Research Article
Influence of Different Restorative Techniques on the Strength of Endodontically Treated Weakened Roots
Table 2
Comparison of fracture strengths of all groups.
| Groups | Treatment done | Mean ± S.D. | Min | Max | ANOVA |
| 1 | Unprepared roots | 0.876 ± .32 | 0.37 | 1.57 | F | P | 2 | Prepared and unfilled weakened roots | 0.193 ± .10 | 0.06 | .42 | 12.472 | 0.000 | 3 | Roots filled with Gutta-percha only | 0.618 ± .32 | 0.24 | 1.21 | 4 | Roots apically filled with Gutta-percha and restored coronally with composite and post | 0.970 ± .32 | 0.29 | 1.39 | 5 | Roots filled with Resilon only | 0.966 ± .77 | 0.28 | 2.78 | 6 | Roots apically filled with Gutta-percha, and restored coronally with composite and post | 1.014 ± .20 | 0.69 | 1.35 |
|
|
Tukey post hoc test: means with the same superscript letter are not significantly different ().
|