Clinical Study

A Comparative Evaluation of the Efficacy of Two Novel Desensitising Dentifrices

Table 1

Summary of change from baseline in efficacy measures within each treatment group; Dentifrice A = Sensodyne Multi Action Iso-Active, Dentifrice B = Colgate Sensitive Pro-Relief. *From ANCOVA model with the following factors: treatment, baseline VAS stratification value (for Schiff and Tactile analyses), number of air sensitive teeth (covariate), and baseline (covariate). aNegative values favour Dentifrice A. bPositive values favour Dentifrice A. Baseline values are raw means (SD).

Time pointSensitivity parameterDentifrice A ( )Dentifrice B ( )
Adjusted mean
(95% CI) value*
% Change from
baseline
Adjusted mean
(95% CI) value*
% Change from
baseline

BaselineVAS74.3 (16.31)74.2 (17.36)
Schiff2.6 (0.40)2.5 (0.45)
Tactile13.0 (4.47)12.9 (4.19)

Week 1 VASa−8.4 (−13.5, −3.4) 11−6.7 (−11.9, −1.5) 9
0.00130.0115
Schiffa−0.6 (−0.8, −0.4) 24−0.6 (−0.8, −0.4) 25
<0.0001<0.0001
Tactileb4.9 (1.4, 8.3) 384.4 (0.9, 7.9) 34
0.00590.0137

Week 2 VASa−20.5 (−26.7, −14.2) 28−16.4 (−22.8, −10.1) 22
<0.0001<0.0001
Schiffa−0.9 (−1.1, −0.8) 37−0.9 (−1.1, −0.7) 35
<0.0001<0.0001
Tactileb6.7 (2.7, 10.6) 516.9 (2.8, 10.9) 53
0.00120.0011

Week 4 VASa−24.3 (−31.6, −17.0) 33−20.5 (−28.0, −13.1) 28
<0.0001<0.0001
Schiffa−1.2 (−1.4, −1.0) 46−1.1 (−1.3, −0.8) 42
<0.0001<0.0001
Tactileb15.5 (10.4, 20.6) <0.000111913.3 (8.1, 18.6) <0.0001104

Week 8 VASa−36.6 (−44.5, −28.6) 49−33.2 (−41.6, −24.8) 45
<0.0001<0.0001
Schiffa−1.6 (−1.8, −1.4) 61−1.5 (−1.7, −1.3) 61
<0.0001<0.0001
Tactileb22.1 (16.9, 27.2) 17020.2 (14.8, 25.6) 157
<0.0001<0.0001