Review Article
The Molecular Evolution of Animal Reproductive Tract Proteins: What Have We Learned from Mating-System Comparisons?
Table 1
Associations between mating system variation and rates of molecular evolution.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1D = discrete comparative method; C = continuous comparative method. 2Inference of positive selection assuming no variation between lineages. 3Two genes (SEMG1 and SEMG2) have been examined in multiple studies—SEMG1 twice [1, 68] and SEMG2 three times [1, 56, 68]. The “total (unique genes)” row reflects this replication and is therefore not a sum of the preceding rows. |