About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
International Journal of Chemical Engineering
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 813931, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/813931
Review Article

Carbonic Anhydrase: An Efficient Enzyme with Possible Global Implications

Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, University of Florida, P.O. Box 100245, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA

Received 24 May 2013; Revised 6 August 2013; Accepted 19 August 2013

Academic Editor: Francisco José Hernández Fernández

Copyright © 2013 Christopher D. Boone et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

As the global atmospheric emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) and other greenhouse gases continue to grow to record-setting levels, so do the demands for an efficient and inexpensive carbon sequestration system. Concurrently, the first-world dependence on crude oil and natural gas provokes concerns for long-term availability and emphasizes the need for alternative fuel sources. At the forefront of both of these research areas are a family of enzymes known as the carbonic anhydrases (CAs), which reversibly catalyze the hydration of CO2 into bicarbonate. CAs are among the fastest enzymes known, which have a maximum catalytic efficiency approaching the diffusion limit of 108 M−1s−1. As such, CAs are being utilized in various industrial and research settings to help lower CO2 atmospheric emissions and promote biofuel production. This review will highlight some of the recent accomplishments in these areas along with a discussion on their current limitations.

1. Introduction

The atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide (CO2), methane, chlorofluorocarbons, and nitrous oxides have been increasing accordingly due to human-induced activities [1]. CO2 is the most abundant greenhouse gas, being produced primarily by the burning of fossil fuels such as coal, oil, and natural gas. The atmospheric concentration of CO2 has increased since preindustrial era from ~280 ppm [2] to 400 ppm in 2013 [3]. According to Antarctic ice core extractions, these levels are significantly higher than those at any time during the past 800,000 years [47]. Less direct geological evidence, based on boron-isotope ratios in ancient planktonic foraminifer shells, suggests that such high CO2 atmospheric concentrations were last seen about 20 million years ago [8].

Since 1896, a trend has been associated with elevated CO2 levels in the atmosphere and an increase in the average global temperature [9]. In ~100 years (1906–2005), the average global temperature increased by 0.7 ± 0.2°C, compared to a relatively constant average over the previous two thousand years [10]. This rise in CO2 levels is linked not only to surface temperature increases (with rising sea levels, melting of the glacier, and polar ice caps) but also to increased ocean acidity [1113]. Fossil fuel burning accounts for 75% of the elevated atmospheric CO2 levels from human activity over the past 20 years, with the remainder being associated primarily with deforestation [14].

2. Carbonic Anhydrase

The need for development of an efficient and inexpensive carbon sequestration system and the drive for an alternative fuel supply have both been led by a group of enzymes called the carbonic anhydrases (CAs; EC 4.2.1.1). The CAs are ubiquitously found in all kingdoms of lifeand are mostly zinc metalloenzymes that catalyze the interconversion between carbon dioxide and bicarbonate [1517]. CAs exist in three structurally distinct and evolutionarily unrelated classes: α, β, and γ. The α-class is found throughout the animal kingdom and in the periplasmic function of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, which is a type of green alga [18]. In addition, α-CAs can be found in Neisseria gonorrhoeae and other Neisseria species [1921]. The β-CAs are found in plants with C3 and C4 metabolism, as well as monocotyledons and dicotyledons, arthropods, and bacteria [17, 2227]. The γ-CA was first isolated and characterized in the Methanosarcina thermophila, a methanogenic archebacterium [28]. Homologous sequences of γ-CAs have been found in eubacteria; however, it is not known whether these sequences represent functional CAs [17].

Despite their structural differences, all CAs utilize the same catalytic mechanism: a two-step ping-pong mechanism that catalyzes the reversible hydration/dehydration of CO2 into bicarbonate and a proton [17] as In the first reaction, the zinc-bound hydroxide (ZnOH) nucleophilically attacks the CO2 to form bicarbonate. Then, a molecule of water coordinates directly to the zinc ion, which promotes diffusion of the bicarbonate out of the active site (Reaction (1)). The zinc-bound water molecule (ZnH2O) is deprotonated in the next reaction to regenerate the ZnOH (Reaction (2)). The proton is transferred from the ZnH2O to the bulk solvent (B) via a highly ordered array of water molecules in the active site [2932]. The amino acid residue that acts as the proton shuttle residue (i.e., the link between the buried ZnH2O in the active site and bulk solvent) is His64 in the case of human CA isoform II (HCA II) [33] and several other HCAs [15]. HCA II is a highly efficient catalyst with a turnover rate () on the order of one per microsecond and an overall catalytic efficiency () approaching the diffusion rate limit of 108 M−1 s−1 [15, 29, 3437]. Due to this highly efficient CO2 hydration, there is considerable interest in using CAs in carbon sequestration systems, as well as in biofuel and calcite production (Figure 1 and Table 1). This review will outline the current status, advantages, and limits of these applications.

tab1
Table 1: CA usage in industrial settings.
813931.fig.001
Figure 1: Schematic of the centralized role for CA in converting CO2 into beneficial products. The catalytic conversion of CO2 produced during the combustion of fossil fuels into bicarbonate () via CA yields a valuable source of inorganic carbon for algal cultures grown in raceway ponds. The lipids and oils from the algae cultures are excellent sources for biofuels, whereas the “waste” product yields additional beneficial proteins, vitamins, minerals, and dietary supplements. The algal CA can also serve as a great source for calcite (CaCO3) production, being critical in many construction, agricultural, and industrial materials.

3. Carbon Sequestration

The typical industrial flue gas contains 10%−20% CO2, which by current processes is cost-inefficient and requires harsh chemical environments at elevated temperatures [60]. Selectively capturing CO2 out of a mixture of waste gas that may also include nitrogen, sulfur, and other compounds can be technically challenging and expensive [61]. Current industrial protocol separates postcombustion CO2 via amine scrubbing, mineral carbonation, pressure storage, or absorption into solids or into liquids. An attractive alternative to these methods includes the use of an environmentally benign, renewable, selective, and inexpensive biomimetic CO2 sequestering agent.

The CAs are the leading candidate for this application as they are fairly inexpensive to be produced, are reuseable, and can work at ambient temperatures and under mild conditions [38]. Adequate bovine CA can be purified from simple chloroform extraction or ammonium sulfate precipitation of slaughterhouse blood samples [62]. Human (and other mammalian) CAs are easily overexpressed in bacteria [63] and are commercially available for purchase. While both human and bovine CAs have been used in the industrial setting, there is a growing need for improved CAs with higher stability and/or catalytic rates (to improve reusability and cost-efficiency, resp.) [38, 64]. A technique currently employed in the industrial setting to improve the stability of CAs is via immobilization onto a variety of inorganic [3943] and biopolymer surfaces [44, 45], including enriched microorganisms [21, 46], as well as onto matrices containing acrylamide, alginate, and chitosan-alginate [47, 48]. Other techniques include site-directed mutagenesis to rationally design faster [65] and/or more stabile [64, 66] variants of HCA II. Research on stable CAs isolated from halo- and thermotolerant microorganisms could provide further CO2 sequestration candidates in the industrial setting.

Once CO2 has been scrubbed from the flue gas, it can be chemically converted into stable compounds such as various carbonates or it can be pressurized to a liquid state for mass transport for geosequestration (storage either underground or in the ocean) [67, 68]. However, there are concerns over the cost, stability, and the long-term biological impacts (e.g., the release of CO2 upon contact with acidic rain) associated with geosequestration [68]. Chemical conversion of CO2 into ecologically friendly products, such as calcite (CaCO3), has gained recent interest. Calcite is the main constituent of shells in marine organisms [69, 70] and is readily prepared by reacting CaCl2 with bicarbonate, the product of CA catalysis. As such, calcite is routinely used in the making of cement and other building materials, but it can also be used as a pigment for paint formulation or as an acid neutralizer. Sequestered CO2 can also be converted into other useful products such as polycarbonates, acrylates, methane, carbonate storage polymers, and other construction materials [5658].

4. Biofuel Production

The potential long-term global environmental effects and the limited availability of oil and natural gas sources have prompted many countries, including the US, to initiate methods to find an environment friendly alternate fuel source [59]. There are an estimated 60 billion gallons of diesel and 120 billion gallons of gasoline used in the US per year [71]. This equates ~140 billion gallons of biodiesel needed for total transportation fuel in the US each year. Biodiesel is preferred over conventional diesel as it does not contribute to CO2 or sulfate levels in the atmosphere, emits less gaseous pollutants, and is nontoxic [49]. Soybean oil accounts for over half of the source of US biodiesel production [72]. However, only ~15% of the biodiesel demand could be met if all the arable land in the US were used to grow soybean for oil production [59]. Additionally, the current production of biofuels displaces croplands, previously used for food, and has been associated with increased consumer prices [73, 74].

An alternative to the soybean-derived biodiesel is algae-based systems. Algae are attractive candidates as they have higher oil production and carbon fixation rates compared to terrestrial plants [75, 76] and do not compete with traditional agriculture as they can be cultivated in ponds or in closed photobioreactors located on nonarable land [59]. Continuous cultivation of algae would also yield beneficial medicinal agents such as proteins, fatty acids, vitamin A, minerals, pigments, dietary supplements, and other biomolecules [77].

The CAs play an important role in the carbon fixation pathways in photosynthetic organisms (plants, algae, and cyanobacteria). The rate-limiting step of biomass production in these organisms is the uptake of CO2 into cells as bicarbonate. A carbon-concentrating mechanism that includes CA delivery of inorganic carbon to RuBisCo was evolved to counterattack this limitation [59, 78]. The CO2 is fixated into phosphoglyceric acid, enters the Calvin cycle and ultimately results in sugar. Numerous research efforts are being conducted to improve the efficiency of carbon fixation pathways aiming to improve food crop cultivation and biomass production [79].

Endogenous algal and cyanobacteria CA can also be used indirectly in calcite deposition, as evidenced by the enhanced CO2 capture and sequestration in the presence of the algal species Chlorella and Spirulina [5053]. These algal species also provide the extra benefit of producing calcite during cell with Chlorella produced the greatest yield of lipid biomass in photobioreactors [50]. Other studies in simulated raceway ponds showed similar results with the additional observation of decreased CO2 capture with increasing levels of acetazolamide, a commonly used CA inhibitor [50, 80]. The role of CA in this calcite precipitation is proposed to be a vital one, as it provides inorganic carbon in a soluble form as bicarbonate, the preferred source for a variety of algal strains (Figure 1 and Table 1) [54, 55]. However, much work is needed in determining the right conditions (pH, substrate/nutrient availability, aeration, etc.) to optimize the simultaneous production of biofuels and calcite with algal species.

5. Conclusion

Man’s dependence on fossil fuels and other natural gas products has brought forth an era when CO2 atmospheric levels are higher than those at any other time in recorded history. The long-term environmental consequences of this pandemic caused by humanities need for energy are bleak but also unpredictable. The global reduction of greenhouse gas emissions is the first critical step in the reversing process as an alternative source of fuel is found. The need for a solution has prompted much research into studying the viability of utilizing CAs for both of these challenges. Ideally, an optimized system would include a cyclic production of biofuels via algal and/or microalgal cultures that would substitute in fossil fuel combustion. The flue gas could then be scrubbed for CO2 by the CAs in the same algal cultures, which would also promote the formation of bicarbonate, inducing further biomass production and increasing the rate of calcite precipitation (Figure 1). As such, this system would provide the benefits of reduced CO2 emissions while also providing an essentially self-enclosed fuel and calcite generator, provided other essential ingredients and nutrients are available. Much research is also needed, however, in designing a highly active and stable variant of CA that can be easily overexpressed in such system.

References

  1. J. Hansen, M. Sato, R. Ruedy, A. Lacis, and V. Oinas, “Global warming in the twenty-first century: an alternative scenario,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 97, no. 18, pp. 9875–9880, 2000. View at Scopus
  2. EPA, “Recent Climate Change: Atmospheric Changes,” Climate Change Science Program, United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2007, http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/science/indicators/index.html.
  3. D. Shukman, “Carbon dioxide passes symbolic mark, British Broadcasting Corporation,” 2013, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-22486153.
  4. R. Spahni, J. Chappellaz, T. F. Stocker et al., “Atmospheric science: atmospheric methane and nitrous oxide of the late pleistocene from Antarctic Ice Cores,” Science, vol. 310, no. 5752, pp. 1317–1321, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. U. Siegenthaler, T. F. Stocker, E. Monnin et al., “Atmospheric science: stable carbon cycle-climate relationship during the late pleistocene,” Science, vol. 310, no. 5752, pp. 1313–1317, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. R. Petit, J. Jouzel, D. Raynaud et al., “Climate and atmospheric history of the past 420,000 years from the Vostok ice core, Antarctica,” Nature, vol. 399, no. 6735, pp. 429–436, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. D. Lüthi, M. le Floch, B. Bereiter et al., “High-resolution carbon dioxide concentration record 650,000-800,000 years before present,” Nature, vol. 453, no. 7193, pp. 379–382, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. P. N. Pearson and M. R. Palmer, “Atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations over the past 60 million years,” Nature, vol. 406, no. 6797, pp. 695–699, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. S. Weart, “The carbon dioxide greenhouse effect,” in The Discovery of Global Warming, American Institue of Physics, 2011, http://www.aip.org/history/climate/co2.htm.
  10. K. Jansen, “What Do Reconstructions Based on Palaeoclimatic Proxies Show?” pp 466–478, 2007.
  11. C. Kennedy, “State of the Climate: 2011 Global Sea Level,” ClimateWatch Magazine, NOAA Climate Services Portal, 2012.
  12. IPCC, “Synthesis Report Summary for Policymakers; Observed changes in climate and their effects,” 2007.
  13. L. Morello, “Oceans Turn More Acidic Than Last 800,000 Years,” Scientific American, 2010, http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=acidic-oceans.
  14. J. T. Houghton, Y. Ding, D. J. Griggs et al., IPCC: Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2001, Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
  15. M. Aggarwal, C. D. Boone, B. Kondeti, and R. McKenna, “Structural annotation of human carbonic anhydrases,” Journal of Enzyme Inhibition and Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 28, pp. 267–277, 2013.
  16. V. M. Krishnamurthy, G. K. Kaufman, A. R. Urbach et al., “Carbonic anhydrase as a model for biophysical and physical-organic studies of proteins and protein-ligand binding,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 108, no. 3, pp. 946–1051, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. S. Lindskog, “Structure and mechanism of Carbonic Anhydrase,” Pharmacology and Therapeutics, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. D. Hewett-Emmett and R. E. Tashian, “Functional diversity, conservation, and convergence in the evolution of the α-, β-, and γ-carbonic anhydrase gene families,” Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 50–77, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. B. Elleby, L. C. Chirica, C. Tu, M. Zeppezauer, and S. Lindskog, “Characterization of carbonic anhydrase from Neisseria gonorrhoeae,” European Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 268, no. 6, pp. 1613–1619, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. S. Huang, Y. Xue, E. Sauer-Eriksson, L. Chirica, S. Lindskog, and B.-H. Jonsson, “Crystal structure of carbonic anhydrase from Neisseria gonorrhoeae and its complex with the inhibitor acetazolamide,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 283, no. 1, pp. 301–310, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. Z. Liu, P. Bartlow, R. M. Dilmore et al., “Production, purification, and characterization of a fusion protein of carbonic anhydrase from Neisseria gonorrhoeae and cellulose binding domain from Clostridium thermocellum,” Biotechnology Progress, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 68–74, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. A. Maresca, D. Vullo, A. Scozzafava, and C. T. Supuran, “Inhibition of the alpha- and beta-carbonic anhydrases from the gastric pathogen Helycobacter pylori with anions,” Journal of Enzyme Inhibition and Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 388–391, 2013.
  23. I. Nishimori, T. Minakuchi, T. Kohsaki et al., “Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors: the β-carbonic anhydrase from Helicobacter pylori is a new target for sulfonamide and sulfamate inhibitors,” Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters, vol. 17, no. 13, pp. 3585–3594, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. R. S. Rowlett, “Structure and catalytic mechanism of the β-carbonic anhydrases,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1804, no. 2, pp. 362–373, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. R. S. Rowlett, C. Tu, M. M. McKay et al., “Kinetic characterization of wild-type and proton transfer-impaired variants of β-carbonic anhydrase from Arabidopsis thaliana,” Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 404, no. 2, pp. 197–209, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. L. Syrjänen, M. Tolvanen, M. Hilvo et al., “Characterization of the first beta-class carbonic anhydrase from an arthropod (Drosophila melanogaster) and phylogenetic analysis of beta-class carbonic anhydrases in invertebrates,” BMC Biochemistry, vol. 11, no. 1, article 28, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. S. A. Zimmerman and J. G. Ferry, “The β and γ classes of carbonic anhydrase,” Current Pharmaceutical Design, vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 716–721, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. T. M. Iverson, B. E. Alber, C. Kisker, J. G. Ferry, and D. C. Rees, “A closer look at the active site of γ-class carbonic anhydrases: high-resolution crystallographic studies of the carbonic anhydrase from methanosarcina thermophila,” Biochemistry, vol. 39, no. 31, pp. 9222–9231, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. D. N. Silverman, “Carbonic anhydrase: oxygen-18 exchange catalyzed by an enzyme with rate-contributing Proton-transfer steps,” Methods in Enzymology, vol. 87, pp. 732–752, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. D. N. Silverman and S. Lindskog, “The catalytic mechanism of carbonic anhydrase: implications of a rate-limiting protolysis of water,” Accounts of Chemical Research, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 30–36, 1988. View at Scopus
  31. D. N. Silverman and R. Mckenna, “Solvent-mediated proton transfer in catalysis by carbonic anhydrase,” Accounts of Chemical Research, vol. 40, no. 8, pp. 669–675, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. D. N. Silverman, C. Tu, X. Chen, S. M. Tanhauser, A. J. Kresge, and P. J. Laipis, “Rate-equilibria relationships in intramolecular proton transfer in human carbonic anhydrase III,” Biochemistry, vol. 32, no. 40, pp. 10757–10762, 1993. View at Scopus
  33. C. K. Tu, D. N. Silverman, C. Forsman, B.-H. Jonsson, and S. Lindskog, “Role of histidine 64 in the catalytic mechanism of human carbonic anhydrase II studied with a site-specific mutant,” Biochemistry, vol. 28, no. 19, pp. 7913–7918, 1989. View at Scopus
  34. S. Lindskog and J. E. Coleman, “The catalytic mechanism of carbonic anhydrase,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 70, no. 9, pp. 2505–2508, 1973. View at Scopus
  35. S. Lindskog and D. N. Silverman, “The catalytic mechanism of mammalian carbonic anhydrases,” in The Carbonic Anhdyrases: New Horizons, W. R. Chegwidden, N. D. Carter, and Y. H. Edwards, Eds., pp. 175–195, Birkhäuser, Boston, Mass, USA, 2000.
  36. T. H. Maren, “Carbonic anhydrase inhibition in ophthalmology: aqueous humour secretion and development of sulphonamide inhibitors,” in The Carbonic Anhydrases: New Horizons, W. R. C. Chegwidden, N. D. Carter, and Y. H. Edwards, Eds., pp. 425–436, 2000.
  37. C. T. Supuran, “Carbonic anhydrases—an overview,” Current Pharmaceutical Design, vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 603–614, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. G.-M. Bong, J. Stringer, D. K. Brandvold, F. A. Simsek, M.-G. Medina, and G. Egeland, “Development of integrated system for biomimetic CO2 sequestration using the enzyme carbonic anhydrase,” Energy and Fuels, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 309–316, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. A. Belzil and C. Parent, “Qualification methods of chemical immobilizations of an enzyme on solid support,” Biochemistry and Cell Biology, vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 70–77, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. S. Bhattacharya, A. Nayak, M. Schiavone, and S. K. Bhattacharya, “Solubilization and concentration of carbon dioxide: novel spray reactors with immobilized carbonic anhydrase,” Biotechnology and Bioengineering, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 37–46, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. S. Hosseinkhani and M. Nemat-Gorgani, “Partial unfolding of carbonic anhydrase provides a method for its immobilization on hydrophobic adsorbents and protects it against irreversible thermoinactivation,” Enzyme and Microbial Technology, vol. 33, no. 2-3, pp. 179–184, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. C. Prabhu, A. Valechha, S. Wanjari et al., “Carbon composite beads for immobilization of carbonic anhydrase,” Journal of Molecular Catalysis B, vol. 71, no. 1-2, pp. 71–78, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. M. Vinoba, K. S. Lim, S. K. Lee, S. K. Jeong, and M. Alagar, “Immobilization of human carbonic anhydrase on gold nanoparticles assembled onto amine/thiol-functionalized mesoporous SBA-15 for biomimetic sequestration of CO2,” Langmuir, vol. 27, no. 10, pp. 6227–6234, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. D. T. Arazawa, H.-I. Oh, S.-H. Ye et al., “Immobilized carbonic anhydrase on hollow fiber membranes accelerates CO2 removal from blood,” Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 403-404, pp. 25–31, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. A. Sharma, A. Bhattacharya, and A. Shrivastava, “Biomimetic CO2 sequestration using purified carbonic anhydrase from indigenous bacterial strains immobilized on biopolymeric materials,” Enzyme and Microbial Technology, vol. 48, no. 4-5, pp. 416–426, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. C. Prabhu, S. Wanjari, S. Gawande et al., “Immobilization of carbonic anhydrase enriched microorganism on biopolymer based materials,” Journal of Molecular Catalysis B, vol. 60, no. 1-2, pp. 13–21, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. G. M. Bond, M. G. Medina, J. Stringer, and E. F. A. Simsek, “Enzymatic Catalysis and CO2 Sequestration,” World Resource Review, vol. 11, pp. 603–619, 1999.
  48. F. A. Simsek-Ege, G. M. Bond, and J. Stringer, “Matrix molecular weight cut-off for encapsulation of carbonic anhydrase in polyelectrolyte beads,” Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 1175–1187, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. A. B. Fulke, S. N. Mudliar, R. Yadav et al., “Bio-mitigation of CO2, calcite formation and simultaneous biodiesel precursors production using Chlorella sp,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 101, no. 21, pp. 8473–8476, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. R. Ramanan, K. Kannan, A. Deshkar, R. Yadav, and T. Chakrabarti, “Enhanced algal CO2 sequestration through calcite deposition by Chlorella sp. and Spirulina platensis in a mini-raceway pond,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 101, no. 8, pp. 2616–2622, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. J. C. M. Pires, M. C. M. Alvim-Ferraz, F. G. Martins, and M. Simões, “Carbon dioxide capture from flue gases using microalgae: engineering aspects and biorefinery concept,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 3043–3053, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. C. Gonzalez-Fernandez and M. Ballesteros, “Linking microalgae and cyanobacteria culture conditions and key-enzymes for carbohydrate accumulation,” Biotechnology Advances, vol. 30, pp. 1655–1661, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  53. A. Y. Shekh, K. Krishnamurthi, S. N. Mudliar et al., “Recent advancements in carbonic anhydrase-driven processes for CO2 sequestration: minireview,” Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 42, pp. 1419–1440, 2012.
  54. Z. Chi, J. V. O'Fallon, and S. Chen, “Bicarbonate produced from carbon capture for algae culture,” Trends in Biotechnology, vol. 29, no. 11, pp. 537–541, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. B. Rost, K.-U. Richter, U. Riebesell, and P. J. Hansen, “Inorganic carbon acquisition in red tide dinoflagellates,” Plant, Cell and Environment, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 810–822, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. T. Sakakura, J.-C. Choi, and H. Yasuda, “Transformation of carbon dioxide,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 107, no. 6, pp. 2365–2387, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. H. Arakawa, M. Aresta, J. N. Armor et al., “Catalysis research of relevance to carbon management: progress, challenges, and opportunities,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 101, no. 4, pp. 953–996, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. E. J. Beckman, “Making polymers from carbon dioxide,” Science, vol. 283, no. 5404, pp. 946–947, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. P. Chen, M. Min, Y. Chen et al., “Review of the biological and engineering aspects of algae to fuels approach,” International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, vol. 2, pp. 1–30, 2009.
  60. S. M. Benson and T. Surles, “Carbon dioxide capture and storage: an overview with emphasis on capture and storage in deep geological formations,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 94, no. 10, pp. 1795–1805, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. A. C. Pierre, “Enzymatic carbon dioxide capture,” ISRN Chemical Engineering, vol. 2012, Article ID 753687, 22 pages, 2012.
  62. J. da Costa Ores, L. Sala, G. P. Cerveira, and S. J. Kalil, “Purification of carbonic anhydrase from bovine erythrocytes and its application in the enzymic capture of carbon dioxide,” Chemosphere, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 255–259, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. C. Forsman, G. Behravan, A. Osterman, and B. H. Jonsson, “Production of active human carbonic anhydrase II in E. coli,” Acta chemica Scandinavica B, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 314–318, 1988. View at Scopus
  64. Z. Fisher, C. D. Boone, S. M. Biswas et al., “Kinetic and structural characterization of thermostabilized mutants of human carbonic anhydrase II,” Protein Engineering, Design & Selection, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 347–355, 2012.
  65. S. Z. Fisher, C. Tu, D. Bhatt et al., “Speeding up proton transfer in a fast enzyme: kinetic and crystallographic studies on the effect of hydrophobic amino acid substitutions in the active site of human carbonic anhydrase II,” Biochemistry, vol. 46, no. 12, pp. 3803–3813, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. C. D. Boone, A. Habibzadegan, C. Tu, D. N. Silverman, and R. McKenna, “Structural and catalytic characterization of a thermally stable and acid-stable variant of human carbonic anhydrase II containing an engineered disulfide bond,” Acta Crystallographica D, vol. 69, pp. 1414–1422, 2013.
  67. R. Zevenhoven, S. Eloneva, and S. Teir, “Chemical fixation of CO2 in carbonates: routes to valuable products and long-term storage,” Catalysis Today, vol. 115, no. 1–4, pp. 73–79, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. D. J. Allen and G. F. Brent, “Sequestering CO2 by mineral carbonation: stability against acid rain exposure,” Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 44, no. 7, pp. 2735–2739, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. M. Suzuki, K. Saruwatari, T. Kogure et al., “An acidic matrix protein, Pif, is a key macromolecule for nacre formation,” Science, vol. 325, no. 5946, pp. 1388–1390, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. L. Astachov, Z. Nevo, T. Brosh, and R. Vago, “The structural, compositional and mechanical features of the calcite shell of the barnacle Tetraclita rufotincta,” Journal of Structural Biology, vol. 175, no. 3, pp. 311–318, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. M. Briggs, Widescale Production From Algae, Physics Department, The University of New Hampshire, 2004.
  72. Monthly Biodiesel Production Report, U.S. Energy Information Administration, 2013, http://www.eia.gov/.
  73. D. Boddiger, “Boosting biofuel crops could threaten food security,” The Lancet, vol. 370, no. 9591, pp. 923–924, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. V. Mercer-Blackman, H. Samiei, and K. Cheng, “Biofuel demand pushes up food prices,” IMF Research Department, IMF Survey Magazine, 2007.
  75. M. L. Jeong, J. M. Gillis, and J.-Y. Hwang, “Carbon Dioxide Mitigation by Microalgal Photosynthesis,” Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society, vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 1763–1766, 2003. View at Scopus
  76. M. B. Johnson and Z. Wen, “Production of biodiesel fuel from the microalga schizochytrium limacinum by direct transesterification of algal biomass,” Energy and Fuels, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 5179–5183, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. C. V. González López, F. G. Acién Fernández, J. M. Fernández Sevilla, J. F. Sánchez Fernández, M. C. Cerón García, and E. Molina Grima, “Utilization of the cyanobacteria Anabaena sp. ATCC 33047 in CO2 removal processes,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 100, no. 23, pp. 5904–5910, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  78. G. C. Cannon, S. Heinhorst, and C. A. Kerfeld, “Carboxysomal carbonic anhydrases: structure and role in microbial CO2 fixation,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1804, no. 2, pp. 382–392, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  79. R. J. Ellis, “Biochemistry: tackling unintelligent design,” Nature, vol. 463, no. 7278, pp. 164–165, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  80. S. Z. Fisher, M. Aggarwal, A. Y. Kovalevsky, D. N. Silverman, and R. McKenna, “Neutron diffraction of acetazolamide-bound human carbonic anhydrase II reveals atomic details of drug binding,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 134, pp. 14726–14729, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar