Copyright © 2008 Ann M. Peiffer et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

1. J. F. Brinley, “Cognitive sets, speed and accuracy of performance in the elderly,” in Behavior, Aging, and the Nervous System, A. T. Welford and J. E. Birren, Eds., pp. 114–149, Thomas, Springfield, Ill, USA, 1965.
2. J. Cerella, “Generalized slowing in Brinley plots,” Journals of Gerontology, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. P65–P71, 1994.
3. J. Myerson, D. R. Adams, S. Hale, and L. Jenkins, “Analysis of group differences in processing speed: Brinley plots, Q-Q plots, and other conspiracies,” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 224–237, 2003.
4. J. Myerson, D. Wagstaff, and S. Hale, “Brinley plots, explained variance, and the analysis of age differences in response latencies,” Journals of Gerontology, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. P72–P80, 1994.
5. T. A. Salthouse, “The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition,” Psychological Review, vol. 103, no. 3, pp. 403–428, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
6. T. A. Salthouse, “Aging and measures of processing speed,” Biological Psychology, vol. 54, no. 1–3, pp. 35–54, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
7. U. Lindenberger, U. Mayr, and R. Kliegl, “Speed and intelligence in old age,” Psychology and Aging, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 207–220, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
8. R. Ratcliff, D. Spieler, and G. Mckoon, “Explicitly modeling the effects of aging on response time,” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–25, 2000.
9. A. D. Fisk and D. L. Fisher, “Brinley plots and theories of aging: the explicit, muddled, and implicit debates,” Journals of Gerontology, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. P81–P89, 1994.
10. M. J. Sliwinski and C. B. Hall, “Constraints on general slowing: a meta-analysis using hierarchical linear models with random coefficients,” Psychology and Aging, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 164–175, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
11. J. Yordanova, V. Kolev, J. Hohnsbein, and M. Falkenstein, “Sensorimotor slowing with ageing is mediated by a functional dysregulation of motor-generation processes: evidence from high-resolution event-related potentials,” Brain, vol. 127, no. 2, pp. 351–362, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
12. R. H. van der Lubbe and R. Verleger, “Aging and the Simon task,” Psychophysiology, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 100–110, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
13. V. Kolev, M. Falkenstein, and J. Yordanova, “Motor-response generation as a source of aging-related behavioural slowing in choice-reaction tasks,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 1719–1730, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
14. N. Raz, S. D. Briggs, W. Marks, and J. D. Acker, “Age-related deficits in generation and manipulation of mental images: II. The role of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex,” Psychology and Aging, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 436–444, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
15. M. D. Greicius, G. Srivastava, A. L. Reiss, and V. Menon, “Default-mode network activity distinguishes Alzheimer's disease from healthy aging: evidence from functional MRI,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 101, no. 13, pp. 4637–4642, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
16. J. Derrfuss, M. Brass, J. Neumann, and D. Y. von Cramon, “Involvement of the inferior frontal junction in cognitive control: meta-analyses of switching and Stroop studies,” Human Brain Mapping, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 22–34, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
17. S. R. Arnott, M. A. Binns, C. L. Grady, and C. Alain, “Assessing the auditory dual-pathway model in humans,” NeuroImage, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 401–408, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
18. J. M. Chein and W. Schneider, “Neuroimaging studies of practice-related change: fMRI and meta-analytic evidence of a domain-general control network for learning,” Cognitive Brain Research, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 607–623, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
19. P. E. Turkeltaub, G. F. Eden, K. M. Jones, and T. A. Zeffiro, “Meta-analysis of the functional neuroanatomy of single-word reading: method and validation,” NeuroImage, vol. 16, no. 3, part 1, pp. 765–780, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
20. T. D. Wager, J. Jonides, and S. Reading, “Neuroimaging studies of shifting attention: a meta-analysis,” NeuroImage, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 1679–1693, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
21. J. Neumann, G. Lohmann, J. Derrfuss, and D. Y. von Cramon, “Meta-analysis of functional imaging data using replicator dynamics,” Human Brain Mapping, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 165–173, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
22. R. L. Buckner, A. Z. Snyder, A. L. Sanders, M. E. Raichle, and J. C. Morris, “Functional brain imaging of young, nondemented, and demented older adults,” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, vol. 12, supplement 2, pp. 24–34, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
23. A. M. Peiffer, C. E. Hugenschmidt, and J. A. Maldjian, et al., “Aging and the interaction of sensory cortices,” in Human Brain Mapping, in press.
24. M. D'Esposito, E. Zarahn, G. K. Aguirre, and B. Rypma, “The effect of normal aging on the coupling of neural activity to the bold hemodynamic response,” NeuroImage, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 6–14, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
25. B. K. Levine, L. L. Beason-Held, and K. P. Purpura, et al., “Age-related differences in visual perception: a PET study,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 577–584, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
26. M. H. Ross, D. A. Yurgelun-Todd, and P. F. Renshaw, et al., “Age-related reduction in functional MRI response to photic stimulation,” Neurology, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 173–176, 1997.
27. S. C. Johnson, A. J. Saykin, and L. C. Baxter, et al., “The relationship between fMRI activation and cerebral atrophy: comparison of normal aging and Alzheimer disease,” NeuroImage, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 179–187, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
28. R. Cabeza, “Hemispheric asymmetry reduction in older adults: the HAROLD model,” Psychology and Aging, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 85–100, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
29. F. Dolcos, H. J. Rice, and R. Cabeza, “Hemispheric asymmetry and aging: right hemisphere decline or asymmetry reduction,” Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 819–825, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
30. R. Cabeza, S. M. Daselaar, F. Dolcos, S. E. Prince, M. Budde, and L. Nyberg, “Task-independent and task-specific age effects on brain activity during working memory, visual attention and episodic retrieval,” Cerebral Cortex, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 364–375, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
31. M. P. Milham, K. I. Erickson, and M. T. Banich, et al., “Attentional control in the aging brain: insights from an fMRI study of the Stroop task,” Brain and Cognition, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 277–296, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar