Research Article
Flexible Sierpinski Carpet Fractal Antenna on a Hilbert Slot Patterned Ground
Table 1
Detailed comparison between performances of the proposed fractal and the conventional patch antenna, for both the planar and the folded cases.
| Antenna type | Modification | f r [GHz] | f r [%] | FBW [%] | FBW [%] | S11 [dB] |
| Fractal | Planar | 1.9850 | — | 5.37 | — | −25.7 | 1 | 2.0120 | 1.36 | 4.02 | −25.14 | −14.7 | 2 | 2.0120 | 1.36 | 5.13 | −4.47 | −20.8 | 3 | 2.0525 | 3.40 | n/a | n/a | −9.4 | 4 | 2.0255 | 2.04 | 4.42 | −17.69 | −16.3 |
| Patch | Planar | 1.9445 | — | 9.8 | — | −34.4 | 1 | 1.9985 | 2.78 | 8.1 | −17.35 | −18.4 | 2 | 1.9915 | 2.42 | 8.35 | −14.80 | −22.5 | 3 | 2.0770 | 6.81 | 6.42 | −34.49 | −23.6 | 4 | 2.0295 | 4.37 | 7.83 | −20.10 | −33.5 |
|
|