Research Article

Locoregional and Distant Recurrence Patterns in Young versus Elderly Women Treated for Breast Cancer

Table 3

Univariate analysis of risk factors for distant recurrence-free survival in younger women.

CharacteristicN*Hazard ratio
(95% CI)
HR
value
Log-rank
value

Receptor status
 ER/PR+#71 (62.28)0.87 (0.33–2.31)0.786 0.822
 Her2+11 (9.65)0.71 (0.11–4.48)0.716
 Triple negative32 (28.07)
Grade
 114 (12.61)0.80 (0.19–3.36)0.766 0.818
 235 (31.53)0.82 (0.28–2.35)0.706
 362 (55.86)
Surgery type
 Lumpectomy69 (55.2)0.28 (0.11–0.72)0.008 0.003
 Mastectomy56 (44.8)
Adjuvant chemotherapy
 No87 (69.6)0.40 (0.17–0.93)0.033 0.027
 Yes38 (30.4)
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
 No41 (32.8)0.89 (0.35–2.26)0.812 0.735
 Yes84 (67.2)
Detected on mammography
 No103 (88.03)1.10 (0.29–4.25)0.888 0.692
14 (11.97)
Stage at diagnosis
 0/I25 (21.01)0.09 (0.00–1.55)0.097 0.018
 II/III94 (78.99)
Nodal status
 Positive41 (32.8)2.58 (1.12–5.98)0.027 0.020
 Negative84 (67.2)
Postmastectomy radiation
 No16 (28.57)0.17 (0.03–0.98)0.048 0.014
 Yes40 (71.43)
Postlumpectomy radiation
 No5 (7.25)1.19 (0.05–26.66)0.912 0.534
 Yes64 (92.75)
Final margin status
 Positive2 (1.63)1.47 (0.08–27.41)0.795 0.771
 Less than 2 mm14 (11.38)0.88 (0.23–3.41)0.851
 Greater than 2 mm107 (86.99)

*Total patients for each characteristic may vary due to incomplete medical records for some patients.
#ER/PR+: estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor positive.