Review Article
Diagnostic Utility of CSF Tau and A in Dementia: A Meta-Analysis
Table 4
Effect size, its 95% CI, and % weight calculations for each selected study of CSF A
in Alzheimerβs disease and dementia due to other causes.
| S. no. | Authorβs name and year |
Country where the studies were conducted |
AΞ²42 level (pg/mL) (AD and control) |
Effect size (pg/mL) | 95% CI | Weight |
AΞ² 42 level (pg/mL) (DOC and control) |
Effect size (pg/mL) | 95% CI | Weight | Diseased | Control | | | | | Diseased | Control | | | | | N | | SD | N | | SD | RMD+ | SE | | | N | | SD | N | | SD | RMD+ | SE | | |
| 1 | Galasko et al. (1998) [17] | USA | 82 | 833 | 379 | 60 | 1485 | 473 | β652.000 | 74.031 | β797.10ββ506.90 | 0.012 | 74 | 1129 | 464 | 60 | 1485 | 473 | β356.000 | 81.475 | β515.69ββ196.31 | 0.011 | 2 | Kanai et al. (1998) [19] | Japan | 32 | 109.9 | 73.2 | 41 | 242 | 180 | β132.100 | 30.947 | β192.75ββ71.45 | 0.069 | 33 | 209 | 180 | 41 | 242 | 180 | β33.000 | 42.096 | β115.51ββ49.51 | 0.041 | 3 | Andreasen et al. (2001) [7] | Sweden | 105 | 523 | 180 | 18 | 897 | 242 | β374.000 | 59.684 | β490.98ββ257.02 | 0.019 | 23 | 704 | 321 | 18 | 897 | 242 | β193.000 | 87.941 | β365.36ββ20.64 | 0.009 | 4 | SjΓΆgren et al. (2002) [20] | Sweden | 19 | 411 | 99 | 17 | 853 | 161 | β442.000 | 45.173 | β530.54ββ353.46 | 0.033 | 15 | 680 | 96 | 17 | 853 | 161 | β173.000 | 46.251 | β263.65ββ82.35 | 0.034 | 5 | Grossman et al. (2005) [21] | USA | 17 | 54 | 15.1 | 13 | 95.2 | 29.7 | β41.200 | 9.015 | β58.87ββ23.53 | 0.819 | 13 | 44 | 14.1 | 13 | 95.2 | 29.7 | β51.200 | 9.118 | β69.07ββ33.33 | 0.876 | 6 | de Jong et al. (2006) [22] | The Netherlands | 61 | 419 | 128 | 30 | 869 | 207 | β450.000 | 41.193 | β530.74ββ369.26 | 0.039 | 25 | 655 | 220 | 30 | 869 | 207 | β214.000 | 58.003 | β327.68ββ100.327 | 0.022 | 7 | Bibl et al. (2007) [23] | Germany | 15 | 310 | 90 | 15 | 810 | 320 | β500.000 | 85.829 | β668.22ββ331.78 | 0.009 | 15 | 480 | 220 | 15 | 810 | 320 | β330.000 | 100.266 | β526.52ββ133.48 | 0.007 |
|
|
*Mean in diseased group, **Mean in control group and raw mean difference.
|