Table 4: Comparing IDAR performance with other IDSs.

IDS Routing protocol Number of nodes Intruders ( ) Moving speed Detection rate False positives rate Increment in memory usage Increment in traffic overhead

IDAR OlSR 30 0–8 m/s 0%–13.2% 17.6–26.5 MB 47.8–621.5 KB (0.36%–5.97 of OlSR traffic)

[43] OlSR 30 , , 6%–12% of OlSR traffic

[41] OlSR 10 0 m/s Detection is possible

[44] OlSR 7 0 m/s Detection is possible

[45] OlSR 5 0 m/s Detection is possible

[14] OlSR 11 0 m/s Detection is possible

[46] AODV 30 0–5 m/s 0%–20%

[47] AODV 50 0–20 m/s

[48] AODV 30 1–20 m/s 12%–18%

[49] AODV 20, 50 1–10 m/s 96.4%–98.7% 900 kB

[50] AODV 52 0–20 m/s
(Fixed IDSs)
0%–0.6%

[51] AODV 5, 21 , 0–10 m/s 0%–30%

[52] AODV 30 0–20 m/s 0.5%–15%

[53] AODV 50 Random 0–20 m/s

[54] AODV 10, 20, 50 0–10 m/s 0%–100%

[55] AODV 20–200 0–20 m/s 30%–95%

[56] AODV 50 1–20 m/s 99.8%–100%

[7] AODV
DSDV
DSR

[57] DSR 50 0–20 m/s 11%–31.3% of data traffic

[58] DSR 30 3–5 m/s 60%–100% 2.5%–50%

[59] DSR 30

[60] DSR 50 0–20 m/s 83.7%–97.4% 1.3%–7.2%