Review Article
CSF Biomarkers for Alzheimer's Disease Diagnosis
Table 1
Some promising biomarkers in diagnosis of AD.
| Category | Markers |
Advantages |
Limitations | References |
| Imaging | | () Noninvasive | () Expensive | [12–14] | CT, PET, PIB-PET, | () Provides structural and functional | () Requires experienced personnel | MRI |
details of brain immediately | (3) The sensitivity and specificity to | | () Can reveal disease progression |
AD is not satisfactory |
| Plasma | -Macroglobulin, | () Noninvasive | () Less correlation to AD | [15–17] | Complement | () Samples are easily accessible | () Less sensitive and specific for AD | factor H, A42 | |
diagnosis (due to epitope masking) |
| CSF | A42, t-tau, | () Can correlate AD directly | () Invasive, sample has to be collected | [10, 18] | p-tau p-tau/A42, | () Highly sensitive and specific |
by lumbar puncture | t-tau/A42 | () Can detect AD progression | () Irreproducible diagnosis due to | | |
sample storage and transportation |
|
|