- About this Journal ·
- Abstracting and Indexing ·
- Aims and Scope ·
- Annual Issues ·
- Article Processing Charges ·
- Articles in Press ·
- Author Guidelines ·
- Bibliographic Information ·
- Citations to this Journal ·
- Contact Information ·
- Editorial Board ·
- Editorial Workflow ·
- Free eTOC Alerts ·
- Publication Ethics ·
- Reviewers Acknowledgment ·
- Submit a Manuscript ·
- Table of Contents

International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks

Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 598946, 15 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/598946

## Connectivity Analysis for Free-Flow Traffic in VANETs: A Statistical Approach

State Key Laboratory of Integrated Service Networks, Xidian University, Xi’an 710071, China

Received 8 July 2013; Accepted 29 August 2013

Academic Editor: Lin Bai

Copyright © 2013 Chen Chen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

#### Abstract

Intervehicle communication gives vehicles opportunities to exchange packets within the limited radio range and self-organized in Ad Hoc manner into VANETs (Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks). However, due to issues such as the high mobility, insufficient market penetration ratio, and lacking of roadside units, connectivity is actually a big problem in VANETs. In addition, relying only on the direct connectivity in most of the previous works, say broadcasting which provides one-hop connections between nodes is far from the continuously growing application demands in VANETs, such as inter-vehicle entertainments, cooperative collision avoidances, and inter-vehicle emergency notifications. Therefore, the indirect connectivity from multihop forwarding is also a necessary complement especially for the case where direct connection is hardly achieved. In this paper, we define a new metric, that is, available connectivity, to consider both direct and indirect connectivity. After analyzing the statistical properties of direct and indirect connectivity in vehicular environment, the available connectivity is proposed and quantified for practical usage. Numerical results show that our available connectivity could provide correct and useful references for protocols design and performance improvements of different applications.

#### 1. Introduction

Vehicular Ad hoc Networks [1–3] (VANETs) are distributed, self-organized communication networks composed of moving vehicles and are thus characterized by very high nodal mobility and limited degrees of freedom in the mobility patterns. The discussed IEEE 1609 Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments [4] (WAVE) draft is being developed for VANETs applications mainly considering safety-related scenarios, such as cooperative forward collision warning [5, 6] (CCW) systems, traffic signal violation warning [7] systems, and lane change warning [8] systems, and at the same time taking account of some requirements from nonsafety-related applications [9]. Indeed, all the above applications greatly rely on the packets exchange on reliable links and robust connections between vehicles. From this perspective, network connectivity becomes a fundamental and crucial issue to any practical application in VANETs. Regarding the node mobility, vehicles can not only depend on the direct one-hop broadcasting; they also need packets to be indirectly forwarded to the destinations through store-carry or multihop relays. However, it is worth noting that both direct and indirect connections are sometime hardly achieved especially during sparse communication environments such as the suburb highway or cases with low market penetration ratio [10]. As a result, the limited connectivity directly affects the possible speed at which information can be transported over a VANET and hence directly influence the up-to-datedness of wanted notifications which may result in accidents.

In summary, analysis to the connectivity is very necessary in VANETs. Actually, a number of models have been proposed in previous works such as stochastic process [11] based, Gaussian unitary ensemble (GUE) of random-matrix theory [12] based, and queuing theory [13] based and almost all their works discussed the connectivity with the famous three-phase traffic theory in which the fundamental relationship between traffic parameters on a road segment is given by the following equation:

where , , and are the traffic flow, average speed, and traffic density, respectively. The influences on the connectivity from the above parameters can be disclosed from Figure 1. Before the state transforming point, at which packets begin to be queued in transceivers’ sending buffers when the density of vehicles increases, the connectivity is intermittent and thus needs further studying to improve the performance. For the stage after the state transforming point, which is named the congestion flow state and depicted by dashed line, the connectivity could be basically guaranteed regarding the larger density. In that case, road is often jammed by vehicles very close to each other whereby the direct connectivity can be readily obtained. Accordingly, our research will focus on the free-flow state depicted by the solid line throughout our paper.

The rest of the paper is organized as follows. Section 2 provides our research motivations and discusses the possible usages of the available connectivity in VANETs. Section 3 presents previous related works. Section 4 introduces our definition of the available connectivity, assumptions, and the statistical analysis of direct and indirect connectivity. Numerical results and performance evaluations are presented in Section 5. Our work is concluded in Section 6 followed by acknowledgments and cited references.

#### 2. Motivations

“Connectivity” in Ad Hoc networks actually has a mature body of research but still absorbed lots of research interests in VANETs recently. With VANETs gradually stepping into our daily life, the connectivity has played an important role in many road applications to ensure driving safety and increase comfortableness. For instance, in CCW scenario, a good connectivity could help to avoid the chain collisions through disseminating warning notifications farther and quicker. In Figure 2, the red car crashed with the blue car and sent a CCW message. Then, car 1 could receive the CCW by direct connection and take brake in time to avoid crash. However, without the help of the indirect connection, that is, multi-hop forwarding in this case, car 2, and 3 may collide with the front car if the intervehicle distances are approaching the unsafe range [14]. In Figure 3, vehicles 2~5 could detect the front traffic jam by the messages store-carry-forwarded by vehicle 1 from the red sender. Therefore, owing to the indirect connectivity, they can beforehand enter into the auxiliary road to avoid the congestion and save time. In summary, the connectivity, direct or indirect, could provide more opportunities for vehicles to make their decisions wisely and safely and to achieve better driving experiences. Hence, a good definition of the connectivity or the metric to measure the connectivity is essential in VANETs.

In our work, we define the connectivity as the probability of connections which could be achieved directly or indirectly. Numerical results show that our definition can explore the potential transmission opportunities for vehicles especially in the safety-related applications context. The connection possibility is discussed through statistical analysis in terms of either connected durations or inter-vehicle distances. To reflect the high dynamics of the connectivity due to different mobility patterns, we also introduce the influence of velocity into our work.

Indeed, a wise definition of the available connectivity can practically make many otherwise complex problems easy. For example, to design an admission control strategy in VANETs, the available connectivity could provide important references for the connectivity improvement by giving the specific time or location at which the vehicles may be admitted into. In addition, to evaluate the performance of emergency-related applications, the available connectivity could roughly work out the delivery ratio of emergency notifications from given vehicles. On the other hand, to make the emergency notifications spread faster and further, the available connectivity could also be taken as a better criterion for relays selection. Besides, to route the packets based on the available connectivity, the throughput can be improved and the backup multiple paths may be simultaneously figured out whereby transmission robustness could be guaranteed. In a dense network, available connectivity may also be able to offer a reference for the threshold of packet generation rate to maintain sufficient connectivity but not make the overall network congested. In summary, along with the available connectivity, a plethora of works now can be implemented to improve the safety, comfortableness, and efficiency in VANETs.

#### 3. Related Works

Although connectivity analysis is a classical issue in wireless communication networks, it is now still a hot topic in VANETs regarding the recently increasing research activities [15–17]. In my point of view, the connectivity research in VANETs can be generally classified into two categories: one for investigating the lifetime properties of connected links or paths; another via the measurement of inter-vehicle distances.

Researches on lifetime properties mainly focus on the statistical analysis of the connection duration. In [11], the authors discussed the connection duration expression in detail considering the velocity vectors with yaw angles. Their numerical results found that high relative velocities impose a hard task on some cooperative maneuvers including underlying routing protocols. However, even the short connection duration is still enough for emergency notification scenarios. In [18], the connection duration between two adjacent vehicles was figured out, given their speeds, directions, and the radio ranges. According to the calculated connection period expression, an admission control strategy is proposed to determine whether the next vehicle is allowed to be injected into the current traffic flow without interrupting the ongoing connections. In [19], metrics for evaluating nodal connectivity in VANETs had been presented considering the different nodal mobility patterns. The connection period distribution was characterized by average duration of the -hop path existing between any two nodes. They also showed by simulation that multi-hop paths have much poorer connectivity performance than the single-hop one in VANETs.

Researches on the connectivity through inter-vehicle distances attempt to disclose the relationship between the connectivity and the distance which is defined as the length of the connected path. In [11], the distance distribution had been expressed by a tuple (), where denotes the inter-vehicle distance, indicates the velocity, and is the market penetration ratio, respectively. By taking specific propagation model and the radio range into consideration, the connectivity formula was given. Without loss of generality, the expression was then further extended to the connectivity of a node with degree . In [13], the authors introduced an equivalent queuing model and applied Laplace transform to the tail probability of the connection distance to find an explicit expression for the expected value of this distance. Their numerical results showed that the increasing of traffic flow and the vehicles’ radio range correspondingly leads to the increasing of the discussed connectivity in terms of platoon size and connection distance. In [20], the paper showed that, under free-flow state, the connectivity increases with either the density or the number of lanes growing. Especially, they found that the inter-vehicle distances had a major impact on connectivity when it is within 3-4 times larger than the radio range. Beyond this distance, the connectivity declines slowly. In [21], a simple geometric analysis to the connectivity was proposed in vehicular networks under a distance-based radio communication model. The authors presented the notion of the connectivity robustness based on inter-vehicle distances, whereby a local computable function could be obtained to provide a sufficient condition for the connectedness of the network. For the above-mentioned works, although, most of them could deduce out or express the connectivity with vehicles density [22, 23], speed or equivalent speed [24], radio ranges [22, 25], and so forth, their methods actually can all be equivalently extended to the approach using statistical distributions of connection durations or inter-vehicle distances. Generally speaking, it is difficult to give a globally uniform probability density function (PDF) or cumulative distribution function (CDF) expression of the inter-vehicle distances or connection durations in different application scenarios such as overtaking, platoon, and collisions. But, when the traffics are in the free-flow state, the distribution function and probability of the minimum node degree can be exactly calculated whereby available connectivity could be figured out.

#### 4. The Connectivity Analysis in VANETs

##### 4.1. The Analytical Model and Definitions

As we have stated before, the connectivity in the free-flow state is worth studying in view of its uncertainty and scarcity. Thus, in this section, we introduce a highway as our discussing objective where vehicles form a free-flow state traffic with lower distribution density. In our analysis, an equipped vehicle is taken as a node for simplicity. The discussed scenario is plotted in Figure 4, where all cars drive on a single lane represented by a line. We assume that requests to send packets to cars on its right. here is the source node at the origin of the one-dimensional coordinate system and we also take it as the reference point later for our connectivity analysis. The arrival stochastic process of these vehicles is supposed to be a Poisson process with intensity . Let denote the average density of equipped vehicles in our discussed road segment. Thus, the arrival rate is equal to .

*Definition 1. *Define the connectivity of two nodes as , where is the probability that node could reach the reference node .

*Definition 2. *Let be the farthest node which can communicate with . in later discussion is also named as the end node with radio range .

is a variable representing the distance between and the end node. The PDF and CDF of can be expressed as and , respectively. If we suppose that is within , it means the following (i) There is at least one node in . (ii) The end node could connect with by single-hop broadcasting. (iii) There is no node within . If and only if the above three conditions are all met, we say the node is the end node [26].

We suppose that two nodes are connected if they are falling into the radio range of each other and the disconnection due to collisions or asymmetrical channel conditions is not taken into account.

##### 4.2. The Statistical Model with Constant Radio Range Setting

In this section, we discuss the connectivity when all nodes choose the same constant radio range, that is, . We model the one-dimension highway as an system [27] as shown in Figure 5.

We investigate of any equipped vehicle in the highway. In free-flow state, vehicles move independently and their velocities follow the normal distribution [28] with PDF as

where is the average speed and is the standard deviation of velocity. We also introduce a metric, that is, speed factor, to reflect the impact of velocity on the inter-vehicle distances and the resulted connectivity.

*Definition 3. * is defined as the speed factor with unit hour/km as

where

and in (4) indicate the permitted minimum and maximum velocity on highway, respectively, and they satisfy the following equation. Consider

For a PDF curve of a normal distribution, the region corresponding to the -axis coordinate ranging from covers about 99.7% of the probability area; thus, we reasonably choose and as the typical values of and , respectively. Indeed, vehicles in highway can travel neither too fast for safety consideration nor too slow for traffic efficiency. Although speed limits are set, overtaking is still allowed to reflect the practical case.

With the above definitions and assumptions, the expression of connectivity with constant radio range setting could be given as follows.

Theorem 4. *For the case where vehicles all have the same constant radio range, the connectivity could be deduced as
**
where , and
*

*Proof. *Let and be the PDF and the CDF of the maximum radio range of . With Figure 5 and based on [27], we have

where corresponds to the PDF of busy period in system, and its Laplace transform is given by

where is the CDF of inter-vehicle distances. Note that inter-vehicle distances in system are independent and identically distributed (IID) [29].

Therefore, we have the following equations:

where and correspond to the Laplace transform of and , respectively.

Based on Definition 2 for an end node, the connectivity of any node at is

and its Laplace transform is

With above equations, (12) can be rewritten as

Actually, in [13], the CDF expression of the inter-vehicle distance is given by

and the average inter-vehicle distance is written as

Thus, with (12) and (14), we have

Applying an inverse Laplace transforming [30] to (16), we have the expression of as (6).

*Remark 5. * is equal to 1 when is within the range ; that is, a node falling into tother radio range can connect to it if it wishes.

*Remark 6. *If a node is exactly located at , then is the probability that it cannot connect to the reference node. The probability that there is no node within range is for a Poisson arrival process.

*Remark 7. * decreases as the relative distance increases. In the extreme case, when .

The above remarks also validate Theorem 4. To understand this theorem in depth, we also explore some connectivity-related statistical properties including the probability that a given node is isolated, the area that a sent message may cover, and the probability of the number of connected nodes. We also classify the connected nodes into two categories by relaying hops between them and analyzing the corresponding connectivity.

*(1) Probability that a Given Node Is Isolated. *The probability that a given node is isolated, denoted by , can be determined by the following theorem.

Theorem 8. *The isolation probability is given by
**For a node at , is equal to the probability that there is no node within the range . *

*(2) The Area that a Sent Message May Cover*. We discuss the area that a sent message from the reference node can cover. The single and multi-hop cases are both considered. Generally, this characteristic can also be evaluated with coverage probability. Here, we use the expectation to show the average value in general case. Because the system is initially assumed not empty, the mathematic expectation could be given by the following theorem.

Theorem 9. *The expectation of the coverage area for a message sent from the reference node is
**
where means the area corresponding to the right side of a given node.*

*Proof. *Based on [27], we can obtain the following equations for different system initial conditions. Consider

Then, with (10) and (12), (18) could be derived out.

Corollary 10. *If both sides of the discussed node are considered, (18) could be rewritten as
**
where corresponds to the area on the left.*

*(3) Probability of the Number of Connected Nodes*. The node which can reach the reference node is called a connected node. Here we discuss the possible number of the connected nodes, that is, . Similarly, we define as the number on the right and on the left.

Theorem 11. *The Probability Mass Function (PMF) of is
**
where .*

*Proof. *We first focus on and then extend the result to .

The PMF of for can be expressed as

The result for is proved in the same way. Then, the PMF for both sides is derived as follows. Consider

Simplify the above equation and then the result can be rewritten as (21).

Theorem 12. *The tail probability of is
*

*Proof. *According to (21), we have

In addition, the probability that at most nodes are connected is

The probability generating function (PGF) of is

And the expected value of is

Substituting (14) into (28), we obtain

Corollary 13. *The expectation of is
**Let be the probability lower bound when the number of connected nodes is and it can be written as
**
For a given and , we may obtain a critical radio range, which will be explained later in Corollary 14 as
**
Actually, the radio range is together determined by the transmission power , the additive Gaussian noise power , the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) , and the path loss factor . The relationship of them is described by (33) where is a constant depending on the system setting. **
Similarly, the equation for considering both sides is
*

Corollary 14. *The critical range could be determined by the intersection of following curves:
**According to (32) and (33), the connectivity could be flexibly controlled via radio range adjustment.*

*(4) Two Kind of Connected Nodes*

*Definition 15. *The connected nodes can be classified into two categories: nodes within the radio range of the reference node, which is denoted by ; nodes out of its radio range expressed by .

An node is the one which can directly communicate with the reference node. We also separately discussed the left and right side cases of . Notice that follows Poisson distribution with parameter and its PMF is

In the same way, the considering both sides could be derived as

And the expectation of is given by

The indicates the number of nodes beyond the radio range of the reference node and connecting to through multiple hops.

Theorem 16. *The PMF of is
*

*Proof. * From (22), (26), and (36), for , we have

where represent the sum of the first and inter-vehicle distances, respectively. Let be the inter-vehicle distances and they are IID to each other; that is,

When , the following inequality can be deduced:

And the PDF of is

Taking Laplace transform to the above equation, we have

According to the independence of inter-vehicle distances, the following equation can be derived as

Then the PDF of is written as

where is a step function.

Meanwhile, the following conditional probability can be obtained as

With (22), (43), (46), and (47), we have

When , we have

Then, the PMF of is rewritten as (39).

Corollary 17. *The PMF of is expressed as
*

*Proof. *Through (51), we have

Corollary 18. *The expectations of and are
**We define as a variable indicating the number of needed hops from the reference node to a connected node on ^{’}s right side and the following inequalities holds
*

##### 4.3. Statistical Model Considering Random Radio Range

If the channel fading is taken into account, the reachable radio range should be reconsidered. Thereupon, the connectivity will also need reexamination. For notion simplicity, we name such variable “radio range” as ERR (equivalent radio range). The queuing model is introduced to check the connectivity in this case. The traffic still follows a Poisson arrival process. Let be the CDF of the radio range corresponding to the service time in .

The PDF of the busy period is [27]

where is the th convolution of , and

Note that, in our work, route selection is based on the shortest path algorithm. And (54) corresponds to the case that nodes at can receive the messages sent from . Indeed, such nodes may not communicate with each other in some cases. Therefore, cannot be directly taken as the connectivity.

Hereinafter, we define as the instantaneous connectivity with a random fading channel. Similarly, the PDF and CDF of are rewritten as , under this case. The distances between adjacent vehicles are denoted by () and they are also IID to each other. Here, vehicles may have different ERRs experiencing different channel fadings.

Theorem 19. *The connectivity for the random radio range case can be expressed as
**
where denotes the distance between the end node and its nearest relay. *

*Proof. *We assume that there are connected nodes on ’s right side. It means that the end node is the th one. Thus, we have

According to the definition of , then

The connectivity between the reference node and a given node with is

To reflect the general fading types in vehicular environment, the Rayleigh and lognormal shadowing are introduced in our work. According to [31–33], the corresponding CDF and expectations of the radio range for the above fading models are as follows.

Lemma 20. *The PDF and average ERR of Rayleigh fading are
*

Lemma 21. *The PDF and average ERR for lognormal shadowing are
**
where is the standard deviation, and
**Note that one just discusses the cases under free-flow state, say is generally very small. Then, in a Rayleigh fading channel, the pass loss factor could be taken as a constant during the transmission of a frame. Indeed, when becomes very large, the above assumption may fail in some cases.**Similar to the analyzing procedure when the radio range is constant, one also investigates some statistical characteristics for random radio range case, that is, probability that a given node is isolated, the area that a message may cover, the probability of the number of connected nodes, and its value for and , respectively.*

*(1) The Probability That a Given Node Is Isolated*. For a fading channel, the number of nodes within is Poisson distributed with parameter and can be expressed as

*(2) The Area that a Transmitted Message May Cover*. Based on [30], we know, the computational complexity of (56) is very high. However, by [27], the expectation value of the coverage area for a sent message is

where

The expectations for the area on the right and both sides are, respectively,

*(3) The Probability of the Number of Connected Nodes*. As stated in the corresponding parts for constant radio rage case, , , and here are the number of connected nodes on both sides, the right and the left, respectively. Then, the probability of given radio range of each car is

Because the radio range is a stochastic variable under a random channel, by (69), the number of connected nodes is mainly determined by the nodes with smaller ranges.

If we focus on the nodes which are within the radio range of , the number of them is named and its PGF [27] is

With (70), the PMF, CDF, and expectation expressions could be derived in theory. However, the procedures are actually very computationally complex. Owing to the works by [34, 35], the above statistics could be deduced in a simple way. Suppose that the vehicular arrival process is a Markovian arrival process (MAP) and it is stationary, ergodic, and nonempty. Without loss of generality, we assume that the arrival traffic flow size in MAP is one [27] and nodes enter into this system one by one.

According to [36], follows , where is the identity matrix and = 1. is an all-1 matrix. Thus, the lower bound of can be derived as

and the result considering both sides is

*(4) Two Kinds of Connected Nodes*. Let be the number of nodes within the radio range of . For , the PMF and its expectation, respectively, are

For the number of nodes out of the radio range of , we have

where is the needed number of hops to reach for a sent message.

##### 4.4. Available Connectivity

The connectivity stated before attempts to evaluate the connection probability between two nodes, either for single-hop broadcasting or for multi-hop relay. However, to completely reflect the connection possibility involving the potential chances, we introduce a new metric, that is, available connectivity, for a node to estimate its communication capability with .

*Definition 22. *Available connectivity is defined as a metric to measure the connection possibility for a given node considering the contributions on connections from others.

Let be an equipped vehicle running on a one-dimensional highway. , say the available connectivity, is an instantaneous variable at time . However, considering the high dynamics and frequently changing topology of VANETs, it is difficult to calculate the available connectivity every second. In addition, to get the available connectivity in a large-scale VANET with hundreds of nodes is still impractical. Thereupon, we introduce two limitations on :

*Limitation I.*

*Limitation II.*

where , denote the lower bound of connectivity and the upper bound of the number of hops.

To make our work practical, we discretize the time continuous variable . Let be the sampling period, say available connectivity is measured every seconds. is an element of the set . Then, the available connectivity for any given node can be rewritten as . In general, a larger value of corresponds to a bigger available connectivity. This means there are many potential nodes that could be used as forwarders to reach the destination node. It is worth noting that, instead of considering the connectivity between a given node and the reference node for analysis simplicity, we now focus on any communication pair in the network.

*Definition 23. *Available connectivity includes two kinds of dissemination ways, say the direct and indirect. Namely, available connectivity is equal to the arithmetic sum of the direct connectivity and indirect connectivity.(i)Direct connectivity: the connection probabilities between a given node and its .(ii)Indirect connectivity: the connection probabilities between a given node and its .

Theorem 24. *The available connectivity of node at time is
**
where are the nodes satisfying Limitations I and II, and represents that and can communicate to each other at time . **Similarly, we have
**
where indicates the direct connectivity for at . If hops between any two communication pair are larger than 2, we have
**
where denotes the indirectly connectivity for at .**With (77) and the definition of our available connectivity, we know that the number of hops influences the connection performance significantly. For different applications, the requirements of hop bounds are variously depending on the delay limitation, information generation frequency, energy efficiency, and so forth. Considering the high dynamics in VANETs, larger hops may correspondingly incur intolerable delays, thus resulting in the service failure especially for emergent events. Therefore, a small hop bound is acceptable in VANETs. *

When using the shortest path route selection algorithm, the following two corollaries hold.

Corollary 25. *For the case that the radio range is a constant, Limitation I could be rewritten as
**
thus
*

Corollary 26. *Similarly, we can derive out the corresponding expression for the case where the radio range is a random variable depending on channel fadings. Consider
**With (82), the probability upper bound of the number of hops could be deduced.*

#### 5. Numerical Results

In this section, we will evaluate the performance of our proposed metric and investigate its feasibility and effectiveness with different simulation settings.

##### 5.1. The Relationship between the Connectivity and , , and

According to (6) and (56), it is noted that the radio range , the equipped vehicle arrival rate , and the speed factor all have influences on the connectivity. In [37], the author provided some typical values for the expectation and standard deviation for vehicular speed on highway which follow the normal distribution as listed in Table 1. We will also use these settings in our later simulations.

The speed factor is actually a function of and . Thus, we will firstly analyze the impact of , on . The result is plotted in Figure 6. It is noted that the speed factor decreases when the mean of the velocity increases. In addition, the standard deviation has only a very limited influence on . For , a great increasing of it could only slightly augment the speed factor.

The connectivity performance when the radio ranges of all nodes are the same constant is showed in Figure 7. In this simulation scenario, we placed 31 vehicles along a one-dimensional highway and investigated the resulted connectivity for a given node at with different (m), (vehicles/hour), and (hour/km).

From Figure 7, it is noted that when , decreases with the inter-vehicle distance to the reference node increases. However when , the connectivity will reasonably be 1. Therefore, it can be noticed that all the curves in Figure 7 show a sharp change at where the amplitude of this variation is determined by the values of , , and . Indeed, any rise of or leads to an increase of . Meanwhile, a larger radio range improves the connectivity performance greatly as shown in Figure 7. In addition, because is determined by the mean and standard deviation of the speed, a vehicle with a large will correspond to a smaller mean and standard deviation. Therefore, with other parameters unchanged, a bigger will increase the connection probability considering moderate topology change.

As a result, it is noted that the variation of the radio range will mainly influence the connectivity performance compared to other factors. With this conclusion, a critical radio range could be calculated for transmitting power saving consideration and applied to scenarios with determined connectivity requirements.

##### 5.2. The Isolation Probability

The probability that a given node is isolated plays an important role in VANETs. Usually, it can be used for algorithms concerning clustering forming, relay selection, routing metric, and so forth. To reflect its influence on connectivity, the isolation probability is shown in Figures 8 and 9 based on (17) and (65), where Figure 8 corresponds to the constant radio range case and Figure 9 for the random radio range case. It is noted that in Figure 8, is still the main influential factor to . Speed factor is in inverse proportion to the isolation probability where a large will decrease the isolated possibility for a given node. The reason is the same with Figure 7 that a larger means a less dynamic network, thus resulting in a relatively stable topology. Additionally, the increase of will reduce due to more neighbors available.

For random radio range case, we compare the isolation probability under the deterministic, Rayleigh, and shadowing fading channel, respectively, as shown in Figure 9. From this figure and (33), (61), and (63), we notice that the Rayleigh shows the worst performance of while lognormal shadowing seems be suitable to reduce isolations between nodes and the deterministic model has a decent performance in between the other two.

##### 5.3. The Number of Connected Nodes

Based on Theorem 16 and (14), the average tail probability of the number of connected nodes is plotted in Figure 10 for the constant radio range case. It is noted that the speed factor, arrival rate, and radio range all greatly influence the average tail probability. A smaller , which corresponds to a larger average speed, will decrease the probability of vehicles forming a bigger cluster. The reason is that high mobility will make the network more dynamic and links unstable. As for the arrival rate , it seems to be in positive proportion to the average tail probability. In addition, among the three influential factors, radio range still contributes the most, which is consistent with the results from Figures 7 and 8.

Figure 11 depicts the corresponding average tail probability of the random radio range case. We set to 1.2 × 10^{5}, the path loss factor to 2.2, and the standard deviation for the lognormal shadowing to 2. Curves in Figure 11 show that a large arrival rate and low average velocity both increase the number of connected nodes. Compared to the curves from the lognormal shadowing in Figure 11, the results corresponding to the Rayleigh fading channel all show worse performance when other parameters are the same.

##### 5.4. Available Connectivity

In this subsection, we will investigate the performance of our introduced available connectivity metric. For simplicity, the threshold of connectivity and are set to 0.1 and 0.5, respectively. The sampling period to investigate the available connectivity is every 4 seconds.

The performance for the constant radio range case is shown in Figure 12. When setting the arrival rate to 500 vehicles/hour, speed factor to 0.008672 hour/km (corresponding to , km/hour), and the radio range to 200 m, the available connectivity of the reference node within 80 seconds is almost zero. After increasing to 0.016105, the available connectivity begins to improve. It means that low average velocities lead to high available connectivity. In Figure 12, the radio range and vehicle arrival rate both greatly influence the available connectivity and the radio range is still the main factor, which is consistent with the previous results. A little rise of the radio range leads to a great increasing of the available connectivity. Thus, when traffic flow is sparse, that is, in free-flow state, the better way to improve the available connectivity is increasing the radio range. However, when traffic is dense, growth of radio range may not be a better choice for obtaining available connectivity considering the introduced interferences.

The available connectivity in random fading channels are plotted in Figures 13 and 14, where we set to 1.2 × 10^{5}, the path loss factor to 2.2, and the standard deviation for lognormal shadowing to 2. The available connectivity of the reference node within 80 seconds in Rayleigh fading and lognormal shadowing channel is described in Figure 13. Similar to the results in Figure 12, the curves are approximately straight lines. Besides, high equipped vehicle arrival rate leads to a high available connectivity. For example, the available connectivity is about 9.5 when is equal to 500 vehicles/hour, and is about 13 when is equal to 700 vehicles/hour when the lognormal shadowing channel is used. Additionally, it can be noticed that a lower average velocity may pose positive impact on the available connectivity. Further, because the average radio range in shadowing channel is greater than that in Rayleigh channel, the available connectivity is higher under the shadowing fading channel.

To show the impact of hop bounds on the available connectivity, the performance from different hop bounds and channel fadings is plotted in Figure 14. Note that the upper bound of hops in Figure 13 is adaptively adjusted according to the average radio range. Because the hop bound is decided by application requirements, we introduce different settings including 5 (correspond to emergency case), 10, and 20 (corresponding to the delay tolerable services) in Rayleigh fading channel and lognormal shadowing channel. As shown in Figure 14, it is noticed that the different hop bounds settings greatly influence the available connectivity and a larger hop bound means a higher available connectivity. Thereupon, hop bounds should also be taken into consideration when designing different applications in VANETs.

#### 6. Conclusion

In this paper, a useful metric, that is, available connectivity has been introduced in VANETs. Our proposed available connectivity comes not only from direct connections from neighbors, but also from the indirect links by multi-hop relay. The elaborate investigations of the related statistical properties of the connectivity have been given to reflect the influential factors and give the important references for applications design. Numerical results show that our proposed available connectivity has many potential relationships with network parameters and may provide important references for future protocols design in VANETs.

#### Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61201133, 61172055, and 61072067), Xian Municipal Technology Transfer Promotion Project (CX12178), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (K5051301011), the Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China (20100481323), the Program for New Century Excellent Talents (NCET-11-0691), the “111 Project” of China (B08038), and the Foundation of Guangxi Key Lab of Wireless Wideband Communication & Signal Processing (11105).

#### References

- L. Bononi and M. Di Felice, “A cross layered MAC and clustering scheme for efficient broadcast in VANETs,” in
*Proceedings of the IEEE Internatonal Conference on Mobile Adhoc and Sensor Systems (MASS '07)*, pp. 1–8, Pisa, Italy, October 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - L. Wang, S. K. Zhang, X. N. Wang, and Y. Zhang, “Research on vehicle automatically tracking mechanism in VANET,”
*International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks*, vol. 2013, Article ID 592129, 10 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar - D. Wu, Y. Ling, H. S. Zhu, and J. Liang, “The RSU access problem based on evolutionary game theory for VANET,”
*International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks*, vol. 2013, Article ID 143024, 7 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar - S. Eichler, “Performance evaluation of the IEEE 802.11p WAVE communication standard,” in
*Proceedings of the IEEE 66th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC '07)*, pp. 2199–2203, Baltimore, Md, USA, September 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - T. ElBatt, S. K. Goel, G. Holland, H. Krishnan, and J. Parikh, “Cooperative collision warning using dedicated short range wireless communications,” in
*Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on Vehicular ad hoc networks (VANET '06)*, pp. 1–9, York, NY, USA, September 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - C. Chen, L. Liu, Q. Q. Pei, X. B. Du, and X. M. Zhao, “Improving driving safety based on safe distance design in vehicular sensor networks,”
*IEEE International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks*, vol. 2012, Article ID 469067, 13 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar - A. Carter, “The status of vehicle-to-vehicle communication as a means of improving crash prevention performance,” Tech. Rep. 05-0264, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC, USA, 2005. View at Google Scholar
- E. Schoch, F. Kargl, M. Weber, and T. Leinmüller, “Communication patterns in VANETs,”
*IEEE Communications Magazine*, vol. 46, no. 11, pp. 119–125, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - H. Hartenstein and K. P. Laberteaux, “A tutorial survey on vehicular ad hoc networks,”
*IEEE Communications Magazine*, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 164–171, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - M. Torrent-Moreno, M. Killat, and H. Hartenstein, “The challenges of robust inter-vehicle communications,” in
*Proceedings of the IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC '05)*, vol. 1, pp. 319–323, 2005. - R. Nagel, “The effect of vehicular distance distributions and mobility on VANET communications,” in
*Proceedings of the IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV '10)*, pp. 1190–1194, San Diego, Calif, USA, June 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - A. Y. Abul-Magd, “Modeling highway-traffic headway distributions using superstatistics,”
*Physical Review E*, vol. 76, no. 5, Article ID 057101, 4 pages, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - S. Yousefi, E. Altman, R. El-Azouzi, and M. Fathy, “Analytical model for connectivity in vehicular Ad Hoc networks,”
*IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology*, vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 3341–3356, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - C. Young, B. R. Chang, J. Lin, and R. Fang, “Cooperative collision warning based highway vehicle accident reconstruction,” in
*Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications (ISDA '08)*, vol. 1, pp. 561–565, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, November 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - C. Chen, L. Liu, X. B. Du, X. L. Wei, and C. X. Pei, “Available connectivity analysis under free flow state in VANETs,”
*EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking*, vol. 2012, article 270, 19 pages, 2012. View at Google Scholar - Z. Yan, H. Jiang, Z. Shen, Y. Chang, and L. Huang, “K-connectivity analysis of one-dimensional linear VANETs,”
*IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology*, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 426–433, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - L. Cheng and S. Panichpapiboon, “Effects of intervehicle spacing distributions on connectivity of VANET: a case study from measured highway traffic,”
*IEEE Communications Magazine*, vol. 50, no. 10, pp. 90–97, 2012. View at Google Scholar - A. Cardote, S. Sargento, and P. Steenkiste, “On the connection availability between relay nodes in a VANET,” in
*Proceedings of the IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC '10)*, pp. 181–185, Miami, Fla, USA, December 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - I. W. H. Ho and K. K. Leung, “Node connectivity in vehicular ad hoc networks with structured mobility,” in
*Proceedings of the 32nd IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN '07)*, pp. 635–642, Dublin, Ireland, October 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - M. M. Artimy, W. Robertson, and W. J. Phillips, “Connectivity in inter-vehicle ad hoc networks,” in
*Proceedings of the Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering*, vol. 1, pp. 293–298, May 2004. View at Scopus - D. P. Spanos and R. M. Murray, “Robust connectivity of networked vehicles,” in
*Proceedings of the 43rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC '04)*, vol. 3, pp. 2893–2898, December 2004. View at Scopus - M. M. Artimy, W. J. Phillips, and W. Robertson, “Connectivity with static transmission range in vehicular ad hoc networks,” in
*Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Communication Networks and Services Research Conference*, pp. 237–242, May 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - M. Kafsi, P. Papadimitratos, O. Dousse, T. Alpcan, and J. P. Hubaux, “Vanet connectivity analysis,” http://arxiv.org/abs/0912.5527.
- S. Durrani, X. Zhou, and A. Chandra, “Effect of vehicle mobility on connectivity of vehicular ad hoc networks,” in
*Proceedings of the IEEE 72nd Vehicular Technology Conference Fall (VTC '10)*, pp. 1–5, Ottawa, Canada, September 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - M. Khabazian and M. K. M. Ali, “A performance modeling of connectivity in vehicular Ad Hoc networks,”
*IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology*, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 2440–2450, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - W. L. Jin and B. Wang,
*Connectivity of Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks with Continuous Node Distribution Patterns*, Faculty Research, University of California Transportation Center, Berkeley, Calif, USA, 2010. - L. Liu and D. H. Shi, “Busy Period in GIX/G/∞,”
*Journal of Applied Probability*, vol. 33, pp. 815–829, 1996. View at Google Scholar - R. P. Roess, E. S. Prassas, and W. R. McShane,
*Traffic Engineering*, Pearson/Prentice Hall, New Jersey, NJ, USA, 2004. - W. Feller,
*An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications*, vol. 2, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1950. - W. Stadje, “The busy period of the queueing system M/G/∞,”
*Journal of Applied Probability*, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 697–704, 1985. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - L. Hanzo, C. H. Wong, and M. S. Yee,
*Adaptive Wireless Transceivers: Turbo-Coded, Turbo-Equalised and Space-Time Coded TDMA, CDMA and OFDM Systems*, John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, USA, 2002. - D. Miorandi and E. Altman, “Connectivity in one-dimensional ad hoc networks: a queueing theoretical approach,”
*Wireless Networks*, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 573–587, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - D. Miorandi and E. Altman, “Coverage and connectivity of ad hoc networks in presence of channel randomness,” in
*Proceedings of the 24th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (INFOCOM '05)*, pp. 491–502, March 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - M. Boegsted, “Connectivity analysis of one-dimensional ad-hoc networks,”
*Wireless Networks*, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 87–101, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus - M. Telek and G. Horvath, “A minimal representation of Markov arrival processes and a moments matching method,”
*Performance Evaluation*, vol. 64, no. 9-12, pp. 1153–1168, 2007. View at Google Scholar - M. F. Neuts,
*Algorithmic Probability: A Collection of Problems*, Chapman and Hall, London, UK, 1995. - M. Rudack, M. Meincke, and M. Lott, “On the dynamics of ad hoc networks for inter-vehicles communications (IVC),” in
*Proceedings of the International Conference on Wireless Networks (ICWN '02)*, pp. 40–48, 2002.