Research Article
Impacted Maxillary Canine Prevalence and Its Association with Other Dental Anomalies in a Mexican Population
Table 1
Prevalence and distribution of dental anomalies by group; total sample size = 860.
| Dental anomalies | IMC1 | Control | | OR2 | CI3 | | 6.04% | | 93.95% |
| Total prevalence | 27 | 51.92% | 163 | 20.17% | <0.0001 | 4.27 | 2.41–7.56 | Agenesis | 4 | 7.69% | 39 | 4.82% | 0.322 | 1.64 | 0.56–4.78 | Supernumerary teeth | 3 | 5.76% | 40 | 4.95% | 0.740 | 1.17 | 0.35–3.93 | Microdontia | 11 | 21.15% | 37 | 4.57% | <0.0001 | 5.59 | 2.66–11.75 | Peg-shaped upper laterals | 1 | 1.92% | 11 | 1.36% | 0.529 | 1.42 | 0.18–11.22 | Barrel-shaped upper laterals | 7 | 13.46% | 15 | 1.85% | <0.0001 | 8.22 | 3.19–21.18 | Upper laterals with talon cusp | 0 | 0% | 16 | 1.98% | — | 0.98 | 0.97–0.99 | Fusion | 0 | 0% | 2 | 0.24% | — | 0.99 | 0.99–1 | Gemination | 0 | 0% | 1 | 0.12% | — | 0.99 | 0.99–1 | Impacted teeth | 10 | 19.23% | 45 | 5.56% | <0.0001 | 4.03 | 1.9–8.56 | Transposition | 12 | 23.07% | 9 | 1.11% | <0.0001 | 26.63 | 10.6–66.88 | Amelogenesis imperfecta | 0 | 0% | 2 | 0.24% | — | 0.99 | 0.99–1 |
|
|
Statistically significant (). 1IMC: impacted maxillary canine. 2OR: odds ratio. 3CI: confidence interval.
|