Research Article
Prediction of Extrathyroidal Extension Using Ultrasonography and Computed Tomography
Table 2
Diagnostic accuracy of preoperative US and CT to predict the extrathyroidal extension.
| | Group | Cutoff criteria | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | PPV (%) | NPV (%) | AUC (95% CIs) |
| US | Group 1 | | | | | | | | Contact with capsule | 93.2 | 18.6 | 61.1 | 66.7 | 0.532 (0.415–0.666) | Group 2 | | | | | | | | Disruption of capsule | 66.1 | 65.1 | 72.2 | 58.3 | 0.647 (0.452–0.702) | Group 3 | | | | | | |
| CT | Group A | | | | | | | | Contact with capsule | 86.8 | 30.2 | 52.4 | 72.2 | 0.483 (0.382–0.519) | Group B | | | | | | | | More than 25% contact | 71.1 | 44.2 | 48.2 | 67.7 | 0.448 (0.335–0.491) | Group C | | | | | | | | More than 50% contact | 23.7 | 95.4 | 81.8 | 58.6 | 0.638 (0.571–0.719) | Group D | | | | | | |
|
|
US, ultrasonography; CT, computed tomography; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value; CIs, confidence intervals.
|