Abstract
Extravascular signal decay rate R2 or R
Extravascular signal decay rate R2 or R
B. E. Hoppel, R. M. Weisskoff, K. R. Thulborn, J. B. Moore, K. K. Kwong, and B. R. Rosen, “Measurement of regional blood oxygenation and cerebral hemodynamics,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 715–723, 1993.
View at: Publisher Site | Google ScholarB. M. Müller-Bierl, H. Graf, U. Lauer, G. Steidle, and F. Schick, “Numerical modeling of needle tip artifacts in MR gradient echo imaging,” Medical Physics, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 579–587, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google ScholarC. R. Fisel, J. L. Ackerman, R. B. Buxton et al., “MR contrast due to microscopically heterogeneous magnetic susceptibility: numerical simulations and applications to cerebral physiology,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 336–347, 1991.
View at: Publisher Site | Google ScholarR. M. Weisskoff, C. S. Zuo, J. L. Boxerman, and B. R. Rosen, “Microscopic susceptibility variation and transverse relaxation: theory and experiment,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 601–610, 1994.
View at: Publisher Site | Google ScholarS. Ogawa, R. S. Menon, D. W. Tank et al., “Functional brain mapping by blood oxygenation level-dependent contrast magnetic resonance imaging. A comparison of signal characteristics with a biophysical model,” Biophysical Journal, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 803–812, 1993.
View at: Google ScholarR. P. Kennan, J. Zhong, and J. C. Gore, “Intravascular susceptibility contrast mechanisms in tissues,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 9–21, 1994.
View at: Publisher Site | Google ScholarJ. L. Boxerman, L. M. Hamberg, B. R. Rosen, and R. M. Weisskoff, “MR contrast due to intravascular magnetic susceptibility perturbations,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 555–566, 1995.
View at: Publisher Site | Google ScholarN. Fujita, “Extravascular contribution of blood oxygenation level-dependent signal changes: a numerical analysis based on a vascular network model,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 723–734, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google ScholarW. H. Press, S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vettering, and B. P. Flannery, Numerical Recipes in C++. The Art of Scientific Computing, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2nd edition, 2002.
S. Balac, G. Caloz, G. Cathelineau, B. Chauvel, and J. D. de Certaines, “Integral method for numerical simulation of MRI artifacts induced by metallic implants,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 724–727, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google ScholarR. Bhagwandien, R. van Ee, R. Beersma, C. J. G. Bakker, M. A. Moerland, and J. J. W. Lagendijk, “Numerical analysis of the magnetic field for arbitrary magnetic susceptibility distributions in 2D,” Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 299–313, 1992.
View at: Publisher Site | Google ScholarK. M. Lüdeke, P. Röschmann, and R. Tischler, “Susceptibility artefacts in NMR imaging,” Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 329–343, 1985.
View at: Publisher Site | Google ScholarC. J. G. Bakker, R. Bhagwandien, M. A. Moerland, and M. Fuderer, “Susceptibility artifacts in 2DFT spin-echo and gradient-echo imaging: the cylinder model revisited,” Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 539–548, 1993.
View at: Publisher Site | Google ScholarB. M. Müller-Bierl, H. Graf, P. L. Pereira, and F. Schick, “Numerical simulations of intra-voxel dephasing effects and signal voids in gradient echo MR imaging using different sub-grid sizes,” Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 88–95, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar