Clinical Study

Comparison of GnRH Agonist, GnRH Antagonist, and GnRH Antagonist Mild Protocol of Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation in Good Prognosis Patients

Table 1

The outcome of COH in terms of oocytes and embryos.

COH protocol Statistical significance at P < 0.05
Mild protocolGnRH antagonist protocol (GnRH-ant)GnRH agonist protocol (GnRH-a)

Oocyte aspirations16610961111

Average female age (years)31.8 ± 3.231.8 ± 3.432.0 ± 3.4/

Baseline FSH (mIU/mL)6.4 ± 1.86.7 ± 2.16.9 ± 2.0/

Oocytes (per cycle)1500 (9.0 ± 5.2)10249 (9.4 ± 5.0)12004 (10.8 ± 5.6)P = 0.0001 (mild versus GnRH-a),  
P < 0.0001 (GnRH-ant versus GnRH-a)

Immature oocytes (%) 240 (16.0%)1602 (15.6%)1687 (14.1%)P = 0.0420 (mild versus GnRH-a),  
P = 0.0010 (GnRH-ant versus GnRH-a)

Fertilized oocytes, 2PN (%)865 (57.7%)5440 (53.1%)6235 (51.9%)P = 0.0009 (mild versus GnRH-ant),  
P < 0.0001 (mild versus GnRH-a)

Embryos (%)845 (56.3%)5198 (50.7%)5968 (49.7%)P < 0.0001 (mild versus GnRH-ant),  
P < 0.0001 (mild versus GnRH-a)

Embryos (per cycle)5.1 ± 3.74.7 ± 3.35.4 ± 3.5P < 0.0001 (GnRH-ant versus GnRH-a)

Embryo transfers (%) 151 (91.0%)1017 (92.8%)1006 (90.5%)/

Transferred embryos (per ET)1.6 ± 0.51.6 ± 0.51.7 ± 0.4P = 0.0022 (mild versus GnRH-a),  
P < 0.0001 (GnRH-ant versus GnRH-a)

Cycles with embryo freezing (%)50 (30.1%)317 (28.9%)210 (18.9%)P = 0.0008 (mild versus GnRH-a),  
P < 0.0001 (GnRH-ant versus GnRH-a)

Frozen embryos (per cycle)0.8 ± 1.40.9 ± 1.80.5 ± 1.3P = 0.0243 (mild versus GnRH-a), 
P < 0.0001 (GnRH-ant versus GnRH-a)

OHSS0412/