Clinical Study

Comparison of GnRH Agonist, GnRH Antagonist, and GnRH Antagonist Mild Protocol of Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation in Good Prognosis Patients

Table 2

The outcome of COH in terms of pregnancies, miscarriages, and deliveries.

COH protocol Statistical significance at P < 0.05
Mild protocolGnRH antagonist protocol (GnRH-ant)GnRH agonist protocol (GnRH-a)

Pregnancies69367355

Pregnancies (per cycle) 41.6% 33.5%32.0%P = 0.0414 (mild versus GnRH-ant), 
P = 0.0141 (mild versus GnRH-a)

Pregnancies (per ET) 45.7%36.1%35.3%P = 0.0227 (mild versus GnRH-ant),  
P = 0.0134 (mild versus GnRH-a)

Miscarriages and ectopic pregnancies (per pregnancy)16 (23.2%)81 (22.1%)69 (19.4%)/

Biochemical pregnancies2126/

Live birth rate (per cycle)52 (31.3%)277 (25.3%)281 (25.3%)/

Twin deliveries21.2% (11/52)11.6% (32/277)18.5% (53/281)P = 0.0163 (GnRH-ant versus GnRH-a)

Live births after FET73523/

Cumulative live birth rate (per cycle)59 (35.6%)312 (28.5%)303 (27.3%)P = 0.0275 (mild versus GnRH-a)

Cumulative twin deliveries 20.3% (12/59)13.1% (41/312)18.2% (55/303)/