Impacted Maxillary Canine Prevalence and Its Association with Other Dental Anomalies in a Mexican Population

Table 1

Prevalence and distribution of dental anomalies by group; total sample size = 860.

Dental anomalies	IMC^1		Control			OR^2	CI^3
		6.04%		93.95%
Total prevalence	27	51.92%	163	20.17%	<0.0001	4.27	2.41–7.56
Agenesis	4	7.69%	39	4.82%	0.322	1.64	0.56–4.78
Supernumerary teeth	3	5.76%	40	4.95%	0.740	1.17	0.35–3.93
Microdontia	11	21.15%	37	4.57%	<0.0001	5.59	2.66–11.75
Peg-shaped upper laterals	1	1.92%	11	1.36%	0.529	1.42	0.18–11.22
Barrel-shaped upper laterals	7	13.46%	15	1.85%	<0.0001	8.22	3.19–21.18
Upper laterals with talon cusp	0	0%	16	1.98%	—	0.98	0.97–0.99
Fusion	0	0%	2	0.24%	—	0.99	0.99–1
Gemination	0	0%	1	0.12%	—	0.99	0.99–1
Impacted teeth	10	19.23%	45	5.56%	<0.0001	4.03	1.9–8.56
Transposition	12	23.07%	9	1.11%	<0.0001	26.63	10.6–66.88
Amelogenesis imperfecta	0	0%	2	0.24%	—	0.99	0.99–1

Statistically significant (). ¹IMC: impacted maxillary canine. ²OR: odds ratio. ³CI: confidence interval.