About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
International Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
Volume 2010 (2010), Article ID 274128, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.4061/2010/274128
Review Article

Amyloid-Beta Peptide, Oxidative Stress and Inflammation in Alzheimer's Disease: Potential Neuroprotective Effects of Omega-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids

British College of Osteopathic Medicine, Lief House, 120-122 Finchely Road, London NW5 5HR, UK

Received 8 February 2010; Accepted 23 April 2010

Academic Editor: Diana Paleacu

Copyright © 2010 S. C. Dyall. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease is the most common form of dementia in the elderly and is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterised by a decline in cognitive function and also profound alterations in mood and behaviour. The pathology of the disease is characterised by the presence of extracellular amyloid peptide deposits and intracellular neurofibrillary tangles in the brain. Although many hypotheses have been put forward for the aetiology of the disease, increased inflammation and oxidative stress appear key to be features contributing to the pathology. The omega-3 polyunsaturated fats, eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) have well-characterised effects on inflammation and may have neuroprotective effects in a number of neurodegenerative conditions including Alzheimer's disease. The aims of this paper are to review the neuroprotective effects of EPA and DHA in Alzheimer's disease, with special emphasis on their role in modulating oxidative stress and inflammation and also examine their potential as therapeutic agents.

1. Introduction

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia in the elderly. It is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterised by a decline in cognitive function and also profound alterations in mood and behaviour [1]. The pathology of the disease is characterised by the presence of extracellular amyloid peptide deposits, soluble amyloid -protein and hyperphosphorylated tau protein leading to the formation of intracellular neurofibrillary tangles in the brain. The aetiology and pathogenesis of the disease are currently poorly understood, and the present management is to a large extent symptomatic and focused on ameliorating the cognitive deficits [2]. However, although many hypotheses have been put forward for the aetiology of the disease, increased inflammation [3] and oxidative stress [4] appear to be key features contributing to the pathology of the disease.

The omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) have well-characterised effects on inflammation [5] and may have neuroprotective effects in a number of neurodegenerative conditions including AD [6]. The purpose of this paper is to review the neuroprotective effects of EPA and DHA in AD with emphasis on their potential for modulating amyloidosis and the increased oxidative stress and inflammation seen with AD and explore their potential application as therapeutic agents.

2. Amyloid -Peptide

A major hallmark of AD is the overproduction of amyloid -peptide (A ), which results in the formation of plaques. A peptides are produced by successive proteolysis of amyloid precursor protein (APP) by -site APP-cleaving enzyme-1 (BACE1) followed by -secretase [79]. This cleavage is imprecise and produces A variants, which include those ending at residues 40 (A 40) and 42 (A 42) [10]. The A 42 is deposited earliest and most abundantly in plaques [11]. A has been shown to induce lipid peroxidation in brain cell membranes and increase production of the lipid peroxidation products 4-hydroxynonenal and acrolein, and this may in part account for neurodegeneration in AD brain [12].

Several groups have investigated the role of DHA-enriched diets in animal models of AD and amyloidosis. In a series of studies Hashimoto and colleagues pretreated rats with DHA (300 mg/kg per day for 12 weeks) before an infusion of A 1-40 [1315]. DHA had a significantly protective effect against the decrease in learning ability and reduced the oxidative stress induced by the A infusion in the cerebral cortex and hippocampus. Pretreatment with DHA also prevented A -induced impairment of an avoidance ability-related memory function. This group also investigated the protective effects of the DHA pretreatment before A infusion on synaptosomal membranes properties. DHA content significantly increased along with both lateral and rotational membrane fluidity, whereas the cholesterol to phospholipid molar ratio and lipid peroxidation decreased.

Elevated cholesterol increases A levels in both in vitro and in vivo models of AD, and the generation, accumulation, and clearance of A are regulated by cholesterol [1618], suggesting an important role for cholesterol in the pathogenesis of AD. Indeed, cholesterol is now a recognized risk factor in the pathogenesis of AD [18]. Furthermore, A generation may be determined by dynamic interactions of APP with lipid rafts, since APP inside rafts undergoes cleavage by -secretase, whereas APP outside rafts undergoes cleavage by -secretase [19]. Lipid rafts are lateral assemblies of sphingolipids and cholesterol within the membrane [20], and it has been suggested that age-related increases in cholesterol in lipid rafts provides a cooperative environment for accumulation of A in plasma membranes [21]. It is therefore of interest to note that omega-3 PUFAs reduce the level of cholesterol in neuronal membranes [22], moreover cholesterol has a low affinity for DHA-containing phospholipids and therefore alterations in the level of membrane DHA will affect the formation of lipid rafts [23, 24]. It may be that the effects of DHA on cholesterol levels and lipid raft formation represent an important, but as-yet relatively unexplored, neuroprotective mechanism.

Recent work by Green and coworkers has shown that DHA reduces the levels of soluble and intraneuronal A and somatodendritic tau protein in the 3xTg AD mouse model [25]. The reduction was attributed to a decrease in the steady-state levels of presenilin 1. Importantly, when DHA was combined with either arachidonic or docosapentaenoic acids (both omega-6 PUFAs) the efficacy of DHA diminished over time, with the effects lost by 9 months. However, the additional presence of docosapentaenoic acid in the diet reduced levels of early-stage phospho-tau epitopes, which correlated with the positive outcome of a reduction in phosphorylated (activated) c-Jun N-terminal kinase, a putative tau kinase. It may be that the interrelationship between omega-6 and omega-3 PUFAs is a further important but neglected area of research. DHA has also been shown to significantly increase levels of the sorting protein LR11/SorLA in primary rat neurons, aged nontransgenic mice, and aged DHA-depleted APPsw AD mice [26]. This increase reduces the trafficking of the amyloid precursor protein to secretases involved in the -amyloidogenic pathway, and reduced LR11/SorLA expression is strongly correlated with AD neuropathology [27].

DHA also attenuates A secretion in cytokine-stressed human neural cells, and this is accompanied by formation of neuroprotectin D1 [28]. 10,17S-docosatriene, also known as neuroprotectin D1, is a metabolite of DHA, which has been shown to have potent anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective effects in neural systems [29] and stroke [30]. DHA and neuroprotectin D1 were reduced in the hippocampus cornu ammonis region 1 (CA1) of AD brains, but not in the thalamus or occipital lobes of the same brains. Furthermore, expression of cytosolic phospholipase A2 and 15-lipoxygenase, which are key enzymes in neuroprotectin D1 biosynthesis, was altered in AD hippocampus. Neuroprotectin D1 also repressed the A 42-triggered activation of proinflammatory genes and upregulated the antiapoptotic genes encoding Bcl-2, Bcl-xl, and Bfl-1(A1). The soluble amyloid precursor protein-alpha (APP- ) stimulated the biosynthesis of neuroprotectin D1 from DHA. These results suggest that the beneficial effects of DHA may in part also be mediated via the production of neuroprotectin D1, which induces anti-apoptotic and neuroprotective gene expression and consequently suppresses A 42-induced neurotoxicity.

Positive effects of DHA treatment have not however been universally reported and a recent study by Arendash and co-workers found that a high omega-3 PUFA diet provided no significant benefit in terms of decreasing the levels of soluble/insoluble hippocampal A levels or improving cognitive performance in neither amyloid precursor protein (APP)-sw and PS1 double transgenic or wild-type mice [31]. The authors did find that higher cortical levels of omega-6 PUFA in both the transgenic and wild type mice were associated with impaired cognitive function, as measured by the radial arm water maze and Morris water maze tests. It may be that if DHA is acting via a reduction in the steady-state levels of presenilin 1, as suggested by Green and co-workers [25], the overexpression of presenilin 1 in the transgenic mouse model used in this study overwhelms the capacity of DHA, and therefore this model may not accurately reflect the potential effects in patients, especially those affected by sporadic AD. Furthermore, the omega-3 PUFA experimental diet contained high levels of EPA, which may have antagonised the effects of DHA (4.7% EPA and 5.7% DHA expressed as % total fat) by for example competing for enzymes in the neuroprotectin D1 biosynthetic pathway.

An additional mechanism leading to a decrease in A levels has been suggested by a study investigating the effect of omega-3 PUFA enrichment on gene expression in aged rats [32]. In this study, there was a 10-fold increase in transthyretin transcription following treatment, and since transthyretin is an A protein scavenger [33], the authors concluded that the omega-3 PUFA-induced expression could potentially prevent amyloid aggregate formation. Indeed Serot and co-workers found an inverse relationship between transthyretin levels in cerebrospinal fluid and the severity of dementia in AD patients [34].

Several lines of evidence indicate that alterations in retinoid signalling lead to A accumulation. For example, vitamin A deprivation results in deposition of A in the cerebral blood vessels and downregulation of the retinoic acid receptor, RAR in adult rat forebrain [35], and APP/presenilin 1 double mutant transgenic mice treated for 8 weeks with retinoic acid show significantly decreased A deposition, tau phosphorylation, activation of microglia and astrocytes, attenuated neuronal degeneration and improved spatial memory compared to controls [36]. Retinoic acid regulates gene expression via its nuclear receptors: the retinoic acid receptors (RARs) and retinoid X receptors (RXRs) [37]. DHA and EPA have been reported to act as endogenous ligands of RXRs [3840], and omega-3 PUFA supplementation has recently been shown to reverse age-related decreases in the levels of RAR , RXR , and RXR in the aged rat forebrain [41]. It may be that omega-3 PUFAs are acting at a fundamental level of cell regulation by controlling gene expression via these receptors.

Omega-3 PUFA may also be acting at proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs), in particular PPAR . PPARs are involved in the control of the expression of a variety of genes involved in lipid energy metabolism and inflammation [42]. In vitro A uptake and clearance from glial and neuronal medium is increased by PPAR [43]. In models of AD PPAR agonists reduce BACE1 transcription and expression in APP transgenic mice [44, 45], PPAR agonist and ibuprofen treatment reduce the expression of BACE1 and A 42 amyloid deposits in the hippocampus and cortex of APPV717I mice [46], and PPAR agonists protect neurons against A -induced mitochondrial damage, apoptosis, and oxidative stress [47]. Furthermore, treatment with PPAR agonists significantly improves measures of cognition in mild AD and mild cognitively impaired subjects compared to a placebo [48]. PPAR ’s are known to bind to and be activated by EPA, DHA, and DHA metabolites [4951] and omega-3 PUFA supplementation has also been shown to reverse age-related decreases in the levels of PPAR in the aged rat forebrain [41].

There are a number of inflammatory events that occur in the brain as a response to the presence of A . The key event appears to be the presence of activated microglia in the vicinity of the A -containing plaques [52]. Microglial activation results in the sustained production of proinflammatory cytokines, growth factors, complement molecules, and adhesion molecules [53]. It has also been demonstrated that exposure of microglia to -amyloid fibrils leads to the production of reactive oxygen species and neurotoxins [54] and activated microglia generate and release large numbers of superoxide ions [52], thereby increasing oxidative stress. The remainder of this paper will focus on this increased oxidative stress and inflammation and the potential role of omega-3 PUFA.

3. Oxidative Stress and Lipid Peroxidation

The importance of increased oxidative stress, lipid peroxidation, and lipid peroxidation products has consistently been shown in the pathogenesis of AD [4]. For example, increased lipid peroxidation has been detected in the frontal, temporal, parietal, and occipital cortices of AD patients [55]. Moreover, significantly increased levels of the lipid peroxidation products 4-hydroxynonenal and acrolein, are found in the hippocampus/parahippocampal gyrus, superior and middle temporal gyrus, and cerebellum of subjects with mild cognitive impairment and early AD compared to age-matched controls [56], suggesting that lipid peroxidation occurs as an early event in the pathogenesis of AD. This is consistent with evidence from animal models of AD, where increased oxidative stress is also found in the APPsw (Tg2576) transgenic mouse model of AD amyloidosis. Cerebral cortical and hippocampal homogenates were found to have higher levels of lipid peroxidation than those from wild-type mice, and lipid peroxidation preceded amyloid plaque formation [57].

Isoprostanes are prostaglandin-like compounds formed in situ by nonenzymatic free radical-catalysed lipid peroxidation [58]. F2-isoprostanes are derived from the omega-6 PUFA, arachidonic acid, F3-isoprostanes from EPA and F4-isoprostanes, also called neuroprostanes, from DHA [5961]. Measurement of isoprostanes provides a sensitive marker of in vivo lipid peroxidation [6264]. Measurements comparing the level of isoprostanes and neuroprostanes between AD and matched controls in different regions of postmortem brains show a PUFA-specific pattern of lipid peroxidation. There is an increase in esterified neuroprostanes in the occipital and temporal lobes, whereas F2-isoprostanes in these regions are unchanged [65]. Similar results were found by Reich and coworkers, in the superior and middle temporal gyri, hippocampus, inferior parietal lobule, and cerebral cortex [66]. There were increased levels of neuroprostanes while F2-isoprostanes levels were unchanged. These results show a selective pattern of lipid peroxidation occuring in AD, whereby DHA appears especially vulnerable and arachidonic acid is unaffected.

These results may reflect more than simply the regional distribution of PUFA, since grey matter, where DHA is more abundant, has a significantly greater susceptibility to oxidative stress than white matter [64]. Levels of F2-isoprostanes and neuroprostanes was measured in the grey and white matter of brains from rats at intervals between 4 and 100 weeks of age. The level of neuroprostanes were consistently 20-fold greater than F2-isoprostanes, whereas DHA content was only two-fold greater than arachidonic acid, suggesting that DHA is especially prone to oxidative stress.

PUFAs are particularly susceptible to lipid peroxidation and as such are a potential abundant source of destructive peroxidation products. The in vitro peroxidisability of unsaturated fatty acids is linearly dependent upon the number of bis-allylic positions, such that the peroxidisability of DHA is five times greater than that of the omega-6 PUFA linoleic acid, which contains only two double bonds [67]. This increased susceptibility would help to explain the vulnerability of membrane DHA to lipid peroxidation and may also suggest that elevating omega-3 PUFA intake in situations of increased oxidative stress, such as AD, would further increase production of toxic peroxidation products.

Although some studies have shown increased lipid peroxidation following dietary supplementation with DHA and EPA in plasma, liver, and kidney [6873] others have shown that EPA and DHA enriched diets do not increase levels of lipid peroxidation [74, 75]. Indeed, rather than increasing lipid peroxidation DHA has been shown to be neuroprotective by actually decreasing lipid peroxidation in the brain [7678]. For example, rats being fed a diet enriched with DHA showed a significantly reduced level of cerebral lipid peroxide compared to controls [78], and the level of peroxidation was inversely related to the cerebral DHA/arachidonic acid ratio [77]. Furthermore, Tg2576 transgenic mice being fed a DHA deficient diet have significantly elevated levels of oxidised proteins compared to the control group, whereas the levels of oxidised proteins were significantly reduced in a DHA supplemented group [79].

Overall, these results suggest that DHA may function in an antioxidant role, at least in the brain. Yavin and colleagues have suggested a number of potential mechanisms for these observed antioxidant effects [80]. Membrane bound DHA may act as a trap for reactive oxygen species, DHA may be able to enhance the activity of endogenous antioxidant enzymes, or phosphatidylethanolamine plasmalogens containing DHA may contain intrinsic antioxidant properties. DHA has also been shown to induce antioxidant defences by enhancing cerebral activities of catalase, glutathione peroxidase, and levels of glutathione [81]. Furthermore, work by Green and colleagues suggests that DHA may reduce reactive oxygen species production by increasing nitric oxide production, which may decrease the cellular oxygen pool and consequently reduce the amount of reactive oxygen species and generate lipid peroxides [82].

4. Fatty Acid Composition

The increased lipid peroxidation and concomitant damage to membrane PUFA have the potential to significantly reduce the brain levels of PUFA and specifically DHA. However, a recent review found that low DHA is not consistently observed in plasma or brain of AD patients [83]. Although the authors did note wide variability between studies and suggested that it may be too early to draw any reliable conclusions. They did however report AD to be consistently associated with significantly lower phosphatidylethanolamine and phosphatidylcholine concentrations in the frontal cortex and hippocampus and the DHA content of hippocampal phosphatidylethanolamine is significantly lower compared to age-matched controls.

DHA is particularly enriched in phosphatidylethanolamine [84], and this is therefore an important cellular store of DHA. Furthermore, in the hippocampal CA1 region of AD patients unesterified DHA and neuroprotectin D1 levels are reported to be about one-half and one-twentieth of those in age-matched controls, respectively [28]. It may therefore be hypothesised that although DHA decreases do not appear widespread or large in magnitude, these selective decreases in the hippocampus may have profound effects on specific cellular pools and the subsequent production of key DHA metabolites.

5. Inflammation

In comparison with nondemented elderly subjects virtually all the inflammatory cytokines and chemokines so far investigated appear to be upregulated in AD patients, including IL-1 , IL-6, TNF- , IL-8, transforming growth factor- (TGF- ), and macrophage inflammatory protein-1α (MIP-1 ), for reviews see [3, 85]. The most notable proinflammatory cytokines produced by microglial cells, IL-1 and IL-1 are found throughout the brain of AD patients at autopsy [86]. IL-1 induces formation of reactive oxygen species, causing lipid peroxidation, and depletes membrane PUFA levels [87, 88]. IL-1 also triggers microglial activation and increases expression of amyloid precursor protein [89, 90]. Age-related increases in IL-1 are coupled with increased activity of MAPK, c-jun-N-terminal kinases (JNK, a stress activated MAP kinase), and p38 kinase and enhanced caspase-3 activity (an effector of apoptosis) [91]. MAP kinases mediate many specific cellular responses, including apoptosis and stress responses.

EPA supplementation has been reported to decrease the production of proinflammatory cytokines in rodents. For example, EPA reversed the age-related increases in IL-1 concentration and activation of p38 and caspase-3 [92]. The EPA supplementation also restored age-related decreases in arachidonic acid and DHA concentrations and decreased reactive oxygen species accumulation. It has also recently been shown that IL-1 reduces acetylcholine release in rats, which correlates with memory deficits, and EPA supplementation prevents the effects of IL-1 and significantly improves memory [93]. Degeneration of cholinergic neurons is thought to contribute to cognitive impairments in AD [94].

EPA and DHA are the precursors of a diverse array of second messengers, called resolvins and docosanoids, with potent anti-inflammatory and proresolving actions [30, 95, 96]. Resolution of inflammation has traditionally been thought of as a passive process; however, recent evidence suggests that resolution is an active process involving the biosynthesis of local lipid derived mediators within the resolution phase, called resolvins [96]. The D class resolvins, derived from DHA block TNF- -induced IL-1 transcripts in brain [95] and resolvin E1 (RvE1), produced from EPA, reduces IL-12 production via the ChemR23 receptor [97]. 10,17S-docosatriene, also known as neuroprotectin D1 is produced from DHA [30] and potently blocks the generation of both TNF- and IFN-c by stimulated T cells [98]. Together, these data suggest that the omega-3 PUFA metabolites have the potential to decrease inflammation by decreasing inflammatory cytokine production.

Most human dietary supplementation studies investigating the effects of omega-3 PUFA on cytokine production have typically examined the effects of high EPA rather than DHA preparations [99105]. EPA and DHA have differing effects on inflammatory response and they should not be considered as having mechanistic equivalence [106, 107]. Furthermore, EPA and DHA produce distinct metabolites, and it may be that DHA is the more potent immunological modulator via production of neuroprotectin D1. A recent trial supplemented 174 AD patients with a high DHA preparation (1.7 g DHA and 0.6 g EPA or placebo for 6 months) [108]. The DHA/EPA supplemented patients had significantly reduced IL-1 , and IL-6 release from lipopolysaccharide stimulated peripheral blood mononuclear cells compared to the placebo group, although TNF- , IL-8, IL-10 and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor were not affected.

The mechanism by which DHA and EPA are able to attenuate inflammatory processes has yet to be elucidated; however it is likely that these observed effects are mediated at the level of gene regulation by modifying the actions of transcription factors, with nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) a being potential candidate. NF-κB has many diverse functions in the nervous system and regulates a large number of genes encoding many inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-1 , IL-6, INF- , and MCP-1; however, it also regulates anti- and proapoptotic proteins including Bcl-2, Bcl-xl, Bcl-xs, Bax, cyclooygenase-2, and inducible nitric oxide synthase [109]. NF-κB activation occurs following a signalling cascade initiated by external inflammatory stimuli and involves the phosphorylation and subsequent degradation of the IκB inhibitory subunit, which allows NF-κB translocation to the nucleus and the subsequent activation of expression of target genes [109].

The role of NF-κB appears to be determined by cell type and timing of activation. For example, activation of NF-κB in neurons associated with amyloid deposits is currently thought to be neuroprotective, whereas induction of NF-κB in glia may be neurotoxic. For reviews see [109111]. EPA or omega-3 PUFA supplemented media decreases lipopolysaccharide-induced activation of NF-κB and TNF-α levels in cultured macrophages [112, 113] and monocytes [114], importantly, DHA suppresses IL-6 production and activation of NF-κB in lipopolysaccharide/interferon- stimulated glial cells [115], suggesting omega-3 PUFAs may have direct effects on inflammatory cytokine production via effects on the NF-κB signalling pathway. However, their site of action in this pathway and specific effects in neurons are yet to be determined.

6. Conclusions

Although there are strong correlations between low tissue levels of omega-3 PUFA and increased risk of AD, and low dietary intakes of omega-3 PUFA and cognitive decline and AD [116, 117], the results of dietary intervention studies have so far failed to live up to expectations raised by the preclinical and epidemiological studies. In the first study to look at the effects of omega-3 PUFA in AD, Yehuda and colleagues conducted a 4 week double-blind trial with 100 AD patients [118]. The supplemented group showed improvements in mood, cooperativity, short-term memory, appetite, sleep, and spatial orientation, whereas no improvements were seen in the placebo group. A subsequent pilot study investigated the effects of 500 mg EPA given twice daily for 12 weeks in patients with AD [119]. No differences were found and the authors concluded that EPA had no effects on cognition. A larger study in 174 patients found that administration of 1.7 g of DHA and 0.6 g of EPA per day for 6 months in patients with mild to moderate AD did not delay the rate of cognitive decline [120], although, positive effects were observed in a small subgroup of patients with very mild AD (MMSE 27 points).

Therefore, current evidence appears to indicate that the beneficial effects of omega-3 PUFAs are more related to limiting the progression of cognitive decline, as most clinical trials have so far failed to demonstrate the efficacy of omega-3 PUFA treatment after the onset of AD symptoms. However, it should be noted that preclinical studies have focused on the effects of DHA and its metabolites, whereas clinical studies have investigated EPA, or may have used insufficient doses of DHA. In brain tissue, DHA-derived metabolites promote resolution and protect neural cells from neurodegeneration [121] and may therefore be the more important omega-3 PUFA in modulating the secretion of cytokines and inhibiting neuroinflammation and oxidative stress in AD. Furthermore, recent evidence suggests that the beneficial effects of omega-3 PUFA on reducing the risk of dementia and AD may be reduced by the presence of the apolipoprotein E ε4 (APOE ε4) allele [122124]. It is hoped that future clinical studies will help clarify these issues and the relative roles and utility of DHA and EPA in the treatment of AD.

References

  1. D. J. Selkoe, “Alzheimer's disease: genes, proteins, and therapy,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 741–766, 2001. View at Scopus
  2. M. F. Murphy, J. J. Sramek, N. M. Kurtz, A. Carta, and N. R. Cutler, Alzheimer's Disease: Optimizing the Development of the Next Generation of Therapeutic Compounds, Greenwich Medical Media, London, UK, 1998.
  3. H. Akiyama, S. Barger, and S. Barger, “Inflammation and Alzheimer's disease,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 383–421, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. W. R. Markesbery, “Oxidative stress hypothesis in Alzheimer's disease,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 134–147, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. P. C. Calder, “Polyunsaturated fatty acids and inflammatory processes: new twists in an old tale,” Biochimie, vol. 91, pp. 791–795, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  6. S. C. Dyall and A. T. Michael-Titus, “Neurological benefits of omega-3 fatty acids,” NeuroMolecular Medicine, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 219–235, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  7. B. De Strooper, P. Saftig, and P. Saftig, “Deficiency of presenilin-1 inhibits the normal cleavage of amyloid precursor protein,” Nature, vol. 391, no. 6665, pp. 387–390, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  8. D. Edbauer, E. Winkler, J. T. Regula, B. Pesold, H. Steiner, and C. Haass, “Reconstitution of γ-secretase activity,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 486–488, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  9. R. Vassar, B. D. Bennett, and B. D. Bennett, “β-Secretase cleavage of Alzheimer's amyloid precursor protein by the transmembrane aspartic protease BACE,” Science, vol. 286, no. 5440, pp. 735–741, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. S. L. Cole and R. Vassar, “The role of amyloid precursor protein processing by BACE1, the β-secretase, in Alzheimer disease pathophysiology,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 283, no. 44, pp. 29621–29625, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  11. D. M .A. Mann, T. Iwatsubo, N. J. Cairns, et al., “Amyloid β protein (Aβ) deposition in chromosome 14-linked Alzheimer's disease: predominance of Aβ42(43),” Annals of Neurology, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 149–156, 1996. View at Scopus
  12. D. A. Butterfield and C. M. Lauderback, “Lipid peroxidation and protein oxidation in Alzheimer's disease brain: potential causes and consequences involving amyloid β-peptide-associated free radical oxidative stress,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 32, no. 11, pp. 1050–1060, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. Hashimoto, S. Hossain, and S. Hossain, “Docosahexaenoic acid provides protection from impairment of learning ability in Alzheimer's disease model rats,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 81, no. 5, pp. 1084–1091, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. Hashimoto, S. Hossain, H. Agdul, and O. Shido, “Docosahexaenoic acid-induced amelioration on impairment of memory learning in amyloid β-infused rats relates to the decreases of amyloid β and cholesterol levels in detergent-insoluble membrane fractions,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1738, no. 1–3, pp. 91–98, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  15. M. Hashimoto, S. Hossain, T. Shimada, and O. Shido, “Docosahexaenoic acid-induced protective effect against impaired learning in amyloid β-infused rats is associated with increased synaptosomal membrane fluidity,” Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology, vol. 33, no. 10, pp. 934–939, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  16. M. Simons, P. Keller, B. de Strooper, K. Beyreuther, C. G. Dotti, and K. Simons, “Cholesterol depletion inhibits the generation of β-amyloid in hippocampal neurons,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 95, no. 11, pp. 6460–6464, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. W. G. Wood, F. Schroeder, U. Igbavboa, N. A. Avdulov, and S. V. Chochina, “Brain membrane cholesterol domains, aging and amyloid beta-peptides,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 685–694, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. L. Puglielli, R. E. Tanzi, and D. M. Kovacs, “Alzheimer's disease: the cholesterol connection,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 345–351, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  19. R. Ehehalt, P. Keller, C. Haass, C. Thiele, and K. Simons, “Amyloidogenic processing of the Alzheimer β-amyloid precursor protein depends on lipid rafts,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 160, no. 1, pp. 113–123, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  20. K. Simons and D. Toomre, “Lipid rafts and signal transduction,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 31–39, 2000. View at Scopus
  21. W. G. Wood, F. Schroeder, U. Igbavboa, N. A. Avdulov, and S. V. Chochina, “Brain membrane cholesterol domains, aging and amyloid beta-peptides,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 685–694, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. S. Yehuda, S. Rabinovitz, R. L. Carasso, and D. I. Mostofsky, “The role of polyunsaturated fatty acids in restoring the aging neuronal membrane,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 843–853, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. S. R. Shaikh, M. R. Brzustowicz, N. Gustafson, W. Stillwell, and S. R. Wassall, “Monounsaturated PE does not phase-separate from the lipid raft molecules sphingomyelin and cholesterol: role for polyunsaturation?” Biochemistry, vol. 41, no. 34, pp. 10593–10602, 2002. View at Scopus
  24. S. R. Shaikh, V. Cherezov, M. Caffrey, W. Stillwell, and S. R. Wassall, “Interaction of cholesterol with a docosahexaenoic acid-containing phosphatidylethanolamine: trigger for microdomain/raft formation?” Biochemistry, vol. 42, no. 41, pp. 12028–12037, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  25. K. N. Green, H. Martinez-Coria, H. Khashwji, E. B. Hall, K. A. Yurko-Mauro, L. Ellis, and F. M. LaFerla, “Dietary docosahexaenoic acid and docosapentaenoic acid ameliorate amyloid-β and tau pathology via a mechanism involving presenilin 1 levels,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 27, no. 16, pp. 4385–4395, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  26. Q.-L. Ma, B. Teter, and B. Teter, “Omega-3 fatty acid docosahexaenoic acid increases SorLA/LR11, a sorting protein with reduced expression in sporadic Alzheimer's disease (AD): relevance to AD prevention,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 27, no. 52, pp. 14299–14307, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  27. K. Offe, S. E. Dodson, J. T. Shoemaker, J. J. Fritz, M. Gearing, A. I. Levey, and J. J. Lah, “The lipoprotein receptor LR11 regulates amyloid β production and amyloid precursor protein traffic in endosomal compartments,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 1596–1603, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  28. W. J. Lukiw, J.-G. Cui, and J.-G. Cui, “A role for docosahexaenoic acid-derived neuroprotectin D1 in neural cell survival and Alzheimer disease,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 115, no. 10, pp. 2774–2783, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  29. P. K. Mukherjee, V. L. Marcheselli, C. N. Serhan, and N. G. Bazan, “Neuroprotectin D1: a docosahexaenoic acid-derived docosatriene protects human retinal pigment epithelial cells from oxidative stress,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 101, no. 22, pp. 8491–8496, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  30. V. L. Marcheselli, S. Hong, and S. Hong, “Novel docosanoids inhibit brain ischemia-reperfusion-mediated leukocyte infiltration and pro-inflammatory gene expression,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 278, no. 44, pp. 43807–43817, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  31. G. W. Arendash, M. T. Jensen, and M. T. Jensen , “A diet high in omega-3 fatty acids does not improve or protect cognitive performance in Alzheimer's transgenic mice,” Neuroscience, vol. 149, no. 2, pp. 286–302, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  32. G. Barceló-Coblijn, K. Kitajka, L. G. Puskás, E. Hogyes, A. Zvara, L. Hackler Jr., and T. Farkas, “Gene expression and molecular composition of phospholipids in rat brain in relation to dietary n-6 to n-3 fatty acid ratio,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1632, no. 1–3, pp. 72–79, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. C. D. Link, “Expression of human β-amyloid peptide in transgenic Caenorhabditis elegans,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 92, no. 20, pp. 9368–9372, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. J.-M. Serot, D. Christmann, T. Dubost, and M. Couturier, “Cerebrospinal fluid transthyretin: aging and late onset Alzheimer's disease,” Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 506–508, 1997. View at Scopus
  35. J. P. T. Corcoran, P. L. So, and M. Maden, “Disruption of the retinoid signalling pathway causes a deposition of amyloid β in the adult rat brain,” European Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 896–902, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  36. Y. Ding, A. Qiao, and A. Qiao, “Retinoic acid attenuates β-amyloid deposition and rescues memory deficits in an Alzheimer's disease transgenic mouse model,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 28, no. 45, pp. 11622–11634, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  37. D. J. Mangelsdorf and D. A. Evans, “The RXR heterodimers and orphan receptors,” Cell, vol. 83, no. 6, pp. 841–850, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. A. M. de Urquiza, S. Liu, M. Sjoberg, R. H. Zetterstrom, W. Griffiths, J. Sjovall, and T. Perlmann, “Docosahexaenoic acid, a ligand for the retinoid X receptor in mouse brain,” Science, vol. 290, no. 5499, pp. 2140–2144, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. P. F. Egea, A. Mitschler, and D. Moras, “Molecular recognition of agonist ligands by RXRs,” Molecular Endocrinology, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 987–997, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. J. Lengqvist, A. Mata de Urquiza, A.-C. Bergman, T. M. Willson, J. Sjövall, T. Perlmann, and W. J. Griffiths, “Polyunsaturated fatty acids including docosahexaenoic and arachidonic acid bind to the retinoid X receptor α ligand-binding domain,” Molecular and Cellular Proteomics, vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 692–703, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  41. S. C. Dyall, G. J. Michael, and A. T. Michael-Titus, “Omega-3 fatty acids reverse age-related decreases in nuclear receptors and increase neurogenesis in old rats,” Journal of Neuroscience Research, vol. 88, pp. 2091–2102, 2010.
  42. B. Desvergne and W. Wahli, “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors: nuclear control of metabolism,” Endocrine Reviews, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 649–688, 1999. View at Scopus
  43. I. E. Camacho, L. Serneels, K. Spittaels, P. Merchiers, D. Dominguez, and B. De Strooper, “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ induces a clearance mechanism for the amyloid-β peptide,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 24, no. 48, pp. 10908–10917, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  44. M. Sastre, I. Dewachter, G. E. Landreth, et al., “Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma agonists modulate immunostimulated processing of amyloid precursor protein through regulation of beta-secretase,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 23, pp. 9796–9804, 2003.
  45. M. Sastre, I. Dewachter, S. Rossner, et al., “Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs repress β-secretase gene promoter activity by the activation of PPARγ,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 103, no. 2, pp. 443–448, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  46. M. T. Heneka, M. Sastre, L. Dumitrescu-Ozimek, et al., “Acute treatment with the PPARgamma agonist pioglitazone and ibuprofen reduces glial inflammation and Abeta1-42 levels in APPV717I transgenic mice,” Brain, vol. 128, pp. 1442–1453, 2005.
  47. K. Fuenzalida, R. Quintanilla, and R. Quintanilla, “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ up-regulates the Bcl-2 anti-apoptotic protein in neurons and induces mitochondrial stabilization and protection against oxidative stress and apoptosis,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 282, no. 51, pp. 37006–37015, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  48. G. S. Watson, B. A. Cholerton, and B. A. Cholerton, “Preserved cognition in patients with early Alzheimer disease and amnestic mild cognitive impairment during treatment with rosiglitazone: a preliminary study,” American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 950–958, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  49. C. Chambrier, J.-P. Bastard, and J.-P. Bastard, “Eicosapentaenoic acid induces mRNA expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ,” Obesity Research, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 518–525, 2002. View at Scopus
  50. T. Itoh, I. Murota, K. Yoshikai, S. Yamada, and K. Yamamoto, “Synthesis of docosahexaenoic acid derivatives designed as novel PPARγ agonists and antidiabetic agents,” Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 98–108, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  51. K. Yamamoto, T. Itoh, and T. Itoh, “Identification of putative metabolites of docosahexaenoic acid as potent PPARγ agonists and antidiabetic agents,” Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 517–522, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  52. E. G. McGeer and P. L. McGeer, “Inflammatory processes in Alzheimer's disease,” Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 741–749, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  53. W. S. T. Griffin, “Inflammation and neurodegenerative diseases,” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 470S–474S, 2006. View at Scopus
  54. C. K. Combs, D. E. Johnson, S. B. Cannady, T. M. Lehman, and G. E. Landreth, “Identification of microglial signal transduction pathways mediating a neurotoxic response to amyloidogenic fragments of β-amyloid and prion proteins,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 928–939, 1999. View at Scopus
  55. M. D. Miranda, V. M. S. de Bruin, M. R. Vale, and G. S. B. Viana, “Lipid peroxidation and nitrite plus nitrate levels in brain tissue from patients with Alzheimer's disease,” Gerontology, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 179–184, 2000. View at Scopus
  56. T. I. Williams, B. C. Lynn, W. R. Markesbery, and M. A. Lovell, “Increased levels of 4-hydroxynonenal and acrolein, neurotoxic markers of lipid peroxidation, in the brain in Mild Cognitive Impairment and early Alzheimer's disease,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 1094–1099, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  57. D. Praticò, K. Uryu, S. Leight, J. Q. Trojanoswki, and V. M.-Y. Lee, “Increased lipid peroxidation precedes amyloid plaque formation in an animal model of alzheimer amyloidosis,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 4183–4187, 2001. View at Scopus
  58. J. D. Morrow, J. A. Awad, H. J. Boss, I. A. Blair, and L. J. Roberts II, “Non-cyclooxygenase-derived prostanoids (F2-isoprostanes) are formed in situ on phospholipids,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 89, no. 22, pp. 10721–10725, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. J. Nourooz-Zadeh, B. Halliwell, and E. E. Änggård, “Evidence for the formation of F3-isoprostanes during peroxidation of eicosapentaenoic acid,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 236, no. 2, pp. 467–472, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  60. J. Nourooz-Zadeh, E. H. C. Liu, E. E. Änggård, and B. Halliwell, “F4-isoprostanes: a novel class of prostanoids formed during peroxidation of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA),” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 242, no. 2, pp. 338–344, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. S. S. Fam, L. J. Murphey, and L. J. Murphey, “Formation of highly reactive A-ring and J-ring isoprostane-like compounds (A4/J4-neuroprostanes) in vivo from docosahexaenoic acid,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 277, no. 39, pp. 36076–36084, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  62. J.-L. Cracowski, T. Durand, and G. Bessard, “Isoprostanes as a biomarker of lipid peroxidation in humans: physiology, pharmacology and clinical implications,” Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 360–366, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. L. J. Roberts II and J. F. Reckelhoff, “Measurement of F2-isoprostanes unveils profound oxidative stress in aged rats,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 287, no. 1, pp. 254–256, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  64. J. A. Youssef, L. S. Birnbaum, L. L. Swift, J. D. Morrow, and M. Z. Badr, “Age-independent, gray matter-localized, brain-enhanced oxidative stress in male fischer 344 rats: brain levels of F2-isoprostanes and F4-neuroprostanes,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 34, no. 12, pp. 1631–1635, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. J. Nourooz-Zadeh, E. H. C. Liu, B. Yhlen, E. E. Änggård, and B. Halliwell, “F4-isoprostanes as specific marker of docosahexaenoic acid peroxidation in Alzheimer's disease,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 734–740, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. E. E. Reich, W. R. Markesbery, L. J. Roberts II, L. L. Swift, J. D. Morrow, and T. J. Montine, “Brain regional quantification of F-ring and D-/E-ring isoprostanes and neuroprostanes in Alzheimer's disease,” American Journal of Pathology, vol. 158, no. 1, pp. 293–297, 2001. View at Scopus
  67. J. P. Cosgrove, D. F. Church, and W. A. Pryor, “The kinetics of the autoxidation of polyunsaturated fatty acids,” Lipids, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 299–304, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. K. Kubo, M. Saito, T. Tadokoro, and A. Maekawa, “Changes in susceptibility of tissues to lipid peroxidation after ingestion of various levels of docosahexaenoic acid and vitamin E,” British Journal of Nutrition, vol. 78, no. 4, pp. 655–669, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. M. Meydani, F. Natiello, and F. Natiello, “Effect of long-term fish oil supplementation on vitamin E status and lipid peroxidation in women,” Journal of Nutrition, vol. 121, no. 4, pp. 484–491, 1991. View at Scopus
  70. A. Jenkinson, M. F. Franklin, K. Wahle, and G. G. Duthie, “Dietary intakes of polyunsaturated fatty acids and indices of oxidative stress in human volunteers,” European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 53, no. 7, pp. 523–528, 1999. View at Scopus
  71. J. P. Allard, R. Kurian, E. Aghdassi, R. Muggli, and D. Royall, “Lipid peroxidation during n-3 fatty acid and vitamin E supplementation in humans,” Lipids, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 535–541, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. H. Grundt, D. W. T. Nilsen, M. A. Mansoor, and A. Nordøy, “Increased lipid peroxidation during long-term intervention with high doses of n-3 fatty acids (PUFAs) following an acute myocardial infarction,” European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 793–800, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  73. J. H. Song and T. Miyazawa, “Enhanced level of n-3 fatty acid in membrane phospholipids induces lipid peroxidation in rats fed dietary docosahexaenoic acid oil,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 155, no. 1, pp. 9–18, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. K. Ando, K. Nagata, R. Yoshida, K. Kikugawa, and M. Suzuki, “Effect of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation on lipid peroxidation of rat organs,” Lipids, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 401–407, 2000. View at Scopus
  75. J. V. Higdon, J. Liu, S.-H. Du, J. D. Morrow, B. N. Ames, and R. C. Wander, “Supplementation of postmenopausal women with fish oil rich in eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid is not associated with greater in vivo lipid peroxidation compared with oils rich in oleate and linoleate as assessed by plasma malondialdehyde and F2-isoprostanes,” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 714–722, 2000. View at Scopus
  76. P. Green, S. Glozman, L. Weiner, and E. Yavin, “Enhanced free radical scavenging and decreased lipid peroxidation in the rat fetal brain after treatment with ethyl docosahexaenoate,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1532, no. 3, pp. 203–212, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. M. S. Hossain, M. Hashimoto, and S. Masumura, “Influence of docosahexaenoic acid on cerebral lipid peroxide level in aged rats with and without hypercholesterolemia,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 244, no. 3, pp. 157–160, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  78. K. Kubo, M. Saito, T. Tadokoro, and A. Maekawa, “Dietary docosahexaenoic acid dose not promote lipid peroxidation in rat tissue to the extent expected from peroxidizability index of the lipids,” Bioscience, Biotechnology and Biochemistry, vol. 62, no. 9, pp. 1698–1706, 1998. View at Scopus
  79. G. P. Lim, F. Calon, and F. Calon, “A diet enriched with the omega-3 fatty acid docosahexaenoic acid reduces amyloid burden in an aged Alzheimer mouse model,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 25, no. 12, pp. 3032–3040, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  80. E. Yavin, A. Brand, and P. Green, “Docosahexaenoic acid abundance in the brain: a biodevice to combat oxidative stress,” Nutritional Neuroscience, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 149–157, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  81. M. S. Hossain, M. Hashimoto, S. Gamoh, and S. Masumura, “Antioxidative effects of docosahexaenoic acid in the cerebrum versus cerebellum and brainstem of aged hypercholesterolemic rats,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 1133–1138, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. P. Green, S. Glozman, and E. Yavin, “Ethyl docosahexaenoate-associated decrease in fetal brain lipid peroxide production is mediated by activation of prostanoid and nitric oxide pathways,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1531, no. 1-2, pp. 156–164, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  83. M. Plourde, M. Fortier, and M. Fortier, “Unresolved issues in the link between docosahexaenoic acid and Alzheimer's disease,” Prostaglandins Leukotrienes and Essential Fatty Acids, vol. 77, no. 5-6, pp. 301–308, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  84. S. C. Dyall, G. J. Michael, R. Whelpton, A. G. Scott, and A. T. Michael-Titus, “Dietary enrichment with omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids reverses age-related decreases in the GluR2 and NR2B glutamate receptor subunits in rat forebrain,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 424–439, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  85. T. Wyss-Coray, “Inflammation in Alzheimer disease: driving force, bystander or beneficial response?” Nature Medicine, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 1005–1015, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  86. W. S. T. Griffin, L. C. Stanley, and L. C. Stanley, “Brain interleukin 1 and S-100 immunoreactivity are elevated in Down syndrome and Alzheimer disease,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 86, no. 19, pp. 7611–7615, 1989. View at Scopus
  87. C. A. Murray and M. A. Lynch, “Evidence that increased hippocampal expression of the cytokine interleukin-1β is a common trigger for age- and stress-induced impairments in long-term potentiation,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 2974–2981, 1998. View at Scopus
  88. C. A. Murray, M. P. Clements, and M. A. Lynch, “Interleukin-1 induces lipid peroxidation and membrane changes in rat hippocampus: an age-related study,” Gerontology, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 136–142, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  89. M. C. P. Godoy, R. Tarelli, C. C. Ferrari, M. I. Sarchi, and F. J. Pitossi, “Central and systemic IL-1 exacerbates neurodegeneration and motor symptoms in a model of Parkinson's disease,” Brain, vol. 131, no. 7, pp. 1880–1894, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  90. W. S. T. Griffin, L. Liu, Y. Li, R. E. Mrak, and S. W. Barger, “Interleukin-1 mediates Alzheimer and Lewy body pathologies,” Journal of Neuroinflammation, vol. 3, p. 5, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  91. A. M. Lynch and M. A. Lynch, “The age-related increase in IL-1 type I receptor in rat hippocampus is coupled with an increase in caspase-3 activation,” European Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 15, no. 11, pp. 1779–1788, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  92. D. S. D. Martin, P. E. Lonergan, and P. E. Lonergan, “Apoptotic changes in the aged brain are triggered by interleukin-1β-induced activation of p38 and reversed by treatment with eicosapentaenoic acid,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 277, no. 37, pp. 34239–34246, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  93. P. Taepavarapruk and C. Song, “Reductions of acetylcholine release and nerve growth factor expression are correlated with memory impairment induced by interleukin-1β administrations: effects of omega-3 fatty acid EPA treatment,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 112, no. 4, pp. 1054–1064, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  94. E. J. Coulson, L. M. May, A. M. Sykes, and A. S. Hamlin, “The role of the p75 neurotrophin receptor in cholinergic dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease,” Neuroscientist, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 317–323, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  95. S. Hong, K. Gronert, P. R. Devchand, R.-L. Moussignac, and C. N. Serhan, “Novel docosatrienes and 17S-resolvins generated from docosahexaenoic acid in murine brain, human blood, and glial cells: autacoids in anti-inflammation,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 278, no. 17, pp. 14677–14687, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  96. C. N. Serhan and N. Chiang, “Endogenous pro-resolving and anti-inflammatory lipid mediators: a new pharmacologic genus,” British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 153, no. 1, pp. S200–S215, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  97. M. Arita, F. Bianchini, and F. Bianchini, “Stereochemical assignment, antiinflammatory properties, and receptor for the omega-3 lipid mediator resolvin E1,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 201, no. 5, pp. 713–722, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  98. A. Ariel, P.-L. Li, and P.-L. Li, “The docosatriene protectin D1 is produced by TH2 skewing promotes human T cell via lipid raft clustering,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 280, no. 52, pp. 43079–43086, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  99. T. R. Billiar, P. E. Bankey, and P. E. Bankey, “Fatty acid intake and Kupffer cell function: fish oil alters eicosanoid and monokine production to endotoxin stimulation,” Surgery, vol. 104, no. 2, pp. 343–349, 1988. View at Scopus
  100. A. L. Cooper, L. Gibbons, M. A. Horan, R. A. Little, and N. J. Rothwell, “Effect of dietary fish oil supplementation on fever and cytokine production in human volunteers,” Clinical Nutrition, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 321–328, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  101. S. Endres, R. Ghorbani, and R. Ghorbani, “The effect of dietary supplementation with n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids on the synthesis of interleukin-1 and tumor necrosis factor by mononuclear cells,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 320, no. 5, pp. 265–271, 1989. View at Scopus
  102. K. Fritsche, “Fatty acids as modulators of the immune response,” Annual Review of Nutrition, vol. 26, pp. 45–73, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  103. S. N. Meydani, S. Endres, and S. Endres, “Oral (n-3) fatty acid supplementation suppresses cytokine production and lymphocyte proliferation: comparison between young and older women,” Journal of Nutrition, vol. 121, no. 4, pp. 547–555, 1991. View at Scopus
  104. S. N. Meydani, A. H. Lichtenstein, and A. H. Lichtenstein, “Immunologic effects of national cholesterol education panel step-2 diets with and without fish-derived N-3 fatty acid enrichment,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 92, no. 1, pp. 105–113, 1993. View at Scopus
  105. G. Renier, E. Skamene, J. DeSanctis, and D. Radzioch, “Dietary n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids prevent the development of atherosclerotic lesions in mice. Modulation of macrophage secretory activities,” Arteriosclerosis and Thrombosis, vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 1515–1524, 1993. View at Scopus
  106. S. Kew, M. D. Mesa, S. Tricon, R. Bitckley, A. M. Minihane, and P. Yaqoob, “Effects of oils rich in eicosapentaenoic and docosahexaenoic acids on immune cell composition and function in healthy humans,” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 79, no. 4, pp. 674–681, 2004. View at Scopus
  107. O. Obajimi, K. D. Black, D. J. MacDonald, R. M. Boyle, I. Glen, and B. M. Ross, “Differential effects of eicosapentaenoic and docosahexaenoic acids upon oxidant-stimulated release and uptake of arachidonic acid in human lymphoma U937 cells,” Pharmacological Research, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 183–191, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  108. I. Vedin, T. Cederholm, Y. F. Levi, et al., “Effects of docosahexaenoic acid-rich n-3 fatty acid supplementation on cytokine release from blood mononuclear leukocytes: the OmegAD study,” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 87, no. 6, pp. 1616–1622, 2008. View at Scopus
  109. R. Malek, K. K. Borowicz, M. Jargiello, and S. J. Czuczwar, “Role of nuclear factor kappaB in the central nervous system,” Pharmacological Reports, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 25–33, 2007.
  110. B. Kaltschmidt and C. Kaltschmidt, “NF-kappaB in the nervous system,” Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology, vol. 1, no. 3, Article ID a001271, 2009.
  111. M. P. Mattson and S. Camandola, “NF-κB in neuronal plasticity and neurodegenerative disorders,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 107, no. 3, pp. 247–254, 2001. View at Scopus
  112. T. E. Novak, T. A. Babcock, D. H. Jho, W. S. Helton, and N. J. Espat, “NF-κB inhibition by ω-3 fatty acids modulates LPS-stimulated macrophage TNF-α-transcription,” American Journal of Physiology, vol. 284, no. 1, pp. L84–L89, 2003. View at Scopus
  113. C.-J. Lo, K. C. Chiu, M. Fu, R. Lo, and S. Helton, “Fish oil decreases macrophage tumor necrosis factor gene transcription by altering the NFκB activity,” Journal of Surgical Research, vol. 82, no. 2, pp. 216–221, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  114. Y. Zhao, S. Joshi-Barve, S. Barve, and L. H. Chen, “Eicosapentaenoic acid Prevents LPS-induced TNF-α expression by preventing NF-κB activation,” Journal of the American College of Nutrition, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 71–78, 2004. View at Scopus
  115. H.-C. Pan, T.-K. Kao, and T.-K. Kao, “Protective effect of docosahexaenoic acid against brain injury in ischemic rats,” Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry, vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 715–725, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  116. P. Barberger-Gateau, L. Letenneur, V. Deschamps, K. Pérès, J.-F. Dartigues, and S. Renaud, “Fish, meat, and risk of dementia: cohort study,” British Medical Journal, vol. 325, no. 7370, pp. 932–933, 2002. View at Scopus
  117. M. C. Morris, “Docosahexaenoic acid and Alzheimer disease,” Archives of Neurology, vol. 63, no. 11, pp. 1527–1528, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  118. S. Yehuda, S. Rabinovtz, R. L. Carasso, and D. I. Mostofsky, “Essential fatty acids preparation (SR-3) improves Alzheimer's patients quality of life,” International Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 87, no. 3-4, pp. 141–149, 1996. View at Scopus
  119. P. F. Boston, A. Bennett, D. F. Horrobin, and C. N. Bennett, “Ethyl-EPA in Alzheimer's disease—a pilot study,” Prostaglandins Leukotrienes and Essential Fatty Acids, vol. 71, no. 5, pp. 341–346, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  120. Y. Freund-Levi, M. Eriksdotter-Jönhagen, and M. Eriksdotter-Jönhagen, “ω-3 fatty acid treatment in 174 patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer disease: omegAD study: a randomized double-blind trial,” Archives of Neurology, vol. 63, no. 10, pp. 1402–1408, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  121. N. G. Bazan, “Neuroprotectin D1 (NPD1): a DHA-derived mediator that protects brain and retina against cell injury-induced oxidative stress,” Brain Pathology, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 159–166, 2005. View at Scopus
  122. T. L. Huang, P. P. Zandi, K. L. Tucker, et al., “Benefits of fatty fish on dementia risk are stronger for those without APOE epsilon4,” Neurology, vol. 65, no. 9, pp. 1409–1414, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  123. M. Plourde, M. C. Vohl, M. Vandal, P. Couture, S. Lemieux, and S. C. Cunnane, “Plasma n-3 fatty acid response to an n-3 fatty acid supplement is modulated by apoE epsilon4 but not by the common PPAR-alpha L162V polymorphism in men,” British Journal of Nutrition, vol. 102, pp. 1121–1124, 2009.
  124. L. J. Whalley, I. J. Deary, J. M. Starr, K. W. Wahle, K. A. Rance, V. J. Bourne, and H. C. Fox, “n-3 Fatty acid erythrocyte membrane content, APOE ε4, and cognitive variation: an observational follow-up study in late adulthood,” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 449–454, 2008. View at Scopus