Assessments of <svg xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" style="vertical-align:-0.2811995pt" id="M1" height="13.056pt" version="1.1" viewBox="-0.0657574 -12.7748 9.16067 13.056" width="9.16067pt"><g transform="matrix(.018,0,0,-0.018,0,0)"><path id="g113-108" d="M480 416C480 431 465 448 438 448C388 448 312 383 252 330C217 299 188 273 155 237H153L257 680C262 700 263 712 253 712C240 712 183 684 97 674L92 648L126 647C166 646 172 645 163 606L23 -6L29 -12C51 -5 77 2 107 8C115 62 130 128 142 180C153 193 179 220 204 241C231 170 259 106 288 54C317 0 336 -12 358 -12C381 -12 423 2 477 80L460 100C434 74 408 54 398 54C385 54 374 65 351 107C326 154 282 241 263 299C296 332 351 377 403 377C424 377 436 372 445 368C449 366 456 368 462 375C472 386 480 402 480 416Z"/></g></svg>-<svg xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" style="vertical-align:-0.2811995pt" id="M2" height="13.056pt" version="1.1" viewBox="-0.0657574 -12.7748 19.0874 13.056" width="19.0874pt"><g transform="matrix(.018,0,0,-0.018,0,0)"><use xlink:href="#g113-108"/></g><g transform="matrix(.018,0,0,-0.018,8.996,0)"><path id="g113-77" d="M541 160L512 170C485 116 462 88 439 67C411 41 376 35 318 35C272 35 238 37 224 48C207 61 205 85 212 121L290 533C305 611 308 615 391 622L397 650H139L133 622C217 615 221 612 206 533L126 118C111 41 103 34 23 26L17 0H474C489 31 528 124 541 160Z"/></g></svg> Turbulence Model Based on Menter’s Modification to Rotta’s Two-Equation Model

<div>Grid effect on varations of centerline axial velocity using <svg height="9.89089pt" id="M157" style="vertical-align:-0.2129898pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -9.6779 26.1416 9.89089" width="26.1416pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.0135,0,0,-0.0135,0,0)"><path d="M480 416C480 431 465 448 438 448C388 448 312 383 252 330C217 299 188 273 155 237H153L257 680C262 700 263 712 253 712C240 712 183 684 97 674L92 648L126 647C166 646 172 645 163 606L23 -6L29 -12C51 -5 77 2 107 8C115 62 130 128 142 180C153 193 179 220 204 241C231 170 259 106 288 54C317 0 336 -12 358 -12C381 -12 423 2 477 80L460 100C434 74 408 54 398 54C385 54 374 65 351 107C326 154 282 241 263 299C296 332 351 377 403 377C424 377 436 372 445 368C449 366 456 368 462 375C472 386 480 402 480 416Z" id="g113-108"></path><glyph.data ascent="3473" descent="-2876" horiz-adv-x="503" vert-adv-y="503"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0135,0,0,-0.0135,6.815,0)"><path d="M300 253H71L57 198H286L300 253Z" id="g190-46"></path><glyph.data ascent="989" descent="-360" horiz-adv-x="356" vert-adv-y="356"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0135,0,0,-0.0135,11.656,0)"><path d="M480 416C480 431 465 448 438 448C388 448 312 383 252 330C217 299 188 273 155 237H153L257 680C262 700 263 712 253 712C240 712 183 684 97 674L92 648L126 647C166 646 172 645 163 606L23 -6L29 -12C51 -5 77 2 107 8C115 62 130 128 142 180C153 193 179 220 204 241C231 170 259 106 288 54C317 0 336 -12 358 -12C381 -12 423 2 477 80L460 100C434 74 408 54 398 54C385 54 374 65 351 107C326 154 282 241 263 299C296 332 351 377 403 377C424 377 436 372 445 368C449 366 456 368 462 375C472 386 480 402 480 416Z" id="g113-108"></path><glyph.data ascent="3473" descent="-2876" horiz-adv-x="503" vert-adv-y="503"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0135,0,0,-0.0135,18.471,0)"><path d="M541 160L512 170C485 116 462 88 439 67C411 41 376 35 318 35C272 35 238 37 224 48C207 61 205 85 212 121L290 533C305 611 308 615 391 622L397 650H139L133 622C217 615 221 612 206 533L126 118C111 41 103 34 23 26L17 0H474C489 31 528 124 541 160Z" id="g113-77"></path><glyph.data ascent="3473" descent="-2876" horiz-adv-x="553" vert-adv-y="553"></glyph.data></g></svg> turbulence model for the jet flow case.</div>

International Journal of Aerospace Engineering

fig24

Figure 24

Figure 24: Assessments of <svg xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" style="vertical-align:-0.2811995pt" id="M1" height="13.056pt" version="1.1" viewBox="-0.0657574 -12.7748 9.16067 13.056" width="9.16067pt"><g transform="matrix(.018,0,0,-0.018,0,0)"><path id="g113-108" d="M480 416C480 431 465 448 438 448C388 448 312 383 252 330C217 299 188 273 155 237H153L257 680C262 700 263 712 253 712C240 712 183 684 97 674L92 648L126 647C166 646 172 645 163 606L23 -6L29 -12C51 -5 77 2 107 8C115 62 130 128 142 180C153 193 179 220 204 241C231 170 259 106 288 54C317 0 336 -12 358 -12C381 -12 423 2 477 80L460 100C434 74 408 54 398 54C385 54 374 65 351 107C326 154 282 241 263 299C296 332 351 377 403 377C424 377 436 372 445 368C449 366 456 368 462 375C472 386 480 402 480 416Z"/></g></svg>-<svg xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" style="vertical-align:-0.2811995pt" id="M2" height="13.056pt" version="1.1" viewBox="-0.0657574 -12.7748 19.0874 13.056" width="19.0874pt"><g transform="matrix(.018,0,0,-0.018,0,0)"><use xlink:href="#g113-108"/></g><g transform="matrix(.018,0,0,-0.018,8.996,0)"><path id="g113-77" d="M541 160L512 170C485 116 462 88 439 67C411 41 376 35 318 35C272 35 238 37 224 48C207 61 205 85 212 121L290 533C305 611 308 615 391 622L397 650H139L133 622C217 615 221 612 206 533L126 118C111 41 103 34 23 26L17 0H474C489 31 528 124 541 160Z"/></g></svg> Turbulence Model Based on Menter’s Modification to Rotta’s Two-Equation Model 

International Journal of Aerospace Engineering

Assessments of - Turbulence Model Based on Menter’s Modification to Rotta’s Two-Equation Model

Figure 24