Global Modeling of N<sub>2</sub>O Discharges: Rate Coefficients and Comparison with ICP and Glow Discharges Results

<table>Densities of species for <svg height="18.4" id="M712" style="vertical-align:-5.56918pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 93.625 18.4" width="93.625" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,.062,11.4)"><path d="M745 361q0 -134 -83.5 -233t-214.5 -130l16 -11q97 -67 250 -132l-8 -23q-76 3 -131 16q-81 19 -242 125l-20 13q-129 8 -209 91t-80 208q0 160 116 271t289 111q136 0 226.5 -83t90.5 -223zM645 356q0 127 -57.5 201.5t-169.5 74.5q-126 0 -210.5 -104.5t-84.5 -248.5
q0 -97 46 -166.5t129 -87.5l84 15l29 -19q104 21 169 121.5t65 213.5z" id="x1D444"></path></g>
<g transform="matrix(.012,-0,0,-.012,13.113,15.475)"><path d="M719 650v-28q-43 -2 -62 -15t-22 -44q-6 -47 -6 -169v-403h-31l-426 524h-2v-251q0 -111 6 -169q4 -37 24 -50.5t72 -16.5v-28h-237v28q45 2 64.5 16t23.5 49q6 62 6 171v220q0 54 -3 68.5t-17 32.5q-16 19 -34.5 26.5t-54.5 10.5v28h147l418 -502h3v246q0 117 -7 166
q-4 34 -24.5 47t-73.5 15v28h236z" id="x4E"></path></g>
<g transform="matrix(.008,-0,0,-.008,21.962,18.338)"><path d="M412 140l28 -9q0 -2 -35 -131h-373v23q112 112 161 170q59 70 92 127t33 115q0 63 -31 98t-86 35q-75 0 -137 -93l-22 20l57 81q55 59 135 59q69 0 118.5 -46.5t49.5 -122.5q0 -62 -29.5 -114t-102.5 -130l-141 -149h186q42 0 58.5 10.5t38.5 56.5z" id="x32"></path></g>
<g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,32,11.4)"><path d="M535 323h-483v50h483v-50zM535 138h-483v50h483v-50z" id="x3D"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,46.704,11.4)"><path d="M456 178h-96v-72q0 -51 12.5 -62.5t72.5 -16.5v-27h-256v27q65 5 78 17t13 62v72h-260v28q182 271 300 426h40v-407h96v-47zM280 225v295h-2q-107 -148 -196 -295h198z" id="x34"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,58.637,11.4)"><path d="M170 255q0 -25 -16 -41t-40 -16t-40 16t-16 41t16 41.5t40 16.5t40 -16.5t16 -41.5z" id="x22C5"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,66.286,11.4)"><path d="M745 361q0 -134 -83.5 -233t-214.5 -130l16 -11q97 -67 250 -132l-8 -23q-76 3 -131 16q-81 19 -242 125l-20 13q-129 8 -209 91t-80 208q0 160 116 271t289 111q136 0 226.5 -83t90.5 -223zM645 356q0 127 -57.5 201.5t-169.5 74.5q-126 0 -210.5 -104.5t-84.5 -248.5
q0 -97 46 -166.5t129 -87.5l84 15l29 -19q104 21 169 121.5t65 213.5z" id="x1D444"></path></g>
<g transform="matrix(.012,-0,0,-.012,79.35,15.475)"><path d="M381 665q131 0 226.5 -93t95.5 -239q0 -158 -96 -253t-238 -95q-137 0 -231 95t-94 238q0 142 92.5 244.5t244.5 102.5zM359 629q-89 0 -151 -74.5t-62 -208.5q0 -141 69 -233t175 -92q90 0 150.5 74t60.5 211q0 152 -69 237.5t-173 85.5z" id="x4F"></path></g>
<g transform="matrix(.008,-0,0,-.008,88.238,18.338)"><path d="M412 140l28 -9q0 -2 -35 -131h-373v23q112 112 161 170q59 70 92 127t33 115q0 63 -31 98t-86 35q-75 0 -137 -93l-22 20l57 81q55 59 135 59q69 0 118.5 -46.5t49.5 -122.5q0 -62 -29.5 -114t-102.5 -130l-141 -149h186q42 0 58.5 10.5t38.5 56.5z" id="x32"></path></g>
</svg> feeding. Pressure varies from 1 mTorr to 100 mTorr.</table>

International Journal of Aerospace Engineering

fig16

Figure 16

Figure 16: Global Modeling of N<sub>2</sub>O Discharges: Rate Coefficients and Comparison with ICP and Glow Discharges Results 

International Journal of Aerospace Engineering

Global Modeling of N2O Discharges: Rate Coefficients and Comparison with ICP and Glow Discharges Results

Figure 16

Global Modeling of N₂O Discharges: Rate Coefficients and Comparison with ICP and Glow Discharges Results