Research Article

Crevicular Alkaline Phosphatase Activity and Rate of Tooth Movement of Female Orthodontic Subjects under Different Continuous Force Applications

Table 4

Comparisons between the measurement of canine movements at 150 gm and 100 gm orthodontic forces using a paired -test.

TimeContinuous orthodontic force value
150 gm100 gm

(A) Canine movement
 Week 1 (W1-W0)0.48 ± 0.320.24 ± 0.140.01*
 Week 2 (W2-W1)0.36 ± 0.300.25 ± 0.150.17
 Week 3 (W3-W2)0.38 ± 0.310.36 ± 0.300.86
 Week 4 (W4-W3)0.33 ± 0.210.39 ± 0.240.41
 Week 5 (W5-W4)0.55 ± 0.550.33 ± 0.17 0.20
(B) Cumulative canine movement
 Week 1 0.48 ± 0.320.24 ± 0.140.01*
 Week 2 0.84 ± 0.360.50 ± 0.200.01*
 Week 3 1.22 ± 0.430.85 ± 0.440.06
 Week 4 1.54 ± 0.371.24 ± 0.450.13
 Week 5 2.10 ± 0.501.57 ± 0.44 0.04*

Significance = * < 0.05.
Data presented as mean ± standard deviation of canine movement in a week ( = 12) with unit of mm.