Table 1: Comparative performance of different electrodes for dopamine determination.

ElectrodeMethodDynamic range (mmol L−1)LD (mol L−1)Reference

ITO modified with LbL film from (PANI-PA/CG)6CVa0.01–0.231.5 × 10−8This work
ITO modified with LbL film from (PAH/Chichá gum/PAH/NiTsPcb)5CV0.3–2501.05 × 10−5[27]
ITO modified with LbL film from ([PAMAM-MWCNTs]c/NiTsPc)3CV2.5 × 10−3–0.245.4 × 10−7[28]
GCEd/MWCNTs modified with LbL film from (Nafion/[PVI-dmeOs]e)3DPVf1.0 × 10−4–0.015.0 × 10−8[29]
GCE modified with poly(flavin adenine dinucleotide)CV2.5 × 10−6–4.0 × 10−55.0 × 10−9[30]
ITO modified with LB film of (PANI/Rupyg)21CV0.04–1.24.0 × 10−5[31]
GCE modified with (LiTCNE/PLL)h membraneDPV1.0 × 10−5–0.015.0 × 10−10[32]

aCyclic voltammetry.
bTetrasulfonated metallophthalocyanine of nickel.
cPolyamidoamine-multiwalled carbon nanotubes.
dGlassy carbon electrode.
ePoly(vinylimidazole)-Os(4,4′-dimethylbpy)2Cl.
fDifferential pulse voltammetry.
gRuthenium complex mer-[RuCl3(dppb)(py)] (dppb = PPh2(CH2)4PPh2; (py) = pyridine).
hLithium tetracyanoethylenide/poly-L-lysine.