Precision of Fit of Titanium and Cast Implant Frameworks Using a New Matching Formula

Table 5

The titanium [Test-Master] best-fit differences of each component centroid in μm.

Specimen		Component
		no. 1	no. 2	no. 3	no. 4	no. 5	no. 6
1	x	−1.9	−3.2	14.3	0.0	−5.5	−0.9
1	y	20.1	11.9	14.9	0.0	−0.5	1.1
1	z	4.5	0.0	1.4	0.5	5.2	0.4
2	x	0.0	19.3	−6.7	22.1	−2.0	18.2
2	y	0.0	7.8	2.6	12.7	1.5	−29.8
2	z	0.5	4.8	8.5	0.0	10.8	1.6
3	x	4.2	1.9	−26.3	9.6	5.6	0.0
3	y	11.6	3.5	13.1	8.3	6.9	0.0
3	z	0.6	0.1	0.0	16.4	6.0	0.0
4	x	17.1	0.0	24.6	16.1	−2.1	−28.4
4	y	−16.2	0.0	−11.4	−15.2	0.0	26.9
4	z	0.0	0.0	7.9	11.0	0.0	9.6
5	x	0.0	9.8	−3.8	−3.7	21.2	−7.3
5	y	0.0	20.2	−4.5	−3.9	3.2	31.9
5	z	0.3	3.6	0.3	9.4	0.0	4.3
6	x	−18.0	−21.1	−16.6	−12.5	−8.5	0.0
6	y	14.6	5.7	17.9	18.3	10.2	0.0
6	z	1.4	0.0	0.4	6.5	0.7	0.1
7	x	5.0	8.4	8.8	0.0	5.8	12.4
7	y	2.9	4.9	3.2	0.0	−0.1	−3.7
7	z	0.0	4.0	2.0	0.1	0.0	1.0
8	x	−23.5	−19.4	−10.1	0.7	−4.8	0.0
8	y	17.9	4.1	5.1	1.6	1.9	0.0
8	z	0.0	0.0	0.2	4.0	1.2	0.2
9	x	0.2	0.1	0.0	−7.1	2.2	4.1
9	y	0.2	1.4	0.0	3.1	3.3	0.8
9	z	0.0	2.1	0.0	2.4	0.0	1.1
10	x	0.0	−2.4	−2.1	−19.5	−8.7	−0.1
10	y	0.0	−3.5	−3.8	1.8	10.1	13.8
10	z	0.0	0.1	1.8	8.4	0.0	0.9
Mean	x	−1.7	−0.7	−1.8	0.6	0.3	−0.2
Mean	y	5.1	5.6	3.7	2.7	3.6	4.1
Mean	z	0.7	1.5	2.2	5.9	2.4	1.9
SD	x	11.5	12.4	14.9	12.6	9.0	12.3
SD	y	11.0	6.6	9.3	9.2	4.0	17.2
SD	z	1.4	2.0	3.2	5.5	3.7	3.0