Review Article

Diagnostic Utility of CSF Tau and A 𝜷 πŸ’ 𝟐 in Dementia: A Meta-Analysis

Table 4

Effect size, its 95% CI, and % weight calculations for each selected study of CSF A in Alzheimer’s disease and dementia due to other causes.

S. no.Author’s name and year Country where the studies were conducted AΞ²42 level (pg/mL) (AD and control) Effect size (pg/mL)95% CIWeight AΞ² 42 level (pg/mL) (DOC and control) Effect size (pg/mL)95% CIWeight
DiseasedControlDiseasedControl
N SDN SDRMD+SEN SDN SDRMD+SE

1Galasko et al. (1998) [17]USA82833379601485473βˆ’652.00074.031βˆ’797.10β€“βˆ’506.900.012741129464601485473βˆ’356.00081.475βˆ’515.69β€“βˆ’196.310.011
2Kanai et al. (1998) [19]Japan32109.973.241242180βˆ’132.10030.947βˆ’192.75β€“βˆ’71.450.0693320918041242180βˆ’33.00042.096βˆ’115.51β€“βˆ’49.510.041
3Andreasen et al. (2001) [7]Sweden10552318018897242βˆ’374.00059.684βˆ’490.98β€“βˆ’257.020.0192370432118897242βˆ’193.00087.941βˆ’365.36β€“βˆ’20.640.009
4SjΓΆgren et al. (2002) [20]Sweden194119917853161βˆ’442.00045.173βˆ’530.54β€“βˆ’353.460.033156809617853161βˆ’173.00046.251βˆ’263.65β€“βˆ’82.350.034
5Grossman et al. (2005) [21]USA175415.11395.229.7βˆ’41.2009.015βˆ’58.87β€“βˆ’23.530.819134414.11395.229.7βˆ’51.2009.118βˆ’69.07β€“βˆ’33.330.876
6de Jong et al. (2006) [22]The Netherlands6141912830869207βˆ’450.00041.193βˆ’530.74β€“βˆ’369.260.0392565522030869207βˆ’214.00058.003βˆ’327.68β€“βˆ’100.3270.022
7Bibl et al. (2007) [23]Germany153109015810320βˆ’500.00085.829βˆ’668.22β€“βˆ’331.780.0091548022015810320βˆ’330.000100.266βˆ’526.52β€“βˆ’133.480.007

*Mean in diseased group, **Mean in control group and raw mean difference.