- About this Journal ·
- Abstracting and Indexing ·
- Aims and Scope ·
- Annual Issues ·
- Article Processing Charges ·
- Author Guidelines ·
- Bibliographic Information ·
- Citations to this Journal ·
- Contact Information ·
- Editorial Board ·
- Editorial Workflow ·
- Free eTOC Alerts ·
- Publication Ethics ·
- Recently Accepted Articles ·
- Reviewers Acknowledgment ·
- Submit a Manuscript ·
- Subscription Information ·
- Table of Contents
International Journal of Antennas and Propagation
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 570923, 9 pages
Analysis of MIMO Diversity Improvement Using Circular Polarized Antenna
Network Technology Research Institute, China United Network Communications Corporation Ltd., Beijing 100048, China
Received 21 October 2013; Accepted 17 December 2013; Published 11 February 2014
Academic Editor: Yue Gao
Copyright © 2014 Jianquan Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
MIMO (Multiple Input Multiple Output) technique is one of the important means to enhance the system capacity. Diversity gain could be acquired by using traditional ±45° dual-polarized antenna, but in the scenario where multipath scattering is not strong, power-unbalance in two polarizations caused by polarization mismatching between transmitting and receiving antennas will reduce diversity gain. This problem can be effectively solved by using circular polarized antennas. In this paper, through theory analysis and test, the improvement of MIMO diversity gain using circular polarization antenna is analyzed.
MIMO technique uses multitransmitting and multireceiving antennas to combat channel fading and increase capacity and spectrum efficiency. MIMO system require low correlation between each pair of transmitting and receiving antenna elements, in order to achieve a good independent channel fading. There are two methods to dispose multi-antenna. The first one is space isolation. It is through the enough space distance to ensure non-correlation between each transmit/receive signals. The other one is polarization isolation. It is through electromagnetic wave orthogonal polarization to ensure non-correlation between each transmit/receive signals. Because the distance requirement is high for space isolation, commonly more than 10 wavelengths, the cost and difficulty of space isolation antenna deployment is higher. So polarization isolation proves to be an effective and economical method to deploy multiantennas.
For polarization isolation, signals go through independent fading in orthogonal polarization direction and hence ensure noncorrelation of two signals. In traditional 2 × 2 MIMO system, two signals are transmitted by dual-polarized base station antenna in ±45° polarization direction and received by terminal in vertical and horizontal polarization directions. During propagation, polarization direction of electromagnetic wave deflects because of reflection, refraction, and scattering. When signals arrive to the receiver, part of signals in ±45° polarization direction could be coupled to vertical direction and the other part could be coupled to horizontal direction. Because of independent fading in vertical and horizontal direction, polarization diversity gain can be gained. When the power of the signal in vertical direction is equal to that in horizontal direction, maximum diversity gain can be gained [1, 2].
In some typical scenes, such as spacious indoor, large public square, and urban city area, electromagnetic wave polarization deflection is not obvious because of less obstacles. When signals arrive to the receiver, power of signals in ±45° polarization direction coupled to vertical and horizontal direction is not equal because electromagnetic wave polarization still keeps intrinsic polarization status in large part. System diversity gain is limited because of influence of minor signal. There is even no diversity gain if two received signals power has great difference .
Using circular polarized antenna in transmitter can solve this problem effectively. Two signals are transmitted through left-hand circular polarization and right-hand circular polarization wave (as shown in Figure 1). The noncorrelation between two signals is ensured by isolation of two circum-gyrate directions.
The rest of this paper is organized as follows: MIMO system principle and channel capacity are introduced in Section 2. Section 3 gives the principle analysis of MIMO diversity improvement using circular polarized antenna (Figure 9). The result of MIMO channel capacity improvement is given in Section 5 and conclusions are given in Section 6.
2. MIMO System and Channel Capacity
2.1. MIMO System
Each channel between a pair of transmitting and receiving antennas is considered to be a MIMO subchannel. Assume that there are transmitting antennas and receiving antennas. Hence there are channel matrix which we name as channel matrix :
The element of is a subchannel between one pair of transmitting and receiving antennas. When the distance of each pair is large enough, every signal between transmitting and receiving antennas is independent. Then, the rank of the matrix will be large, even full when under ideal circumstances. Vice versa, when near, the rank will be small, because the signals are correlated to each other. From the above, we can conclude that the channel capacity of MIMO is highly related with the matrix . If the channel condition of the transmitting point is unknown, but the index of the matrix and the overall transmission power are fixed, the overall power can be designated to every transmission antenna averagely. Then, the capacity can be calculated as
2.2. MIMO Channel Capacity
The model of the channel capacity can be considered as a complex baseband linear system. It has been assumed that there are transmission antennas, receiving antennas, and the overall transmission power . Then, the power of each antenna will be and the receiving power of receiving antenna will be equal to the overall transmission power. If the channel is interfered by AWGN, and the noise power of each antenna is , then SNR of every receiving antenna will be
When the bandwidth of transmitting signal is narrow enough, the frequency response of the channel is flat, and the channel matrix is considered to be matrix , whose element shows the channel fading index between transmission antenna and receiving antenna ; the capacity can be shown as where “min” is the smaller of and and matrix is shown as
2.2.1. The MIMO System of “all 1” Channel Matrix 
If the correlation detection technology is used at receiving point, and then all the signals of each antenna will have the same frequency and phase. As a result, all signals which come from transmitting antennas can be considered the same.
Considering and , the signal coming from antenna can be shown as , , the power of the dedicated antenna is shown as , and SNR of each receiving antenna is ; the overall SNR of receiving point is shown as .
This multiantenna system can be seen as a sole-antenna system which hasdiversity gains. The capacity is shown as
If the receiving point adopts noncoherent detection technology, the SNR of each receiving antenna will still be , and the overall SNR will be . This sole-antenna system has an gain compared to the typical sole-antenna system. The capacity is shown as
2.2.2. The MIMO System of Orthogonal Transmitting Channel 
The MIMO system of orthogonal transmitting channel is a subsystem whose subchannel is orthogonal. Assuming the amount of antennas of transmitting and receiving point is the same (), the matrix can be shown as ( is the unit matrix of ). From (2), we can get the capacity as
The channel capacity gets a gain of compared to the old system due to the coupling of subchannels of each antenna.
If the channel index is changed randomly, the capacity of MIMO channel will be a random variable. The average capacity is where is the rank of matrix , .
3. Analysis of MIMO Diversity Improvement Using Circular Polarized Antenna
3.1. Polarization Matching
Polarization is an important character of antennas. It gives the changing orbit of electric vector and time in certain conditions. Normally, the wave along + can be shown in -axis and -axis as
From the relationship of ’s and ’s amplitude and phase, we can conclude that the electromagnetic wave has three polarizations: linear polarization, circular polarization, and elliptical polarization. If ,
When or ,
Electromagnetic amplitude and phase As shown above, the resultant wave changes along with time, but the orbit is in the line which has a degree over -axis. It is linear polarization wave.
When, Electromagnetic amplitude . The resultant wave is not changed with time, but direction changed with time. The vector of electronic field is rotating with angular velocity ω. It is circular polarization wave.
When , , When is subtracted, The degree of the oval’s axis over -axis is
All the vectors are rotating with an oval shape. As a result, this polarization wave is named as elliptical polarization wave.
Only when the transmitting and receiving antenna match correctly can the antenna achieve the best receiving effect.
When vertical polarized antenna is receiving vertical polarized wave, the transmitting wave will be shown as
The receiving antenna is shown as
Polarization matching index is
The receiving antenna will get the maximum power from the wave and now the transmitting and receiving antenna match perfectly.
When circular polarized antenna is receiving linear polarized wave, the transmitting wave is shown as
For the receiving antenna,
Polarization matching index is
The antenna will get half the power which means a 3 dB loss. The same result comes with linear polarized antenna receiving circular polarized wave.
When left-hand circular polarized antenna is receiving left-hand circular polarized wave, the wave is shown as
For the receiving antenna,
Polarization matching index is
The receiving antenna cannot get power, because they did not match in rotation direction. The same result comes with horizontal/vertical polarized antenna receiving vertical/horizontal polarized wave.
When two linear polarized antennas which are in vertical and horizontal direction are receiving circular polarized wave, the wave is shown as
For the receiving antenna,
Polarization matching index is
The receiving antennas match transmitting wave in polarization direction perfectly.
3.2. Cross Polarization Ratio and Polarization Leakage Ratio
Cross polarization ratio (Figure 2), which means the ratio of main polarization electromagnetic wave and orthogonal polarization electromagnetic wave, is the index which shows the dual-polarization antenna’s polarization features. The higher the CRP is, the better performance dual-polarization antenna can achieve and hence the higher diversity gain.
Due to the multipath effect of reflection and refraction, the electromagnetic wave will deflect to cross polarization from main polarization. If so, the receiving power will not be determined by CPR. That means the CPR of dual-polarization antenna will be 0 dB. That will also maximize the diversity gain.
However, in some typical scenario which has less reflection, refraction, and scattering, the electromagnetic wave in UE side will keep the original polarization direction. The multipath effect cannot put half power of linear polarization wave to the orthogonal polarization direction; that is, CPR does not come to ideal condition 0 dB.
We define an index as polarization leakage ratio. It indicates the ratio of power received by UE antennas in vertical polarization and horizontal polarization: will be determined by CPR, transmitting channel, and receiving antenna. When transmitting and receiving antenna’s polarization match perfectly and we do not consider the interference of transmitting channel, the relationship betweenand CPR will be
3.3. Antenna Configuration and Transmitting Channel
Assume two transmitting antennas are and . They keep vertical to each other and have 45° included angle with vertical direction (dual-polarization antenna configuration), as we can get from Figure 3. The same with receiving antennas named and which have a degree . is determined by the direction of equipment.
Assume ’s and ’s linear polarization component are and . They have the same amplitude and a 90° phase difference. That means circular polarized wave is transmitted:
This is a left-hand circular polarized wave. When , it will be changed to a right-hand circular polarized wave.
The channel model (Figure 4) is based on references [1, 3–5]. Matrix shows each channel function relationship. and show the cross-coupling relationship of to and to independently. is a random variable that shows the multipath fading degree. References [2, 6, 7] give the relevant testing result. is the signal random phase which is in .
3.4. Received Signal Power Ratio
Based upon antenna configuration and channel model, two received signals and are shown below: and signal strength is expressed as
From and , we can get the received LHCP wave power ratio in and :
From the above, we can conclude that polarization leakage ratio is not decided by the direction relationship , but completely by channel condition.
If linear polarized antenna is adopted in transmitting point, and , we can get
The received signal strength ratio in and is
When and ,
When linear polarization antenna is adopted in transmitting point, polarization leakage ratio is determined by channel condition and direction relationship .
In the scenarios which have less multipath effect, and are small. The power coupling of different polarization channel is determined by of dual-polarization antenna.
For circular polarized antenna,
For linear polarized antenna,
We can conclude that, for circular polarized antenna, the power of circular polarization wave received by two receiving antennas is equal; for linear polarized antenna, the power received by two receiving antennas is decided by and .
The received signal power balance of circular polarized antenna and linear polarized antenna can be compared (see Table 1 and Figure 7). The multipath fading vector obeys Rayleigh distribution. Considering the condition of dual-polarization antenna, is almost 30 dB. To better show the received signal power balance of circular polarized antenna and linear polarized antenna, the simulation is shown in Figure 5.
As we can see, in the same channel condition, the received signal power balance of linear polarized antenna power is decided by antenna polarization isolation. When or , the received signal power ratio is equal to circular polarization antenna. It is not realistic to keep the angle between transmitting and receiving antennas still along the whole communication process. That means the signal balance can be harmed by the slight change of antenna angle, That means the signal balance can be harmed by the slight change of antenna angle, that is, reduce the polarization diversity gain.
4. Design of Circular Polarization Antenna
Assume antenna lies along -axis and at the plane of yoz; for 45° dual-polarization antenna, the Tx (or Rx) signal can be decomposed aswhere and are the complex signals in theta and phi polarization, respectively.
For LH/RH dual circular polarization antenna, the Tx (or Rx) signal can be decomposed as where .
The most intuitive method is to combine the 45° ports of the dual-polar antenna by 90° hybrid with a 90° phase difference. The schematic diagram is illustrated in Figure 6.
Contrast can be seen from the test results; circular polarized antenna performance is consistent with linearly polarized antenna. Circular polarized antenna axis radio value is small enough; electromagnetic wave can maintain a good circular polarization characteristic. That is, the performance of the existing network will not be impacted using circular polarized antenna.
5. The Enhancement of MIMO Diversity Using Circular Polarized Antenna
At line-of-sight environment, the power received from antenna can be small, and the diversity gain is limited. The power of two received antennas is balanced when circular polarization antenna is adopted. However, the power of two received antennas is decided by antenna angle when linear polarization antenna is adopted. We give a better explanation of the relationship between received power balance and MIMO diversity gain loss by the calculation of computer.
The power of two received antennas is not even when linear polarization antenna is adopted. The diversity gain is limited by the signal that has the smaller power. That means the SNR of receiving antenna is lowered. According to (9), we can get the curve of channel capacity as in Figure 8.
By using circular polarization in the actual wireless environment in the realization of MIMO, through the cell 1 and cell 2 test results, can be seen that the average system throughput has relative 11%–18% ascension and has 25% of the highest lifting capacity.
MIMO diversity improvement using circular polarized antenna is given by principle analysis and test. System gain drops because of power imbalance in two receiving antennas in the scenes which do not have enough multipath effect when using traditional ±45° dual-polarization antenna. When using circular polarized antenna in transmitting point, this problem can be solved effectively. Two signals are transmitted through left-hand polarized and right-hand polarized electromagnetic waves. The noncorrelation between two signals is ensured by isolation of two circum-gyrate directions.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.
- 3GPP TS 25. 211 V8. 0. 0 Physical channels and mapping of transport channels onto physical channels (FDD).
- 3GPP TR 25. 876 V7. 0. 0 (2007-03) Multiple Input Multiple Output in UTRA.
- Y. C. Huang and B. Senadji, “Orientation analysis for antenna diversity using circular polarization,” in Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Signal Processing and Communication Systems (ICSPCS '08), Gold Coast, Australia, December 2008.
- R. G. Vaughan, “Polarization diversity in mobile communications,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 177–186, 1990.
- W. C. Y. Lee and Y. S. Yeh, “Polarization diversity system for mobile radio,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 912–923, 1972.
- J. D. Kraus and R. J. Marhefka, Antennas for all Applications, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 3rd edition, 2002.
- A. Kajiwara, “Circular polarization diversity with passive reflectors in indoor radio channels,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 778–782, 2000.