Research Article
Cusp Fracture Resistance of Maxillary Premolars Restored with the Bonded Amalgam Technique Using Various Luting Agents
Table 1
Mean fracture strengths and standard
deviations of tested teeth.
| | Group | N | Mean (S.D.) | ANOVA/post hoc Bonferroni comparison |
| | Control
(intact) | 15 | 2070.9(317.02) | A | | Amalgam | 16 | 917.4(198.04) | B | | RelyX
Arc | 16 | 834.5(323.73) | B | | RelyX Luting | 17 | 869.6(299.39) | B | | Ketac-Cem
| 15 | 917.8(344.73) | B | | Similar
letters are not significant at |
|
|
