About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
International Journal of Dentistry
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 498305, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/498305
Review Article

The Impact of Edentulism on Oral and General Health

1Département de Dentisterie et de Restauration, Faculté de Médecine Dentaire, Université de Montréal, CP 6128, Succursale Centre-Ville, Montréal, QC, Canada H3C 3J7
2Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of São Paulo, 14040-904 Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil
3Oral Health and Society Research Unit, Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada H3A 0C7
4Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada H3A 1A2

Received 8 January 2013; Revised 15 April 2013; Accepted 15 April 2013

Academic Editor: Yasuhiro Morimoto

Copyright © 2013 Elham Emami et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

An adequate dentition is of importance for well-being and life quality. Despite advances in preventive dentistry, edentulism is still a major public health problem worldwide. In this narrative review, we provide a perspective on the pathways that link oral to general health. A better understanding of disease indicators is necessary for establishing a solid strategy through an organized oral health care system to prevent and treat this morbid chronic condition.

1. Epidemiology of Tooth Loss

Edentulism is a debilitating and irreversible condition and is described as the “final marker of disease burden for oral health” [1]. Although the prevalence of complete tooth loss has declined over the last decade, edentulism remains a major disease worldwide, especially among older adults [2] (Table 1). However, there are intra- and intercountry variations in the prevalence of complete edentulism [3], and direct comparison between national samples is difficult because of the impact of various factors like education, economic circumstances, lifestyle, oral health knowledge and beliefs, and attitudes to dental care [4]. In the United States, the number of edentate individuals is likely to stay stable at 9 million and, according to the most recent information, the prevalence of edentulism amongst adults over 60 years of age was 25% [5]. In 2010, the overall rate of edentulism in Canada was 6.4%, and among adults between 60 and 79 years of age, it was 21.7% [6]. The rate of edentulism tends to vary among different regions within a country. In Canada, there is a wide variation between provinces, from 14% (Quebec) to 5% (Northwest Territories) due to associated factors such as access to fluoridated water and smoking [3]. In Brazil, the wealthier, more industrialized states tend to have lower rates than other parts of the country [7].

tab1
Table 1: Prevalence of edentulism in the elderly from different countries.

Studies show that edentulism is closely associated with socioeconomic factors and is more prevalent in poor populations and in women [3, 16]. In 2003, the ratio of edentulism was 6 times higher in low-income than in higher income Canadian families [3]. Other factors contributing to the prevalence of complete tooth loss are age, education, access to dental care, dentist/population ratios, and insurance coverage [17, 18]. Most edentate people are elders who wear complete dentures in one or both jaws. Studies have demonstrated that denture wearing continues to increase due to the increase in the aging population; a large number of people still depend on removable dentures for oral function [2].

Edentulism can lead directly to impairment, functional limitation, physical, psychological, and social disability, and handicap [19]. Thus, the impact of edentulism on general health should be examined by analyzing the major dimensions of health: physical symptoms and functional capacity, social functioning and perception of well-being. This means that well-quantified endpoints of demographic significance can be used to understand the global burden of this disease. The literature has been reviewed accordingly.

2. Impact of Edentulism on Oral Health

2.1. Tooth Loss: Modifier of Normal Physiology

Bone loss is an ongoing process following tooth loss [20], affecting the mandible four times more than the maxilla [21]. Edentulism was found to have a significant effect on residual ridge resorption [22], which leads to a reduction in the height of alveolar bone and the size of the denture bearing area. This reduction affects face height and facial appearance, which are altered following total tooth loss [20]. The loss of alveolar bone height and width also leads to substantial changes in the soft-tissue profile, such as protrusion of the mandibular lip and chin [23]. There exists an interpatient variation in these anatomic degenerative changes, and the etiology of these is still unclear. It is believed that a combination of local and systemic factors may be contributors; these include age, gender, duration of edentulism, parafunctional habits, general health, and several diseases [24].

2.2. Tooth Loss: Risk Factor for Impaired Mastication

The number of teeth has been chosen as a key determinant of oral function and oral health status [25, 26]. Several studies using different methodologies have demonstrated that an important indicator for masticatory efficiency is the number of functional tooth units [27, 28]. According to a systematic review evaluating the relationship between oral function and dentition, tooth numbers below a minimum of 20 teeth, with nine to 10 pairs of contacting units, are associated with impaired masticatory efficiency, performance, and masticatory ability (an individual’s perception of his/her ability to chew) [25].

Although some evidence suggests that reduced oral function in elders is related to muscle atrophy, aging alone has little impact on masticatory performance [29]. Most studies agree that denture wearers have only about one-fifth to one-fourth the bite strength and masticatory force of dentate individuals [30]. Furthermore, complete denture wearers require 7 times more chewing strokes than those with natural dentitions to be able to cut food into half of its original size [31]. Moreover, the thickness of the masseter muscle was found to be decreased in edentulous patients, thus decreasing bite force [32].This may partly explain why individuals wearing complete dentures have difficulty chewing hard foods.

This disability could substantially influence the desire to bite, to chew, and to swallow and could lead to a modification of food choices [33, 34]. As a result, research has consistently demonstrated that tooth loss and dental status have a negative impact on diet and food selection [20, 35].

2.3. Tooth Loss: Determinant of Oral Health

Edentulism can be accompanied by functional and sensory deficiencies of the oral mucosa, oral musculature, and the salivary glands. Decreased tissue regeneration and decreased tissue resistance are expected in the edentulous population, which can impair the protective function of the oral mucosa. Associations have been reported between aging, denture use, and oral mucosal disorders, including denture stomatitis, an inflammatory condition of the palatal mucosa seen in complete denture wearers, angular cheilitis, oral candidosis, and traumatic ulcers [3638]. According to MacEntee et al., the odds of finding hyperplasia, stomatitis, and angular cheilitis increase approximately three-fold in denture wearers [36]. Such disorders could expose the individual to internal and external pathogens, and their prevalence is an important parameter in evaluating the oral health of an elderly population [39, 40]. Although a direct correlation between edentulism and aspiration pneumonia has not been reported, the potential relation between denture plaque and aspiration pneumonia has been discussed in susceptible individuals [41, 42]. Although the majority of oral mucosal conditions in the elderly are benign, some may become malignant, especially if the protective functions of oral mucosa are decreased [37].

Edentulism may induce an oral dyskinesia, defined as abnormal, involuntary, patterned or stereotyped, and purposeless orofacial movements. Several factors, such as ill-fitting and unstable prostheses, oral discomfort, and lack of sensory contacts, have been proposed to explain oral dyskinesia in edentulous individuals, but the exact mechanism is still unclear. Denture wearers may have additional prosthetic problems as a result of soft and hard tissue damage caused by oral dyskinesia [43]. Edentulism is also associated with tardive dyskinesia, a type of dyskinesia occurring among patients chronically treated with antipsychotic drugs [44].

3. Impact of Edentulism on General Health

According to several studies, tooth loss can affect general health in several ways as indicated as follows(a)lower intake of fruits and vegetables, fiber, and carotene and increased cholesterol and saturated fats, in addition to a higher prevalence of obesity, can increase the risk of cardiovascular diseases and gastrointestinal disorders [14, 45];(b)increased rates of chronic inflammatory changes of the gastric mucosa, upper gastrointestinal and pancreatic cancer, and higher rates of peptic or duodenal ulcers [4648];(c)increased risk of noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus [49, 50];(d)increased risk of electrocardiographic abnormalities, hypertension, heart failure, ischemic heart disease, stroke, and aortic valve sclerosis [46, 5153]. A study also demonstrated a possible association between complete edentulism and an increased risk of coronary heart disease [54]. Furthermore, a more recent large prospective study concluded that the number of teeth was a dose-dependent predictor to cardiovascular mortality [55];(e)decreased daily function, physical activity, and physical domains of health-related quality of life [56, 57];(f)increased risk of chronic kidney disease [58];(g)association between edentulism and sleep-disordered breathing, including obstructive sleep apnea [59].

Although evidence is accumulating to support a reciprocal relationship between oral and general health [38, 60], the mechanisms linking poor general health and tooth loss are not yet clear. A purported pathway for this association involves deleterious effects of tooth loss on nutrition that, in turn, impacts systemic health [61]. Nutritional factors, especially antioxidants, may decrease following tooth loss and modulate systemic disease by interfering with the inflammatory cascade and preventing carcinogenesis [61]. A study on 83,104 US women [45] showed that diet might partially explain the association between oral health and cardiovascular disease. In this cross-sectional analysis, the edentulous women had dietary intakes associated with an increased rate of cardiovascular disease. These results are supported by a longitudinal analysis on 41,891 adults, which confirms an association between tooth loss and the prevalence of heart diseases [53].

Furthermore, excessive intakes of highly processed high-fat and high-carbohydrate foods contribute to obesity and obesity-related diseases, such as insulin resistance, cardiovascular disease, and hyperlipidemia [62]. However, it should be understood that the nutritional consequences of edentulism are complex due to a plethora of factors that influence food intake and nutritional status, including acute and chronic disease, alterations in the gastrointestinal tract, functional disabilities, chewing problems, psychological and social factors, and lowered socioeconomic status [63, 64].

Several longitudinal, prospective, and cross-sectional studies have supported the association between tooth loss, diet, and nutrition. Impaired dentition imposes dietary restriction and affects food taste, food selection, food preparation and food eating patterns [35, 6567]. Results of a study by Locker [68] indicated that 39% of edentulous elders were prevented from eating foods they would like to eat, 29% reported a decline in their enjoyment of food, and 14% avoided eating with others. Suboptimal diets may prevent edentulous individuals from meeting recommended dietary allowances and lead to compromised nutritional states, especially in edentulous subjects without dentures [63, 69, 70]. Studies have demonstrated that diet in edentulous subjects consists of food that is low in fiber and high in saturated fat, with a significant lack of intake of high-fiber foods such as breads, fruits, vegetables, and nonstarch polysaccharides (NSP) [35, 63, 65, 67]. Low NSP intakes (>10 g/d) and low fruit and vegetable intakes (>160 g/d) have been reported in edentulous people [71]. Joshipura et al. [72] collected dietary intake data from 49,501 male health professionals and demonstrated that, compared to dentate individuals, edentulous respondents consumed fewer vegetables, less fiber, and less carotene intake, while consuming more cholesterol and saturated fats. These differences were independent of sociodemographic and health behaviour characteristics. Lowe et al. [73] established that total tooth loss was associated with low citrus fruit consumption, low plasma vitamin C levels, and increased amounts of inflammatory reactants, such as plasma C-reactive protein. They also demonstrated increased levels of plasma interleukin-6, fibrinogen, and factor VIII in women. These factors are associated with an increased risk of coronary heart diseases and stroke.

In relation to weight gain, the results of a study carried out by Lee et al. [74] demonstrated that edentulism was associated with a weight gain of >5% in one year. Furthermore, an association between edentulism and obesity was found in several studies [14, 75]. When edentulism was not rehabilitated with complete dentures, it was associated with both underweight and overweight/obesity in an elderly population [76].

Despite this evidence, some findings contradict the association between dentition and nutrition [77, 78]. In a cross-sectional study, Shinkai et al. [77] investigated the influence of dentition status on overall diet quality. The authors concluded that, although individuals with better dentition status had better masticatory performance and bite force, no association was found between dentition status and quality of diet. However, in the same study, they found an association between masticatory variables and intakes of specific dietary components, such as vitamin C and fiber. There also exist some contradicting results regarding the influence of sociodemographic variables on the dentition-nutrition relationship. Findings of Nowjack-Raymer and Sheiham [66] demonstrated that the association between dentition and nutrition was independent of age, sex, raceethnicity, and socioeconomic factors, whereas Lee et al. [74] demonstrated racial-ethnic differences in dietary intake patterns, showing that the food intake of African American edentulous elders was similar to those with teeth. However, Caucasian edentate elders displayed different dietary food patterns than their dentate counterparts. This ethnic difference could be explained by fundamental differences in socioeconomic characteristics of racial groups. African Americans consumed more fat, fewer vegetables, and less fiber than did the Caucasians, irrespective of dental condition [79].

Although diet has been shown to be poorer in edentulous populations, there is still a need for more research about the association between tooth loss and specific changes in nutrient intake. The association between tooth loss and aging [17] may become even more important with the growth of the elder population worldwide. Such an increasing population has higher prevalence of chronic conditions [80] that may be indirectly aggravated by edentulism [73].

Regarding life expectancy of edentulous individuals, tooth loss was found to be associated with the onset of disability and mortality, even after adjusting for confounding factors such as socioeconomic and health behavior factors [81], and one study demonstrated that each tooth that remains in the oral cavity after the age of 70 decreased the risk of mortality over 7 years by 4% [82]. In addition, several studies established an association between edentulism before the age of 65 and an increased risk of earlier death [83]. Also, according to Shimazaki et al. [84], the mortality rate of edentulous elders without dentures was significantly higher than those with 20 or more teeth and, in a large cohort study, an association was found between tooth loss and mortality, in addition to death resulting from gastrointestinal cancer, heart disease, and stroke [46].

4. Impact of Edentulism on the Quality of Life

The term “quality of life” is often used as an umbrella term that covers various concepts, that is, health status, function, and life conditions. In general, quality of life (QoL) is defined as an individual’s perception of his or her position in life, in the context of the culture and value systems in which they live, and in relation to their goals, expectations, and concerns [85]. Perception of QoL varies among individuals and fluctuates over time for the same person as a result of changes in any of its component parts [86]. QoL is partly affected by a person’s oral health. Perceptions of how oral conditions affect daily function and well-being are referred to as oral health-related quality of life (OHQoL) [8789]. OHQoL has been widely used in clinical studies as an outcome to assess the quality, effectiveness, and efficacy of oral health care [87, 90].

Increasingly, it is recognized that patients’ perceptions of their oral health are important in evaluating well-being and determining health care outcomes [91]. The exclusive use of clinical measures has been generally criticized because they provide little insight into the psychosocial aspects of health and do not adequately reflect the health status, functioning, and perceived needs of edentulous and elderly individuals [33, 92, 93]. Edentulism may lead to changes in most of the domains leading to poorer QoL (e.g. impaired mastication, denture trauma, aesthetic concerns, or negative self-perception). Teeth have an important role in facial appearance, speech, and eating ability. There is overwhelming evidence showing the negative effect of edentulism on OHQoL [94, 95]. Edentulism negatively influences not only oral function, but also social life and day-to-day activities [96]. Compromised oral function has been linked to decreased self-esteem and a decline in psychosocial well-being [97]. Edentulous people may avoid participation in social activities because they are embarrassed to speak, smile, or eat in front of others, leading to isolation [98]. Many people develop skills to overcome the limitations of dentures, but some are unable to do so [20]. Fiske et al. [99] demonstrated that denture wearers have decreased self-confidence, premature aging, altered self-image, and altered behaviour in socializing and forming close relationships. On the other hand, dentures could improve oral appearance and social interactions of individuals, which might enhance self-esteem and thus contribute to psychological well-being [90, 100]. Variables, including type of treatment, age, sex, and marital status, could explain the variation in ratings of OHQoL and tooth loss [90].

5. Conclusion

Edentulism has a series of deleterious consequences for oral and general health. Oral consequences vary from the well-known residual ridge resorption to an impaired masticatory function, an unhealthy diet, social disability, and poor oral health quality of life. Edentulous individuals are also in greater risk for different systemic diseases and an increase in mortality rate. Therefore, oral health care providers should prevent tooth loss with proper dental education, oral health promotion, and a high level of dental care in an attempt to assure the existence of a physiologic dentition.

References

  1. J. Cunha-Cruz, P. P. Hujoel, and P. Nadanovsky, “Secular trends in socio-economic disparities in edentulism: USA, 1972–2001,” Journal of Dental Research, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 131–136, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. C. W. Douglass, A. Shih, and L. Ostry, “Will there be a need for complete dentures in the United States in 2020?” Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 5–8, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. W. J. Millar and D. Locker, “Edentulism and denture use,” Health Reports, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 55–58, 2005.
  4. F. Müller, M. Naharro, and G. E. Carlsson, “What are the prevalence and incidence of tooth loss in the adult and elderly population in Europe?” Clinical Oral Implants Research, vol. 18, supplement 3, pp. 2–14, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. E. D. Beltrán-Aguilar, L. K. Barker, M. T. Canto et al., “Surveillance for dental caries, dental sealants, tooth retention, edentulism, and enamel fluorosis—United States, 1988–1994 and 1999–2002,” Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. Surveillance Summaries, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 1–43, 2005. View at Scopus
  6. Health Canada, Report on the Findings of the Oral Health Component of the Canadian Health Measures Survey 2007–2009, Ministry of Health, Ottawa, Ontario, 2010.
  7. R. Moreira, Tooth-loss in adults and the elderly in Brazil: the influence of individual, contextual and geographical features [Ph.D. thesis], Faculdade de Saúde Pública, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 2009.
  8. B. A. Dye, X. Li, and G. Thorton-Evans, “Oral health disparities as determined by selected healthy people 2020 oral health objectives for the United States, 2009-2010,” NCHS Data Brief, 2012.
  9. M. T. Ribeiro, M. A. Rosa, R. M. Lima, et al., “Edentulism and shortened dental arch in Brazilian elderly from the National Survey of Oral Health 2003,” Revista de Saúde Pública, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 817–823, 2011.
  10. C. E. Medina-Solís, R. Pérez-Núñez, G. Maupomé et al., “National survey on edentulism and its geographic distribution, among Mexicans 18 years of age and older (with emphasis in WHO age groups),” Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 237–244, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. V. Eustaquio-Raga, J. M. Montiel-Company, and J. M. Almerich-Silla, “Factors associated with edentulousness in an elderly population in Valencia (Spain),” Gaceta Sanitaria, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 123–127, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. P. Tramini, S. Montal, and J. Valcarcel, “Tooth loss and associated factors in long-term institutionalised elderly patients,” Gerodontology, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 196–203, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. B. G. Dogan and S. Gokalp, “Tooth loss and edentulism in the Turkish elderly,” Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 162–166, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. T. Österberg, D. K. Dey, V. Sundh, G. E. Carlsson, J. O. Jansson, and D. Mellström, “Edentulism associated with obesity: a study of four national surveys of 16 416 Swedes aged 55–84 years,” Acta Odontologica Scandinavica, vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 360–367, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. Madlena, P. Hermann, M. Jahn, and P. Fejerdy, “Caries prevalence and tooth loss in Hungarian adult population: results of a national survey,” BMC Public Health, vol. 8, article 364, 2008.
  16. C. Bedos, J. M. Brodeur, L. Boucheron, et al., “The dental care pathway of welfare recipients in Quebec,” Social Science & Medicine, vol. 57, no. 11, pp. 2089–2099, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. H. W. Elani, S. Harper, P. J. Allison, C. Bedos, and J. S. Kaufman, “Socio-economic inequalities and oral health in Canada and the United States,” Journal of Dental Research, vol. 91, no. 9, pp. 865–70, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. J. M. Brodeur, M. Benigeri, M. Olivier, and M. Payette, “Use of dental services and the percentage of persons possessing private dental insurance in Québec,” Journal of the Canadian Dental Association, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 83–90, 1996. View at Scopus
  19. D. Locker, “Measuring oral health: a conceptual framework,” Community Dental Health, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 3–18, 1988.
  20. P. F. Allen and A. S. McMillan, “A review of the functional and psychosocial outcomes of edentulousness treated with complete replacement dentures,” Journal of the Canadian Dental Association, vol. 69, no. 10, p. 662, 2003. View at Scopus
  21. A. Tallgren, “The continuing reduction of the residual alveolar ridges in complete denture wearers: a mixed-longitudinal study covering 25 years,” The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 120–132, 1972. View at Scopus
  22. K. Divaris, A. Ntounis, A. Marinis, G. Polyzois, and A. Polychronopoulou, “Loss of natural dentition: multi-level effects among a geriatric population,” Gerodontology, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 192–199, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. A. Tallgren, B. R. Lang, and R. L. Miller, “Longitudinal study of soft-tissue profile changes in patients receiving immediate complete dentures,” The International Journal of Prosthodontics, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 9–16, 1991. View at Scopus
  24. G. E. Carlsson, “Clinical morbidity and sequelae of treatment with complete dentures,” Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 17–23, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. K. Gotfredsen and A. W. Walls, “What dentition assures oral function?” Clinical Oral Implants Research, vol. 18, supplement 3, pp. 34–45, 2007.
  26. M. Hashimoto, K. Yamanaka, T. Shimosato et al., “Oral condition and health status of elderly 8020 achievers in Aichi Prefecture,” The Bulletin of Tokyo Dental College, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 37–43, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. F. A. Fontijn-Tekamp, A. P. Slagter, A. van der Bilt et al., “Biting and chewing in overdentures, full dentures, and natural dentitions,” Journal of Dental Research, vol. 79, no. 7, pp. 1519–1524, 2000. View at Scopus
  28. A. Sheiham and J. Steele, “Does the condition of the mouth and teeth affect the ability to eat certain foods, nutrient and dietary intake and nutritional status amongst older people?” Public Health Nutrition, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 797–803, 2001. View at Scopus
  29. J. P. Hatch, R. S. A. Shinkai, S. Sakai, J. D. Rugh, and E. D. Paunovich, “Determinants of masticatory performance in dentate adults,” Archives of Oral Biology, vol. 46, no. 7, pp. 641–648, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. C. G. Michael, N. S. Javid, F. A. Colaizzi, and C. H. Gibbs, “Biting strength and chewing forces in complete denture wearers,” The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 549–553, 1990. View at Scopus
  31. F. M. C. van Kampen, A. van der Bilt, M. S. Cune, F. A. Fontijn-Tekamp, and F. Bosman, “Masticatory function with implant-supported overdentures,” Journal of Dental Research, vol. 83, no. 9, pp. 708–711, 2004. View at Scopus
  32. P. S. Bhoyar, S. R. Godbole, R. U. Thombare, and A. J. Pakhan, “Effect of complete edentulism on masseter muscle thickness and changes after complete denture rehabilitation: an ultrasonographic study,” Journal of Investigative and Clinical Dentistry, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 45–50, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. J. S. Feine and J. P. Lund, “Measuring chewing ability in randomized controlled trials with edentulous populations wearing implant prostheses,” Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 301–308, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. A. W. G. Walls, J. G. Steele, A. Sheiham, W. Marcenes, and P. J. Moynihan, “Oral health and nutrition in older people,” Journal of Public Health Dentistry, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 304–307, 2000. View at Scopus
  35. G. Tsakos, K. Herrick, A. Sheiham, and R. G. Watt, “Edentulism and fruit and vegetable intake in low-income adults,” Journal of Dental Research, vol. 89, no. 5, pp. 462–467, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. M. I. MacEntee, N. Glick, and E. Stolar, “Age, gender, dentures and oral mucosal disorders,” Oral Diseases, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 32–36, 1998. View at Scopus
  37. A. Jainkittivong, V. Aneksuk, and R. P. Langlais, “Oral mucosal lesions in denture wearers,” Gerodontology, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 26–32, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. D. Felton, L. Cooper, I. Duqum, et al., “Evidence-based guidelines for the care and maintenance of complete dentures: a publication of the American College of Prosthodontists,” Journal of the American Dental Association, vol. 142, supplement 1, pp. 1S–20S, 2011.
  39. A. Jainkittivong, V. Aneksuk, and R. P. Langlais, “Oral mucosal conditions in elderly dental patients,” Oral Diseases, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 218–223, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. M. I. MacEntee, E. Stolar, and N. Glick, “Influence of age and gender on oral health and related behaviour in an independent elderly population,” Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 234–239, 1993. View at Scopus
  41. Y. Sumi, H. Miura, Y. Michiwaki, S. Nagaosa, and M. Nagaya, “Colonization of dental plaque by respiratory pathogens in dependent elderly,” Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 119–124, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. L. Coulthwaite and J. Verran, “Potential pathogenic aspects of denture plaque,” British Journal of Biomedical Science, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 180–189, 2007. View at Scopus
  43. P. J. Blanchet, P. H. Rompre, G. J. Lavigne, and C. Lamarche, “Oral dyskinesia: a clinical overview,” The International Journal of Prosthodontics, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 10–19, 2005.
  44. P. Girard, C. Monette, L. Normandeau, et al., “Contribution of orodental status to the intensity of orofacial tardive dyskinesia: an interdisciplinary and video-based assessment,” Journal of Psychiatric Research, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 684–687, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  45. H. C. Hung, G. Colditz, and K. J. Joshipura, “The association between tooth loss and the self-reported intake of selected CVD-related nutrients and foods among US women,” Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 167–173, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. C. C. Abnet, Y. L. Qiao, S. M. Dawsey, Z. W. Dong, P. R. Taylor, and S. D. Mark, “Tooth loss is associated with increased risk of total death and death from upper gastrointestinal cancer, heart disease, and stroke in a Chinese population-based cohort,” International Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 467–474, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. T. Sierpinska, M. Golebiewska, J. W. Dlugosz, A. Kemona, and W. Laszewicz, “Connection between masticatory efficiency and pathomorphologic changes in gastric mucosa,” Quintessence International, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 31–37, 2007. View at Scopus
  48. R. Z. Stolzenberg-Solomon, K. W. Dodd, M. J. Blaser, J. Virtamo, P. R. Taylor, and D. Albanes, “Tooth loss, pancreatic cancer, and Helicobacter pylori,” The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 176–181, 2003.
  49. T. J. Cleary and J. E. Hutton, “An assessment of the association between functional edentulism, obesity, and NIDDM,” Diabetes Care, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 1007–1009, 1995. View at Scopus
  50. C. E. Medina-Solis, R. Perez-Nunez, G. Maupome, and J. F. Casanova-Rosado, “Edentulism among Mexican adults aged 35 years and older and associated factors,” American Journal of Public Health, vol. 96, no. 9, pp. 1578–1581, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  51. H. Völzke, C. Schwahn, A. Hummel et al., “Tooth loss is independently associated with the risk of acquired aortic valve sclerosis,” American Heart Journal, vol. 150, no. 6, pp. 1198–1203, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. Y. Takata, T. Ansai, K. Matsumura et al., “Relationship between tooth loss and electrocardiographic abnormalities in octogenarians,” Journal of Dental Research, vol. 80, no. 7, pp. 1648–1652, 2001. View at Scopus
  53. C. A. Okoro, L. S. Balluz, P. I. Eke, et al., “Tooth loss and heart disease: findings from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System,” American Journal of Preventive Medicine, vol. 29, pp. 50–56, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  54. P. de Pablo, T. Dietrich, and T. E. McAlindon, “Association of periodontal disease and tooth loss with rheumatoid arthritis in the US population,” Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 70–76, 2008. View at Scopus
  55. A. Holmlund, G. Holm, and L. Lind, “Number of teeth as a predictor of cardiovascular mortality in a cohort of 7,674 subjects followed for 12 years,” Journal of Periodontology, vol. 81, no. 6, pp. 870–876, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. M. N. Mollaoglu and R. Alpar, “The effect of dental profile on daily functions of the elderly,” Clinical Oral Investigations, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 137–140, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. F. Mack, C. Schwahn, J. S. Feine et al., “The impact of tooth loss on general health related to quality of life among elderly Pomeranians: results from the study of health in Pomerania (SHIP-0),” International Journal of Prosthodontics, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 414–419, 2005. View at Scopus
  58. M. A. Fisher, G. W. Taylor, B. J. Shelton et al., “Periodontal disease and other nontraditional risk factors for CKD,” American Journal of Kidney Diseases, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 45–52, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. C. Bucca, A. Cicolin, L. Brussino, et al., “Tooth loss and obstructive sleep apnoea,” Respiratory Research, vol. 7, p. 8, 2006.
  60. D. Kandelman, P. E. Petersen, and H. Ueda, “Oral health, general health, and quality of life in older people,” Special Care in Dentistry, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 224–236, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. C. S. Ritchie, K. Joshipura, H. C. Hung, and C. W. Douglass, “Nutrition as a mediator in the relation between oral and systemic disease: associations between specific measures of adult oral health and nutrition outcomes,” Critical Reviews in Oral Biology and Medicine, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 291–300, 2002. View at Scopus
  62. R. Touger-Decker, D. Sirois, and C. C. Mobley, Eds., Nutrition and Oral Medicine, Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, USA, 2005.
  63. A. W. Walls and J. G. Steele, “The relationship between oral health and nutrition in older people,” Mechanisms of Ageing and Development, vol. 125, no. 12, pp. 853–857, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  64. W. F. Nieuwenhuizen, H. Weenen, P. Rigby, and M. M. Hetherington, “Older adults and patients in need of nutritional support: review of current treatment options and factors influencing nutritional intake,” Clinical Nutrition, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 160–169, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. A. Sheiham, J. G. Steele, W. Marcenes et al., “The relationship among dental status, nutrient intake, and nutritional status in older people,” Journal of Dental Research, vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 408–413, 2001. View at Scopus
  66. R. E. Nowjack-Raymer and A. Sheiham, “Numbers of natural teeth, diet, and nutritional status in US adults,” Journal of Dental Research, vol. 86, no. 12, pp. 1171–1175, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. R. J. de Marchi, F. N. Hugo, D. M. P. Padilha et al., “Edentulism, use of dentures and consumption of fruit and vegetables in south Brazilian community-dwelling elderly,” Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 533–540, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. D. Locker, “The burden of oral disorders in a population of older adults,” Community Dental Health, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 109–124, 1992. View at Scopus
  69. B. Hutton, J. Feine, and J. Morais, “Is there an association between edentulism and nutritional state?” Journal of the Canadian Dental Association, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 182–187, 2002. View at Scopus
  70. N. Prakash, N. Kalavathy, J. Sridevi, and K. Premnath, “Nutritional status assessment in complete denture wearers,” Gerodontology, vol. 29, pp. 224–230, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  71. P. Moynihan and P. E. Petersen, “Diet, nutrition and the prevention of dental diseases,” Public Health Nutrition, vol. 7, pp. 201–226, 2004.
  72. K. J. Joshipura, W. C. Willett, and C. W. Douglass, “The impact of edentulousness on food and nutrient intake,” The Journal of the American Dental Association, vol. 127, pp. 459–467, 1996.
  73. G. Lowe, M. Woodward, A. Rumley, C. Morrison, H. Tunstall-Pedoe, and K. Stephen, “Total tooth loss and prevalent cardiovascular disease in men and women: possible roles of citrus fruit consumption, vitamin C, and inflammatory and thrombotic variables,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 56, no. 7, pp. 694–700, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. J. S. Lee, R. J. Weyant, P. Corby et al., “Edentulism and nutritional status in a biracial sample of well-functioning, community-dwelling elderly: the health, aging, and body composition study,” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 295–302, 2004. View at Scopus
  75. J. B. Hilgert, F. N. Hugo, L. de Sousa Mda, and M. C. Bozzetti, “Oral status and its association with obesity in Southern Brazilian older people,” Gerodontology, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 46–52, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. T. L. do Nascimento, D. D. da Silva, N. A. Liberalesso, H. J. Balbinot, H. F. Neves, and L. de Sousa Mda, “Association between underweight and overweight/obesity with oral health among independently living Brazilian elderly,” Nutrition, vol. 29, pp. 152–157, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  77. R. S. Shinkai, J. P. Hatch, S. Sakai, C. C. Mobley, M. J. Saunders, and J. D. Rugh, “Oral function and diet quality in a community-based sample,” Journal of Dental Research, vol. 80, no. 7, pp. 1625–1630, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  78. N. G. Sebring, A. D. Guckes, S. H. Li, and G. R. McCarthy, “Nutritional adequacy of reported intake of edentulous subjects treated with new conventional or implant-supported mandibular dentures,” The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, vol. 74, no. 4, pp. 358–363, 1995. View at Scopus
  79. B. M. Popkin, A. M. Siega-Riz, and P. S. Haines, “A comparison of dietary trends among racial and socioeconomic groups in the United States,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 335, no. 10, pp. 716–720, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  80. S. Bromfield and P. Muntner, “High blood pressure: the leading global burden of disease risk factor and the need for worldwide prevention programs,” Current Hypertension Reports, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  81. P. Holm-Pedersen, K. Schultz-Larsen, N. Christiansen, and K. Avlund, “Tooth loss and subsequent disability and mortality in old age,” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 429–435, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. T. Osterberg, G. E. Carlsson, V. Sundh, and D. Mellstrom, “Number of teeth—a predictor of mortality in 70-year-old subjects,” Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 258–268, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  83. D. W. Brown, “Complete edentulism prior to the age of 65 years is associated with all-cause mortality,” Journal of Public Health Dentistry, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 260–266, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  84. Y. Shimazaki, I. Soh, T. Saito et al., “Influence of dentition status on physical disability, mental impairment, and mortality in institutionalized elderly people,” Journal of Dental Research, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 340–345, 2001. View at Scopus
  85. K. C. Calman, “Quality of life in cancer patients—an hypothesis,” Journal of Medical Ethics, vol. 10, pp. 124–127, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  86. P. J. Allison, D. Locker, and J. S. Feine, “Quality of life: a dynamic construct,” Social Science & Medicine, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 221–230, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  87. G. Heydecke, L. A. Tedesco, C. Kowalski, and M. R. Inglehart, “Complete dentures and oral health-related quality of life—do coping styles matter?” Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 297–306, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  88. D. Locker, “Oral health and quality of life,” Oral Health & Preventive Dentistry, vol. 2, supplement 1, pp. 247–253, 2004. View at Scopus
  89. D. S. Brennan and A. J. Spencer, “Dimensions of oral health related quality of life measured by EQ-5D+ and OHIP-14,” Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, vol. 2, article 35, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  90. M. A. Awad, D. Locker, N. Korner-Bitensky, and J. S. Feine, “Measuring the effect of intra-oral implant rehabilitation on health-related quality of life in a randomized controlled clinical trial,” Journal of Dental Research, vol. 79, no. 9, pp. 1659–1663, 2000. View at Scopus
  91. D. Buck and J. T. Newton, “Non-clinical outcome measures in dentistry: publishing trends 1988–98,” Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 2–8, 2001. View at Scopus
  92. G. Heydecke, E. Klemetti, M. A. Awad, J. P. Lund, and J. S. Feine, “Relationship between prosthodontic evaluation and patient ratings of mandibular conventional and implant prostheses,” International Journal of Prosthodontics, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 307–312, 2003. View at Scopus
  93. D. Locker and G. Slade, “Association between clinical and subjective indicators of oral health status in an older adult population,” Gerodontology, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 108–114, 1994. View at Scopus
  94. F. N. Hugo, J. B. Hilgert, L. de Sousa Mda, and J. A. Cury, “Oral status and its association with general quality of life in older independent-living south-Brazilians,” Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 231–240, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  95. I. Nitschke and F. Müller, “The impact of oral health on the quality of life in the elderly,” Oral Health & Preventive Dentistry, vol. 2, supplement 1, pp. 271–275, 2004. View at Scopus
  96. G. Heydecke, J. M. Thomason, J. P. Lund, and J. S. Feine, “The impact of conventional and implant supported prostheses on social and sexual activities in edentulous adults: results from a randomized trial 2 months after treatment,” Journal of Dentistry, vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 649–657, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  97. A. V. Naik and R. C. Pai, “Study of emotional effects of tooth loss in an aging north Indian community,” ISRN Dentistry, vol. 2011, Article ID 395498, 4 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  98. S. M. Rodrigues, A. C. Oliveira, A. M. Vargas, A. N. Moreira, and E. F. E. Ferreira, “Implications of edentulism on quality of life among elderly,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 100–109, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  99. J. Fiske, D. M. Davis, C. Frances, and S. Gelbier, “The emotional effects of tooth loss in edentulous people,” British Dental Journal, vol. 184, no. 2, pp. 90–93, 1998. View at Scopus
  100. J. A. Jones, M. B. Orner, A. Spiro III, and N. R. Kressin, “Tooth loss and dentures: patients' perspectives,” International Journal of Dentistry, vol. 53, pp. 327–334, 2003.