Research Article

Multidisciplinary Integrated Framework for the Optimal Design of a Jet Aircraft Wing

Table 5

Level 3, structural sizing loop results summary.
(a) Structural Sizing Optimization

             Sizing data

Stringer sectionL section
Spar cap materialAluminium
Stringer materialAluminium

Sizing variablesBest

Spar caps (Figure 12  shows the legend for element position)

h1321,24 mm
h2422,29 mm
Base1322,19 mm
Base2422,08 mm
Thickness h131,72 mm
Thickness h242,34 mm
Thickness base131,62 mm
Thickness base242,64 mm

Stringers L section
h top22,02 mm
h bottom15,86 mm
Base top21,41 mm
Base bottom20,30 mm
Thickness h top2,98 mm
Thickness h bottom2,57 mm
Thickness base top1,86 mm
Thickness base bottom2,66 mm
Number of stringers3

Spars position

125,98% chord
262,11% chord

Ribs position

10% span
25% span
310% span
415% span
520% span
625% span
730% span
835% span
940% span
1045% span
1150% span
1255% span
1360% span
1465% span
1570% span
1675% span
1780% span
18100% span

(b) Composites stacking sequence characteristics

Layers thickness

Leading edge0,3 mm
Top surface0,3 mm
Bottom surface0,3 mm
Trailing edge0,3 mm
Spars0,3 mm
Ribs0,3 mm

Layers orientation [ ° ]12345678910

Leading edge45459045909045904545
Top surface904545904509090045
Bottom surface904590900450904590
Trailing edge90045045454545900
Spars4545909090454545900
Ribs454590454500000

(c) Optimum objective variables

Manufacturing cost 4,35E + 07
Structural mass2077 kg
Maximum displacement1603 mm