginseng, the crude drug of Panax ginseng, is one of the most important natural medicines in many countries. It has been used to enhance stamina and capacity to cope with fatigue and physical stress and as a tonic against cancers, disturbances of the central nervous system (memory, learning, and behavior), hypothermia, carbohydrate and lipid metabolism, immune function, the cardiovascular system, and radioprotection [21]. It contains more than 30 kinds of dammarane and oleanane saponins considered to be pharmacologically active components. Ginsenoside Rb1 is the main saponin in ginseng. However, since the concentration in the ginseng root or the root extract varies depending on the method of extraction, subsequent treatment, or even the season of its collection [22], standardization of quality is required. For this purpose, we have prepared anti-ginsenoside Rb1 [6] and Rg1 MAbs [7]. The immunoassay system using MAb is not frequently used for naturally occurring smaller molecular weight bioactive compounds. Preparation of MAbs is difficult, but is one of the most important steps for the analysis of natural products. As a typical natural product, the preparation of MAb against the ginseng saponin ginsenoside Rb1 will be discussed.

A hybridoma-producing MAb reactive to ginsenoside Rb1 was obtained by the general procedure and classified into IgG2b which had κ light chains. The reactivity of IgG type MAb, 9G7 was tested by varying antibody concentration and by performing a dilution curve. The antibody concentration was selected for competitive ELISA. The free MAb following competition is bound to polystyrene microtiter plates precoated with ginsenoside Rb1-HSA. Under these conditions, the full measurement range of the assay extends from 20 to 400 ng/mL [6].

Cross-reactivity is the most important factor in determining the value of an antibody. Since the ELISA for ginsenoside Rb1 was established for phytochemical investigations involving crude plant extracts, the assay specificity was checked by determining the cross-reactivity of the MAb with various related compounds. The cross-reactivity data of MAb that was obtained were examined by competitive ELISA and calculated using picomole amounts of ginsenoside Rb1. The cross-reactivity of ginsenoside Rc and Rd, which possess a diglucose moiety attached to the C-3 hydroxy group, was weak compared to ginsenoside Rb1 (0.024 and 0.020%, resp.). Ginsenoside Re and Rg1 showed no cross-reactivity (less than 0.005%). It is evident that the MAb reacted only with a small number of structurally related ginsenoside Rb1 molecules, and very weakly, and did not react with other steroidal compounds like glycyrrhizin, digitoxin, tigogenin, tigonin, and solamargine.

In our ongoing studies on MAbs against ginseng saponins, anti-ginsenoside Rg1 MAb [7] and Re [23] have been prepared and their ELISA was set up. Anti-ginsenoside Rg1 MAb was also highly specific like anti-ginsenoside Rb1. On the other hand, anti-ginsenoside Re MAb showed wide cross-reactivity. Therefore, the MAb can be used for the analysis for the total ginsenoside concentration.

2.3. Application of MAb in the Natural Products Field

Although western blotting is a common assay methodology for high-molecular-weight-substances, this method has not been employed for small molecules, as direct immunostaining of such compounds on a TLC plate is as yet unknown. Therefore, a new method for such small-molecular compounds is required. Moreover, if small molecules can be blotted to a membrane, fixing them also requires a new methodology. Previously, we succeeded in separating small-molecule compounds such as solasodine glycosides into a part of an epitope and fixing on the membrane [24], as follows.

2.3.1. New Staining Method for Ginsenosides, “Eastern Blotting”

Figure 2 shows the H2SO4 staining and eastern blotting of ginsenoside standards and TCM using anti-ginsenoside Rb1 MAb. It is impossible to determine the ginsenosides by TLC staining by H2SO4 as indicated in Figure 2(a). On the other hand, clear staining of ginsenoside Rb1 occurred by eastern blotting, as indicated in Figure 2(b). Furthermore, it became evident that Jigengtang and Dahuanggancaotang prescriptions that did not contain ginseng, as indicated by the absence of a ginsenoside Rb1 band. The eastern blotting method was considerably more sensitive than that of H2SO4 staining. The H2SO4 staining detected all standard compounds. The eastern blotting indicated only limited staining of ginsenoside Rb1, Rc, and Rd, whose cross-reactivities were under 0.02% as shown in Figure 2(b). We suggest that an aglycone, protopanaxadiol, and a part of the sugars may be of importance to the immunization and may function as an epitope for the structure of ginsenosides. In addition, it is suggested that the specific reactivity of sugar moieties in the ginsenoside molecule against anti-ginsenoside Rb1 MAb may be modified by the NaIO4 treatment of ginsenosides on the PVDF membrane, causing ginsenoside Rc and Rd to become detectable by eastern blotting.

fig2
Figure 2: Eastern blotting of ginsenosides in traditional Chinese medicine formulas using anti-ginsenoside Rb1 MAb. Samples (1) Jigengtang, (2) Dahuanggancaotang, (3) Nenshenyangyongtang, (4) Sijunzitang, (5) Nenshentang, (6) Buanxiaxiexintang, (7) Xiaocaihutang, and (8) Crude ginseng extract. Lanes 1 and 2 do not contain ginseng. Standard of ginsenosides indicated, ginsenosidr-Rg1, -Re, -Rd, -Rc, and -Rb1, respectively, from the upper spot.

Application of the eastern blotting method for the detection of glycyrrhizin in the serum samples was investigated. In general, it is difficult to detect glycyrrhizin in serum due to the large amount of impurities. The developed bands of impurities lapped over the band of glycyrrhizin, and we failed to find a proper developing solvent system that could separate glycyrrhizin and the impurities apart from each other clearly on the TLC plate. Figure 3 shows the detection of glycyrrhizin by the eastern blotting technique in the rat serum samples. Glycyrrhizin could not be identified on the TLC plate stained by H2SO4 through many bands that were detected (Figure 3(a)). On the other hand, eastern blotting clearly shows the band of glycyrrhizin even after 1 h (Figure 3(b)). Although the sensitivity of the eastern blotting method was greatly affected by the impurities, the detection limit was still at the nanogram level. The results proved that the eastern blotting technique could be a unique method for identifying glycyrrhizin against a background of a large amount of impurities.

fig3
Figure 3: Eastern blotting profile of glycyrrhizin in rat serum after injection of glycyrrhizin (a) TLC of rat-serum-injected glycyrrhizin TLC was developed with n-BuOH-H2O-AcOH (7 : 2 : 1). Spots were detected by 10% H2SO4. (b) Eastern blotting of rat-serum-injected glycyrrhizin; the band of glycyrrhizin was detected until 1 h after injection. GA: glycyhrrhetinic acid, GC: glycyrrhizin, and GG: glycyrrhetinic acid monoglucuronide.

When the mixture of anti-ginsenoside Rb1 and Rg1 MAbs and the pair of substrates were tested for staining for ginsenosides, all ginsenosides, ginsenoside Rb1, -Rc, -Rd, -Re, and -Rg1 were stained blue although the purple color staining for ginsenoside Rg1 was expected because 3-amino-9-ethylcarbazole and 4-chloro-1-naphotol might be different. Therefore, we performed successive staining of the membrane using anti-ginsenoside Rg1 and then anti-ginsenoside Rb1. Finally, we performed the double staining of ginsenosides indicating that ginsenoside Rg1 and ginsenoside Re were stained purple and the other blue, as indicated in Figure 4. From this result, both antibodies can distinguish the individual aglycones, protopanaxatriol, and protopanaxadiol. For this application, the crude extract of various Panax species was analyzed by the newly developed double staining system. Major ginsenosides can be determined clearly by the double staining method, as indicated in Figure 4.

fig4
Figure 4: Double Eastern blotting staining of ginsenosides contained in various ginseng samples using anti-ginseenoside-Rb1 and anti-ginsenoside-Rg1 MAbs. (a) TLC profile stained by sulfuric acid. (b) Eastern blotting by anti-ginsenoside-Rb1 and anti-ginseside-Rg1 monoclonal antibodies I, II, III, IV, V, and VI indicated white ginseng, red ginseng, fibrous ginseng (P. ginseng), P. notoginseng, P. quinquefolius and P. japonicus, respectively. Upper purple color spots and lower blue color spots were stained by anti-ginsenoside-Rg1, and anti-ginsenoside-Rb1 monoclonal antibodies, respectively.

Therefore, it is suggested that the staining color shows the pharmacological activity. As shown in Figure 4(b), the purple bands indicate ginsenosides which have protopanaxatriol as an aglycone and stimulation activity for the central nervous system (CNS). On the other hand, the blue color indicates ginsenosides containing protopanaxadiol as an aglycone that possess a depression effect on the CNS. Moreover, the Rf value of ginsenosides roughly suggests the number of sugars attached to the aglycone. Both analyses make it possible to jointly identify which aglycone attaches and how many sugars it possesses, leading to the structure of the ginsenosides. In fact, three kinds of ginsenosides possessing protopanaxadiol-ginsenoside Rh1, -Rf, and 20-O-glucoginsenoside Rf in P. ginseng root were determined by coloring and Rf value by comparing them with the structures reported in the previous paper [25].

Figure 5(a) indicates immunolocalization of glycyrrhizin in a licorice root slice using anti-glycyrrhizin MAb as another application of the eastern blotting method. The phloem () contained a higher concentration of glycyrrhizin than the xylem and cork part [26]. On the other hand, no staining occurred on ginseng (Figure 5(c)).

fig5
Figure 5: Immunocytolocalization of glycyrrhizin in fresh licorice root using anti-glycyrrhizin MAb. (a) Eastern blotting of fresh licorice slice, (b) fresh licorice slice, (c) Eastern blotting of fresh ginseng slice, and (d) fresh ginseng slice.

In the earlier experiments, we carried out the blotted staining on PVDF membrane using MAb on solasodine glycosides and called it western blotting [24]. Now we have applied this new methodology to licorice glycoside, glycyrrhizin and named it eastern blotting [12] for studying ginsenosides [23], saikosaponin [27], and so on.

2.3.2. Immunoaffinity Concentration and One-Step Purification of Ginsenoside Rb1 by Immunoaffinity Column

A crude extract of P. ginseng roots was loaded onto the immunoaffinity column and washed with the washing solution of phosphate buffer. Figure 6 shows the fraction 1–8 containing overloaded ginsenoside Rb1. The other ginsenosides Rg1, Rc, Re. and Rd were also detected in these fractions by eastern blotting (data not shown). A sharp peak appeared around fraction 20–24 eluted by acetate buffer containing KSCN and methanol to give pure ginsenoside Rb1.

260425.fig.006
Figure 6: Elution profile of Panax ginseng crude extract on immunoaffinity column monitoring by ELISA using anti-ginsenoside-Rb1 MAb. The column was washed by phosphate buffer and then eluted by HOAc buffer containing KSCN and MeOH. Individual fractions (2 mL) were assayed by ELISA using anti-ginsenoside-Rb1 MAb.

Overloaded ginsenoside Rb1 was repeatedly immunoaffinity column choromatographed to separate ginsenoside Rb1 completely [28]. The antibody was stable when exposed to the eluent, and the immunoaffinity column showed almost no decrease in capacity after repeated use more than 10 times under the same conditions, as was reported for a one-step separation of forskolin from a crude extract of Coleus forskohlii root [29]. This methodology is effective for the rapid and simple purification of ginsenoside Rb1 and may open up a wide field of comparable studies with other families of saponins for which an acceptable method for one-step separation has not yet been developed. Furthermore, to separate the total ginseng saponins, a wide cross-reactive MAb against ginsenoside like anti-ginsenoside Re MAb could be designed, as was done for the total solasodine glycosides by an immunoaffinity column using an anti-solamargine MAb [30]. A combination of immunoaffinity column chromatography, Eastern blotting and ELISA could be used to survey low concentrations of ginsenoside Rb1 of plant origin and/or in experimental animals and humans. In fact, we have succeeded in the isolation of ginsenoside Rb1 from a different plant, Kalopanax pictus Nakai, which was not known previously to contain ginsenosides, using this combination of methods [31].

2.3.3. Newly Established Knockout Extract for Glycyrrhizin

Glycyrrhizin has been reported to possess numerous pharmacological effects like anti-inflammation [32], antiulcer [33], antitumor [34], antiallergy [35], and hepatoprotective activities [36]. Although glycyrrhizin is supposed to be a major active principle in licorice crude extract, a large number of studies have demonstrated that the licorice extract is rich in bioactive compounds other than glycyrrhizin such as triterpenes, flavonoids, and their aglycones [37]. In order to confirm the effect of glycyrrhizin in TCM, previously we purified glycyrrhizin from TCM using an immunoaffinity column conjugated with anti-glycyrrhizin MAb [38]. In this section, one-step purification of glycyrrhizin and its function in the licorice crude extract have been indicated as previously discussed about ginsenoside Rb1.

To eliminate glycyrrhizin from licorice extract, 12 mg of licorice extract (glycyrrhizin content: 1275.0 μg) in loading buffer was applied on the anti-glycyrrhizin MAb immunoaffinity column, and then the loading buffer was continuously circulated through the column to enhance the binding efficiency. After overnight circulation at 4°C, the unbound column fraction was collected. The column was washed, and then bound column fraction was eluted by elution solvent. Glycyrrhizin concentration of bound column fraction was 1269.26 μg of glycyrrhizin (99.5% of the loading glycyrrhizin). On the other hand, glycyrrhizin content of unbound fraction was 3.50 μg (0.27% of the loading glycyrrhizin). These data indicated that anti-glycyrrhizin MAb immunoaffinity column could eliminate glycyrrhizin from licorice crude extract with high efficiency. From this evidence, we named this fraction knockout extract [16, 39].

To further characterize glycyrrhizin knockout extract, the TLC analysis and eastern blotting were performed. As shown in Figure 7(a), several spots including glycyrrhizin were detected in licorice extract. However, the spots of glycyrrhizin were undetected in glycyrrhizin-knockout extract, although all other spots were clearly detected (Figure 7(a), lane 2). eastern blotting by anti-glycyrrhizin MAb demonstrated that glycyrrhizin was detected in licorice extract, but the spot of glycyrrhizin was invisible in unbound fraction (Figure 7(b), lane 2). Therefore, these data suggest that glycyrrhizin was specifically eliminated from licorice extract by anti-glycyrrhizin MAb binding immunoaffinity column.

fig7
Figure 7: Preparation of knock-out extract eliminated glycyrrhizin from licorice crude extract using immunoaffinity column conjugated with anti-glycyrrhizin MAb. Lines 1, 2, and 3 indicate glycyrrhizin, crude extract, and knock-out extract, respectively.

This technique is useful approach to clarify the multicomponent interaction with the specific protein such as enzymes, but it is unsuitable to investigate the interaction between one principal component and other components in herbal medicines. To investigate the role of one principal compound in the crude extract, we prepared knockout extract by removing target compound from the crude extract using high-specific MAb immunoaffinity column. By using this approach, it may become possible to determine the potential function of one natural compound on the crude extract or TCM by in vitro and in vivo assays.

Nitric oxide (NO) is free radical with multiple physiological functions, such as vasodilatation, neurotransmission, and inflammation [40]. During inflammatory process, large amount of NO is produced by inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) by inflammatory cytokines and/or bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in various cell types including macrophages [41]. Overproduction of NO by iNOS triggers the pathogenesis of septic shock and organ destruction in certain inflammatory and autoimmune diseases [4244]. Therefore, the inhibition of NO production by blocking iNOS expression may be useful strategy for the treatment of various inflammatory diseases.

To determine whether licorice crude extract inhibits NO production in LPS-stimulated mouse RAW264 macrophages, cells were treated with various concentrations of licorice extract for 30 min and then stimulated with LPS. LPS caused a dramatic increase in NO production, and this induction was inhibited in a dose-dependent manner by treatment with licorice extract.

We next investigated the inhibitory effect of glycyrrhizin-knockout extract and the combined treatment with glycyrrhizin-knockout extract and glycyrrhizin on NO production. Since 100 μg/mL of licorice extract contains 10.6 μg of glycyrrhizin, the cells were pretreated with licorice extract (100 μg/mL), glycyrrhizin-knockout extract (89.4 μg/mL), or combination of glycyrrhizin-knockout extract (89.4 μg/mL) and glycyrrhizin (10.6 μg/mL). Figure 8(a) indicated that treatment of licorice extract leads to a marked suppression of NO production as compared to LPS treatment [inhibition ratio (IR) = 57.7%]. Interestingly, although glycyrrhizin alone could not block NO production, the inhibitory effect of glycyrrhizin-knockout extract was decreased compared with licorice extract (IR = 17.8%). Moreover, the combined treatment with glycyrrhizin-knockout extract and glycyrrhizin significantly improved the inhibition of NO production (IR = 33.5%). To determine whether the combinational effect of glycyrrhizin-knockout extract and glycyrrhizin was related to iNOS expression, we performed western blotting (Figure 8(b)). Although the licorice extract strongly suppressed LPS-induced iNOS expression, treatment of glycyrrhizin-knockout extract reduced this effect [45].

fig8
Figure 8: Effects of glycyrrhizin-knockout extract and the combination of glycyrrhizin-knockout extract and glycyrrhizin on LPS-induced NO production (a) and iNOS protein expression (b). * , ** , *** .

3. Conclusions

Two unique applications using MAb, eastern blotting and knockout extract have been introduced in this paper. The eastern blotting method has great potential applications for the wide range of natural products, especially glycosides like ginsenosides of ginseng and glycyrrhizin in licorice. When two kinds of MAbs, against ginsenoside Rb1 and Rg1 can be used, the double staining that enhanced the separate staining of ginsenosides having protopanaxatriol or protopanaxadiol in a molecule, occurred. The staining color can be used to monitor the pharmacological activity suggesting that the purple spots contain protopanaxatriol as an aglycone indicating central nervous system (CNS) stimulatory activity [46]. On the other hand, the blue color indicates ginsenosides having protopanaxadiol which possess a depression effect on the CNS [37]. Furthermore, the Rf value of ginsenosides suggests the number of sugars attached to the aglycone. Both evidences make it possible to confirm which aglycone is attached and how many sugars are combined with the aglycone.

We demonstrated that knockout extract prepared by anti-natural compound-specific MAb immunoaffinity column is a useful approach for determination of potential function of natural compound on in vitro and in vivo assays. The pharmacological analysis by knockout extract might be directly applicable to both other crude extracts and various TCMs to clarify the real pharmacologically active components.

A ginsenoside Rb1 knockout extract can be prepared using an immunoaffinity column conjugated with anti-ginsenoside Rb1 MAb. In this extract, all compounds except only ginsenoside Rb1 are contained. Furthermore, glycyrrhizin-knockout extract prepared from licorice crude extract using an immunoaffinity column conjugated with anti-glycyrrhizin MAb. These knockout extracts may be able to support the pharmacological investigation for finding out a really active component in a crude drug and/or TCM. In fact, addition of glycyrrhizin to glycyrrhizin-knockout extract could improve the inhibition of iNOS expression resulting that glycyrrhizin may exert combinational inhibition of iNOS expression when coexisting with the other constituents contained in licorice extract.

References

  1. R. Sakata, Y. Shoyama, and H. Murakami, “Production of monoclonal antibodies and enzyme immunoassay for typical adenylate cyclase activator, forskolin,” Cytotechnology, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 101–108, 1994. View at Scopus
  2. M. Ishiyama, Y. Shoyama, H. Murakami, and H. Shinohara, “Production of monoclonal antibodies and development of an ELISA for solamargine,” Cytotechnology, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 153–158, 1996. View at Scopus
  3. L. Xuan, H. Tanaka, Y. Xu, and Y. Shoyama, “Preparation of monoclonal antibody against crocin and its characterization,” Cytotechnology, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 65–70, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  4. H. Tanaka, Y. Goto, and Y. Shoyama, “Monoclonal antibody based enzyme immunoassay for marihuana (cannabinoid) compounds,” Journal of Immunoassay, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 321–342, 1996. View at Scopus
  5. Y. Shoyama, T. Fukada, and H. Murakami, “Production of monoclonal antibodies and ELISA for thebaine and codeine,” Cytotechnology, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 55–61, 1995. View at Scopus
  6. H. Tanaka, N. Fukuda, and Y. Shoyama, “Formation of monoclonal antibody against a major ginseng component, ginsenoside Rb1 and its characterization,” Cytotechnology, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 115–120, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. N. Fukuda, H. Tanaka, and Y. Shoyama, “Formation of monoclonal antibody against a major ginseng component, ginsenoside Rg1 and its characterization: monoclonal antibody for a ginseng saponin,” Cytotechnology, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 197–204, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  8. J. S. Kim, H. Tanaka, and Y. Shoyama, “Immunoquantitative analysis for berberine and its related compounds using monoclonal antibodies in herbal medicines,” Analyst, vol. 129, no. 1, pp. 87–91, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  9. O. Morinaga, S. Nakajima, H. Tanaka, and Y. Shoyama, “Production of monoclonal antibodies against a major purgative component, sennoside B, their characterization and use in ELISA,” Analyst, vol. 126, no. 8, pp. 1372–1376, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. Z. Lu, O. Morinaga, H. Tanaka, and Y. Shoyama, “A quantitative ELISA using monoclonal antibody to survey paeoniflorin and albiflorin in crude drugs and traditional Chinese herbal medicines,” Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 862–866, 2003. View at Scopus
  11. H. Tanaka and Y. Shoyama, “Formation of a monoclonal antibody against glycyrrhizin and development of an ELISA,” Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 1391–1393, 1998. View at Scopus
  12. S. Shan, H. Tanaka, and Y. Shoyama, “Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for glycyrrhizin using anti-glycyrrhizin monoclonal antibody and an eastern blotting technique for glucuronides of glycyrrhetic acid,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 73, no. 24, pp. 5784–5790, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. P. Loungratana, H. Tanaka, and Y. Shoyama, “Production of monoclonal antibody against ginkgolic acids in Ginkgo biloba Linn,” American Journal of Chinese Medicine, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 33–48, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. K. Katsumi, K. Edakuni, O. Morinaga, H. Tanaka, and Y. Shoyama, “An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for aconitine-type alkaloids using an anti-aconitine monoclonal antibody,” Analytica Chimica Acta, vol. 616, no. 1, pp. 109–114, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  15. K. Kido, O. Morinaga, Y. Shoyama, and H. Tanaka, “Quick analysis of baicalin in Scutellariae Radix by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using a monoclonal antibody,” Talanta, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 346–350, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  16. H. Tanaka, N. Fukuda, and Y. Shoyama, “Eastern blotting and immunoaffinity concentration using monoclonal antibody for ginseng saponins in the field of traditional Chinese medicines,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 55, no. 10, pp. 3783–3787, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  17. I. Wengatz, R.-D. Schmid, S. Kreissig, et al., “Determination of the hapten density of immuno-conjugates by matrix-assisted UV laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry,” Analytical Letters, vol. 25, pp. 1983–1997, 1992.
  18. Y. Shoyama, T. Fukada, T. Tanaka, A. Kusai, and K. Nojima, “Direct determination of opium alkaloid-bovine serum albumin conjugate by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry,” Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 1051–1053, 1993. View at Scopus
  19. Y. Shoyama, R. Sakata, R. Isobe, H. Murakami, A. Kusai, and K. Nojima, “Direct determination of forskolin-bovine serum albumin conjugate by matrx-assisted laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry,” Organic Mass Spectrometry, vol. 28, pp. 987–988, 1993.
  20. Y. Goto, Y. Shima, S. Morimoto, et al., “Determination of tetrahydrocannabinolic acid-carrier protein conjugate by matrix-assisted laster desorption/Ionization mass spectrometry and antibody formation,” Organic Mass Spectrometry, vol. 29, pp. 668–671, 1994.
  21. The Society for Korean Ginseng, In Understanding of Korean Ginseng, The Society for Korean Ginseng, Seoul, Korea, 1995.
  22. I. Kitagawa, T. Taniyama, M. Yoshikawa, Y. Ikenishi, and Y. Nakagawa, “Chemical studies on crude drug processing. VI. (1)) Chemical structures of malonyl-Ginsenosides Rb1, Rb2, Rc, and Rd isolated from the root of Panax ginseng C.A. Meyer,” Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, vol. 37, no. 11, pp. 2961–2970, 1989. View at Scopus
  23. O. Morinaga, H. Tanaka, and Y. Shoyama, “Detection and quantification of ginsenoside Re in ginseng samples by a chromatographic immunostaining method using monoclonal antibody against ginsenoside Re,” Journal of Chromatography B, vol. 830, no. 1, pp. 100–104, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  24. H. Tanaka, W. Putalun, C. Tsuzaki, and Y. Shoyama, “A simple determination of steroidal alkaloid glycosides by thin-layer chromatography immunostaining using monoclonal antibody against solamargine,” FEBS Letters, vol. 404, no. 2-3, pp. 279–282, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. N. Fukuda, S. Shan, H. Tanaka, and Y. Shoyama, “New staining methodology: eastern blotting for glycosides in the field of Kampo medicines,” Journal of Natural Medicines, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 21–27, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. S. Yokota, Y. Onohara, and Y. Shoyama, “Immunofluorescence and immunoelectron microscopic localization of medicinal substance, Rb1, in several plant parts of Panax ginseng,” Current Drug Discovery Technologies, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 51–59, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. O. Morinaga, S. Zhu, H. Tanaka, and Y. Shoyama, “Visual detection of saikosaponins by on-membrane immunoassay and estimation of traditional Chinese medicines containing Bupleuri radix,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 346, no. 3, pp. 687–692, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  28. N. Fukuda, H. Tanaka, and Y. Shoyama, “Isolation of the pharmacologically active saponin ginsenoside Rb1 from ginseng by immunoaffinity column chromatography,” Journal of Natural Products, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 283–285, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. H. Yanagihara, R. Sakata, H. Minami, H. Tanaka, Y. Shoyama, and H. Murakami, “Immunoaffinity column chromatography against forskolin using an anti-forskolin monoclonal antibody and its application,” Analytica Chimica Acta, vol. 335, no. 1-2, pp. 63–70, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. W. Putalun, H. Tanaka, and Y. Shoyama, “Rapid separation of solasodine glycosides by an immunoaffinity column using anti-solamargine monoclonal antibody,” Cytotechnology, vol. 31, no. 1-2, pp. 151–156, 1999. View at Scopus
  31. H. Tanaka, N. Fukuda, S. Yahara, S. Isoda, C. S. Yuan, and Y. Shoyama, “Isolation of ginsenoside Rb1 from Kalopanax pictus by eastern blotting using anti-ginsenoside Rb1 monoclonal antibody,” Phytotherapy Research, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 255–258, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  32. S. Amagaya, E. Sugishita, and Y. Ogihara, “Comparative studies of the stereoisomers of glycyrrhetinic acid on anti-inflammatory activities,” Journal of Pharmacobio-Dynamics, vol. 7, no. 12, pp. 923–928, 1984.
  33. R. Doll and I.-D. Hill, “Triterpenoid liquorice compound in gastric and duodenal ulcer,” The Lancet, vol. 280, no. 7266, pp. 1166–1167, 1962. View at Scopus
  34. Z. Y. Wang and D. W. Nixon, “Licorice and cancer,” Nutrition and Cancer, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2001. View at Scopus
  35. T. Kuroyanagi and M. Saito, “Effect of prednisolone and glycyrrhizin on passive transfer in experimental allergic encephalomyelitis,” Japanese Journal of Allergology, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 67–74, 1966. View at Scopus
  36. T. Nakamura, T. Fujii, and A. Ichihara, “Enzyme leakage due to change of membrane permeability of primary cultured rat hepatocytes treated with various hepatotoxins and its prevention by glycyrrhizin,” Cell Biology and Toxicology, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 285–295, 1985. View at Scopus
  37. M. N. Asl and H. Hosseinzadeh, “Review of pharmacological effects of glycyrrhiza sp. and its bioactive compounds,” Phytotherapy Research, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 709–724, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  38. J. Xu, H. Tanaka, and Y. Shoyama, “One-step immunochromatographic separation and ELISA quantification of glycyrrhizin from traditional Chinese medicines,” Journal of Chromatography B, vol. 850, no. 1-2, pp. 53–58, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  39. C.-Z. Wang and Y. Shoyama, “Herbal medicine: identification, and evaluation strategies,” in Text Book of Complementary and Alternative Medicine, C.-S. Yuan, E.-J. Bieber, and B.-A. Bauer, Eds., pp. 51–70, Informa Healthcare, Minnesota, Minn, USA, 2nd edition, 2006.
  40. S. Moncada, R. M. J. Palmer, and E. A. Higgs, “Nitric oxide: physiology, pathophysiology, and pharmacology,” Pharmacological Reviews, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 109–142, 1991. View at Scopus
  41. C. Nathan and Q. W. Xie, “Regulation of biosynthesis of nitric oxide,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 269, no. 19, pp. 13725–13728, 1994. View at Scopus
  42. K. M. Naseem, “The role of nitric oxide in cardiovascular diseases,” Molecular Aspects of Medicine, vol. 26, no. 1-2, pp. 33–65, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  43. T. J. Guzik, R. Korbut, and T. Adamek-Guzik, “Nitric oxide and superoxide in inflammation and immune regulation,” Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 469–487, 2003. View at Scopus
  44. S. B. Abramson, A. R. Amin, R. M. Clancy, and M. Attur, “The role of nitric oxide in tissue destruction,” Best Practice and Research: Clinical Rheumatology, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 831–845, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  45. T. Uto, O. Morinaga, H. Tanaka, and Y. Shoyama, “Analysis of the synergistic effect of glycyrrhizin and other constituents in licorice extract on lipopolysaccharide-induced nitric oxide production using knock-out extract,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 417, no. 1, pp. 473–478, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  46. K. Hashimoto, K. Satoh, P. Murata et al., “Components of Panax ginseng that improve accelerated small intestinal transit,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 115–119, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus