- About this Journal ·
- Abstracting and Indexing ·
- Aims and Scope ·
- Annual Issues ·
- Article Processing Charges ·
- Articles in Press ·
- Author Guidelines ·
- Bibliographic Information ·
- Citations to this Journal ·
- Contact Information ·
- Editorial Board ·
- Editorial Workflow ·
- Free eTOC Alerts ·
- Publication Ethics ·
- Reviewers Acknowledgment ·
- Submit a Manuscript ·
- Subscription Information ·
- Table of Contents
International Journal of Differential Equations
Volume 2011 (2011), Article ID 401803, 14 pages
The Existence of Solutions for a Nonlinear Fractional Multi-Point Boundary Value Problem at Resonance
Department of Mathematics, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, China
Received 16 May 2011; Accepted 16 June 2011
Academic Editor: Nikolai Leonenko
Copyright © 2011 Xiaoling Han and Ting Wang. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
We discuss the existence of solution for a multipoint boundary value problem of fractional differential equation. An existence result is obtained with the use of the coincidence degree theory.
In this paper, we study the multipoint boundary value problem where , satisfying the Carathéodory conditions, . and are the standard Riemann-Liouville derivative and integral, respectively. We assume, in addition, that where is the Gamma function. Due to condition (1.3), the fractional differential operator in (1.1), (1.2) is not invertible.
Fractional differential equation can describe many phenomena in various fields of science and engineering. Many methods have been introduced for solving fractional differential equations, such as the popular Laplace transform method, the iteration method. For details, see [1, 2] and the references therein.
Recently, there are some papers dealing with the solvability of nonlinear boundary value problems of fractional differential equation, by use of techniques of nonlinear analysis (fixed-point theorems, Leray-Schauder theory, etc.), see, for example, [3–6]. But there are few papers that consider the fractional-order boundary problems at resonance. Very recently , Y. H. Zhang and Z. B. Bai considered the existence of solutions for the fractional ordinary differential equation subject to the following boundary value conditions: where is a natural number, is a real number, is continuous, and , and are given constants such that . and are the standard Riemann-Liouville derivative and integral, respectively. By the conditions, the kernel of the linear operator is one dimensional.
Motivated by the above work and recent studies on fractional differential equations [8–18], in this paper, we consider the existence of solutions for multipoint boundary value problem (1.1), (1.2) at resonance. Note that under condition (1.3), the kernel of the linear operator in (1.1), (1.2) is two dimensional. Our method is based upon the coincidence degree theory of Mawhin .
Now, we will briefly recall some notation and abstract existence result.
Let be real Banach spaces, let be a Fredholm map of index zero, and let be continuous projectors such that , and . It follows that is invertible. We denote the inverse of the map by . If is an open-bounded subset of such that , the map will be called -compact on if is bounded and is compact.
The theorem that we used is Theorem 2.4 of .
Theorem 1.1. Let be a Fredholm operator of index zero and be -compact on . Assume that the following conditions are satisfied: (i) for every ,(ii) for every ,(iii), where is a projection as above with , and is any isomorphism,
then the equation has at least one solution in .
2. Background Materials and Preliminaries
Definition 2.1. The fractional integral of order of a function is given by provided the right side is pointwise defined on . And we let for every continuous .
Definition 2.2. The fractional derivative of order of a function is given by where , provided the right side is pointwise defined on .
Lemma 2.3 (see ). Assume that with a fractional derivative of order that belongs to , then for some , where is the smallest integer greater than or equal to .
We use the classical space with the norm . Given and , one can define a linear space where and . By means of the linear function analysis theory, one can prove that with the norm is a Banach space.
Lemma 2.4 (see ). is a sequentially compact set if and only if is uniformly bounded and equicontinuous. Here, uniformly bounded means that there exists such that for every , and equicontinuous means that such that
Let with the norm . , where , with the norm , and is a Banach space.
Definition 2.6. We say that the map satisfies the Carathéodory conditions with respect to if the following conditions are satisfied:(i)for each , the mapping is Lebesgue measurable,(ii)for almost every , the mapping is continuous on ,(iii)for each , there exists such that, for a.e., and every , we have .
Proof. It is clear that .
Let and then and, if hold. Then satisfies the boundary conditions (1.2), that is, , and we have Let , then for , we have which, due to the boundary value condition (1.2), implies that satisfies (2.11). In fact, from , we have , from , we have and from , we have Hence, Therefore, Consider the continuous linear mapping and defined by Using the above definitions, we construct the following auxiliary maps : Since the condition (1.4) holds, the mapping defined by is well defined.
Recall (1.4) and note that and similarly we can derive that So, for , it follows from the four relations above that that is, the map is idempotent. In fact, is a continuous linear projector.
Note that implies . Conversely, if , then we must have ; since the condition (1.4) holds, this can only be the case if , that is, . In fact, .
Take in the form , so that and . Thus, . Let and assume that is not identically zero on , then, since , from (2.11) and the condition (1.4), we derive , which is a contradiction. Hence, ; thus, .
Now, , and so is a Fredholm operator of index zero.
Let be defined by Note that is a continuous linear projector and It is clear that .
Note that the projectors and are exact. Define by Hence, we have then , and thus In fact, if , then . Also, if , then from boundary value condition (1.2) and the fact that , we have . Thus, Using (2.19), we write With arguments similar to those of , we obtain the following Lemma.
Lemma 2.8. is completely continuous.
3. The Main Results
Assume that the following conditions on the function are satisfied:
(H1) there exists a constant , such that for satisfying for all , we have
(H2) there exist functions and a constant such that for all and a.e., , one of the following inequalities is satisfied:
(H3) there exists a constant such that for every satisfying , then either or else
Remark 3.1. and from (H3) stand for the images of under the maps and , respectively.
then for ; thus, , and hence for all . By the definition of , we have . It follows from (H1) that there exists such that . Now,
Now by (3.8), we have
Note that for , then, by (2.28) and (2.30),
Using (3.9) and (3.10), we obtain
where is a constant. This is for all ,
If the first condition of (H2) is satisfied, then we have
Note that and , so there exists such that for all . The inequalities (3.14) and (3.15) show that there exist such that for all . Therefore, for all , that is, is bounded given the first condition of (H2). If the other conditions of (H2) hold, by using an argument similar to the above, we can prove that is also bounded.
Let For , and ; thus, . By (H3), , that is, is bounded.
We define the isomorphism by
If the first part of (H3) is satisfied, let For every , If , then , and if , then by (H3), which, in either case, obtain a contradiction. If the other part of (H3) is satisfied, then we take and, again, obtain a contradiction. Thus, in either case, for all , that is, is bounded.
In the following, we will prove that all the conditions of Theorem 1.1 are satisfied. Set to be a bounded open set of such that . by Lemma 2.8, the operator is compact; thus, is -compact on , then by the above argument, we have(i), for every ,(ii), for every .Finally, we will prove that (iii) of Theorem 1.1 is satisfied. Let , where is the identity operator in the Banach space . According to the above argument, we know that and thus, by the homotopy property of degree, then by Theorem 1.1, has at least one solution in , so boundary problem (1.1), (1.2) has at least one solution in the space . The proof is finished.
This work is supported by the NSFC (no. 11061030, no. 11026060), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Gansu Universities, the nwnu-kjcxgc-03-69, nwnu-kjcxgc-03-61.
- A. A. Kilbas, H. M. Srivastava, and J. J. Trujillo, Theory and Applications of Fractional Differential Equations, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2006.
- K. S. Miller, “Fractional differential equations,” Journal of Fractional Calculus, vol. 3, pp. 49–57, 1993.
- Z. Bai and H. Lü, “Positive solutions for boundary value problem of nonlinear fractional differential equation,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 311, no. 2, pp. 495–505, 2005.
- A. Babakhani and V. Daftardar-Gejji, “Existence of positive solutions of nonlinear fractional differential equations,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 278, no. 2, pp. 434–442, 2003.
- V. Daftardar-Gejji and A. Babakhani, “Analysis of a system of fractional differential equations,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 293, no. 2, pp. 511–522, 2004.
- F. Meng and Z. Du, “Solvability of a second-order multi-point boundary value problem at resonance,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 208, no. 1, pp. 23–30, 2009.
- Y. H. Zhang and Z. B. Bai, “Exitence of solutions for nonlinear fractional three-point boundary value problem at resonance,” Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computing, vol. 36, no. 1-2, pp. 417–440, 2011.
- H. Jafari and V. Daftardar-Gejji, “Positive solutions of nonlinear fractional boundary value problems using Adomian decomposition method,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 180, no. 2, pp. 700–706, 2006.
- C. Yu and G. Z. Gao, “On the solution of nonlinear fractional order differential equation,” Nonlinear Analysis, vol. 63, no. 5–7, pp. e971–e976, 1998.
- N. Kosmatov, “A multi-point boundary value problem with two critical conditions,” Nonlinear Analysis, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 622–633, 2006.
- B. Liu and Z. Zhao, “A note on multi-point boundary value problems,” Nonlinear Analysis, vol. 67, no. 9, pp. 2680–2689, 2007.
- R. P. Agarwal, V. Lakshmikantham, and J. J. Nieto, “On the concept of solution for fractional differential equations with uncertainty,” Nonlinear Analysis, vol. 72, no. 6, pp. 2859–2862, 2010.
- Y.-K. Chang and J. J. Nieto, “Some new existence results for fractional differential inclusions with boundary conditions,” Mathematical and Computer Modelling, vol. 49, no. 3-4, pp. 605–609, 2009.
- A. M. A. El-Sayed, “Nonlinear functional-differential equations of arbitrary orders,” Nonlinear Analysis, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 181–186, 1998.
- D. Guo and J. Sun, Nonlinear Integral Equations, Shandong Science and Technology Press, Jinan, China, 1987.
- V. Lakshmikantham and S. Leela, “Nagumo-type uniqueness result for fractional differential equations,” Nonlinear Analysis, vol. 71, no. 7-8, pp. 2886–2889, 2009.
- V. Lakshmikantham and S. Leela, “A Krasnoselskii-Krein-type uniqueness result for fractional differential equations,” Nonlinear Analysis, vol. 71, no. 7-8, pp. 3421–3424, 2009.
- J. Mawhin, “Topological degree and boundary value problems for nonlinear differential equations,” in Topological Methods for Ordinary Differential Equations, P. M. Fitzpatrick, M. Martelli, J. Mawhin, and R. Nussbaum, Eds., vol. 1537 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics, pp. 74–142, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1991.