Research Article
Adaptive Image Compressive Sensing Using Texture Contrast
Table 2
Comparison of execution time(s) to reconstruct an image when using different algorithms.
| | Lenna | Barbara | Peppers | Goldhill | Mandrill |
| | Sparse representation | | | | | | MH-SPL | 1.62 | 1.76 | 1.53 | 1.36 | 1.80 | NESTA | 198.47 | 174.76 | 197.28 | 115.32 | 159.45 | Quantization | | | | | | DPCM + NESTA | 224.06 | 174.07 | 184.70 | 191.80 | 156.42 | Proposed | 2.57 | 3.12 | 1.91 | 2.27 | 5.62 | | | Sparse representation | | | | | | MH-SPL | 1.91 | 3.23 | 2.12 | 1.80 | 2.40 | NESTA | 134.34 | 170.11 | 130.25 | 130.48 | 117.25 | Quantization | | | | | | DPCM + NESTA | 152.26 | 116.98 | 126.01 | 125.42 | 114.77 | Proposed | 75.71 | 62.75 | 37.30 | 40.00 | 66.96 | | Sparse representation | | | | | | MH-SPL | 2.00 | 3.37 | 2.12 | 2.19 | 2.95 | NESTA | 120.89 | 102.80 | 117.19 | 110.17 | 196.12 | Quantization | | | | | | DPCM + NESTA | 120.00 | 100.81 | 110.05 | 107.47 | 98.36 | Proposed | 162.54 | 141.37 | 155.93 | 214.95 | 146.90 |
|
|