Research Article
Crevicular Alkaline Phosphatase Activity and Rate of Tooth Movement of Female Orthodontic Subjects under Different Continuous Force Applications
Table 4
Comparisons between the measurement of canine movements at 150 gm and 100 gm orthodontic forces using a paired
-test.
| Time | Continuous orthodontic force | value | 150 gm | 100 gm |
| (A) Canine movement | | | | Week 1 (W1-W0) | 0.48 ± 0.32 | 0.24 ± 0.14 | 0.01* | Week 2 (W2-W1) | 0.36 ± 0.30 | 0.25 ± 0.15 | 0.17 | Week 3 (W3-W2) | 0.38 ± 0.31 | 0.36 ± 0.30 | 0.86 | Week 4 (W4-W3) | 0.33 ± 0.21 | 0.39 ± 0.24 | 0.41 | Week 5 (W5-W4) | 0.55 ± 0.55 | 0.33 ± 0.17 | 0.20 | (B) Cumulative canine movement | | | | Week 1 | 0.48 ± 0.32 | 0.24 ± 0.14 | 0.01* | Week 2 | 0.84 ± 0.36 | 0.50 ± 0.20 | 0.01* | Week 3 | 1.22 ± 0.43 | 0.85 ± 0.44 | 0.06 | Week 4 | 1.54 ± 0.37 | 1.24 ± 0.45 | 0.13 | Week 5 | 2.10 ± 0.50 | 1.57 ± 0.44 | 0.04* |
|
|
Significance = * < 0.05. Data presented as mean ± standard deviation of canine movement in a week ( = 12) with unit of mm.
|