Research Article
Design of Fully Digital Controlled Shaped Beam Synthesis Using Differential Evolution Algorithm
Table 5
Comparative performance of DE, PSO, and GA.
| Different cases | Algorithm | Best fitness (out of 20) | Worst | Mean | Standard deviation |
| Case I | DE | 29.10 | 35.14 | 31.25 | 1.91 | PSO | 47.47 | 56.96 | 51.33 | 2.89 | GA | 54.25 | 67.73 | 58.27 | 3.89 |
| Case II | DE | 39.18 | 45.85 | 42.35 | 1.97 | PSO | 64.03 | 79.90 | 74.40 | 3.49 | GA | 73.67 | 93.87 | 85.69 | 4.32 |
|
|