Review Article

Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Degludec versus Insulin Glargine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Fifteen Clinical Trials

Table 1

Baseline characteristics of the included studies.

Study, yearPatientsSample sizeAge (y)Male (%)Duration of DM (y)HbA1c (%)Trial duration (weeks)
IDegIGlarIDegIGlarIDegIGlarIDegIGlarIDegIGlar

Zinman et al., 2011 [10]T2DM1216255.3 (8.7)53.9 (8.5)60%60%7.2 (4.5)6.7 (5.0)8.7 (1.2)8.7 (1.1)16
Birkeland et al., 2011 [11]T1DM1195944.5 (12.7)45.6 (12.5)62%54%21.7 (11.8)19.1 (10.8)8.5 (1.0)8.3 (0.8)16
Zinman et al., 2012 [12]T2DM77325759.3 (9.7)58.7 (9.9)61%65%9.4 (6.3)8.6 (5.7)8.2 (0.8)8.2 (0.8)52 (+52ex)
Garber et al., 2012 [13]T2DM74424859.2 (9.1)58.1 (10.0)54%54%13.6 (7.4)13.4 (6.9)8.3 (0.8)8.4 (0.9)52 (+26ex)
Heller et al., 2012 [14]T1DM47215742.8 (13.7)43.7 (13.3)59%57%19.1 (12.2)18.2 (11.4)7.7 (0.9)7.7 (1.0)52 (+52ex)
Onishi et al., 2013 [20]T2DM28914658.8 (9.8)58.1 (10.1)55%51%11.8 (6.5)11.1 (6.5)8.4 (0.8)8.5 (0.8)26
Gough et al., 2013 [21]T2DM22822957.8 (9.0)57.3 (9.4)52%54%8.4 (6.7)8.0 (5.6)8.3 (1.0)8.2 (0.9)26
Mathieu et al., 2013 [22]T1DM32916443.6 (13.1)44.1 (12.6)60%54%18.7 (12.5)18.2 (11.9)7.7 (1.0)7.7 (0.9)26 (+26ex)
Meneghini et al., 2013 [23]T2DM45723056.3 (10.1)56.7 (8.8)57%48%10.6 (6.8)10.8 (6.4)8.5 (1.0)8.4 (0.9)26
Pan et al., 2016 [16]T2DM55527855.9 (9.7)56.6 (9.2)54%47%7.6 (5.3)8.3 (5.5)8.3 (0.9)8.3 (0.8)26
DEVOTE trial, 2017 [24]T2DM3818381964.9 (7.3)65.0 (7.5)63%62%16.6 (8.8)16.2 (8.9)8.4 (1.6)8.4 (1.7)108
Iga et al., 2017 [25]T1DM202055 (14)53 (18)50%60%14.4 (8.6)16.1 (8.7)7.1 (0.9)7.7 (0.6)12
Warren et al., 2017 [17]T2DM14514554.7 (10.2)55.8 (9.0)58%67%12.1 (6.7)12.1 (7.9)8.0 (1.1)8.3 (1.4)16
Lane et al., 2017 [26]T1DM50150145.4 (13.7)46.4 (14.6)51%57%23.2 (13.5)23.6 (13.4)7.7 (1.0)7.5 (1.0)32
Wysham et al., 2017 [18]T2DM72172161.5 (10.7)61.2 (10.3)53%53%14.2 (8.3)13.9 (8.0)7.6 (1.1)7.6 (1.1)32

Data are shown as numbers or means (standard deviation) unless otherwise stated. IDeg: insulin degludec; IGlar: insulin glargine; T1DM: type 1 diabetes mellitus; T2DM: type 2 diabetes mellitus; HbA1C: hemoglobin A1c. They were crossover trials; data were from the first period. These studies had two intervention groups. Groups were combined by formulae from Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (Version 5.1.0). ex: extension of trial.