About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
International Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
Volume 2011 (2011), Article ID 276393, 17 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.4061/2011/276393
Review Article

Link between Aluminum and the Pathogenesis of Alzheimer's Disease: The Integration of the Aluminum and Amyloid Cascade Hypotheses

1Department of Analytical Chemistry, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyushu University of Health and Welfare, 1714-1 Yoshino-cho, Nobeoka-shi, Miyazaki 882-8508, Japan
2Institute of Industrial Science (IIS), The University of Tokyo, 4-6-1 Komaba, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-8904, Japan

Received 15 September 2010; Revised 29 November 2010; Accepted 5 January 2011

Academic Editor: Paolo Zatta

Copyright © 2011 Masahiro Kawahara and Midori Kato-Negishi. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Whilst being environmentally abundant, aluminum is not essential for life. On the contrary, aluminum is a widely recognized neurotoxin that inhibits more than 200 biologically important functions and causes various adverse effects in plants, animals, and humans. The relationship between aluminum exposure and neurodegenerative diseases, including dialysis encephalopathy, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and Parkinsonism dementia in the Kii Peninsula and Guam, and Alzheimer's disease (AD) has been suggested. In particular, the link between aluminum and Alzheimer's disease has been the subject of scientific debate for several decades. However, the complex characteristics of aluminum bioavailability make it difficult to evaluate its toxicity and therefore, the relationship remains to be established. Mounting evidence has suggested that significance of oligomerization of -amyloid protein and neurotoxicity in the molecular mechanism of AD pathogenesis. Aluminum may play crucial roles as a cross-linker in -amyloid oligomerization. Here, we review the detailed characteristics of aluminum neurotoxicity based on our own studies and the recent literatures. Our aim is to revisit the link between aluminum and AD and to integrate aluminum and amyloid cascade hypotheses in the context of -amyloid oligomerization and the interactions with other metals.

1. Introduction

Aluminum (Al) is abundantly distributed in our environment, and compounds containing Al have been used in manufacturing (e.g., clays, glasses, and alum) for centuries. Despite its abundance, Al was first isolated as an element in 1827, and its use as being a silvery metal began only after 1886. Al is a new metal in this context. Because of its beneficial characteristics such as a lightweight, nonmagnetic, malleable, and ductile element, Al has a widespread and important use in industrial applications and consumer products. Al is also used in cooking utensils and in pharmacological agents including antacids and antiperspirants from which the element enters the human body.

Al is not essential for life. On the contrary, Al is a well established neurotoxin and is suspected to be linked with various neurodegenerative diseases including Alzheimer’s disease (AD), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and Parkinsonism dementia in the Kii Peninsula and Guam [1], and the Gulf War syndrome [2].

In particular, a possible relationship between Al and the pathogenesis of AD has been discussed for several decades [37]. AD is a severe senile type of dementia first reported in 1906. The pathological hallmarks of AD are the deposition of extracellular senile plaques, intracellular neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs), and the selective loss of synapses and neurons in the hippocampal and cerebral cortical regions. The major component of NFTs is the phosphorylated tau protein. Senile plaques are largely comprised of -amyloid protein (A P) [8]. The hypothesis that Al is an environmental contributor to the pathogenesis of AD, termed the “aluminum hypothesis”, was proposed in the 1960s based on various neurotoxicological, analytical, and epidemiological findings [911]. In spite of these findings, the aluminum hypothesis has been the subject of much debate and criticism for several decades. During this period, great progress was made in AD research. Particularly, numerous studies have supported the idea termed “amyloid cascade hypothesis”, namely that the conformational changes of A P and its neurotoxicity play a central role in AD pathogenesis [12, 13]. Al3+ and other metals including Zn2+, Cu2+, and Fe3+ influence the oligomerization and conformational changes of A P as cross-linkers, and, therefore, their implications are important in this context. Furthermore, increasing evidence suggests the implication of these metals in the pathogenesis of AD [1416]. Al binds to various metal-binding proteins and influences homeostasis of other metals.

We review here the detailed characteristics of aluminum neurotoxicity based on our own studies and the recent literature. Our aim is to update the various adverse effects of Al and revisit the link between Al and AD based on new findings on Al-induced conformational changes and metal-metal interactions.

2. Neurotoxicity of Aluminum Update

2.1. Effects of Al on the Memory Disorder of Human: Historical Overview

An association between Al poisoning and memory disorder in humans was first reported in 1921 [17]. Later, it was shown that the intracerebral administration of Al induced epilepsy in experimental animals [18]. As a component of dialysis solutions or Al-containing pharmacological compounds, Al is known to cause various dialysis-related disorders, including osteomalacia (aluminum bone disease), microcytic anemia, -microglobulin-associated amyloidosis [19], and dialysis encephalopathy in hemodialysis patients [20].

The accidental contamination of Al into drinking water occurred and more than 20,000 persons were exposed to high level of Al at 1988 in Camelford (Cornwall, UK). Residents exposed to contaminated Al exhibited various symptoms related to cerebral impairments such as loss of concentration and short term memory in a 10-year follow-up study [21].

Martyn et al. reported a high incidence of AD in areas with a high level of Al in the drinking water in England and Wales [11]. A considerable number of studies have provided evidence to support an association between AD and Al in drinking water after this initial report [22]. Frecker reported on a Norwegian area where high Al concentrations in drinking water were linked with high dementia mortality [23]. Neri and Hewitt found a positive relationship between Al in drinking water and AD risk in Canada [24]. Forbes and McLachlan demonstrated a greater risk of AD in Canadian areas where concentrations of Al are high and those of fluoride are low [25]. Rondeau et al. demonstrated that high daily intake of Al was correlated with increased risk of dementia or cognitive decline in a 15-year follow-up French cohort study [2628]. These studies suggest that Al has adverse effects on human memories and causes dementia when it enters the brain.

2.2. Effects of Al on the Central Nervous System  In Vitro or In Vivo

Despite it’s environmental abundance, Al is not an essential element for living organisms, and no enzymatic reaction requires Al. Al is reported to influence more than 200 biologically important reactions and to cause various adverse effects on the mammalian central nervous system (CNS) (Table 1). These include crucial reactions for brain development such as the axonal transport, neurotransmitter synthesis, synaptic transmission, phosphorylation or dephosphorylation of proteins, protein degradation, gene expression, and inflammatory responses.

tab1
Table 1: Effects of aluminum on the central nervous system.

Al exhibits only one oxidation state, Al3+. Al3+ has affinity for negatively charged, oxygen-donor ligands. Inorganic and organic phosphates, carboxylate, and deprotonated hydroxyl groups form strong bonds with Al3+. Owing to these chemical characteristics, Al3+ binds to the phosphate groups of DNA and RNA, affecting DNA topology and influencing the expression of various genes essential for brain functions. Lukiw et al. reported that nanomolar levels of Al3+ were sufficient to influence neuronal gene expression [33, 35].

Al3+ also binds to the phosphate groups of nucleoside di- and triphosphates, such as ATP and can thus influence energy metabolism. Furthermore, Al inhibits the functions of various protein kinases and phosphatases.

Al3+ has very low ligand-exchange rate in comparison to other metals. For example, the ligand-exchange rate of Mg2+ is 105 times faster than that of Al3+, and therefore, Al3+ inhibits enzymes with Mg2+ cofactors. Al3+ also inhibits biological processes involving rapid Ca2+ exchange: the exchange rate for Al3+ is 108 times slower than that of Ca2+. These properties make Al useless in enzymatic reactions and increase its half-life in the human body. We show the typical effects of Al in Figure 1.

276393.fig.001
Figure 1: Effects of aluminum on the central nervous system. Major biological effects of Al on the central nervous system are depicted.

Al3+ has strong positive charges and a relatively small ionic radius in comparison to other metal ions such as Ca2+, Zn2+, and Na+ (Figure 2). Thus, Al3+ firmly binds to metal-binding amino acids (histidine (His), tyrosine (Tyr), arginine (Arg) etc.) or phosphorylated amino acids and acts as a cross-linker; this property has made it useful as a leather tanning agent. By binding to various proteins, Al can cause the oligomerization of proteins, inducing conformational changes that can inhibit their degradation by proteases. Strong binding of Al3+ to phosphorylated amino acids promotes the self-aggregation and accumulation of highly phosphorylated cytoskeleton proteins, including neurofilament and microtubule-associated proteins (MAPs), and so forth [58].

276393.fig.002
Figure 2: Cross-linking of protein by Al3+. Al3+ has a relatively small ionic radius (50 pm) with 3 positive charges; here it is compared to other metal ions such as Zn2+ (74 pm), Ca2+ (99 pm), and Na+ (95 pm). These characteristics enable Al to be an effective cross-linker of proteins.

Consequently, Al causes apoptotic death of neurons and glial cells. Chronic administration of Al impairs long-term potentiation (LTP), which is a form of synaptic information storage well-known as a paradigm of memory mechanisms. Al also impairs various enzymes including those related to neurotransmitter synthesis and thus affects the neurotransmitter content. Al3+ also inhibits voltage-gated Ca2+ channels and neurotransmitter receptors, and impairs synaptic transmission. Finally, Al causes spatial memory deficit, influences emotional reactivity, and impairs various brain functions related to learning and memory. These adverse effects may be involved in the mechanisms that underlie Al-induced memory disorder.

3. Link between Al and AD

3.1. Historical Overview of Aluminum Hypothesis and Arguments

A link between Al and AD is supported on many fronts, beginning in 1965 with the finding of Klatzo et al. that the intracerebral administration of Al to experimental animals induced neurofibrillary degeneration and the appearance of tangle-like structures that were similar to the NFTs found in the brains of AD patients [9]. Crapper et al. reported an increased level of Al in the brains of AD patients [10]. In the 1970s, Al in dialysis solutions or pharmacological compounds was found to cause dementia in dialysis patients (dialysis encephalopathy) [20]. As noted previously, several epidemiological studies reported a high percentage of AD cases in areas with high Al level in drinking water [11, 19].

Despite supporting evidence, the aluminum hypothesis of AD remains controversial and has been the subject of much debate in the past few decades. There were at least three arguments against the aluminum hypothesis. First, it has been argued that neurofibrillary changes in Al-intoxicated animals (Al-NFTs) are different from those in AD patients (AD-NFTs) [108]. Arguments cite morphological and biochemical differences such as the lack of paired helical filamental (PHF) structures, their different distributions in nerve terminals, and the absence of immunoreactivity for tau protein, which is the main component of NFTs in AD patients. Second, there is no significant difference in Al levels of AD patients and age-matched controls [109]. Third, the epidemiological studies on Al in drinking water are immature and inconclusive [110]. However, most of these criticisms were made in the 1990s. We would like to reinvestigate these early arguments in the context of new findings in the study of AD.

Regarding the first argument, more recent immunohistochemical studies have indicated that depositions in the brains of Al-intoxicated animals are stained with the anti-tau antibody [62, 63]. The accumulation of tau protein was reported in patients with dialysis encephalopathy [111], and in Al-intoxicated cultured neuronal cells [60, 61]. Al inhibits the dephosphorylation of tau [56] and enhances its aggregation in vitro [112]. Furthermore, NFTs in some AD patients have been shown to be composed of straight-type filaments rather than PHF-type filaments as is observed in Al-NFT [113]. These data indicate that attempts to discredit the aluminum hypothesis on the basis of differences between Al-NFTs and AD-NFTs are no longer tenable.

3.2. Accumulation of Al in AD Brain

Another argument cites a lack of significant difference between Al levels in AD patients and age-matched controls. One reason for the controversy may be Al contamination of the solutions used in the process of tissue fixation and staining. Therefore, prior studies in fixed tissues cannot be relied upon for precise measures of Al; quantitative analysis of nonfixed and freshly frozen tissues is necessary. One such study showed that the amount of Al in whole brains of AD patients was not significantly different in comparison to controls [114]. Landsberg et al. claimed that they could not detect Al in senile plaques or NFTs using nuclear microscopy [115]. However, this failure could simply be due to low detection limits of their analytical method. Bouras et al. used highly sensitive laser microprobe mass analysis (LAMMA) with nonfixed brain samples and reported an accumulation of Al in NFT-bearing neurons of AD brains [116]. An accumulation of Al in both senile plaques and NFTs has been reported in renal failure patients [117]. Recently, Yumoto et al. analyzed Al using energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy combined with transmission electron microscopy (TEM-EDX), a method which yields a high-resolution and low detection limit. Their detailed analysis demonstrated that Al was present in cores of senile plaques at a concentration of 35–50 ppm [118].

3.3. Epidemiological Studies of AD and Al in Drinking Water

Some epidemiological studies have failed to demonstrate the relationship between Al and AD [119, 120]. However, there are a number of possible explanations for this inconsistency, particularly when considering the difficulty in making side-by-side comparisons of epidemiological studies of Al (e.g., intake estimations, effect of move, changes in water-treatment processes, etc.). Using strict neuropathological criteria to discriminate between AD patients and controls (including histopathological verification), McLachlan et al. found an elevated risk of histopathologically verified AD to be associated with the consumption of higher concentrations of Al in drinking water [121]. More detailed analysis revealed an association between exposure to organic monomeric Al and AD, even after adjustment for education level, family history and presence of the apoE4 allele [122].

The amount of Al consumed in drinking water is approximately 5% of the total daily intake. Thus, it is possible that some factors that prevent or accelerate Al absorption may exist in drinking water. Silicate in the water was reported to interact with Al and prevent Al toxicity to fish [123, 124]. Therefore, the level of silicate in drinking water may also be important. In a French cohort study, the relationship between Al and cognitive impairment is suggested to be influenced by the silica concentration [29]. Cognitive impairment among women was correlated with low concentrations of silica in drinking water [125].

In considering the above new lines of evidence about the neurotoxicity and epidemiology of Al, it is difficult to agree with the early criticisms of the aluminum hypothesis.

3.4. Effects of Al on the Oligomerization of A P

In the 1990s when the early arguments were claimed, Al-induced Alzheimer-like pathological changes were first attributed to tau proteins (NFT). However, numerous biochemical, toxicological, cell biological, and genetic studies have supported the “amyloid cascade hypothesis”, namely, that the accumulation of A P and its neurotoxicity play a central role in the pathogenesis of AD [12, 13].

A P is a small peptide of 39–43 amino acid residues, secreted by cleavage of the amyloid precursor protein (APP) N-terminus by -APP cleaving enzyme (BACE) and intramembrane cleavage of its C-terminus by -secretase. Genetic studies of early-onset cases of familial AD indicated that APP mutations and A P metabolism are associated with AD [126]. Yankner et al. reported that the first 40 amino acid residues of A P (A P(1–40)) caused the death of cultured rat hippocampal neurons or neurodegeneration in the brains of experimental animals [127]. A P is a hydrophobic peptide with an intrinsic tendency to self-assemble and form SDS-stable oligomers in aqueous solution. The monomeric form of A P has a random coiled structure. Oligomeric A Ps have -pleated sheet structures and form insoluble aggregates, termed amyloid fibrils. Neurotoxicity of A P(1–40) peptides was enhanced by the process of “aging” (aggregated under incubation at 37°C for several days) compared to freshly prepared A P(1–40) in cultured neurons [128], and were correlated with its -sheet contents [129]. Recent approaches using size-exclusion chromatography, gel electrophoresis, and atomic force microscopy have demonstrated that the soluble oligomers are synaptotoxic and neurotoxic [130]. Figure 3 exhibits the oligomerization of A P and its neurotoxicity.

276393.fig.003
Figure 3: Secretion of A P from APP and its oligomerization. A P is secreted by the cleavage of the APP N-terminus by -secretase (BACE), followed by the intramembrane cleavage of the C-terminus by -secretase. APP also binds to Cu or Zn. Human A P and rodent A P differ by 3 amino acids (Arg5, Tyr10, and His13). A P monomers form random-coil structures. However, under aging conditions or the existence of trace metals such as Al, Zn, and Cu, A P self-aggregates and oligomerizes (dimmer to protofibrils), and then forms insoluble amyloid fibrils. Although monomeric A Ps are not toxic, oligomeric A Ps induce marked neuronal death.

Considering that A P is secreted in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of young individuals as well as in aged or dementia patients [146], factors that accelerate or inhibit oligomerization may play essential roles in the pathogenesis of AD. Several factors such as peptide concentration, pH or composition of solvents, and temperature can influence the oligomerization processes [147].

Interestingly, rodent A P exhibits less tendency to oligomerization than human A P in vitro [148] and the accumulation of A P is rarely observed in the brains of rodents (rats or mice) as compared to primates (humans or monkeys). As shown in Figure 3, the amino acid sequences of human and rodent A P are similar, but rodent A P differs from primate only 3 amino acids (Arg5, Tyr10, and His13) from primate A P. All 3 amino acids have the ability to bind metals. Therefore, trace elements including Al3+ are of particular interest as potential acceleratory factors and may play important roles in the accumulation of A P in the human brain.

Table 2 summarizes the effects of Al3+ on conformational changes of A P and other various disease-related proteins. Exley et al. first demonstrated by CD spectroscopy that Al induces a conformational change in A P(1–40) [131]. Al has also been shown to promote the aggregation of 125I-labelled A P(1–40), with similar findings for Fe and Zn [132]. Bush et al. demonstrated that Zn2+ and Cu2+ caused the oligomerization of AβP [149, 150]. However, role of Zn2+ in AD is complex and enigmatic. Lovell et al. reported that zinc has the protective effects against A P-induced neurotoxicity [151]. We have demonstrated that Zn2+ blocks AβP-channels formed on membranes and inhibits the neurotoxicity [152].

tab2
Table 2: Al-induced conformational changes of various proteins.

We have developed a system for investigating A P oligomerization that involves immunoblotting and precipitation. Using this system, we have demonstrated that Al enhances the polymerization of A P(1–40) and forms SDS-stable oligomers in vitro [64, 133, 134]. The aggregated A P(1–40) is redissolved by adding deferoxamine (DFO), an Al chelator. The oligomerization induced by Al is more marked than that induced by other metals, including Zn2+, Fe3+, Cu2+, and Cd2+ (Figure 4(A)). Furthermore, while Al-aggregated A Ps bind tightly to the surface of cultured neurons and form fibrillar deposits, Zn-aggregated A Ps are rarely observed on the surface of cultured neurons (Figure 4(B)). These results suggest that Al-aggregated A Ps have a strong affinity for membrane surfaces as a result of minimal degradation by proteases. Indeed, Al has been shown to inhibit the degradation of A P as the result of conformational changes [43, 153]. Furthermore, A P coupled with Al is more toxic than normal A P causing membrane disruption or perturbation of neural Ca2+ homeostasis and mitochondrial respiration [154156].

276393.fig.004
Figure 4: Aggregation of A P by Al and other metals. (A) Immunoblotting of A P preincubated with Al and other metals. The solutions of A P(1–40) were incubated at 37°C for 24 h with or without 1 mM of various metals, and were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting using an antibody to A P. Each lane contained 4  g A P(1–40). Lane a: control, b: AlCl3, c: ZnCl2, d: CuCl2, e: FeCl3, f: CdCl2, Modified from [134]. (B) Deposition of A P on surfaces of cultured neurons. Solutions of A P(1–40) preincubated at 37°C for 24 h (a), with 1 mM AlCl3 (b), or 1 mM ZnCl2 (c) were applied to cultured rat cortical neurons. After 2 days of exposure, cells were washed and double immunostained with a polyclonal antibody to A P (green) and a monoclonal antibody to MAP2 (red), and observed by laser confocal microscope. Scale bar: 50 μm, modified from [64].

The chronic application of Al caused the accumulation of A P in cultured neurons of rat cerebral cortex [64] and in neuroblastoma cells [65]. Praticó et al. (2002) found that orally administered Al caused a marked increase in the amount of A P both in its secreted and accumulated forms, and increased deposition of senile plaques in AD-model mice transfected with the human APP gene (Tg 2576) [66]. These results are consistent with other studies demonstrating that oral Al exposure causes the accumulation of A P and impairs spatial learning memory in AD-model mice [67].

Exposure to Al causes the accumulation of A P and induces adverse effects in humans as seen in the aftermath of the accidental Al exposure in 1988 at Camelford [157]. The neuropathological case study of a 58 year-old woman who was exposed to Al and died 15 years later with unspecified neurological symptoms demonstrated the rare form of sporadic cerebral amyloid angiopathy, which is characterized by the deposition of A P in blood vessels and has a causative link with AD [158]. The deposition of high amounts of Al in the patient’s brain was also observed.

Al has also been reported to bind and cause conformational changes in other AD-related proteins, including APP [138], tau protein [32, 57], and PHF-tau protein [139] and in proteins related to other neurodegenerative diseases such as -synuclein (Parkinson’s disease (PD) and dementia with Lewy bodies; DLB) [140, 141], amylin (diabetes mellitus) [142], ABri (familial British dementia) [143], and ataxin 3 (spinocerebellar ataxia type 3) [144], -microglobulin (dialysis-related arthropathy) [145] (Table 2).

3.5. Metal-Metal Interactions in the Pathogenesis of AD

The evidence now suggests that the significance of Al in the pathogenesis of AD should be concerned. Other metals usually share the binding site of one metal ion, although their binding constants differ. Al binds to various metal-binding proteins and influences metal homeostasis. The interactions between Al and other metals should be considered owing to the implications of various trace elements in the pathogenesis of AD. Figure 5 illustrates the modified aluminum hypothesis that accounts for the implications of Al and other trace metals in AD pathology from the secretion of A P to its neurotoxicity as mentioned below.

276393.fig.005
Figure 5: Modified aluminum hypothesis addressing the implications of Al and other trace metals in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease. This model describes the implication of Al and other trace metals including Fe, Cu, and Zn in APP processing, generation and oligomerization of A P, and the neurotoxic effects caused by A P. Details are descried in the text.
3.5.1. Al3+ Affects Iron-Homeostasis and Generates Free Radicals

Al has similar characteristics to iron (Fe) and binds to Fe-binding proteins such as ferritin, transferrin, iron regulatory protein (IRP) or to iron chelators such as DFO. The iron responsive element/iron regulatory protein (IRE/IRP) network regulates the production of iron binding proteins which prevent the formation of free Fe2+, which causes toxic free radicals [159]. In iron-deficient conditions, IRP binds to IRE and regulates the expression of genes that contain IREs in their mRNA, such as ferritin or transferrin. As the concentration of free Fe2+ increases, the binding of iron to IRP, expression of transferrin is downregulated and that of ferritin is upregulated, and the amount of free Fe2+ is thereby decreased. Al3+ also binds to IRP [34, 160], and thus influences the expression of Fe-binding proteins with IREs in their mRNA causing an elevated Fe concentration [161]. Al also influences the uptake of iron into cultured neurons or glial cells [34, 162]. Thus, Al3+ affects iron homeostasis and the expression of various iron-regulated proteins with IREs. Important findings are that APP mRNA contains an IRE as well as ferritin, and its expression is regulated by iron [163]. Indeed, Al caused elevated expression of APP in experimental animals [40, 41]. Recently, Duce et al. demonstrated that APP has ferroxidase activity, which converts Fe2+ to Fe3+ and regulates free pro-oxidant Fe2+ concentrations [164]. They also found that Zn2+ inhibits the ferroxidase activity of APP. APP also possesses copper/zinc binding sites in its amino-terminal domain and in the A P domain and may be involved in homeostasis of these metals [165]. Al3+ stimulates Fe-induced membrane lipid peroxidation and causes oxidative damage in vitro and in vivo, although Al3+ does not directly affect peroxidation [89, 90]. There are other important findings implicating iron homeostasis in AD pathogenesis. Iron related genes such as transferrin C2 or hemochromatosis were revealed to be risk factors for AD [166, 167]. Imagawa et al. (1992) reported that iron supplementation was effective for the recovery of cognitive functions in AD patients [168].

3.5.2. Al3+ and Other Metals Enhance the Oligomerization of A P

An abnormal expression of APP could lead to an increased secretion of A P, and then enhance its accumulation. Secreted A P is usually degraded by various proteases such as neprilysin within a short period. The downregulation of neprilysin induced by Al can cause the accumulation A P [43]. Furthermore, A P becomes oligomerized in the presence of trace metals such as Al3+, Zn2+, Fe3+, and Cu2+, could be resistant to proteases, and thus accumulates in the brain.

3.5.3. Al3+ Impairs Calcium Homeostasis

A P oligomers could be readily incorporated into cell membranes, resulting in the formation of ion channels [147]. A subsequent influx of Ca2+ through these amyloid channels would lead to the phosphorylation of tau, depletion of neurotrophic factors, and the formation of free radicals, and so forth, with the outcome of these effects being neuronal death. Al3+ blocks various Ca2+ channels and influences Ca2+ homeostasis. We found that Al also inhibits the increase in Ca2+ levels induced by brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) [94]. As described previously, Al is implicated in most of these neurodegenerative pathways such as dephosphorylation of tau [56], depletion of neurotrophic factor [38], formation of free radicals [89], and induction of neuronal death.

This working hypothesis may be useful in developing an understanding of the link between AD and trace elements including Al, Zn, Cu, and Fe. Considering the implications of metals in AD pathogenesis, chelation therapy for AD treatment is of great interest [169]. Clioquinol (quinoform), a chelator of Cu2+ or Zn2+, inhibits oligomerization of A P and attenuates the accumulation of amyloid in the brains of experimental animals. Clinical trials using its analogue PBT2 are under investigation [170]. DFO, a chelator of Al and Fe, attenuates the decline of daily living skills in AD patients [171]. Silicates, which couple with Al and reduce its toxicity, are also candidates for chelation therapy in AD [172].

4. Conclusion: Al and Human Health

In this review, we have summarized the properties associated with various aspects of Al neurotoxicity. There is growing evidence for a link between Al and AD, and between other metals and AD. Nevertheless, because the precise mechanism of AD pathogenesis remains unknown, this issue is controversial. However, it is widely accepted that Al is a recognized neurotoxin, and that it could cause cognitive deficiency and dementia when it enters the brain and may have various adverse effects on CNS. In general, the absorption of metals by the gastrointestinal tract is widely variable and is influenced by various factors including an individual difference, age, pH, stomach contents [173]. Recent studies using mass spectrometry of 26Al have demonstrated that small, but a considerable amount of Al crosses the blood brain barrier, enters into the brain, and accumulates in a semipermanent manner [174, 175]. Therefore, Al can cause severe health problems in particular populations, including infants, elderly people, and patients with impaired renal functions, and unnecessary exposure to Al should be avoided for such patients [176].

In 1989, a joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA) recommended a provisional tolerable weekly intake (PTWI) of 7.0 mg/kg body weight Al; however, this was changed in 2007 to 1.0 mg/kg body weight because of potential effects on the reproductive system and the developing nervous system. The characteristics of Al neurotoxity are complex, and further research is needed especially in relation to bioavailability, cellular effects, metabolism, and metal-metal interactions.

Abbreviations

AD:Alzheimer’s disease
A P: -amyloid protein
Al:Aluminum
ALS:Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
APP:Amyloid precursor protein
BACE: -APP cleaving enzyme
BDNF:Brain derived neurotrophic factor
CSF:Cerebrospinal fluid
CNS:Central nervous system
DFO:Deferoxamine
DLB:Dementia with Lewy bodies
JECFA:FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives
IRE:Iron responsive element
IRP:Iron regulatory protein
LAMMA:Laser microprobe mass analysis
LTP:Long-term potentiation
MAP:Microtubule-associated protein
NFT:Neurofibrillary tangle
NGF:Nerve growth factor
PD:Parkinson’s disease
PHF:Paired helical filament
PTWI:Provisional tolerable weekly intake
TEM-EDX:Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy combined with transmission electron microscopy.

Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan and by a Grant from Cooperation for Innovative Technology and Advanced Research in Evolutional Area (CITY AREA) from the Miyazaki Prefectural Industrial Support Foundation.

References

  1. H. Shiraki and Y. Yase, “Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and Parkinsonism-dementia in the Kii peninsula: comparison with the same disorders in Guam and with Alzheimer's disease,” Handbook of Clinical Neurology, vol. 15, pp. 273–300, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  2. M. S. Petrik, M. C. Wong, R. C. Tabata, R. F. Garry, and C. A. Shaw, “Aluminum adjuvant linked to Gulf War illness induces motor neuron death in mice,” NeuroMolecular Medicine, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 83–100, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. A. Campbell, “The potential role of aluminium in Alzheimer's disease,” Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 17–20, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. D. R. McLachlan, “Aluminium and the risk for Alzheimer's disease,” Environmetrics, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 233–275, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. P. Zatta, Ed., “Recent topics in aluminium chemistry,” Coordination Chemistry Reviews, vol. 228, no. 2, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  6. M. Kawahara, “Effects of aluminum on the nervous system and its possible link with neurodegenerative diseases,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 171–182, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. P. Zatta, R. Lucchini, S. J. van Rensburg, and A. Taylor, “The role of metals in neurodegenerative processes: aluminum, manganese, and zinc,” Brain Research Bulletin, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 15–28, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. D. J. Selkoe, “The molecular pathology of Alzheimer's disease,” Neuron, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 487–498, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. I. Klatzo, H. Wisniewski, and E. Streicher, “Experimental production of neurofibrillary degeneration I. Light microscopic observation,” Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology, vol. 24, pp. 187–199, 1965. View at Google Scholar
  10. D. R. Crapper, S. S. Krishnan, and A. J. Dalton, “Brain aluminum distribution in Alzheimer's disease and experimental neurofibrillary degeneration,” Science, vol. 180, no. 4085, pp. 511–513, 1973. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. C. N. Martyn, C. Osmond, J. A. Edwardson, D. J. P. Barker, E. C. Harris, and R. F. Lacey, “Geographical relation between Alzheimer's disease and aluminium in drinking water,” The Lancet, vol. 1, no. 8629, pp. 59–62, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J. Hardy and D. J. Selkoe, “The amyloid hypothesis of Alzheimer's disease: progress and problems on the road to therapeutics,” Science, vol. 297, no. 5580, pp. 353–356, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. O. Wirths, G. Multhaup, and T. A. Bayer, “A modified β-amyloid hypothesis: intraneuronal accumulation of the β-amyloid peptide—the first step of a fatal cascade,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 91, no. 3, pp. 513–520, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. S. L. Sensi, P. Paoletti, A. I. Bush, and I. Sekler, “Zinc in the physiology and pathology of the CNS,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 780–791, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. P. Zatta, D. Drago, S. Bolognin, and S. L. Sensi, “Alzheimer's disease, metal ions and metal homeostatic therapy,” Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 346–355, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. Y. H. Hung, A. I. Bush, and R. A. Cherny, “Copper in the brain and Alzheimer's disease,” Journal of Biological Inorganic Chemistry, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 61–76, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. J. Spofforth, l. R. C. Edin, and M. R. C. Eng, “Case of aluminium poisoning,” The Lancet, vol. 197, no. 5103, p. 1301, 1921. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. J. G. Chusid, B. L. Pacella, L. M. Kopeloff, and N. Kopeloff, “Chronic epilepsy in the monkey following multiple intracerebral injection of alumina cream,” Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine, vol. 78, pp. 53–54, 1951. View at Google Scholar
  19. M. R. Wills and J. Savory, “Aluminum and chronic renal failure: sources, absorption, transport, and toxicity,” Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 59–107, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. A. C. Alfrey, G. R. LeGendre, and D. Kaehny, “The dialysis encephalopathy syndrome. Possible aluminium intoxication,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 294, no. 4, pp. 184–188, 1976. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. P. Altmann, J. Cunningham, U. Dhanesha, M. Ballard, J. Thompson, and F. Marsh, “Disturbance of cerebral function in people exposed to drinking water contaminated with aluminium sulphate: retrospective study of the Camelford water incident,” British Medical Journal, vol. 319, no. 7213, pp. 807–811, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. T. P. Flaten, “Aluminium as a risk factor in Alzheimer's disease, with emphasis on drinking water,” Brain Research Bulletin, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 187–196, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. M. F. Frecker, “Dementia in Newfoundland: identification of a geographical isolate?” Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 307–311, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. L. C. Neri and D. Hewitt, “Aluminium, Alzheimer's disease, and drinking water,” The Lancet, vol. 338, no. 8763, p. 390, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. W. F. Forbes and D. R. C. McLachlan, “Further thoughts on the aluminum—Alzheimer's disease link,” Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 401–403, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. H. Jacqmin, D. Commenges, L. Letenneur, P. Barberger-Gateau, and J. F. Dartigues, “Components of drinking water and risk of cognitive impairment in the elderly,” American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 139, no. 1, pp. 48–57, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. V. Rondeau, D. Commenges, H. Jacqmin-Gadda, and J. F. Dartigues, “Relation between aluminum concentrations in drinking water and Alzheimer's disease: an 8-year follow-up study,” American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 152, no. 1, pp. 59–66, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. V. Rondeau, H. Jacqmin-Gadda, D. Commenges, C. Helmer, and J. F. Dartigues, “Aluminum and silica in drinking water and the risk of Alzheimer's disease or cognitive decline: findings from 15-year follow-up of the PAQUID cohort,” American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 169, no. 4, pp. 489–496, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. W. J. Lukiw, T. P. A. Kruck, and D. R. Crapper McLachlan, “Alterations in human linker histone-DNA binding in the presence of aluminum salts in vitro and in Alzheimer's disease,” NeuroToxicology, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 291–301, 1987. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. K. S. Bharathi, R. Jagannatha, and R. Stein, “First evidence on induced topological changes in supercoiled DNA by an aluminium D-aspartate complex,” Journal of Biological Inorganic Chemistry, vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 823–830, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. K. S. Latha, S. Anitha, K. S. J. Rao, and M. A. Viswamitra, “Molecular understanding of aluminum-induced topological changes in (CCG)12 triplet repeats: relevance to neurological disorders,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1588, no. 1, pp. 56–64, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. N. A. Muma and S. M. Singer, “Aluminum-induced neuropathology: transient changes in microtubule-associated proteins,” Neurotoxicology and Teratology, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 679–690, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. I. M. Parhad, C. A. Krekoski, A. Mathew, and P. M. Tran, “Neuronal gene expression in aluminum myelopathy,” Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 123–138, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. S. Oshiro, M. Kawahara, S. Mika et al., “Aluminum taken up by transferrin-independent iron uptake affects the iron metabolism in rat cortical cells,” Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 123, no. 1, pp. 42–46, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. W. J. Lukiw, H. J. LeBlanc, L. A. Carver, D. R. C. McLachlan, and N. G. Bazan, “Run-on gene transcription in human neocortical nuclei: inhibition by nanomolar aluminum and implications for neurodegenerative disease,” Journal of Molecular Neuroscience, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 67–78, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. F. Bosetti, G. Solaini, E. A. Tendi, E. G. Chikhale, K. Chandrasekaran, and S. I. Rapoport, “Mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit III is selectively down-regulated by aluminum exposure in PC12S cells,” NeuroReport, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 721–724, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. K. A. Cox and M. A. Dunn, “Aluminum toxicity alters the regulation of calbindin-D28k protein and mRNA expression in chick intestine,” Journal of Nutrition, vol. 131, no. 7, pp. 2007–2013, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. V. J. Johnson and R. P. Sharma, “Aluminum disrupts the pro-inflammatory cytokine/neurotrophin balance in primary brain rotation-mediated aggregate cultures: possible role in neurodegeneration,” NeuroToxicology, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 261–268, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. W. J. Lukiw, M. E. Percy, and T. P. Kruck, “Nanomolar aluminum induces pro-inflammatory and pro-apoptotic gene expression in human brain cells in primary culture,” Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry, vol. 99, no. 9, pp. 1895–1898, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. R. Lin, X. Chen, W. Li, Y. Han, P. Liu, and R. Pi, “Exposure to metal ions regulates mRNA levels of APP and BACE1 in PC12 cells: blockage by curcumin,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 440, no. 3, pp. 344–347, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. J. R. Walton and M. X. Wang, “APP expression, distribution and accumulation are altered by aluminum in a rodent model for Alzheimer's disease,” Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry, vol. 103, no. 11, pp. 1548–1554, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. T. García, J. L. Esparza, M. Giralt, M. Romeu, J. L. Domingo, and M. Gómez, “Protective role of melatonin on oxidative stress status and RNA expression in cerebral cortex and cerebellum of aβpp transgenic mice after chronic exposure to aluminum,” Biological Trace Element Research, vol. 135, no. 1–3, pp. 220–232, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. Y. Luo, F. Niu, Z. Sun et al., “Altered expression of Aβ metabolism-associated molecules from d-galactose/AlCl3 induced mouse brain,” Mechanisms of Ageing and Development, vol. 130, no. 4, pp. 248–252, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. A. Castorina, A. Tiralongo, S. Giunta, M. L. Carnazza, G. Scapagnini, and V. D'Agata, “Early effects of aluminum chloride on beta-secretase mRNA expression in a neuronal model of β-amyloid toxicity,” Cell Biology and Toxicology, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 367–377, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  45. J. M. Socorro, R. Olmo, C. Teijon, M. D. Blanco, and J. M. Teijon, “Analysis of aluminum-yeast hexokinase interaction: modifications on protein structure and functionality,” Journal of Protein Chemistry, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 199–208, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. J. C. K. Lai and J. P. Blass, “Inhibition of brain glycolysis by aluminum,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 438–446, 1984. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. S. W. Cho and J. G. Joshi, “Inactivation of bakers' yeast glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase by aluminum,” Biochemistry, vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 3613–3618, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. V. Kumar, A. Bal, and K. D. Gill, “Impairment of mitochondrial energy metabolism in different regions of rat brain following chronic exposure to aluminium,” Brain Research, vol. 1232, pp. 94–103, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. J. Lemire, R. Mailloux, S. Puiseux-Dao, and V. D. Appanna, “Aluminum-induced defective mitochondrial metabolism perturbs cytoskeletal dynamics in human astrocytoma cells,” Journal of Neuroscience Research, vol. 87, no. 6, pp. 1474–1483, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. R. J. Mailloux, R. Hamel, and V. D. Appanna, “Aluminum toxicity elicits a dysfunctional TCA cycle and succinate accumulation in hepatocytes,” Journal of Biochemical and Molecular Toxicology, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 198–208, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. K. Shetty, T. Veeranna, and S. C. Guru, “Phosphatase activity against neurofilament proteins from bovine spinal cord: effect of aluminium and neuropsychoactive drugs,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 137, no. 1, pp. 83–86, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. G. V. W. Johnson, K. W. Cogdill, and R. S. Jope, “Oral alumimum alters in vitro protein phosphorylation and kinase activities in rat brain,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 209–216, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. D. Julka and K. D. Gill, “Involvement of altered cytoskeletal protein phosphorylation in aluminum-induced CNS dysfunction,” Journal of Biochemical Toxicology, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 227–233, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. A. Kaur, K. Joshi, R. W. Minz, and K. D. Gill, “Neurofilament phosphorylation and disruption: a possible mechanism of chronic aluminium toxicity in Wistar rats,” Toxicology, vol. 219, no. 1–3, pp. 1–10, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. J. C. Troncoso, J. L. March, M. Haner, and U. Aebi, “Effect of aluminum and other multivalent cations on neurofilaments in vitro: an electron microscopic study,” Journal of Structural Biology, vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 2–12, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. H. Yamamoto, Y. Saitoh, S. Yasugawa, and E. Miyamoto, “Dephosphorylation of τ factor by protein phosphatase 2A in synaptosomal cytosol fractions, and inhibition by aluminum,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 683–690, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. A. H. El-Sebae, M. E. Abdel-Ghany, D. Shalloway, M. M. A. Zeid, J. Blancato, and M. A. Saleh, “Aluminum interaction with human brain tau protein phosphorylation by various kinases,” Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part B, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 763–777, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. J. Diaz-Nido and J. Avila, “Aluminum induces the in vitro aggregation of bovine brain cytoskeletal proteins,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 110, no. 1-2, pp. 221–226, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. S. K. Abd-Elghaffar, G. H. El-Sokkary, and A. A. Sharkawy, “Aluminum-induced neurotoxicity and oxidative damage in rabbits: protective effect of melatonin,” Neuroendocrinology Letters, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 609–616, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. S. P. Guy, D. Jones, D. M. A. Mann, and R. F. Itzhaki, “Human neuroblastoma cells treated with aluminium express an epitope associated with Alzheimer's disease neurofibrillary tangles,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 121, no. 1-2, pp. 166–168, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. M. Kawahara, K. Muramoto, K. Kobayashi, and Y. Kuroda, “Functional and morphological changes in cultured neurons of rat cerebral cortex induced by long-term application of aluminum,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 189, no. 3, pp. 1317–1322, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. J. Savory, Y. Huang, M. M. Herman, M. R. Reyes, and M. R. Wills, “Tau immunoreactivity associated with aluminum maltolate-induced neurofibrillary degeneration in rabbits,” Brain Research, vol. 669, no. 2, pp. 325–329, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. T. Kihira, S. Yoshida, Y. Yase, S. Ono, and T. Kondo, “Chronic low-Ca/Mg high-Al diet induces neuronal loss,” Neuropathology, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 171–179, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. M. Kawahara, M. Kato, and Y. Kuroda, “Effects of aluminum on the neurotoxicity of primary cultured neurons and on the aggregation of β-amyloid protein,” Brain Research Bulletin, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 211–217, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. A. Campbell, A. Kumar, F. G. La Rosa, K. N. Prasad, and S. C. Bondy, “Aluminum increases levels of β-amyloid and ubiquitin in neuroblastoma but not in glioma cells,” Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine, vol. 223, no. 4, pp. 397–402, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. D. Praticò, K. Uryu, S. Sung, S. Tang, J. Q. Trojanowski, and V. M. Lee, “Aluminum modulates brain amyloidosis through oxidative stress in APP transgenic mice,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 1138–1140, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. L. F. Rodella, F. Ricci, E. Borsani et al., “Aluminium exposure induces Alzheimer's disease-like histopathological alterations in mouse brain,” Histology and Histopathology, vol. 23, no. 4-6, pp. 433–439, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. S. D. Provan and R. A. Yokel, “Aluminum inhibits glutamate release from transverse rat hippocampal slices: role of G proteins, Ca channels and protein kinase C,” NeuroToxicology, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 413–420, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. J. J. Canales, R. Corbalán, C. Montoliu et al., “Aluminium impairs the glutamate-nitric oxide-cGMP pathway in cultured neurons and in rat brain in vivo: molecular mechanisms and implications for neuropathology,” Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 63–69, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. H. Meiri, E. Banin, M. Roll, and A. Rousseau, “Toxic effects of aluminium on nerve cells and synaptic transmission,” Progress in Neurobiology, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 89–121, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. S. J. Yang, J. W. Huh, J. E. Lee, S. Y. Choi, T. U. Kim, and S. W. Cho, “Inactivation of human glutamate dehydrogenase by aluminum,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, vol. 60, no. 11, pp. 2538–2546, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. C. M. Nday, B. D. Drever, T. Salifoglou, and B. Platt, “Aluminium interferes with hippocampal calcium signaling in a species-specific manner,” Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry, vol. 104, pp. 919–927, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. J. R. Hofstetter, I. Vincent, O. Bugiani, B. Ghetti, and J. A. Richter, “Aluminum-induced decreases in choline acetyltransferase, tyrosine hydroxylase, and glutamate decarboxylase in selected regions of rabbit brain,” Neurochemical Pathology, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 177–193, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. P. Zatta, M. Ibn-Lkhayat-Idrissi, P. Zambenedetti, M. Kilyen, and T. Kiss, “In vivo and in vitro effects of aluminum on the activity of mouse brain acetylcholinesterase,” Brain Research Bulletin, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 41–45, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. H. Bielarczyk, M. Tomaszewicz, and A. Szutowicz, “Effect of aluminum on acetyl-CoA and acetylcholine metabolism in nerve terminals,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 1175–1181, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. K. S. J. Rao and G. V. Rao, “Effect of aluminium (Al) on brain mitochondrial monoamine oxidase-A (MAO-A) activity—an in vitro kinetic study,” Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 137, no. 1, pp. 57–60, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. P. Zatta, P. Zambenedetti, and M. Milanese, “Activation of monoamine oxidase type-B by aluminum in rat brain homogenate,” NeuroReport, vol. 10, no. 17, pp. 3645–3648, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  78. M. Milanese, M. I. Lkhayat, and P. Zatta, “Inhibitory effect of aluminum on dopamine β-hydroxylase from bovine adrenal gland,” Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology, vol. 15, no. 2-3, pp. 139–141, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  79. J. C. K. Lai, L. Lim, and A. N. Davison, “Effects of Cd2+, Mn2+, and AI2+ on rat brain synaptosomal uptake of noradrenaline and serotonin,” Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 215–225, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  80. M. Kanazirska, P. P. Vassilev, S. Y. Birzon, and P. M. Vassilev, “Voltage-dependent effect of AI3+ on channel activities in hippocampal neurons,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 232, no. 1, pp. 84–87, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  81. T. Csóti, J. Gyri, J. Salánki, and L. Erdélyi, “pH-dependent actions of aluminum on voltage-activated sodium currents in snail neurons,” NeuroToxicology, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 109–116, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. B. Platt and D. Busselberg, “Combined actions of Pb2+, Zn2+, and AI2+ on voltage-activated calcium channel currents,” Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 831–840, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  83. S. Pentyala, J. Ruggeri, A. Veerraju et al., “Microsomal Ca2+ flux modulation as an indicator of heavy metal toxicity,” Indian Journal of Experimental Biology, vol. 48, no. 7, pp. 737–743, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  84. L. Li, “The biochemistry and physiology of metallic fluoride: action, mechanism, and implications,” Critical Reviews in Oral Biology and Medicine, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 100–114, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  85. C. Theiss and K. Meller, “Aluminum impairs gap junctional intercellular communication between astroglial cells in vitro,” Cell and Tissue Research, vol. 310, no. 2, pp. 143–154, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  86. A. Bizzi, R. C. Crane, L. Autilio Gambetti, and P. Gambetti, “Aluminum effect on slow axonal transport: a novel impairment of neurofilament transport,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 722–731, 1984. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  87. N. Siegel, C. Suhayda, and A. Haug, “Aluminum changes the conformation of calmodulin,” Physiological Chemistry and Physics, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 165–167, 1982. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  88. A. Campbell, A. Becaria, D. K. Lahiri, K. Sharman, and S. C. Bondy, “Chronic exposure to aluminum in drinking water increases inflammatory parameters selectively in the brain,” Journal of Neuroscience Research, vol. 75, no. 4, pp. 565–572, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  89. P. I. Oteiza, “A mechanism for the stimulatory effect of aluminum on iron-induced lipid peroxidation,” Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 308, no. 2, pp. 374–379, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  90. N. Kaneko, T. Sugioka, and H. Sakurai, “Aluminum compounds enhance lipid peroxidation in liposomes: insight into cellular damage caused by oxidative stress,” Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry, vol. 101, no. 6, pp. 967–975, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  91. S. V. Verstraeten and P. I. Oteiza, “Al-mediated changes in membrane physical properties participate in the inhibition of polyphosphoinositide hydrolysis,” Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 408, no. 2, pp. 263–271, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  92. J. D. Pandya, K. R. Dave, and S. S. Katyare, “Effect of long-term aluminum feeding on lipid/phospholipid profiles of rat brain myelin,” Lipids in Health and Disease, vol. 3, article no. 13, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  93. V. S. Silva, J. M. Cordeiro, M. J. Matos, C. R. Oliveira, and P. P. Gonçalves, “Aluminum accumulation and membrane fluidity alteration in synaptosomes isolated from rat brain cortex following aluminum ingestion: effect of cholesterol,” Neuroscience Research, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 181–193, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  94. O. Ghribi, M. M. Herman, M. S. Forbes, D. A. DeWitt, and J. Savory, “GDNF protects against aluminum-induced apoptosis in rabbits by upregulating Bcl-2 and Bcl-X and inhibiting mitochondrial Bax translocation,” Neurobiology of Disease, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 764–773, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  95. M. Kawahara, M. Kato-Negishi, R. Hosoda, L. Imamura, M. Tsuda, and Y. Kuroda, “Brain-derived neurotrophic factor protects cultured rat hippocampal neurons from aluminum maltolate neurotoxicity,” Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 124–131, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  96. G. W. Guo and Y. X. Liang, “Aluminum-induced apoptosis in cultured astrocytes and its effect on calcium homeostasis,” Brain Research, vol. 888, no. 2, pp. 221–226, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  97. M. J. Strong and R. M. Garruto, “Neuron-specific thresholds of aluminum toxicity in vitro: a comparative analysis of dissociated fetal rabbit hippocampal and motor neuron-enriched cultures,” Laboratory Investigation, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 243–249, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  98. C. A. Shaw and M. S. Petrik, “Aluminum hydroxide injections lead to motor deficits and motor neuron degeneration,” Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry, vol. 103, no. 11, pp. 1555–1562, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  99. B. Platt, D. O. Carpenter, D. Busselberg, K. G. Reymann, and G. Riedel, “Aluminum impairs hippocampal long-term potentiation in rats in vitro and in vivo,” Experimental Neurology, vol. 134, no. 1, pp. 73–86, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  100. M. Wang, J. T. Chen, D. Y. Ruan, and Y. Z. Xu, “The influence of developmental period of aluminum exposure on synaptic plasticity in the adult rat dentate gyrus in vivo,” Neuroscience, vol. 113, no. 2, pp. 411–419, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  101. R. A. Yokel, D. D. Allen, and J. J. Meyer, “Studies of aluminum neurobehavioral toxicity in the intact mammal,” Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 791–808, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  102. N. Kaneko, J. Takada, H. Yasui, and H. Sakurai, “Memory deficit in mice administered aluminum-maltolate complex,” BioMetals, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 83–89, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  103. J. R. Walton, “A longitudinal study of rats chronically exposed to aluminum at human dietary levels,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 412, no. 1, pp. 29–33, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  104. P. Sethi, A. Jyoti, R. Singh, E. Hussain, and D. Sharma, “Aluminium-induced electrophysiological, biochemical and cognitive modifications in the hippocampus of aging rats,” NeuroToxicology, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 1069–1079, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  105. D. Ribes, M. T. Colomina, P. Vicens, and J. L. Domingo, “Effects of oral aluminum exposure on behavior and neurogenesis in a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer's disease,” Experimental Neurology, vol. 214, no. 2, pp. 293–300, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  106. D. Ribes, M. T. Colomina, P. Vicens, and J. L. Domingo, “Impaired spatial learning and unaltered neurogenesis in a transgenic model of alzheimer's disease after oral aluminum exposure,” Current Alzheimer Research, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 401–408, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  107. P. Zatta, P. Zambenedetti, E. Reusche et al., “A fatal case of aluminium encephalopathy in a patient with severe chronic renal failure not on dialysis,” Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, vol. 19, no. 11, pp. 2929–2931, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  108. H. M. Wisniewski and G. Y. Wen, “Aluminium and Alzheimer's disease,” Ciba Foundation Symposium, vol. 169, pp. 142–154, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  109. D. Shore and R. J. Wyatt, “Aluminum and Alzheimer's disease,” Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, vol. 171, no. 9, pp. 553–558, 1983. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  110. R. Doll, “Review: Alzheimer's disease and environmental aluminium,” Age and Ageing, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 138–153, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  111. C. R. Harrington, C. M. Wischik, F. K. McArthur, G. A. Taylor, J. A. Edwardson, and J. M. Candy, “Alzheimer's-disease-like changes in tau protein processing: association with aluminium accumulation in brains of renal dialysis patients,” The Lancet, vol. 343, no. 8904, pp. 993–997, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  112. C. W. Scott, A. Fieles, L. A. Sygowski, and C. B. Caputo, “Aggregation of tau protein by aluminum,” Brain Research, vol. 628, no. 1-2, pp. 77–84, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  113. R. A. Crowther, “Straight and paired helical filaments in Alzheimer disease have a common structural unit,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 88, no. 6, pp. 2288–2292, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  114. E. Bjertness, J. M. Candy, A. Torvik et al., “Content of brain aluminum is not elevated in Alzheimer disease,” Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 171–174, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  115. J. P. Landsberg, B. McDonald, and F. Watt, “Absence of aluminium in neuritic plaque cores in Alzheimer's disease,” Nature, vol. 360, no. 6399, pp. 65–68, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  116. C. Bouras, P. Giannakopoulos, P. F. Good, A. Hsu, P. R. Hof, and D. P. Perl, “A laser microprobe mass analysis of brain aluminum and iron in dementia pugilistica: comparison with Alzheimer's disease,” European Neurology, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 53–58, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  117. J. M. Candy, F. K. McArthur, A. E. Oakley et al., “Aluminium accumulation in relation to senile plaque and neurofibrillary tangle formation in the brains of patients with renal failure,” Journal of the Neurological Sciences, vol. 107, no. 2, pp. 210–218, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  118. S. Yumoto, S. Kakimi, A. Ohsaki, and A. Ishikawa, “Demonstration of aluminum in amyloid fibers in the cores of senile plaques in the brains of patients with Alzheimer's disease,” Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry, vol. 103, no. 11, pp. 1579–1584, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  119. A. Wettstein, J. Aeppli, K. Gautschi, and M. Peters, “Failure to find a relationship between mnestic skills of octagenarians and aluminum in drinking water,” International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 97–103, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  120. C. N. Martyn, D. N. Coggon, H. Inskip, R. F. Lacey, and W. F. Young, “Aluminum concentrations in drinking water and risk of Alzheimer's disease,” Epidemiology, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 281–286, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  121. D. R. C. McLachlan, C. Bergeron, J. E. Smith, D. Boomer, and S. L. Rifat, “Risk for neuropathologically confirmed Alzheimer's disease and residual aluminum in municipal drinking water employing weighted residential histories,” Neurology, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 401–405, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  122. E. Gauthier, I. Fortier, F. Courchesne, P. Pepin, J. Mortimer, and D. Gauvreau, “Aluminum forms in drinking water and risk of Alzheimer's disease,” Environmental Research, vol. 84, no. 3, pp. 234–246, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  123. J. D. Birchall and J. S. Chappell, “The chemistry of aluminum and silicon in relation to Alzheimer's disease,” Clinical Chemistry, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 265–267, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  124. J. A. Edwardson, P. B. Moore, I. N. Ferrier et al., “Effect of silicon on gastrointestinal absorption of aluminium,” The Lancet, vol. 342, no. 8865, pp. 211–212, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  125. S. Gillete-Guyonnet, S. Andrieu, F. Nourhashemi, V. de la Guéronnière, H. Grandjean, and B. Vellas, “Cognitive impairment and composition of drinking water in women: findings of the EPIDOS study,” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 81, no. 4, pp. 897–902, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  126. A. Goate, M. C. Chartier-Harlin, M. Mullan et al., “Segregation of a missense mutation in the amyloid precursor protein gene with familial Alzheimer's disease,” Nature, vol. 349, no. 6311, pp. 704–706, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  127. B. A. Yankner, L. K. Duffy, and D. A. Kirschner, “Neurotrophic and neurotoxic effects of amyloid β protein: reversal by tachykinin neuropeptides,” Science, vol. 250, no. 4978, pp. 279–282, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  128. C. J. Pike, D. Burdick, A. J. Walencewicz, C. G. Glabe, and C. W. Cotman, “Neurodegeneration induced by β-amyloid peptides in vitro: the role of peptide assembly state,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 1676–1687, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  129. L. K. Simmons, P. C. May, K. J. Tomaselli et al., “Secondary structure of amyloid β peptide correlates with neurotoxic activity in vitro,” Molecular Pharmacology, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 373–379, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  130. D. J. Selkoe, “Soluble oligomers of the amyloid β-protein impair synaptic plasticity and behavior,” Behavioural Brain Research, vol. 192, no. 1, pp. 106–113, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  131. C. Exley, N. C. Price, S. M. Kelly, and J. D. Birchall, “An interaction of β-amyloid with aluminium in vitro,” FEBS Letters, vol. 324, no. 3, pp. 293–295, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  132. P. W. Mantyh, J. R. Ghilardi, S. Rogers et al., “Aluminum, iron, and zinc ions promote aggregation of physiological concentrations of β-amyloid peptide,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 1171–1174, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  133. M. Kawahara, K. Muramoto, K. Bobayashi, H. Mori, and Y. Kuroda, “Aluminum promotes the aggregation of Alzheimer's amyloid β-protein in vitro,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 198, no. 2, pp. 531–535, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  134. Y. Kuroda and M. Kawahara, “Aggregation of amyloid beta-protein and its neurotoxicity: enhancement by aluminum and other metals,” Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 174, no. 3, pp. 263–268, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  135. G. D. Fasman, A. Perczel, and C. D. Moore, “Solubilization of β-amyloid-(1-42)-peptide: reversing the β-sheet conformation induced by aluminum with silicates,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 92, no. 2, pp. 369–371, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  136. E. House, J. Collingwood, A. Khan, O. Korchazkina, G. Berthon, and C. Exley, “Aluminium, iron, zinc and copper Influence the in vitro formation of amyloid fibrils of Aβ42 in a manner which may have consequences for metal chelation therapy in Alzheimer's disease,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 291–301, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  137. S. C. Bondy and A. Truong, “Potentiation of beta-folding of β-amyloid peptide 25–35 by aluminum salts,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 267, no. 1, pp. 25–28, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  138. Y. H. Chong and Y. H. Suh, “Aggregation of amyloid precursor proteins by aluminum in vitro,” Brain Research, vol. 670, no. 1, pp. 137–141, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  139. H. Murayama, R.-W. Shin, J. Higuchi, S. Shibuya, T. Muramoto, and T. Kitamoto, “Interaction of aluminum with PHFtau in Alzheimer's disease neurofibrillary degeneration evidenced by desferrioxamine-assisted chelating autoclave method,” American Journal of Pathology, vol. 155, no. 3, pp. 877–885, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  140. S. R. Paik, J. H. Lee, D. H. Kim, C. S. Chang, and J. Kim, “Aluminum-induced structural alterations of the precursor of the non-Aβ component of Alzheimer's disease amyloid,” Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 344, no. 2, pp. 325–334, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  141. V. N. Uversky, J. Li, and A. L. Fink, “Metal-triggered structural transformations, aggregation, and fibrillation of human α-synuclein: a possible molecular link between parkinson's disease and heavy metal exposure,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 276, no. 47, pp. 44284–44296, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  142. B. Ward, K. Walker, and C. Exley, “Copper(II) inhibits the formation of amylin amyloid in vitro,” Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry, vol. 102, no. 2, pp. 371–375, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  143. A. Khan, A. E. Ashcroft, O. V. Korchazhkina, and C. Exley, “Metal-mediated formation of fibrillar ABri amyloid,” Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry, vol. 98, no. 12, pp. 2006–2010, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  144. F. Ricchelli, P. Fusi, P. Tortora et al., “Destabilization of non-pathological variants of ataxin-3 by metal ions results in aggregation/fibrillogenesis,” International Journal of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 966–977, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  145. M. Chaussidon, P. Netter, M. Kessler et al., “Dialysis-associated arthropathy: secondary ion mass spectrometry evidence of aluminum silicate in β-microglobulin amyloid synovial tissue and articular cartilage,” Nephron, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 559–563, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  146. R. Fukuyama, T. Mizuno, T. Mizuno et al., “Age-dependent change in the levels of Aβ40 and Aβ42 in cerebrospinal fluid from control subjects, and a decrease in the ratio of Aβ42 to Aβ40 level in cerebrospinal fluid from Alzheimer's disease patients,” European Neurology, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 155–160, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  147. M. Kawahara, “Role of calcium dyshomeostasis via amyloid channels in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease,” Current Pharmaceutical Design, vol. 16, pp. 2779–2789, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  148. T. Dyrks, E. Dyrks, C. L. Masters, and K. Beyreuther, “Amyloidogenicity of rodent and human βA4 sequences,” FEBS Letters, vol. 324, no. 2, pp. 231–236, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  149. A. I. Bush, W. H. Pettingell, G. Multhaup et al., “Rapid induction of Alzheimer Aβ amyloid formation by zinc,” Science, vol. 265, no. 5177, pp. 1464–1467, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  150. C. S. Atwood, R. D. Moir, X. Huang et al., “Dramatic aggregation of alzheimer Aβ by Cu(II) is induced by conditions representing physiological acidosis,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 273, no. 21, pp. 12817–12826, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  151. M. A. Lovell, C. Xie, and W. R. Markesbery, “Protection against amyloid beta peptide toxicity by zinc,” Brain Research, vol. 823, no. 1-2, pp. 88–95, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  152. M. Kawahara, N. Arispe, Y. Kuroda, and E. Rojas, “Alzheimer's disease amyloid β-protein forms Zn2+-sensitive, cation-selective channels across excised membrane patches from hypothalamic neurons,” Biophysical Journal, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 67–75, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  153. T. Sakamoto, H. Saito, K. Ishii, H. Takahashi, S. Tanabe, and Y. Ogasawara, “Aluminum inhibits proteolytic degradation of amyloid β peptide by cathepsin D: a potential link between aluminum accumulation and neuritic plaque deposition,” FEBS Letters, vol. 580, no. 28-29, pp. 6543–6549, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  154. F. Ricchelli, D. Drago, B. Filippi, G. Tognon, and P. Zatta, “Aluminum-triggered structural modifications and aggregation of β-amyloids,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, vol. 62, no. 15, pp. 1724–1733, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  155. D. Drago, A. Cavaliere, N. Mascetra et al., “Aluminum modulates effects of βamyloid1-42 on neuronal calcium homeostasis and mitochondria functioning and is altered in a triple transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer's disease,” Rejuvenation Research, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 861–871, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  156. D. Drago, S. Bolognin, and P. Zatta, “Role of metal ions in the Aβ oligomerization in Alzheimer's disease and in other neurological disorders,” Current Alzheimer Research, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 500–507, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  157. C. Exley and M. M. Esiri, “Severe cerebral congophilic angiopathy coincident with increased brain aluminium in a resident of Camelford, Cornwall, UK,” Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, vol. 77, no. 7, pp. 877–879, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  158. D. L. Dickstein, J. Walsh, H. Brautigam, S. D. Stockton Jr., S. Gandy, and P. R. Hof, “Role of vascular risk factors and vascular dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease,” Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 82–102, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  159. M. U. Muckenthaler, B. Galy, and M. W. Hentze, “Systemic iron homeostasis and the iron-responsive element/iron-regulatory protein (IRE/IRP) regulatory network,” Annual Review of Nutrition, vol. 28, pp. 197–213, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  160. K. Yamanaka, N. Minato, and K. Iwai, “Stabilization of iron regulatory protein 2, IRP2, by aluminum,” FEBS Letters, vol. 462, no. 1-2, pp. 216–220, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  161. R. R. Crichton, S. Wilmet, R. Legssyer, and R. J. Ward, “Molecular and cellular mechanisms of iron homeostasis and toxicity in mammalian cells,” Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 9–18, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  162. S. Oshiro, M. Kawahara, Y. Kuroda et al., “Glial cells contribute more to iron and aluminum accumulation but are more resistant to oxidative stress than neuronal cells,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1502, no. 3, pp. 405–414, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  163. H.-H. Cho, C. M. Cahill, C. R. Vanderburg et al., “Selective translational control of the Alzheimer amyloid precursor protein transcript by iron regulatory protein-1,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 285, no. 41, pp. 31217–31232, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  164. J. A. Duce, A. Tsatsanis, M. A. Cater et al., “Iron-export ferroxidase activity of β-amyloid precursor protein is inhibited by zinc in Alzheimer's disease,” Cell, vol. 142, no. 6, pp. 857–867, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  165. G. K. W. Kong, L. A. Miles, G. A. N. Crespi et al., “Copper binding to the Alzheimer's disease amyloid precursor protein,” European Biophysics Journal, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 269–279, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  166. K. Namekata, M. Imagawa, A. Terashi, S. Ohta, F. Oyama, and Y. Ihara, “Association of transferrin C2 allele with late-onset Alzheimer's disease,” Human Genetics, vol. 101, no. 2, pp. 126–129, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  167. D. J. Lehmann, M. Schuur, D. R. Warden et al., “Transferrin and HFE genes interact in Alzheimer's disease risk: the Epistasis Project,” Neurobiology of Aging. In press. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  168. M. Imagawa, S. Naruse, S. Tsuji, A. Fujioka, and H. Yamaguchi, “Coenzyme Q10, iron, and vitamin B6 in genetically-confirmed Alzheimer's disease,” The Lancet, vol. 340, no. 8820, p. 671, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  169. M. L. Hegde, P. Bharathi, A. Suram et al., “Challenges associated with metal chelation therapy in alzheimer's disease,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 457–468, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  170. A. I. Bush and R. E. Tanzi, “Therapeutics for Alzheimer's disease based on the metal hypothesis,” Neurotherapeutics, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 421–432, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  171. R. A. Yokel, “Aluminum chelation: chemistry, clinical, and experimental studies and the search for alternatives to desferrioxamine,” Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 131–174, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  172. C. Exley, “Organosilicon therapy in Alzheimer's disease?” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 301–302, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  173. M. Kawahara, K. Konoha, T. Nagata, and Y. Sadakane, “Aluminum and human health: its intake, bioavailability and neurotoxicity,” Biomedical Research on Trace Elements, vol. 18, pp. 111–120, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  174. S. Yumoto, H. Nagai, K. Kobayashi, A. Tamate, S. Kakimi, and H. Matsuzaki, “Al incorporation into the brain of suckling rats through maternal milk,” Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 155–160, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  175. N. D. Priest, “The biological behaviour and bioavailability of aluminium in man, with special reference to studies employing aluminium-26 as a tracer: review and study update,” Journal of Environmental Monitoring, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 375–403, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  176. M. Kawahara, “Auminum and human health: possible link with neurodegenerative disorders,” in Metals and Neurodegeneration, S. Huang, Ed., pp. 15–56, Research Signpost, 2010. View at Google Scholar