Speech and Swallowing Data in Individual Patients Who Underwent Glossectomy after Prosthetic Rehabilitation

Table 1

Study type and characteristics patients of the included articles.

Author	ST		Age; years	TS	Area of; resection	Type of surgery	FLAP	RT/CT	Type of; prosthesis
Lehman et al. [19]	CR	1	66	NR	OBT	TG + TL	NR	NR	TP
Moore [20]	CR	1	59	NR	OBT	TG + FOM	ALT	NR	TP
Leonard and Gillis [21]	CR	1	48	NR	OBT	TG	NR	NR	TP
Gillis and Leonard [22]	CR	1	46	NR	OBT	TG	DPF	PORT	TP
Knowles et al. [23]	CR	1	46	NR	NR	PG + FOM + M	NR	NR	PAP
Ballard et al. [24]	CR	1	72	NR	OBT	STG + M + TL	TF	PORT	TP
Davis et al. [25]	CR	1	45	NR	OBT	STG + M + epiglottidectomy	NR	PRERT	PAP
Izdebski et al. [26]	CR	1	65	NR	OBT	TG + M	NR	NR	TP
Meyer Jr. et al. [27]	CR	1	69	NR	NR	PG	NR	NR	PAP
Godoy et al. [28]	CR	1	75	T3	OBT	TG	RFFF	PRERT	PAP
Kaplan [15]	CR	1	72	NR	OBT	TG + TL	SGF	NR	PAP + TP
Shimodaira et al. [29]	CR	1	60	NR	OBT	TG	TFL	PRERT	PAP
Çötert and Aras [30]	CR	1	63	NR	OBT	TG	NR	NR	TP
Martins et al. [31]	CR	1	57	T4	OBT	TG	PMMF	PORT	PAP
Goiato and Fernandes [32]	CR	1	62	T2	OBT	TG	NR	PORT	TP
Pigno and Funk [16]	CR	1	57	T4	OBT	TG	RAM	PRERT	PAP
Penn et al. [33]	CR	1	66	T4	OBT	TG + TL + M	IC	PRERT	TP
Dhamankar et al. [34]	CR	1	51	NR	OT	PG	NR	PORT	PAP
Laaksonen et al. [35]	CR	1	64	NR	OT	PG	RFFF	CT + PORT	PAP
Bachher and Dholam [5]	CR	1	59	T4	OBT	TG	PMMF	PORT	TP
Bhirangi et al. [36]	CR	1	NR	T4	OBT	TG	PMMF	PORT	TP
Sabouri et al. [37]	CR	1	46	NR	OBT	TG	NR	PRERT	TP
Okuno et al. [38]	CR	1	64	T2	OBT	STG	ALT	CT + PRERT	PAP + TP
Abdulhadi [39]	CR	2	51,5	NR	OT	PG	RFFF	CT + PRERT	PAP
Koyama et al. [40]	CR	3	62	T4	OT	PG	RAM	NR	PAP + TP
Lauciello et al. [41]	CR	4	59	NR	3 BOT/1 BT	1 TG/3 PG	1: TF; 2: DPF	PRERT	PAP
Leonard and Gillis [18]	CC	5	42,6	NR	OBT	1 TG; 3 PG; 1 STG; associated M + FOM	NR	5 PORT	3: PAP; 1 TP; 1 PAP + TP
Okayama et al. [42]	P	6	65	5: T2, 1: T4	NR	5 PG; 1 STG + M	4 RFFF; 1 LD; 1 SF	NR	PAP
Cantor et al. [43]	R	10	NR	NR	NR	10 = 5 severe restriction + 5 moderate restriction	NR	NR	PAP
Wheeler et al. [44]	R	10	NR	NR	4 OT/6 BT	2 STG; 8 PG; (6: 10–20%; 2: 50% resection); + 9 M + 3 FOM	3 TF	NR	PAP
Robbins et al. [45]	R	10	55,4	NR	8 OT/2 OBT	2 TG; 8 PG	NR	NR	PAP
Weber et al. [46]	R	18	NR	T3/T4	NR	18 TG or STG	PMMC	NR	PAP
De Carvalho-Teles et al. [4]	P	36	53,9	4: T2; 6: T3; 26: T4	6 OT; 30 BOT	26 TG; 4 STG; 6 PG + 12 M	35: PMMC; 1: PMF	35 PORT	PAP

ST: study type; TS = tumor stage; = sample size; RT = radiotherapy; CT = chemotherapy; PORT = postoperative radiotherapy; PRERT = preoperative radiotherapy; CR = case report; P = prospective; R = retrospective; CC = case control; NR = not reported; OT = oral tongue; BOT = base of tongue; OBT = oral and base of tongue; TG = total glossectomy; PG = partial glossectomy; STG = subtotal glossectomy; TL = total laryngectomy; FOM = floor of mouth; M = mandibulectomy; RFFF = radial forearm free flap; ALT = anterolateral thigh flap; DPF = deltopectoral flap; PMMC = pectoralis major myocutaneous flap; RAM = rectus abdominus microvascular free flap; TF = tongue flap; LD = latissimus dorsi; RFFF = radial forearm free flap; IC = iliac crest; FSG = free skin graft; TFL = tensor fascia latae; SF = scapular flap; PF = platysma myocutaneous flap; PAP = palatal augmentation prosthesis; TP = tongue prosthesis.