About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
International Journal of Biomaterials
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 415230, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/415230
Research Article

Nanomechanical Characterization of Canine Femur Bone for Strain Rate Sensitivity in the Quasistatic Range under Dry versus Wet Conditions

1Composite Materials and Mechanics Laboratory, Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department, Polytechnic Institute of New York University, Brooklyn, NY 11201, USA
2Department of Biomaterials and Biomimetics, College of Dentistry, New York University, 345 24th Street 813a, New York, NY 10010, USA
3Department of Epidemiology, New York University, NY 10010, USA
4Department of Periodontology and Implant Dentistry, College of Dentistry, New York University, 345 24th Street 813a, New York, NY 10010, USA

Received 24 April 2012; Revised 7 November 2012; Accepted 8 November 2012

Academic Editor: Thomas J. Webster

Copyright © 2012 Kun-Lin Lee et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

As a strain rate-dependent material, bone has a different mechanical response to various loads. Our aim was to evaluate the effect of water and different loading/unloading rates on the nanomechanical properties of canine femur cortical bone. Six cross-sections were cut from the diaphysis of six dog femurs and were nanoindented in their cortical area. Both dry and wet conditions were taken into account for three quasistatic trapezoid profiles with a maximum force of 2000 μN (holding time = 30 s) at loading/unloading rates of 10, 100, and 1000 μN/s, respectively. For each specimen, (mean ± SD) indentations were performed under different loading conditions. Significant differences were found for the elastic modulus and hardness between wet and dry conditions ( ). No influence of the loading/unloading rates was observed between groups except for the elastic modulus measured at 1000 μN/s rate under dry conditions ( ) and for the hardness measured at a rate of 10 μN/s under wet conditions ( ). Therefore, for a quasistatic test with peak load of 2000 μN held for 30 s, it is recommended to nanoindent under wet conditions at a loading/unloading rate of 100–1000 μN/s, so the reduced creep effect allows for a more accurate computation of mechanical properties.